What the Clinical Microbiologist Should Know About Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics in the Era of Emerging Multidrug Resistance: Focusing on β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

What are the optimal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for β-lactamase inhibitors? A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices are widely used for the selection of optimum antibiotic doses. For β-lactam antibiotics, fT>MIC, best relates antibiotic exposure to efficacy and is widely used to guide the dosing of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations, often without considering any PK/PD exposure requirements for BLIs.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review aimed to describe the PK/PD exposure requirements of BLIs for optimal microbiological efficacy when used in combination with β-lactam antibiotics.

METHODS

Literature was searched online through PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library databases up to 5 June 2023. Studies that report the PK/PD index and threshold concentration of BLIs approved for clinical use were included. Narrative data synthesis was carried out to assimilate the available evidence.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. The PK/PD index that described the efficacy of BLIs was fT>CT for tazobactam, avibactam and clavulanic acid and fAUC0-24/MIC for relebactam and vaborbactam. The optimal magnitude of the PK/PD index is variable for each BLI based on the companion β-lactam antibiotics, type of bacteria and β-lactamase enzyme gene transcription levels.

CONCLUSIONS

The PK/PD index that describes the efficacy of BLIs and the exposure measure required for their efficacy is variable among inhibitors; as a result, it is difficult to make clear inference on what the optimum index is. Further PK/PD profiling of BLI, using preclinical infection models that simulate the anticipated mode(s) of clinical use, is warranted to streamline the exposure targets for use in the optimization of dosing regimens.

Revisiting the Checkerboard to Inform Development of β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

A two-dimensional "checkerboard" array employing systematic titration (e.g., serial two-fold dilutions) is a well-established in vitro method for exploring the antibacterial effects of novel drug combinations. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) on the checkerboard are isoeffective points at which the antibiotic potency is the same. Representations of checkerboard MIC curves for a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination are used in hypothetical "thought experiments" and reveal the ways in which current practices can be improved. Because different types of response (i.e., independence vs. additivity vs. one effective agent; interaction vs. noninteraction) produce different MIC curves, data from different strains/isolates should not be pooled indiscriminately, as the composition of a pooled dataset will influence any derived pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) index. Because the β-lactamase inhibitor threshold concentration (CT) parameter is a function of the β-lactam partner dosing regimen, it is not possible to derive a universal PK/PD index target based on CT. Alternative susceptibility testing methods represent different planes through the checkerboard; a fixed ratio method is less prone to bias for all β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Susceptibility test MICs will often not reflect the sensitivity of the strain/isolate to the β-lactamase inhibitor, so the use of these MICs to normalize PK/PD indices is inappropriate.

Antimicrobials: An update on new strategies to diversify treatment for bacterial infections

Ninety-five years after Fleming's discovery of penicillin, a bounty of antibiotic compounds have been discovered, modified, or synthesised. Diversification of target sites, improved stability and altered activity spectra have enabled continued antibiotic efficacy, but overwhelming reliance and misuse has fuelled the global spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). An estimated 1.27 million deaths were attributable to antibiotic resistant bacteria in 2019, representing a major threat to modern medicine. Although antibiotics remain at the heart of strategies for treatment and control of bacterial diseases, the threat of AMR has reached catastrophic proportions urgently calling for fresh innovation. The last decade has been peppered with ground-breaking developments in genome sequencing, high throughput screening technologies and machine learning. These advances have opened new doors for bioprospecting for novel antimicrobials. They have also enabled more thorough exploration of complex and polymicrobial infections and interactions with the healthy microbiome. Using models of infection that more closely resemble the infection state in vivo, we are now beginning to measure the impacts of antimicrobial therapy on host/microbiota/pathogen interactions. However new approaches are needed for developing and standardising appropriate methods to measure efficacy of novel antimicrobial combinations in these contexts. A battery of promising new antimicrobials is now in various stages of development including co-administered inhibitors, phages, nanoparticles, immunotherapy, anti-biofilm and anti-virulence agents. These novel therapeutics need multidisciplinary collaboration and new ways of thinking to bring them into large scale clinical use.

Optimal ceftazidime/avibactam dosing exposure against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

OBJECTIVES

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales are considered urgent public health threats and often treated with a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination. However, clinical treatment failure and resistance emergence have been attributed to inadequate dosing. We used a novel framework to provide insights of optimal dosing exposure of ceftazidime/avibactam.

