Bevacizumab, Pemetrexed, and Cisplatin, or Bevacizumab and Erlotinib for Patients With Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Stratified by Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation: Phase II Trial SAKK19/09

Clinical Implementation of DPYD Pharmacogenetic Testing to Prevent Early-Onset Fluoropyrimidine-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients in Switzerland

The implementation of pharmacogenetic testing into clinical practice has been a slow process so far. Here, we review the implementation of pre-treatment testing of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) risk variants to prevent early-onset fluoropyrimidine (FP)-related toxicity in cancer patients in Switzerland based on data of a large Swiss diagnostic center. In January 2017, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health introduced the reimbursement of DPYD testing by the compulsory health insurance in Switzerland based on evidence for the clinical relevance of DPYD-risk variants and the cost-effectiveness of pre-treatment testing, and on the availability of international guidelines. However, we did not observe a strong increase in DPYD testing at our diagnostic center from 2017 to 2019. Only a low number of DPYD-testing requests (28-42 per year), concerning mostly retrospective investigations of suspected FP-toxicity, were received. In contrast, we observed a 14-fold increase in DPYD testing together with a strong shift from retrospective to pre-treatment test requests upon the release of recommendations for DPYD testing prior to FP-treatment in April 2020 by the European Medicines Agency. This increase was mainly driven by three geographic regions of Switzerland, where partner institutions of previous research collaborations regarding FP-related toxicity are located and who acted as early-adopting institutions of DPYD testing. Our data suggest the important role of early adopters as accelerators of clinical implementation of pharmacogenetic testing by introducing these policies to their working environment and educating health workers from their own and nearby institutions.

Pemetrexed-Platinum With or Without Bevacizumab for Chinese Chemo-Naive Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients: A Real-World Study

Despite recent advances in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), bevacizumab plus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy remains a commonly used first-line regimen. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of pemetrexed-platinum with or without bevacizumab in Chinese chemo-naive advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in a real-world setting. We retrospectively collected 100 patients who received pemetrexed-platinum with or without bevacizumab (PP, n = 46; Bev+PP, n = 54) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Clinical characteristics of patients were balanced, except for the proportion of stage IV b+c (Bev+PP and PP: 67.4 vs. 37.0%, p = 0.0066). Bev+PP significantly improved the objective response rate (ORR, 65 vs. 30%, p = 0.0004) and progression-free survival (PFS, 7.4 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.009), but not overall survival (OS, 17.5 vs. 15.0 months, p = 0.553) compared with PP. Treatment (p = 0.001), gender (p = 0.008), adrenal metastasis (p = 0.001), and liver metastasis (p = 0.013) were independent risk factors for PFS. Patients with adrenal metastasis tended to be at the highest risk of not benefiting from bevacizumab addition (HR [95% CI]: 2.244 [0.6495-7.753]). The safety profile was acceptable, and grade ≥3 toxicity occurred similarly. This study showed that pemetrexed-platinum plus bevacizumab was effective compared to chemotherapy alone in Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC.

Chemotherapy negatively impacts the tumor immune microenvironment in NSCLC: an analysis of pre- and post-treatment biopsies in the multi-center SAKK19/09 study

Background

Over the past few years, immune checkpoint inhibitors have changed the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Response to immune checkpoint inhibitors correlates with a pre-existing anti-tumoral immune response. Checkpoint inhibitors have been introduced as second-line therapy and are only very recently used as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment of NSCLC. However, the effect of conventional first-line platinum-based chemotherapy on the immune infiltrate in the tumor is largely unknown.

Methods

We measured the gene expression of a custom set of 201 cancer- and immune-related genes in 100 NSCLC tumor biopsies collected before chemotherapy and 33 re-biopsies after platinum-based chemotherapy at the time point of progression. For 29 patients matched pre- and post-chemotherapy samples could be evaluated.

Results

We identified a cluster of 47 co-expressed immune genes, including PDCD1 (PD1) and CD274 (PD-L1), along with three other co-expression clusters. Chemotherapy decreased the average gene expression of the immune cluster while no effect was observed on the other three cluster. Within this immune cluster, CTLA4, LAG3, TNFRSF18, CD80 and FOXP3 were found to be significantly decreased in patient-matched samples after chemotherapy.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that conventional platinum-based chemotherapy negatively impacts the immune microenvironment at the time point of secondary progression.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-020-02688-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Potential Benefits of Bevacizumab Combined With Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients With EGFR Mutation

BACKGROUND

Oncogenic EGFR signaling has been shown to upregulate vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression involved in tumor angiogenesis. However, the clinical benefits of bevacizumab plus cytotoxic chemotherapy for EGFR mutation-positive patients remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate VEGFA messenger RNA expression in patients with EGFR mutation, and to further compare the efficacy of bevacizumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy between EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Gene expression of various proangiogenic factors was analyzed in nonsquamous, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients using The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset. Additionally, clinical data of patients receiving carboplatin and pemetrexed (CPem; n = 104) or bevacizumab plus CPem (BevCPem; n = 55) at Nagoya University hospital were retrospectively assessed for progression-free survival and best overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

