A Phase III Study of Durvalumab (MEDI4736) With or Without Tremelimumab for Previously Treated Patients With Advanced NSCLC: Rationale and Protocol Design of the ARCTIC Study

A multi-component paclitaxel -loaded β-elemene nanoemulsion by transferrin modification enhances anti-non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

A multi-component paclitaxel (PTX) -loaded β-elemene nanoemulsion by transferrin modification (Tf-PE-MEs) was developed to enhance non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. After transferrin modification, the particle size of Tf-PE-MEs was (14.87 ± 1.84) nm, and the zeta potential was (-10.19 ± 0.870) mV, respectively. In vitro experiments showed that Tf-PE-MEs induced massive apoptosis in A549 cells, indicating that it had significant cytotoxicity to A549 cells. Through transferrin modification, Tf-PE-MEs accumulated at the tumor site efficiently with overexpressed transferrin receptor (TfR) on the surface of A549 cells. This will allow increasing PTX and β-elemene concentration in the target cells, enhancing the therapeutic effect. Compared to PTX alone, Tf-PE-MEs displayed good anti-tumor efficacy and diminished systemic toxicity in vivo studies. With favourable therapeutic potential, this study provides a new strategy for the combined anticancer treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Advancing non-small cell lung cancer treatment: the power of combination immunotherapies

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an unsolved challenge in oncology, signifying a substantial global health burden. While considerable progress has been made in recent years through the emergence of immunotherapy modalities, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), monotherapies often yield limited clinical outcomes. The rationale behind combining various immunotherapeutic or other anticancer agents, the mechanistic underpinnings, and the clinical evidence supporting their utilization is crucial in NSCLC therapy. Regarding the synergistic potential of combination immunotherapies, this study aims to provide insights to help the landscape of NSCLC treatment and improve clinical outcomes. In addition, this review article discusses the challenges and considerations of combination regimens, including toxicity management and patient selection.

Fertility Preservation in the Era of Immuno-Oncology: Lights and Shadows

In recent years, immuno-oncology has revolutionized the cancer treatment field by harnessing the immune system's power to counteract cancer cells. While this innovative approach holds great promise for improving cancer outcomes, it also raises important considerations related to fertility and reproductive toxicity. In fact, most young females receiving gonadotoxic anti-cancer treatments undergo iatrogenic ovarian exhaustion, resulting in a permanent illness that precludes the vocation of motherhood as a natural female sexual identity. Although commonly used, oocyte cryopreservation for future in vitro fertilization and even ovarian cortex transplantation are considered unsafe procedures in cancer patients due to their oncogenic risks; whereas, ovarian stem cells might support neo-oogenesis, providing a novel stemness model of regenerative medicine for future fertility preservation programs in oncology. Recent scientific evidence has postulated that immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) might in some way reduce fertility by inducing either primary or secondary hypogonadism, whose incidence and mechanisms are not yet known. Therefore, considering the lack of data, it is currently not possible to define the most suitable FP procedure for young patients who are candidates for ICIs. In this report, we will investigate the few available data concerning the molecular regulation of ICI therapy and their resulting gonadal toxicity, to hypothesize the most suitable fertility preservation strategy for patients receiving these drugs.

Correlation of preclinical and clinical biomarkers with efficacy and toxicity of cancer immunotherapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revealed significant clinical values in different solid tumors and hematological malignancy, changing the landscape for the treatment of multiple types of cancer. However, only a subpopulation of patients has obvious tumor response and long-term survival after ICIs treatment, and many patients may experience other undesirable clinical features. Therefore, biomarkers are critical for patients to choose exact optimum therapy. Here, we reviewed existing preclinical and clinical biomarkers of immunotherapeutic efficacy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Based on efficacy prediction, pseudoprogression, hyperprogressive disease, or irAEs, these biomarkers were divided into cancer cell-derived biomarkers, tumor microenvironment-derived biomarkers, host-derived biomarkers, peripheral blood biomarkers, and multi-modal model and artificial intelligence assessment-based biomarkers. Furthermore, we describe the relation between ICIs efficacy and irAEs. This review provides the overall perspective of biomarkers of immunotherapeutic outcome and irAEs prediction during ICIs treatment.

MOVIE: a phase I, open-label, multicenter study to evaluate the safety and tolerability of metronomic vinorelbine combined with durvalumab plus tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents have only moderate antitumor activity in some advanced solid tumors (AST), including breast cancer (BC), prostate cancer (PC), cervical cancer (CC), and head and neck cancer (HNC). Combining anti-PD-L1 with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein (CTLA) and chemotherapy may significantly improve efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

MOVIE is a multicohort phase I/II study examining the combination of anti-PD-L1 durvalumab (Durv; 1500 mg IV Q4W) plus anti-CTLA tremelimumab (Trem; 75 mg IV Q4W) with metronomic vinorelbine (MVino; 20-40 mg orally daily) in various AST resistant to conventional therapies. The primary objective of the phase I part was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for phase II (RP2D).