METHODS

Seven clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae producing different KPC variants were examined. Ceftazidime susceptibility (MIC) was determined by broth dilution using escalating concentrations of avibactam. The observed MICs were characterized as response to avibactam concentrations using an inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. Using the best-fit parameter values, %fT>MICi was estimated for various dosing regimens of ceftazidime/avibactam. A hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was subsequently used to ascertain the effectiveness of selected regimens over 120 h. The drug exposure threshold associated with bacterial suppression was identified by recursive partitioning.

RESULTS

In all scenarios, ceftazidime MIC reductions were well characterized with increasing avibactam concentrations. In HFIM, bacterial regrowth over time correlated with emergence of resistance. Overall, suppression of bacterial regrowth was associated with %fT>MICi ≥ 76.1% (100% versus 18.2%; P < 0.001). Using our framework, the optimal drug exposure could be achieved with ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g every 12 h in 5 out of 7 isolates. Furthermore, ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 g every 8 h can suppress an isolate deemed resistant based on conventional susceptibility testing method.

CONCLUSIONS

An optimal drug exposure to suppress KPC-producing bacteria was identified. The novel framework is informative and may be used to guide optimal dosing of other β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Further in vivo investigations are warranted.

Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of New 1H-Imidazole-2-Carboxylic Acid Derivatives as Metallo-β-Lactamase Inhibitors

As one of important mechanisms to β-lactam antimicrobial resistance, metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) have been receiving increasing worldwide attentions. Ambler subclass B1 MBLs are most clinically relevant, because they can hydrolyze almost all β-lactams with the exception of monobactams. However, it is still lacking of clinically useful drugs to combat MBL-medicated resistance. We previously identified 1H-imidazole-2-carboxylic acid as a core metal-binding pharmacophore (MBP) to target multiple B1 MBLs. Herein, we report structural optimization of 1H-imidazole-2-carboxylic acid and substituents. Structure-activity relationship (SAR) analyses revealed that replacement of 1H-imidazole-2-carboxylic acid with other structurally highly similar MBPs excepting thiazole-4-carboxylic acid resulted in decreased MBL inhibition. Further SAR studies identified more potent inhibitors to MBLs, of which 28 manifested IC₅₀ values of 0.018 µM for both VIM-2 and VIM-5. The microbiological tests demonstrated that the most tested compounds showed improved synergistic effects; some compounds at 1 µg/ml were able to reduce meropenem MIC by at least 16-fold, which will be worth further development of new potent inhibitors particularly targeting VIM-type MBLs.

Recent advances in β-lactamase inhibitor chemotypes and inhibition modes

The effectiveness of β-lactam antibiotics is increasingly influenced by serine β-lactamases (SBLs) and metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs), which can hydrolyze β-lactam antibiotics. The development of effective β-lactamase inhibitors is an important direction to extend use of β-lactam antibiotics. Although six SBL inhibitors have been approved for clinical use, but no MBL inhibitors or MBL/SBL dual-action inhibitors are available so far. Broad-spectrum targeting clinically relevant MBLs and SBLs is currently desirable, while it is not easy to achieve such a purpose owing to structural and mechanistic differences between MBLs and SBLs. In this review, we summarized recent advances of inhibitor chemotypes targeting MBLs and SBLs and their inhibition mechanisms, particularly including lead discovery and structural optimization strategies, with the aim to provide useful information for future efforts to develop new MBL and SBL inhibitors.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Assessment of rationality of available fixed dose combinations of antibiotics in India

OBJECTIVE

India is among the largest consumers of antibiotics. Easy availability and growing sales of Fixed Dose Combinations (FDCs) of antibiotics can worsen Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR). There is lack of comprehensive data on available antibiotic FDC formulations, their dose strengths and adequacy of scientific evidence regarding their efficacy, safety and suitability for human use. In the present work, we aimed at addressing this knowledge gap.

METHODS

Availability of FDCs was ascertained from the Current Index of Medical Specialties (CIMS) [Issue Jan-April 2020]. Customized data abstraction form was used to capture pertinent information for these FDCs. Assessment of rationality was done based on standard parameters.

