Patient and Caregiver Health State Utilities in Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome and Dravet Syndrome

Additional Results from Two Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials of Stiripentol in Dravet Syndrome Highlight a Rapid Antiseizure Efficacy with Longer Seizure-Free Periods

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy of stiripentol in Dravet syndrome children was evidenced in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, namely STICLO France (October 1996-August 1998) and STICLO Italy (April 1999-October 2000), but data were not fully exploited at the time.

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis used additional information, notably collected during the open-label extension (OLE) month, or reported by caregivers in individual diaries, to evaluate new outcomes.

RESULTS

Overall, 64 patients were included (31 in the placebo group, 33 in the stiripentol group) of whom 34 (53.1%) were female. Patients' mean and median (25%; 75%) age were 9.2 years (range 3.0-20.7 years) and 8.7 years (6.0; 12.1) respectively. At the end of the double-blind treatment period, 72% of the patients in the stiripentol group had a ≥ 50% decrease in generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) frequency, versus 7% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), 56% had a profound (≥ 75%) decrease versus 3% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), and 38% were free of GTCS, but none in the placebo group (P < 0.001). The onset of stiripentol efficacy was rapid, significant from the fourth day of treatment onwards. The median longest period of consecutive days with no GTCS was 32 days in the stiripentol group compared to 8.5 days in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Further to the switch to the third month OLE, an 80.2% decrease in seizure frequency from baseline was observed in patients previously receiving placebo, while no change in efficacy was observed in those already on stiripentol. Adverse events were more frequent in the stiripentol group, with significantly more episodes of somnolence, anorexia, and weight decrease than in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

Altogether these new analyses of the STICLO data reinforce the evidence for a remarkable efficacy of stiripentol in Dravet syndrome, with a demonstrated rapid onset of action and sustained response, as also evidenced in further post-randomized trials.

Non-pharmacological therapeutic needs in people with Dravet syndrome

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a genetic rare disease, which is usually caused by a mutation in the SCN1A gene. DS is characterised by a drug-resistant epilepsy and by cognitive and behavioural disturbances. Thus, DS patients require both pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. However, there is a paucity of studies on non-pharmacological therapies and their potential benefits. The main aim of this study was to describe the non-pharmacological therapy modalities received by DS patients and their socio-economic impact on the family. Thus, we designed an online survey addressed to caregivers of DS patients. Our results indicated that up to 91.9% of the surveyed patients required non-pharmacological therapies, which were mainly directed to treat cognitive, sensory and motor impairments. In many cases, the economic costs of these therapies were borne entirely by the families. Nevertheless, patients required a deployment of resources not only at a health care level, but also at an educational level.

Dravet syndrome: A systematic literature review of the illness burden

We performed a systematic literature review and narrative synthesis according to a pre-registered protocol (Prospero: CRD42022376561) to identify the evidence associated with the burden of illness in Dravet syndrome (DS), a developmental and epileptic encephalopathy characterized by drug-resistant epilepsy with neurocognitive and neurobehavioral impairment. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and APA PsychInfo, Cochrane's database of systematic reviews, and Epistemonikos from inception to June 2022. Non-interventional studies reporting on epidemiology (incidence, prevalence, and mortality), patient and caregiver health-related quality of life (HRQoL), direct and indirect costs and healthcare resource utilization were eligible. Two reviewers independently carried out the screening. Pre-specified data were extracted and a narrative synthesis was conducted. Overall, 49 studies met the inclusion criteria. The incidence varied from 1:15 400-1:40 900, and the prevalence varied from 1.5 per 100 000 to 6.5 per 100 000. Mortality was reported in 3.7%-20.8% of DS patients, most commonly due to sudden unexpected death in epilepsy and status epilepticus. Patient HRQoL, assessed by caregivers, was lower than in non-DS epilepsy patients; mean scores (0 [worst] to 100/1 [best]) were 62.1 for the Kiddy KINDL/Kid-KINDL, 46.5-54.7 for the PedsQL and 0.42 for the EQ-5D-5L. Caregivers, especially mothers, were severely affected, with impacts on their time, energy, sleep, career, and finances, while siblings were also affected. Symptoms of depression were reported in 47%-70% of caregivers. Mean total direct costs were high across all studies, ranging from $11 048 to $77 914 per patient per year (PPPY), with inpatient admissions being a key cost driver across most studies. Mean costs related to lost productivity were only reported in three publications, ranging from approximately $19 000 to $20 000 PPPY ($17 596 for mothers vs $1564 for fathers). High seizure burden was associated with higher resource utilization, costs and poorer HRQoL. The burden of DS on patients, caregivers, the healthcare system, and society is profound, reflecting the severe nature of the syndrome. Future studies will be able to assess the impact that newly approved therapies have on reducing the burden of DS.