RESULTS

Among the 14 patients enrolled during phase I, including 13 women and 1 man, 9 had BC, 1 PC, 2 CC, and 2 miscellaneous cancers with high mutational loads. Median age was 53 years. A total of 12 patients were assessable for the dose-escalation part in which only one dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed [one neutropenia without fever, grade (G) 4]. Two (14.3%), four (28.6%), and four (28.6%) patients had G ≥3 adverse events (AEs) related to MVino, Durv, and Trem, respectively. Treatment-related events included mostly clinical AEs with asthenia (eight G2; three G3), colitis (one G2, one G3), diarrhea (one G3), nausea (two G2), dry skin (two G2), maculopapular rash (one G3), and hyperthyroidism (three G2). No toxic death was reported. Preliminary data showed one patient (CC) who presented a complete response and four patients with stable disease (SD).

CONCLUSIONS

MTD was not reached and dose level 2 (MVino 40 mg, Durv 1500 mg, Trem 75 mg) was selected as RP2D. The safety profile of the combination was manageable and consistent with previous reports of Trem + Durv or MVino. Phase II is currently ongoing in BC, PC, CC, HNC, and miscellaneous cohorts.

Harnessing the immune system by targeting immune checkpoints: Providing new hope for Oncotherapy

With the goal of harnessing the host's immune system to provide long-lasting remission and cures for various cancers, the advent of immunotherapy revolutionized the cancer therapy field. Among the current immunotherapeutic strategies, immune checkpoint blockades have greatly improved the overall survival rates in certain patient populations. Of note, CTLA4 and PD-1/PD-L1 are two major non-redundant immune checkpoints implicated in promoting cancer immune evasion, and ultimately lead to relapse. Antibodies or inhibitors targeting these two c+heckpoints have achieved some encouraging clinical outcomes. Further, beyond the canonical immune checkpoints, more inhibitory checkpoints have been identified. Herein, we will summarize recent progress in immune checkpoint blockade therapies, with a specific focus on key pre-clinical and clinical results of new immune checkpoint therapies for cancer. Given the crucial roles of immune checkpoint blockade in oncotherapy, drugs targeting checkpoint molecules expressed by both cancer and immune cells are in clinical trials, which will be comprehensively summarized in this review. Taken together, investigating combinatorial therapies targeting immune checkpoints expressed by cancer cells and immune cells will greatly improve immunotherapies that enhance host elimination of tumors.

Biomarkers related to immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy is an emerging cancer treatment. During treatment it is necessary to monitor the patient at all times and respond to any adverse reactions that may occur, such as immune-related adverse events and unconventional reactions. Biomarkers, the biochemical indicators that mark changes in the structure or function of systems, organs, tissues, and cells, may be used to predict and design treatment for such reactions. Anti-tumor immunotherapy biomarkers can be derived from the tumors themselves (e.g. negative regulatory molecules and dynamic changes in genome sequence) or from the immune system (e.g. peripheral blood cell population counts, various cytokines, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and intestinal microbes). The development of biomarkers is important for monitoring the effect of treatment, assessing the patient's response to ICIs, determining adverse reactions, and predicting the direction of disease development. In addition, organ toxicity and systemic events also have an impact on the therapeutic effect of ICIs.

Cancer immunotherapy by immune checkpoint blockade and its advanced application using bio-nanomaterials

Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Traditional approaches, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy have been the main cancer therapeutic modalities in recent years. Cancer immunotherapy is a novel therapeutic modality that potentiates the immune responses of patients against malignancy. Immune checkpoint proteins expressed on T cells or tumor cells serve as a target for inhibiting T cell overactivation, maintaining the balance between self-reactivity and autoimmunity. Tumors essentially hijack the immune checkpoint pathway in order to survive and spread. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are being developed as a result to reactivate the anti-tumor immune response. Recent advances in nanotechnology have contributed to the development of successful, safe, and efficient anticancer drug systems based on nanoparticles. Nanoparticle-based cancer immunotherapy overcomes numerous challenges and offers novel strategies for improving conventional immunotherapies. The fundamental and physiochemical properties of nanoparticles depend on various cancer therapeutic strategies, such as chemotherapeutics, nucleic acid-based treatments, photothermal therapy, and photodynamic agents. The review discusses the use of nanoparticles as carriers for delivering immune checkpoint inhibitors and their efficacy in cancer combination therapy.

Therapeutic advances in non-small cell lung cancer: Focus on clinical development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy

Lung cancer still contributes to nearly one-quarter cancer-related deaths in the past decades, despite the rapid development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The development and availability of comprehensive genomic profiling make the classification of NSCLC more precise and personalized. Most treatment decisions of advanced-stage NSCLC have been made based on the genetic features and PD-L1 expression of patients. For the past 2 years, more than 10 therapeutic strategies have been approved as first-line treatment for certain subgroups of NSCLC. However, some major challenges remain, including drug resistance and low rate of overall survival. Therefore, we discuss and review the therapeutic strategies of NSCLC, and focus on the development of targeted therapy and immunotherapy in advanced-stage NSCLC. Based on the latest guidelines, we provide an updated summary on the standard treatment for NSCLC. At last, we discussed several potential therapies for NSCLC. The development of new drugs and combination therapies both provide promising therapeutic effects on NSCLC.