Among various proangiogenic factors, only VEGFA expression was significantly higher in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with EGFR mutation compared to wild-type patients (P = .0476). Progression-free survival in the BevCPem group was significantly longer in patients with EGFR mutation than in wild-type patients (10.5 vs. 6.6 months; Wilcoxon P = .0278), while the difference in the CPem group was not significant (6.6 vs. 4.5 months; Wilcoxon P = .1822). The ORRs in the BevCPem group were 54.5% and 36.4% for EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients, respectively, and the ORRs in the CPem group were 35.5% and 28.8 % in EGFR-mutant and wild-type patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

VEGFA messenger RNA expression was significantly increased in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC harboring EGFR mutation, and BevCPem provided better clinical benefits to patients with EGFR mutation than wild-type carriers.

EGFR-TKIs in non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on clinical pharmacology and mechanisms of resistance

The clinical introduction of EGFR-TKIs within the oncologic armamentarium has changed the therapeutic landscape of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) creating widespread expectations both in patients and clinicians. However, several gaps in current understanding leave open important questions regarding the use of these drugs in clinical practice. For instance, there is uncertainty in regard to which EGFR-TKI should be given first in naive patients with EGFR-driven malignancies since different generations of drugs are available with different pharmacological profiles. Furthermore, acquired drug resistance may limit the therapeutic potential of EGFR-TKIs and the choice of the best treatment strategy after first-line treatment failure is still debated. This review article is aimed at describing the pharmacological properties of EGFR-TKIs and the current treatment options for NSCLC patients who develop acquired resistance. This information might be useful to design new rational and more effective pharmacological strategies in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

A systematic review of targeted agents for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is characterized by having limited treatment options and thus a poor prognosis. However, new treatment options, in the form of targeted agents (TA), have emerged during recent years. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the accessible literature in PubMed evaluating TA used on NSCLC patients, and the resulting survival outcomes.

METHOD

this systematic literature review was conducted by reviewing all relevant literature in PubMed. Six separate searches were performed: Three searches where controlled entry terms were used and three free text searches. Furthermore, other relevant publications were included manually. A total of seventy-two studies met the search criteria and were thus further analyzed and evaluated.

RESULTS

In the included studies, various TAs and their effect on different molecular targets have been evaluated. Clinical responses vary considerably among the different genetic aberrations. The majority of studies evaluated TA for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and TA for echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4-anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) rearrangements. Studies regarding the use of TA for Rat sarcoma (RAS), rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1) rearrangement, Receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (ERBB2), Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PIK3CA)/v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog; protein kinase B(AKT)/Phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome 10(PTEN), The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) were included as well. In general, studies comparing treatment outcomes in EGFR-mutated patients and EML4-ALK (ALK) rearranged patients after use of either TA or standard chemotherapy, present significant better results after TA.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review provides an overview of available literature in PubMed regarding NSCLC and TA. Included studies point toward that TA appears to be a promising therapeutic tool in treating NSCLC patients and use of TA is expected to result in improved treatment outcomes.

Population-level effect of molecular testing and targeted therapy in patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma: a prospective cohort study

Large cancer centres in the USA demonstrated that molecular diagnosis and targeted therapy improved overall survival of patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma. We validated this finding in a rural area of Switzerland, served by private practices, community hospitals and a tertiary referral centre. We conducted a prospective cohort study with the Cancer Registry of Central Switzerland, covering 4 cantons and 517,000 inhabitants. All residents newly diagnosed with stage IV pulmonary adenocarcinoma from 2010 to 2014 were enrolled. We obtained information on patients, tumour, molecular testing, therapy and survival. Three hundred forty-eight patients were included in the study. Molecular testing was performed in 279 (80%); 132 (38%) had oncogenic driver mutations: Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS, 16%), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR, 11%), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK, 5%), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, 2%), B rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (BRAF, 1%), rearranged during transfection (RET, 0.5%), MET proto-oncogene (0.5%) and multiple mutations (2%). Fifty-six patients with an oncogenic driver mutation, mostly epidermal growth factor receptor (34) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (12), received genotype-matched targeted therapy, at least 25 (45%) of whom in a clinical trial or named patient programme. Median overall survival was 18 months for patients with driver mutations and targeted therapy, 8 months for patients with driver mutations and conventional therapy and 10 months for patients with no driver mutation and conventional therapy. For patients with driver mutations and targeted therapy, overall survival was significantly better than that for patients with driver mutations and conventional therapy (HR 0.64, p = 0.04). Rigorous testing combined with optimal access to targeted therapy in clinical trials improved the prognosis of patients with advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma in Central Switzerland. This effect was mainly driven by therapies targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and anaplastic lymphoma kinase.

Erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and activating EGFR mutations (BELIEF): an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The tyrosine kinase inhibitor erlotinib improves the outcomes of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The coexistence of the T790M resistance mutation with another EGFR mutation in treatment-naive patients has been associated with a shorter progression-free survival to EGFR inhibition than in the absence of the T790M mutation. To test this hypothesis clinically, we developed a proof-of-concept study, in which patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were treated with the combination of erlotinib and bevacizumab, stratified by the presence of the pretreatment T790M mutation.

METHODS

BELIEF was an international, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial done at 29 centres in eight European countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older and had treatment-naive, pathologically confirmed stage IIIB or stage IV lung adenocarcinoma with a confirmed, activating EGFR mutation (exon 19 deletion or L858R mutation). Patients received oral erlotinib 150 mg per day and intravenous bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days and were tested centrally for the pretreatment T790M resistance mutation with a peptide nucleic acid probe-based real-time PCR. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. The primary efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population and was stratified into two parallel substudies according to the centrally confirmed pretreatment T790M mutation status of enrolled patients (T790M positive or negative). The safety analysis was done in all patients that have received at least one dose of trial treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01562028.

FINDINGS

Between June 11, 2012, and Oct 28, 2014, 109 patients were enrolled and included in the efficacy analysis. 37 patients were T790M mutation positive and 72 negative. The overall median progression-free survival was 13·2 months (95% CI 10·3-15·5), with a 12 month progression-free survival of 55% (95% CI 45-64). The primary endpoint was met only in substudy one (T790M-positive patients). In the T790M-positive group, median progression-free survival was 16·0 months (12·7 to not estimable), with a 12 month progression-free survival of 68% (50-81), whereas in the T790M-negative group, median progression-free survival was 10·5 months (9·4-14·2), with a 12 month progression-free survival of 48% (36-59). Of 106 patients included in the safety analysis, five had grade 4 adverse events (one acute coronary syndrome, one biliary tract infection, one other neoplasms, and two colonic perforations) and one died due to sepsis.

INTERPRETATION

The BELIEF trial provides further evidence of benefit for the combined use of erlotinib and bevacizumab in patients with NSCLC harbouring activating EGFR mutations.

FUNDING

European Thoracic Oncology Platform, Roche.

Bevacizumab Plus Pemetrexed Versus Pemetrexed Alone as Maintenance Therapy for Patients With Advanced Nonsquamous Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: Update From the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) 19/09 Trial

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed and bevacizumab as single agents have been approved for maintenance therapy after platinum-based induction in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. It is currently unknown whether bevacizumab plus pemetrexed is superior to pemetrexed alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a nonrandomized phase II trial with 2 sequential cohorts. In the first cohort, 77 patients were treated with 4 cycles of cisplatin, bevacizumab, and pemetrexed every 3 weeks, followed by bevacizumab plus pemetrexed maintenance until progression. In the second cohort, we treated 52 patients without bevacizumab, using maintenance with pemetrexed alone. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), adverse events, and the treatment costs of the 2 cohorts were compared.

RESULTS

The median PFS from the time of registration was 6.9 months in cohort 1 and 5.6 months in cohort 2. The ORR was 62.3% in cohort 1% and 44.2% in cohort 2. The PFS (hazard ratio, 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5-1.0; P = .041) and ORR (odds ratio, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.3; P = .049) were better in cohort 1 than in cohort 2. No OS difference was found (hazard ratio, 1.0; 95% CI, 0.7-1.6; P = .890) after a median follow-up period of 47 months for cohort 1 and 27 months for cohort 2. The rate of grade ≥ 3 adverse events was greater in cohort 1. The treatment costs per patient were on average 1.4 times greater for cohort 1.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab increased the ORR and PFS, but not OS, in our nonrandomized trial. Furthermore, the addition of bevacizumab was associated with greater toxicity and higher costs.

Anti-EGFR and antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, several clinical trials have evaluated the efficacy and safety of biological therapies in lung cancer. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the axis vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF/VEGFR) are targeted by small molecules and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), especially in non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

AREAS COVERED

The current state of the art of anti-EGFR and antiangiogenic monoclonal antibodies in metastatic NSCLC is reviewed and discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Bevacizumab and cetuximab are the most studied mAbs in NSCLC, but only bevacizumab is in clinical practice in the first-line setting. Necitumumab is a new anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody that improves survival when combined to cisplatin/gemcitabine chemotherapy and has been approved in first-line advanced NSCLC. Ramucirumab, an antiangiogenic drug binding with high affinity to VEGFR-2, improves the results of chemotherapy alone when administered with docetaxel and has been approved in second-line setting. Moreover, the novel combination of bevacizumab and erlotinib is very promising for the treatment of patients with NSCLC harbouring EGFR mutations. The association of antiangiogenic mAbs and immunotherapy is under investigation too.