Prognostic Molecular Assay Might Improve Identification of Patients At Risk for Recurrence in Early-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Beneficial implications of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma exhibiting elevated SUVmax in FDG-PET/CT: a retrospective study from a single center

Background

Controversy surrounds the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of stage I lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). The objective of this study was to examine the impact of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) as measured by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) on the efficacy of ACT in patients diagnosed with stage I LUAD.

Methods

We scrutinized the medical records of 928 consecutive patients who underwent complete surgical resection for pathological stage I LUAD at our institution. The ideal cut-off value for primary tumor SUVmax in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) was determined using the X-tile software. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analysis were used for survival analysis.

Results

Based on the SUVmax algorithm, the ideal cutoff values were determined to be 4.9 for DFS and 5.0 for OS. We selected 5.0 as the threshold because OS is the more widely accepted predictive endpoint. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, SUVmax ≥ 5.0, problematic IB stage, and sublobectomy were identified as independent risk factors for poor DFS and OS. It is noteworthy that patients who were administered ACT had significantly longer DFS and OS than what was observed in the subgroup of patients with pathological stage IB LUAD and SUVmax ≥ 5.0 (p < 0.035 and p ≤ 0.046, respectively). However, there was no observed survival advantage for patients in stages IA or IB who had an SUVmax < 5.0.

Conclusion

The preoperative SUVmax of tumors served as an indicator of the impact of ACT in the context of completely resected pathological stage I LUAD. Notably, patients within the Stage IB category exhibiting elevated SUVmax levels emerged as a subgroup experiencing substantial benefits from postoperative ACT.

The impact of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs and 14-gene molecular assay on stage I non-small cell lung cancer with sensitive EGFR mutations

Background

Currently, the role of EGFR-TKIs as adjuvant therapy for stage I, especially IA NSCLC, after surgical resection remains unclear. We aimed to compare the effect of adjuvant EGFR-TKIs with observation in such patients by incorporating an established 14-gene molecular assay for risk stratification.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Study ID: ChNCRCRD-2022-GZ01). From March 2013 to February 2019, completely resected stage I NSCLC (8th TNM staging) patients with sensitive EGFR mutation were included. Patients with eligible samples for molecular risk stratification were subjected to the 14-gene prognostic assay. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was employed to minimize imbalances in baseline characteristics.

Findings

A total of 227 stage I NSCLC patients were enrolled, with 55 in EGFR-TKI group and 172 in the observation group. The median duration of follow-up was 78.4 months. After IPTW, the 5-year DFS (HR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.14-0.67; P = 0.003) and OS (HR = 0.26, 95% CI, 0.07-0.96; P = 0.044) of the EGFR-TKI group were significantly better than the observation group. For subgroup analyses, adjuvant EGFR-TKIs were associated with favorable 5-year DFS rates in both IA (100.0% vs. 84.5%; P = 0.007), and IB group (98.8% vs. 75.3%; P = 0.008). The 14-gene assay was performed in 180 patients. Among intermediate-high-risk patients, EGFR-TKIs were associated with a significant improvement in 5-year DFS rates compared to observation (96.0% vs. 70.5%; P = 0.012), while no difference was found in low-risk patients (100.0% vs. 94.9%; P = 0.360).

Interpretation

Our study suggested that adjuvant EGFR-TKI might improve DFS and OS of stage IA and IB EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and the 14-gene molecular assay could help patients that would benefit the most from treatment.

Funding

This work was supported by China National Science Foundation (82022048, 82373121).

Clinical Significance of a Circulating Tumor Cell-based Classifier in Stage IB Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter, Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effectiveness of a CTC-based classifier in stratifying stage IB LUAD.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Stage IB LUADs have an approximately 70% 5-year survival rate. The clinical application of ACT is controversial due to inconsistent results in a series of trials and few useful guide biomarkers. Thus, there is a pressing need for robust biomarkers to stratify stage IB patients to define which group would most likely benefit from ACT. Methods: Two hundred twelve stage IB LUAD patients were enrolled and were divided into 3 independent cohorts. The aptamer-modified NanoVelcro system was used to enrich the CTCs.