Comprehensive analysis of PD-L1 in non-small cell lung cancer with emphasis on survival benefit, impact of driver mutation and histological types, and archival tissue

Background

The aim of the study was to assess programmed death‐ligand‐1 (PD‐L1) expression in different histological types and gene mutation status of patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

A total of 4062 pathology‐confirmed lung cancer patients were retrospectively screened at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from November 2010 to June 2017. There were 699 NSCLC patients with confirmed PD‐L1 expression level retrospectively enrolled for analysis.

Results

There was a trend of higher PD‐L1 expression in squamous cell carcinoma and adenosquamous cell carcinoma than in adenocarcinoma (p = 063). Significant higher PD‐L1 expression in EGFR wild‐type was noted (p < 0.001). No significant differences in PD‐L1 expression were found between ALK wild‐ and mutant types, but there seem was a trend of high PD‐L1 level noted in ALK mutation patients (p = 0.069). In EGFR mutation patients, a higher time to treatment failure (TTF) duration was observed in no PD‐L1 expression (p = 0.011). Longer tumor tissue storage time correlated with lower PD‐L1 expression in lung cancer (p < 0.001 for linear trend).

Conclusions

There were a trend or significant differences in PD‐L1 expression between different histological types in NSCLC, different EGFR and ALK status, and different tumor tissue storage time. A higher survival benefit was observed in no PD‐L1 expression than with PD‐L1 expression in adenocarcinoma, EGFR and ALK mutation patients. We recommend that PD‐L1 assay should be performed as early as possible if tissue is available.

Review of the recent clinical trials for PD-1/PD-L1 based lung cancer immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is known for its high mortality rate and prevalence in the world today. For decades, chemotherapy has been used as the main treatment for this cancer, but this has changed over time. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as programmed death 1 and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blocking agents have been assessed in numerous clinical trials as single or combination therapy and have shown overall promising results. Nevertheless, various challenges have been encountered, which cast doubts over this method.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an introduction to the mechanisms underlying the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Then, we discuss the latest results from the most leading-edge studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in different lines of lung cancer therapy (some of which have gained FDA approval), potential biomarkers, and major challenges of ICI therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, the standard of care (SoC) for lung cancer consists mostly of chemotherapeutics. With further studies and ongoing trials evaluating novel ICI therapy, FDA has been approving specific ICI therapeutics, including PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, for particular types of lung cancer. However, for ICIs to play a key role in SoC, we need to overcome the major challenges of ICI therapy.

PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: heterogeneity by pathologic types, tissue sampling and metastasis

Background

Programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) is a predictive marker of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy response. Intra-tumour heterogeneity of PD-L1 expression has been reported in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but comprehensive studies regarding the determination of PD-L1 expression in different materials are still lacking. Therefore, we aimed to compare PD-L1 expression in paired tumour samples and in different specimen types.

Methods

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, 35 biopsy specimens and 54 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples were performed PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing using the 22C3 assay. PD-L1 expression was evaluated using the tumour proportion score (TPS) and categorized into three levels: negative (TPS <1%), low expression (TPS 1–49%) and high expression (TPS ≥50%).

Results

A total of 1,002 resected NSCLC specimens, including 852 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 150 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs); 35 paired biopsy and resected samples; 54 paired cell block and biopsy samples; 53 paired blocks from the same resected tissue and 49 paired primary and metastatic lesion samples were included in this study. Interestingly, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more frequent in poorly differentiated subtypes than in well-differentiated subtypes in the ADC subgroup (P<0.001). In the SCC subgroup, high PD-L1 expression was significantly more associated with the nonkeratinizing type than the keratinizing type (P=0.001). PD-L1 expression differed between cell blocks and matched biopsy specimens (discordance rate =11.1%, 6/54) and between biopsy and matched resected specimens (discordance rate =31.4%, 11/35). PD-L1 expression differed between different paraffin blocks from the same resected specimen (discordance rate =35.8%, 19/53), and the discordance rate of PD-L1 expression between primary tumours and matched lymph node metastases was 28.6% (14/49).

Conclusions

Discordant PD-L1 expression is not uncommon in NSCLC and warrants additional studies and serious consideration when interpreting PD-L1 test results. Initial negative test results may lead to repeat PD-L1 testing in additional samples or the use of a different clone if necessary.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in elderly patients treated for a lung cancer: a narrative review

This article is a review of the literature concerning efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the elderly population. In the past decade, immunotherapy deeply changed the treatment paradigm of lung cancer in particular in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Thus, ICIs have successively demonstrated a survival benefit as single agent in second line, and moved in first line as monotherapy for patients with high programmed death protein 1 (PD-L1) expression or in combination with chemotherapy regardless PD-L1 expression. If patients aged 70 years or older represent up to half of our patients in clinical routine, elderly population is significantly under-represented in clinical trials. This leads to a lack of knowledge concerning efficacy and safety of ICIs in a population of patients with frequent comorbidities, organs dysfunctions and a potential immune-senescence due to age. In this review, we described available data evaluating efficacy and safety of ICI either as monotherapy or in combination in elderly population treated for a lung cancer. These data derived from clinical trial evaluating ICIs in aNSCLC as single agent or in combination with chemotherapy or anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4). As monotherapy, older patients seem to derive the same benefit from ICIs than younger patients with no excess of toxicities. In combination with chemotherapy, real impact of ICIs in elderly population is still unclear. Results of dedicated studies evaluating ICIs as single agent or in combination in elderly patients are needed.