RESULTS

More than 90% of the existing FDCs were found to be irrational; with two third of them being unapproved and or banned from use in the country.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the regulatory agency has already taken cognizance of the seriousness of the matter; there is an urgent need to revisit these FDCs to promote prudent antibiotic use.

EXPERT OPINION

High antibiotic use is associated with antimicrobial resistance; it is imperative that all factors which lead to high antibiotic use are adequately addressed. Easy availability of fixed dose combinations (FDCs) has begun to catch the attention of regulators in developing economies like India leading to a ban of 330 FDCs of which 19% were antibiotic combinations. The continuing presence and increasing sales of these irrational FDCs is a concern for effective antimicrobial stewardship.

Optimizing pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations against high inocula of ESBL-producing bacteria

OBJECTIVES

Reduced in vitro β-lactam activity against a dense bacterial population is well recognized. It is commonly attributed to the presence of β-lactamase(s) and it is unknown whether the inoculum effect could be diminished by a β-lactamase inhibitor. We evaluated different β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations in suppressing a high inoculum of ESBL-producing bacteria.

METHODS

Three clinical isolates expressing representative ESBLs (CTX-M-15 and SHV-12) were examined. The impact of escalating β-lactamase inhibitor (tazobactam or avibactam) concentrations on β-lactam (piperacillin or ceftazidime) MIC reduction was characterized by an inhibitory sigmoid Emax model. The effect of various dosing regimens of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations was predicted using %T>MICi and selected exposures were experimentally validated in a hollow-fibre infection model over 120 h. The threshold exposure to suppress bacterial regrowth was identified using recursive partitioning.

RESULTS

A concentration-dependent reduction in β-lactam MIC was observed (r2 ≥0.93). Regrowth could be suppressed in all six experiments using %T>MICi ≥73.6%, but only one out of six experiments below the threshold (P = 0.015). The exposures to suppress regrowth might be attained using the clinical dose of avibactam, but a much higher dose than the standard dose would be needed for tazobactam.

CONCLUSIONS

A dense population of ESBL-producing bacteria could be suppressed by an optimized dosing regimen of selected β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations. The reversibility of enzyme inhibition could play an important role in diminishing the inoculum effect. In vivo investigations to validate these findings are warranted.

In vitro Optimization of Ceftazidime/Avibactam for KPC-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae

Ceftazidime/avibactam is an important treatment option for infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-Kp), however, resistance can emerge during treatment. The objective of the study was to define the ceftazidime/avibactam concentrations required to suppress bacterial regrowth in ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible isolates and identify active therapies against ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp. Time-kill assays were performed against twelve ST258 KPC-Kp isolates that harbored bla_KPC–2 or bla_KPC–3. Nine KPC-Kp isolates (KPC-Kp 5A, 6A, 7A, 8A, 9A, 24A, 25A, 26A, and 27A) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam, two (KPC-Kp 6B and 7B) were ceftazidime/avibactam resistant and meropenem susceptible, and one (KPC-Kp 1244) was resistant to both ceftazidime/avibactam and meropenem. Sequencing of the bla_KPC genes revealed mutations in KPC-Kp 6B (D179Y substitution) and 7B (novel 21 base pair deletion) that both affected the Ω-loop encoding portion of the gene. Time-kill assays showed that against ceftazidime/avibactam-susceptible KPC-Kp, ceftazidime/avibactam concentrations ≥40/7.5 mg/L caused mean 5.42 log₁₀CFU/mL killing and suppressed regrowth. However, regrowth occurred for some KPC-Kp isolates with a ceftazidime/avibactam concentration of 20/3.75 mg/L. Against ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant and meropenem-susceptible KPC-Kp 6B and 7B, bactericidal activity and synergy was observed for ceftazidime/avibactam in combination with meropenem ≤3.125 mg/L, while meropenem concentrations ≥50 mg/L were bactericidal as monotherapy. In contrast, clinically achievable concentrations of ceftazidime/avibactam were bactericidal against KPC-Kp 1244, which was ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant and meropenem-resistant due to outer membrane porin mutations and elevated bla_KPC expression. Achieving high ceftazidime/avibactam concentrations may help to suppress bacterial regrowth in the presence of ceftazidime/avibactam. The optimal treatment approach for ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant KPC-Kp likely depends on the mechanism of resistance. Additional studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