Determining the Relationship Between Seizure-Free Days and Other Predictors of Quality of Life in Patients with Dravet Syndrome and Their Carers from FFA Registration Studies

INTRODUCTION

Dravet syndrome (DS) is a rare, lifelong epileptic encephalopathy characterised by frequent and severe seizures associated with premature mortality. Typically diagnosed in infancy, patients also experience progressive behavioural, motor-function and cognitive decline. Twenty percent of patients do not reach adulthood. Quality of life (QoL) is impaired for both patients and their carers. Reducing convulsive seizure frequency, increasing convulsive seizure-free days (SFDs) and improving patient/carer QoL are primary treatment goals in DS. This study explored the relationship between SFDs and patients' and carers' QoL to inform a cost-utility analysis of fenfluramine (FFA).

METHODS

In FFA registration studies, patients (or their carer proxies) completed the Paediatric QoL inventory (PedsQL). These data were mapped to EuroQol-5 Dimensions Youth version (EQ-5D-Y) to provide patient utilities. Carer utilities were collected using EQ-5D-5L and mapped to EQ-5D-3L to align patient and carer QoL on the same scale. Linear mixed-effects and panel regression models were tested and Hausman tests identified the most appropriate approach for each group. On this basis, a linear mixed-effects regression model was used to examine the relationships between patient EQ-5D-Y and clinically relevant variables (age, frequency of SFDs per 28 days, motor impairments and treatment dose). A linear panel regression model examined the relationship between SFDs and carer QoL.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age and underlying comorbidities, the patient regression model showed that SFDs per 28 days was a significant predictor of QoL. Each additional patient-SFD increased utility by 0.005 (p < 0.001). The carer linear panel model also showed that increasing SFDs per 28 days was a significant predictor of improved QoL. Each additional SFD increased carer utility by 0.014 (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This regression framework highlights that SFDs are significantly correlated with both patients' and carers' QoL. Treatment with effective antiseizure medications that increase SFDs directly improves QoL for patients and their carers.

Efficacy and safety of adjunctive antiseizure medications for dravet syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Purpose: Recently, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved stiripentol, cannabidiol, and fenfluramine to treat patients with Dravet syndrome (DS). Moreover, soticlestat was determined as a promising new drug for the treatment of DS as it has good efficacy and safety. However, the efficacy and safety of these drugs have not yet been evaluated in “head-to-head” trials. This study aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacy and safety of these adjunctive antiseizure medications in the treatment of DS.

Methods: We searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and open-label extension (OLE) studies in patients with DS. We performed a random-effect meta-analysis of OLE studies and a network meta-analysis for RCTs to evaluate the efficacy and safety of antiseizure medications in the treatment of DS. Primary efficacy outcomes were defined as a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared with baseline. Furthermore, safety evaluation indicators were defined as the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) during treatment. Relative ranking was assessed using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) probabilities.

Results: Seven RCTs involving four antiseizure medications (stiripentol, cannabidiol, fenfluramine, and soticlestat) and a total of 634 patients were included in the analysis. According to the SUCRA results, all four drugs significantly reduced the frequency of seizures compared with the placebo. Soticlestat was the most likely to reduce seizure frequency by ≥50% compared to the baseline [risk ratio (RR): 19.32; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.20–311.40], followed by stiripentol and fenfluramine. Stiripentol was ranked highest for the near percentage reduction in the seizure rate from baseline [RR: 12.33; 95% CI: 1.71–89.17] and the occurrence of any treatment-emergent adverse events [RR: 3.73; 95% CI: 1.65–8.43] and serious adverse events [RR: 4.76; 95% CI: 0.61–37.28]. A total of ten OLE studies containing 1,121 patients were included in our study. According to the results of the meta-analysis, the order of probability of reducing seizure frequency by ≥50% was fenfluramine (0.715, 95% CI: 0.621–0.808), stiripentol (0.604, 95% CI: 0.502–0.706), cannabidiol (0.448, 95% CI: 0.403–0.493). And the probability of occurrence of AEs is ranked as fenfluramine(0.832, 95% CI: 0.795–0.869), cannabidiol (0.825, 95% CI:0.701–0.950), stiripentol (0.823, 95% CI: 0.707–0.938), soticlestat (0.688, 95% CI: 0.413–0.890).

Conclusion: According to the results of indirect comparison of efficacy and safety, cannabidiol is slightly inferior to the other three antiseizure medications in terms of efficacy and safety. Soticlestat, fenfluramine, and stripentol may have little difference in efficacy, but soticlestat and fenfluramine are safer. Soticlestat is probably the best adjunctive antiseizure medication, followed by fenfluramine. This conclusion is consistent with the comparison of long-term efficacy and safety.