How patients being treated for non-small cell lung cancer value treatment benefit despite side effects

PURPOSE

To describe symptoms and side effects experienced by patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), assess how patients allocate sensations (i.e. symptoms or side effects) to either the disease or its treatment, and evaluate how patients balance side effects with treatment benefits.

METHODS

Qualitative sub-studies were conducted as part of two clinical trials in patients treated for advanced NSCLC (AURA [NCT01802632]; ARCTIC [NCT02352948]).

RESULTS

Interviews were conducted with 23 patients and 19 patients in the AURA and ARCTIC sub-studies, respectively. The most commonly experienced symptoms/side effects were respiratory (81% of patients), digestive (76%), pain and discomfort (76%), energy-related (71%), and sensory (62%). Patients identified a sensation as a treatment side effect if they had not experienced it before, if there was a temporal link between the sensation and receipt of treatment, and/or if their doctors consistently told or asked them about it in relation to side effects. Themes that emerged when patients talked about their cancer treatment and its side effects related to the serious nature of their advanced disease and their treatment expectations. Patients focused on treatment benefits, wanting a better quality of life, being hopeful, not really having a choice, and not thinking about side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

In these two qualitative sub-studies, patients with advanced NSCLC valued the benefits of their treatment regardless of side effects that they experienced. Patients weighed their options against the seriousness of their disease and expressed their willingness to tolerate their side effects in return for receiving continued treatment benefits.

From Melanoma Development to RNA-Modified Dendritic Cell Vaccines: Highlighting the Lessons From the Past

Although melanoma remains the deadliest skin cancer, the current treatment has not resulted in the desired outcomes. Unlike chemotherapy, immunotherapy has provided more tolerable approaches and revolutionized cancer therapy. Although dendritic cell-based vaccines have minor side effects, the undesirable response rates of traditional approaches have posed questions about their clinical translation. The immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment can be the underlying reason for their low response rates. Immune checkpoints and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase have been implicated in the induction of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Growing evidence indicates that the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Protein kinase B (PKB) (PI3K/AKT) pathways, as the main oncogenic pathways of melanoma, can upregulate the tumoral immune checkpoints, like programmed death-ligand 1. This study briefly represents the main oncogenic pathways of melanoma and highlights the cross-talk between these oncogenic pathways with indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase, tumoral immune checkpoints, and myeloid-derived suppressor cells. Moreover, this study sheds light on a novel tumor antigen on melanoma, which has substantial roles in tumoral immune checkpoints expression, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase secretion, and stimulating the oncogenic pathways. Finally, this review collects the lessons from the previous unsuccessful trials and integrates their lessons with new approaches in RNA-modified dendritic cell vaccines. Unlike traditional approaches, the advances in single-cell RNA-sequencing techniques and RNA-modified dendritic cell vaccines along with combined therapy of the immune checkpoint inhibitors, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase inhibitor, and RNA-modified dendritic cell-based vaccine can overcome these auto-inductive loops and pave the way for developing robust dendritic cell-based vaccines with the most favorable response rate and the least side effects.

The progress and challenge of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy in treating non-small cell lung cancer

The use of programmed cell-death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors is the standard therapy for the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In contrast to current traditional treatments such as chemotherapy or radiotherapy, anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments can directly attenuate tumour-mediated exhaustion and effectively modulate the host anti-tumour immune response in vivo. In addition, compared with traditional therapy, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor monotherapy can significantly prolong survival without obvious side effects in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. Ideally, several biomarkers could be used to monitor the safety and effectiveness of anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 treatments; however, the current lack of optimal prognostic markers remains a widespread limitation and challenge for further clinical applications, as does the possibility of immune-related adverse events and drug resistance. In this review, we aimed to summarise the latest progress in anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 treatment of advanced NSCLC, worldwide, including in China. An exploration of underlying biomarker identification and future challenges will be discussed in this article to facilitate translational studies in cancer immunotherapy.

Ocular side effects of checkpoint inhibitors

The incidence and impact of ocular side effects in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are not clearly defined. We reviewed prospective phase III clinical trials of checkpoint inhibitors applied in lung cancer, renal cell cancer, and melanoma. Case reports of the occurrence of ocular toxicities in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors were also included. Of the 35 articles corresponding to phase III clinical trials with checkpoint inhibitors, ocular toxicity was described in four. Forty-six clinical cases of ocular toxicity after therapy with checkpoint inhibitors have been reported. The most frequently described ocular toxicities are uveitis, inflammatory orbital disease, and alterations of the ocular surface. Ocular toxicity is underestimated in checkpoint inhibitors clinical trials. Early ophthalmic examination and treatment with corticosteroids may improve the visual prognosis in these patients.

A Review of Monoclonal Antibody-Based Treatments in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most common types of lung cancer worldwide. It metastasizes rapidly and has a poor prognosis. The first-line treatment for most patients is a combination of chemotherapy and radiation. In many subjects, using targeted treatments alongside chemoradiation has shown a better outcome in terms of progression and quality of life for patients. These targeted treatments include small biological inhibiting molecules and monoclonal antibodies. In this review, we have assessed studies focused upon the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Some therapies are approved, such as bevacizumab and atezolizumab, while some are still in clinical trials, such as ficlatuzumab and ipilimumab, and others have been rejected due to inadequate disease control, such as figitumumab.