RESULTS

A cutoff of <4 or >4 CTCs as the optimal prognostic threshold for stage IB LUAD was generated to stratify the patients in a 70-patient cohort into low-risk and high-risk groups. Patients with ≥ 4 CTCs in the training cohort had shorter progression-free survival ( P < 0.0001) and overall survival ( P < 0.0001) than patients with <4 CTCs. CTC number remained the strongest predictor of progression-free survival and overall survival even in a multivariate analysis including other clinicopathological parameters. Furthermore, a nomogram based on the CTC count was developed to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival in the training cohort and performed well in the other 2 validation cohorts (C-index: 0.862, 0.853, and 0.877).

CONCLUSION

The presence of >4 CTCs can define a high-risk subgroup, providing a new strategy to make optimal clinical decisions for stage IB LUAD.

Novel Genetic Prognostic Signature for Lung Adenocarcinoma Identified by Differences in Gene Expression Profiles of Low- and High-Grade Histological Subtypes

The 2021 WHO classification proposed a pattern-based grading system for early-stage invasive non-mucinous lung adenocarcinoma. Lung adenocarcinomas with high-grade patterns have poorer outcomes than those with lepidic-predominant patterns. This study aimed to establish genetic prognostic signatures by comparing differences in gene expression profiles between low- and high-grade adenocarcinomas. Twenty-six (9 low- and 17 high-grade adenocarcinomas) patients with histologically “near-pure” patterns (predominant pattern comprising >70% of tumor areas) were selected retrospectively. Using RNA sequencing, gene expression profiles between the low- and high-grade groups were analyzed, and genes with significantly different expression levels between these two groups were selected for genetic prognostic signatures. In total, 196 significant candidate genes (164 upregulated and 32 upregulated in the high- and low-grade groups, respectively) were identified. After intersection with The Cancer Genome Atlas–Lung Adenocarcinoma prognostic genes, three genes, exonuclease 1 (EXO1), family with sequence similarity 83, member A (FAM83A), and disks large-associated protein 5 (DLGAP5), were identified as prognostic gene signatures. Two independent cohorts were used for validation, and the areas under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic were 0.784 and 0.703 in the GSE31210 and GSE30219 cohorts, respectively. Our result showed the feasibility and accuracy of this novel three-gene prognostic signature for predicting the clinical outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma.

A Six-Gene Signature Predicts Survival of Adenocarcinoma Type of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Study Based on Integrated Analysis and Weighted Gene Coexpression Network

Background and Goals. To identify a multigene signature model for prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, we first found 2146 consensus differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in NSCLC overlapped in Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and TCGA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) datasets using integrated analysis. We constructed a weighted gene coexpression network (WGCN) using the consensus DEGs and identified the module significantly associated with pathological M stage and consisted of 61 genes. After univariate Cox regression analysis and subsequent stepwise model selection by the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and multivariate Cox hazard model analysis, an mRNA signature model which calculated prognostic score was generated: prognostic score = (-0.2491 × EXP_RRAGB) + (-0.0679 × EXP_RSPH9) + (-0.2317 × EXP_RPS6KL1) + (-0.1035 × EXP_RXFP1) + 0.1571 × EXP_RRM2 + 0.1104 × EXP_RTL1, where EXP is the fragments per kilobase million (FPKM) value of the mRNA included in the model. The prognostic model separated NSCLC patients in the TCGA-LUAD dataset into the low- and high-risk score groups with a median prognostic score of 0.972. Higher scores predicted higher risk. The area under ROC curve (AUC) was 0.994 or 0.776 in predicting the 1- to 10-year survival of NSCLC patients. The prognostic performance of this prognostic model was validated by an independent GSE11969 dataset of NSCLC adenocarcinoma with AUC values between 0.822 and 0.755 in predicting 1- to 10-year survival of NSCLC. These results suggested that the six-gene signature functioned as an independent biomarker to predict the overall survival of NSCLC adenocarcinoma.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy Guided by Molecular Profiling and Improved Outcomes in Early Stage, Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Many early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who are not considered candidates for adjuvant treatment according to current guidelines do harbor occult metastasis, and have disease recurrence despite complete resection. Although National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines suggest clinicopathologic characteristics to identify high-risk patients for adjuvant intervention, molecular profiling more accurately predicts 5-year survival. Early evidence of clinical benefit from application of this molecular-based management strategy, however, has not been reported.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An internationally validated, prognostic, 14-gene quantitative polymerase chain reaction expression assay was used to stratify risk prospectively in 100 consecutive patients with stage IA, IB, and IIA nonsquamous NSCLC. Kaplan-Meyer estimates, log rank analysis, and Cox regression were used to compare disease-free survival (DFS) between high-risk patients who did or did not elect adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (48%) were deemed high-risk according to molecular testing and 36 (36%) met NCCN high-risk criteria; risk designations were discordant in 34 (34%) of all patients. Estimated 5-year DFS was 48.9% among molecular high-risk patients who did not undertake adjuvant chemotherapy, 93.8% among untreated molecular low-risk patients, and 91.7% in molecular high-risk patients who did undergo chemotherapy (P = .004). In contrast, DFS was only 75.2% in untreated NCCN low-risk patients, and 61.9% in untreated NCCN high-risk patients (P = .183).