New β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

The limited armamentarium against drug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli has led to the development of several novel β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (BLBLIs). In this review, we summarize their spectrum of in vitro activities, mechanisms of resistance, and pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics. A summary of available clinical data is provided per drug. Four approved BLBLIs are discussed in detail. All are options for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftazidime-avibactam is a potential drug for treating Enterobacterales producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL), Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC), AmpC, and some class D β-lactamases (OXA-48) in addition to carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Ceftolozane-tazobactam is a treatment option mainly for carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (non-carbapenemase producing), with some activity against ESBL-producing Enterobacterales Meropenem-vaborbactam has emerged as treatment option for Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, or AmpC, with similar activity as meropenem against P. aeruginosa Imipenem-relebactam has documented activity against Enterobacterales producing ESBL, KPC, and AmpC, with the combination having some additional activity against P. aeruginosa relative to imipenem. None of these drugs present in vitro activity against Enterobacterales or P. aeruginosa producing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) or against carbapenemase-producing Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical data regarding the use of these drugs to treat MDR bacteria are limited and rely mostly on nonrandomized studies. An overview on eight BLBLIs in development is also provided. These drugs provide various levels of in vitro coverage of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, with several drugs presenting in vitro activity against MBLs (cefepime-zidebactam, aztreonam-avibactam, meropenem-nacubactam, and cefepime-taniborbactam). Among these drugs, some also present in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (cefepime-zidebactam and cefepime-taniborbactam) and A. baumannii (cefepime-zidebactam and sulbactam-durlobactam).

Novel Beta-Lactam/Beta-Lactamase Plus Metronidazole vs Carbapenem for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) remain a leading cause of death in surgical wards, in which antibiotic treatment is crucial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLIs) in combination with metronidazole and carbapenems in the treatment of cIAIs.

Methods

A comprehensive search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library, which compared the efficacy and safety of novel BL/BLIs and carbapenems for the treatment of cIAIs.

Results

Six RCTs consisting of 2254 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that novel BL/BLIs in combination with metronidazole had a lower clinical success rate (risk difference [RD], -0.05; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02; I ² = 0%) and a lower microbiological success rate (RD, -0.04; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.00; I ² = 0%). No difference was found between the 2 groups in incidence of adverse events (RD, 0.02; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.06; I ² = 0%), serious adverse events (SAEs; RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03; I ² = 0%), or mortality (RD, 0.01; 95% CI, -0.00 to 0.02). However, ceftazidime/avibactam had a higher risk of vomiting (RD, 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05; I ² = 47%), and the ceftolozane/tazobactam subgroup showed a higher incidence of SAEs (RD, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.03).

Conclusions

The efficacy of novel BL/BLIs in combination with metronidazole was not as high as that of carbapenems. Although no significant differences were found with respect to overall adverse events, SAEs, or mortality, the novel BL/BLIs has a higher risk of vomiting. We still need to be cautious about the clinical application of a new anti-infective combination.

Trial registration

PROSPERO ID: 42020166061.

The latest advances in β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations for the treatment of Gram-negative bacterial infections

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative pathogens is a significant threat to global health. β-Lactams (BL) are one of the safest and most-prescribed classes of antibiotics on the market today. The acquisition of β-lactamases, especially those which hydrolyze carbapenems, is eroding the efficacy of BLs for the treatment of serious infections. During the past decade, significant advances were made in the development of novel BL-β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations to target β-lactamase-mediated resistant Gram-negatives.Areas covered: The latest progress in 20 different approved, developing, and preclinical BL-BLI combinations to target serine β-lactamases produced by Gram-negatives are reviewed based on primary literature, conference abstracts (when available), and US clinical trial searches within the last 5 years. The majority of the compounds that are discussed are being evaluated as part of a BL-BLI combination.Expert opinion: The current trajectory in BLI development is promising; however, a significant challenge resides in the selection of an appropriate BL partner as well as the development of resistance linked to the BL partner. In addition, dosing regimens for these BL-BLI combinations need to be critically evaluated. A revolution in bacterial diagnostics is essential to aid clinicians in the appropriate selection of novel BL-BLI combinations for the treatment of serious infections.