Immune checkpoint: The novel target for antitumor therapy

Inhibitory checkpoint molecules include programmed cell death-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1), cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), human endogenous retrovirus-H Long terminal repeat-associating 2 (HHLA2), B7 homolog 4 protein (B7-H4), T cell membrane protein-3 (TIM-3) and Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), which are up-regulated during tumorigenesis. These pathways are essential to down-regulate the immune system by blocking the activation of T cells. In recent years, immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) against PD-1, PD-L1, CTLA-4 or TIM-3 has made remarkable progress in the clinical application, revolutionizing the treatment of malignant tumors and improving patients' overall survival. However, the efficacy of ICBs in some patients does not seem to be good enough, and more immune-related adverse events (irAEs) will inevitably occur. Therefore, biomarkers research provides practical guidance for clinicians to identify patients who are most likely to benefit from or exhibit resistance to particular types of immune checkpoint therapy. There are two points in general. On the one hand, given the spatial and temporal differential expression of immune checkpoint molecules during immunosuppression process, it is essential to understand their mechanisms to design the most effective individualized therapy. On the other hand, due to the lack of potent immune checkpoints, it is necessary to combine them with novel biomarkers (such as exosomes and ctDNA) and other anticancer modalities (such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy).

Expression and Clinical Significance of CMTM6 in Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

Chemokine-like factor (CKLF)-like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing protein 6 (CMTM6) is a ubiquitously expressed protein, which plays a critical role in the stability of programmed death-ligand 1. However, the expression of CMTM6 in a variety of cancer pathological tissues is not clear. Therefore, 109 patients who were diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and underwent surgical resection were included in this retrospective study. The expression of CMTM6 in NSCLC patients' tissue samples were measured by immunohistochemistry and the results showed that 60 cases (55.05%) had high CMTM6 expression. The chi-square test showed that the expression of CMTM6 in NSCLC was significantly related to smoking (p = 0.017) and differentiation (p = 0.029). The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis suggested that the high expression of CMTM6 was associated with better prognosis of NSCLC patients. The univariate analysis revealed that the prognosis of NSCLC patients was correlated with T stage (p = 0.042), lymph node metastasis (p = 0.007), metastasis (p = 0.009), pathological differentiation (p = 0.001), and CMTM6 expression level (p < 0.001). In addition, multivariate analysis indicated that CMTM6 was an independent prognostic factor for NSCLC patients (p = 0.002). CMTM6 expression may have the potential to be a biomarker assisting in disease monitoring and prognosis in NSCLC.

Safety, Antitumor Activity, and Pharmacokinetics of Toripalimab, a Programmed Cell Death 1 Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase 1 Trial

IMPORTANCE

Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies have shown substantial survival benefit in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Toripalimab is a promising and practicable PD-1 antibody; however, its performance in NSCLC has not been established.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the safety, antitumor activity, and pharmacokinetics of toripalimab in patients with advanced NSCLC and to evaluate the utility of JS311, a novel PD ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This single-arm open-label phase 1 trial enrolled 41 patients with advanced NSCLC that had progressed after at least 3 lines of therapy between September 21, 2017, and June 5, 2018, with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 14.9 (3.2-22.5) months and included a cohort study comparing JS311 with other PD-L1 IHC assays that included 280 NSCLC specimens collected from January 1, 2016, to May 21, 2018. Data collection was conducted from September 21, 2017, to September 27, 2019, and analysis was conducted from September 27, 2019, to December 30, 2019.

EXPOSURE

Enrolled patients were administered a single dose of toripalimab, under 2 manufacturing processes and scales (200 L and 500 L), for safety and pharmacokinetic analysis within 28 days, followed by subsequent multidose infusions every 2 weeks. PD-L1 expression was determined by IHC with JS311, comparing its results with results from 22C3, 28-8, and SP263 simultaneously.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves, and continuous variables compared by t test or Mann-Whitney test. Correlations between PD-L1 IHC antibodies were evaluated by Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients (29 [70.7%] men) with a median (interquartile range) age of 59 (53 to 63) years who experienced disease progression following chemotherapy were included. The most common treatment-related adverse events were rash (6 [14.6%]), increased amylase level (5 [12.2%]), and increased aspartate aminotransferase level (5 [12.2%]). In 35 patients included in the pharmacokinetic analysis, drug exposure and area under curve after 1 dose was similar under both manufacturing processes and scales (mean [SD] for 200-L group: 12 465.28 [4128.17] hour × μg/mL; for 500-L group: 12 331.42 [2472.58] hour × μg/ml). In 28 patients included in the response and survival analysis, the median PFS and OS were 2.8 (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.6) months and 13.8 months (95% CI, 10.0 months to not reached), respectively. Stratified by PD-L1 tumor proportion score of at least 50%, 1% to 49%, and less 1%, median PFS rates were 11.2 months (95% CI, 2.3 months to not evaluable), 2.3 (95% CI, 1.7 to 2.7) months, and 2.8 (95% CI, 2.7 to 4.6) months, respectively. A total of 4 anti-PD-L1 IHC antibodies were compared during PD-L1 staining, using 280 NSCLC specimens. The consistency rates between the 4 antibodies were 80.8% to 89.5% (ρ, 0.619 to 0.790) and 93.3% to 95.5% (ρ, 0.691 to 0.773), with PD-L1 tumor proportion scores of 1% and 50% as cut points, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, toripalimab exhibited encouraging antitumor activity and manageable safety profiles among patients with heavily treated NSCLC. The novel PD-L1 IHC antibody JS311 was highly consistent with previously verified PD-L1 IHC assays.