CONCLUSION

This prospective, nonrandomized study provides initial evidence that high-risk designation according to the 14-gene prognostic assay also predicts benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy for very early stage NSCLC, and further supports the superiority of molecular stratification over current NCCN criteria at identifying high-risk patients.

Lung Cancer Staging and Prognosis

The seventh edition of the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) TNM staging system was developed by the International Association for the Staging of Lung Cancer (IASLC) Lung Cancer Staging Project by a coordinated international effort to develop data-derived TNM classifications with significant survival differences. Based on these TNM groupings, current 5-year survival estimates in NSLCC range from 73 % in stage IA disease to 13 % in stage IV disease. TNM stage remains the most important prognostic factor in predicting recurrence rates and survival times, followed by tumor histologic grade, and patient sex, age, and performance status. Molecular prognostication in lung cancer is an exploding area of research where interest has moved beyond TNM stage and into individualized genetic tumor analysis with immunohistochemistry, microarray, and mutation profiles. However, despite intense research efforts and countless publications, no molecular prognostic marker has been adopted into clinical use since most fail in subsequent cross-validation with few exceptions. The recent interest in immunotherapy for NSCLC has identified new biomarkers with early evidence that suggests that PD-L1 is a predictive marker of a good response to new immunotherapy drugs but a poor prognostic indicator of overall survival. Future prognostication of outcomes in NSCLC will likely be based on a combination of TNM stage and molecular tumor profiling and yield more precise, individualized survival estimates and treatment algorithms.

The Latest in Surgical Management of Stage IIIA Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Tumor Molecular Profiling

Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a treatment challenge and requires a multidisciplinary care team to optimize survival outcomes. Thoracic surgeons play an important role in selecting operative candidates and assisting with pathologic mediastinal staging via cervical mediastinoscopy, endobronchial ultrasound, or esophageal ultrasound with fine needle aspiration. The majority of patients with stage IIIA disease will receive induction therapy followed by repeat staging before undergoing lobectomy or pneumonectomy; occasionally, a patient with an incidentally found, single-station microscopic IIIA tumor will undergo resection as the primary initial therapy. Multiple large clinical trials, including SWOG-8805, EORTC-8941, INT-0139, and ANITA, have shown 5-year overall survival rates of up to 30% to 40% using triple-modality treatments, and the best outcomes repeatedly are seen among patients who respond to induction treatment or who have tumors amenable to lobectomy instead of pneumonectomy. The need for a pneumonectomy is not a reason to deny patients an operation, because current operative mortality and morbidity rates are acceptably low at 5% and 30%, respectively. In select patients with stage IIIA disease, video-assisted thoracic surgery and open resections have been shown to have comparable rates of local recurrence and long-term survival. New developments in genetic profiling and personalized medicine are exciting areas of research, and early data suggest that molecular profiling of stage IIIA NSCLC tumors can accurately stratify patients by risk within this stage and predict survival outcomes. Future advances in treating stage IIIA disease will involve developing better systemic therapies and customizing treatment plans on the basis of an individual tumor's genetic profile.