The changing landscape of stage III lung cancer: a literature review

INTRODUCTION

The treatment of stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains challenging and associated with overall poor outcomes. Since seminal studies in the early 90s introduced concurrent chemo-radiotherapy as standard of care for treatment of this disease, no major advances have been introduced in this landscape. Both radiation dose escalation and neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy strategies were unsuccessful to improve the survival over standard of care radiation dose and chemotherapy schedule: five-year overall survival (OS) ranging from 15-20%. However, in 2017 the PACIFIC Trial demonstrated that the addition of consolidative immune checkpoint inhibitor durvalumab for 1 year led to superior progression-free survival (PFS) and 3-year overall survival with no significant increase in toxicity compared to placebo in patients who achieved disease control with concurrent chemo-RT.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the treatment evolution of stage III NSCLC over the past decades, discusses current standard of care strategies, and highlights potential future directions for the management of this condition.

EXPERT OPINION

Ongoing trials incorporating upfront checkpoint inhibitors with radiotherapy will answer whether adding checkpoint inhibitors to chemotherapy or substituting them for chemotherapy altogether will improve long-term outcome.

Tumor-induced neurogenesis and immune evasion as targets of innovative anti-cancer therapies

Normal cells are hijacked by cancer cells forming together heterogeneous tumor masses immersed in aberrant communication circuits that facilitate tumor growth and dissemination. Besides the well characterized angiogenic effect of some tumor-derived factors; others, such as BDNF, recruit peripheral nerves and leukocytes. The neurogenic switch, activated by tumor-derived neurotrophins and extracellular vesicles, attracts adjacent peripheral fibers (autonomic/sensorial) and neural progenitor cells. Strikingly, tumor-associated nerve fibers can guide cancer cell dissemination. Moreover, IL-1β, CCL2, PGE2, among other chemotactic factors, attract natural immunosuppressive cells, including T regulatory (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and M2 macrophages, to the tumor microenvironment. These leukocytes further exacerbate the aberrant communication circuit releasing factors with neurogenic effect. Furthermore, cancer cells directly evade immune surveillance and the antitumoral actions of natural killer cells by activating immunosuppressive mechanisms elicited by heterophilic complexes, joining cancer and immune cells, formed by PD-L1/PD1 and CD80/CTLA-4 plasma membrane proteins. Altogether, nervous and immune cells, together with fibroblasts, endothelial, and bone-marrow-derived cells, promote tumor growth and enhance the metastatic properties of cancer cells. Inspired by the demonstrated, but restricted, power of anti-angiogenic and immune cell-based therapies, preclinical studies are focusing on strategies aimed to inhibit tumor-induced neurogenesis. Here we discuss the potential of anti-neurogenesis and, considering the interplay between nervous and immune systems, we also focus on anti-immunosuppression-based therapies. Small molecules, antibodies and immune cells are being considered as therapeutic agents, aimed to prevent cancer cell communication with neurons and leukocytes, targeting chemotactic and neurotransmitter signaling pathways linked to perineural invasion and metastasis.

Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with camrelizumab: data derived from a multicenter phase 2 trial

Background

Association of immune-related adverse events with tumor response has been reported. Reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (RCCEP) is the most common adverse event related to camrelizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, but lack of comprehensive analyses. In this study, we conducted comprehensive analyses on RCCEP in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with camrelizumab monotherapy.

Methods

Data were derived from a Chinese nationwide, multicenter phase 2 trial of camrelizumab in pre-treated advanced HCC. The occurrence, clinicopathological characteristics, and prognostic value of RCCEP were analyzed.

Results

With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, 145 of the 217 camrelizumab-treated patients (66.8%) experienced RCCEP (all grade 1 or 2). RCCEP occurred on the skin surface, mainly on the skin surface of head, face, and trunk. RCCEP could be divided into 5 types including “red-nevus-like,” “pearl-like,” “mulberry-like,” “patch-like,” and “tumor-like,” according to the morphological features. RCCEP biopsy and pathology showed capillary endothelial hyperplasia and capillary hyperplasia in dermis. Significant association between RCCEP occurrence with higher objective response rate was observed (19.3% vs. 5.6%; one-sided p = 0.0044). Compared with those without RCCEP, patients with RCCEP had prolonged progression-free survival (median PFS; 3.2 months vs. 1.9 months; one-sided p < 0.0001) and overall survival (median OS; 17.0 months vs. 5.8 months; one-sided p < 0.0001). In multivariable analyses, the development of RCCEP was significantly associated with prolonged PFS and OS after adjusting for baseline covariates. In addition, the landmark analyses of PFS and OS were consistent with the unadjusted analysis.

Conclusions

RCCEP occurred on the skin surface and was an immune response of skin capillary endothelial cells. RCCEP occurrence positively associated with outcomes of camrelizumab in advanced HCC.

Programmed death-ligand 1 expression profiling in thymic epithelial cell tumors: Clinicopathological features and quantitative digital image analyses

OBJECTIVES

Whether the extent of expression of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is clinically significant remains uncertain, although immuno-oncological features have been studied in thymic epithelial cell tumors (TETs). We investigated the histological features of PD-L1 expression in TETs, and assessed PD-L1 expression using digital image analysis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Participants comprised 66 patients with TET who underwent surgical resection between 2001 and 2016. We calculated tumor cell-positive ratio as total proportion score (TPS) with immunohistochemistry using SP263 anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody. PD-L1 expression was also quantified using digital image analysis of whole-slide images. We evaluated the relationship between conventional visual TPS using optical microscopy (TPS-V) and TPS from digital image analysis (TPS-IA). We further classified all TETs into high or low PD-L1 expression groups and assessed the clinical significance of PD-L1 expression level using TPS-V and TPS-IA.

RESULTS

WHO histological types were Type A (n = 8), AB (n = 18), B1 (n = 5), B2 (n = 16), B3 (n = 6), metaplastic thymoma (n = 2), and thymic carcinoma (TC) (n = 11). Median TPS-Vs were 2%, 2%, 10 %, 65 %, 90 %, 1%, and 20 %, respectively. TPS-IAs correlated with TPS-Vs in TETs overall and in thymomas, but not in TCs. PD-L1 expression levels in TETs differed significantly among histological types. Whether TPS-V or TPS-IA were used, the PD-L1^high group included more cases of the more aggressive histological types. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was shorter in the PD-L1^high group than in the PD-L1^low group in thymoma using TPS-IA, whereas RFS of the PD-L1^high group was shorter in all TETs using TPS-V.

CONCLUSION

PD-L1 expression levels depended on the histological type of TET. Extensive PD-L1 expression in TETs was associated with poor prognosis. Digital image analysis is feasible for evaluating PD-L1 expression in TETs and might offer clinically relevant features of thymomas.

Epigenomics-Guided Drug Development: Recent Advances in Solving the Cancer Treatment "jigsaw puzzle"

The human epigenome plays a key role in determining cellular identity and eventually function. Drug discovery undertakings have focused mainly on the role of genomics in carcinogenesis, with the focus turning to the epigenome recently. Drugs targeting DNA and histone modifications are under development with some such as 5-azacytidine, decitabine, vorinostat, and panobinostat already approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). This expert review offers a critical analysis of the epigenomics-guided drug discovery and development and the opportunities and challenges for the next decade. Importantly, the coupling of epigenetic editing techniques, such as clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-CRISPR-associated protein-9 (Cas9) and APOBEC-coupled epigenetic sequencing (ACE-seq) with epigenetic drug screens, will allow the identification of small-molecule inhibitors or drugs able to reverse epigenetic changes responsible for many diseases. In addition, concrete and sustainable innovation in cancer treatment ought to integrate epigenome targeting drugs with classic therapies such as chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

PD-L1 expression in malignant pleural effusion samples and its correlation with oncogene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) is currently widely used for selection of immune therapies in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Most of samples for PD-L1 expression were obtained from tumor tissue. However, the feasible of malignant pleural effusion (MPE) cytological samples for PD-L1 detection is poorly reported. And the correlation between oncogene mutations and PD-L1 expression based on high-throughput sequencing is rarely studied.

Methods

NSCLC MPE cytological samples and partially paired tumor tissue from our institution analyzed for PD-L1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using the clone SP263 pharmDx kit and evaluated genomic aberrations in all patients using next generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

One hundred and twenty-three MPE cell blocks and 29 paired tumor tissue were successfully tested for PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% were seen in 18.7% (23/123) of all samples. The accordance of PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue and MPE samples was 86.2% (50% as cut-off value). PD-L1 TPS ≥50% tumors were significantly associated with EGFR wild-type (P=0.007), but, no correlation between other genes and PD-L1 expression. A trend of longer overall survival (OS) was observed in patients with PD-L1 TPS <50% than those TPS ≥50% (20.0 vs. 13.8 months, P=0.057). No difference of tumor mutational burden (TMB) was observed between patients with PD-L1 ≥50% and <50% (8.2/MB and 7.7/MB, P=0.47).

Conclusions

Our results suggest that cytological material is feasible for PD-L1 IHC analysis. Gene alterations could partially contribute to select the samples that with different PD-L1 expression. No correlation between the PD-L1 expression and TMB.

PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Therapy in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Status and Future Directions

This article summarizes the latest clinical applications of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade therapy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) worldwide and in China, reporting the bottlenecks related to the use of this therapy in clinic. An exploration of the underlying mechanism of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade therapy and biomarker identification will maximize the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced NSCLC and facilitate bedside‐to‐bench studies in cancer immunotherapy.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become one of the most promising approaches in the field of cancer therapy. Unlike the current therapies that target tumor cells, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or targeted therapy, ICIs directly restore the exhausted host antitumor immune responses mediated by the tumors. Among multiple immune modulators identified, the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1)/programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD‐L1) axis leading to the exhaustion of T‐cell immunity in chronic infections and tumors has been widely investigated. Therefore, blocking antibodies targeting PD‐1 or PD‐L1 have been developed and approved for the treatment of various advanced cancers, including non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC), making them the most successful ICIs. Compared with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade therapy significantly improves the durable response rate and prolongs long‐term survival with limited adverse effects in both monotherapy and combination therapy for advanced NSCLC. However, extensive challenges exist for further clinical applications, such as a small fraction of benefit population, primary and acquired resistance, the lack of predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and treatment‐related adverse effects. In this article, we summarize the latest clinical applications of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade therapy in advanced NSCLC worldwide, as well as in China, and discuss the bottlenecks related to the use of this therapy in clinical practice. An exploration of the underlying mechanism of PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade therapy and biomarker identification will maximize the application of ICIs in advanced NSCLC and facilitate bedside‐to‐bench studies in cancer immunotherapy as well.

Implications for Practice.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD‐1) and programmed cell death protein ligand 1 (PD‐L1) display apparent benefits for the treatment of advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the clinical applications of these therapies are challenged by the limited benefit population with additional high economic burden and adverse events. This review discusses the bottlenecks of ICI therapy in clinical practice and provides appropriate guidance in the development of predictive biomarkers, the establishment of the criteria for combining PD‐1/PD‐L1 blockade therapy with the existing therapies, and the management of adverse events observed both in monotherapy and combination therapy, which will help maximize the applications of ICIs in advanced NSCLC.

The clinical outcomes of undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS): A single-centre experience of two decades with the assessment of PD-L1 expressions

INTRODUCTION

Little is known about undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) because of the low incidence and heterogeneous diagnosis of sarcoma. We investigated the oncologic outcomes of patients with UPS in a real-practice setting in association with adjuvant treatments and assessment of PD-L1 expression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who were diagnosed with UPS in Asan Medical Center between January 1995 and December 2016. PD-L1 staining was performed using formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumour tissue by immunohistochemistry, and positive PD-L1 expression was defined as staining in ≥1% of tumour cells. The PD-L1 H-score, which was calculated for statistical analysis as intensity (0-3) multiplied by proportion (0-100), ranged from 0 to 300.

RESULTS

Of 205 patients included in our analysis, 176 underwent a curative-intent operation for localised disease. The five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate of resected UPS patients was 54.3%. Administration of adjuvant therapy did not overcome the poor prognostic factors such as primary tumour size (>5 cm) and locations, especially the abdomen and pelvis. The PD-L1 analysis was available for 114 patients, and 83 (72.8%) showed immunoreactivity for PD-L1 with weak (44/83), intermediate (29/83), and strong (10/83) staining intensities. The positive PD-L1 expression seemed to be associated with prolonged DFS, though no statistical significance was observed.

CONCLUSION

Complete surgical resection was the most important UPS treatment strategy, and adjuvant radio- or chemotherapy was insufficient to improve survival. Our results raise the possibility that immunotherapy could be a breakthrough in the treatment of UPS patients.

Therapeutic landscape of metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in Canada in 2020

Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada and remains associated with high mortality. Nevertheless, recent advances in the fields of immuno-oncology and precision medicine have led to significant improvements in clinical outcome in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc). Those improvements were facilitated by a greater understanding of the biologic classification of nsclc, which catalyzed discoveries of novel therapies. Here, we present a comprehensive review of the recent avalanche of practice-changing trials in metastatic nsclc, and we offer an approach to the management of this disease from a Canadian perspective. We begin with an overview of the pathologic and molecular characterization of metastatic nsclc. Next, we review the indications for currently approved immune checkpoint inhibitors, and we provide an approach to the management of disease with a driver mutation. Finally, we address future avenues in both diagnostics and therapeutics for patients with advanced and metastatic nsclc.

Use of Programmed Death Receptor-1 and/or Programmed Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors for the Treatment of Brain Metastasis of Lung Cancer

The central nervous system (CNS) is regarded as an immune privileged environment; however, changes in the neuroimmunology paradigm have led to an increased interest in systematic immunotherapy in lung cancer therapy. The presence of the lymphatic system in the CNS as well as the physiological and biochemical changes in the blood–brain barrier in the tumor microenvironment suggests that immunocytes are fully capable of entering and exiting the CNS. Emerging clinical data suggest that inhibitors of programmed death receptor-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) can stimulate surrounding T cells and thus have antitumor effects in the CNS. For example, PD-1 antibody (pembrolizumab) monotherapy has displayed a 20–30% encephalic response rate in patients with brain metastases from malignant melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. Combined application of nivolumab and ipilimumab anti-PD-1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 showed an encephalic response rate of 55% in patients with brain metastases of melanoma. Further evidence is required to verify these response rates and identify the mechanisms of curative effects and drug tolerance. While regional treatments such as whole-brain radiosurgery, stereotactic radiosurgery, and brain surgery remain the mainstream, PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors display potential decreased neurotoxic effects. To date, five drugs have been approved for use in patients with encephalic metastases of lung carcinoma: the anti-PD-1 drugs, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, and the anti-PD-L1 agents, atezolizumab, durvalumab, and avelumab. In recent years, clinical trials of inhibitors in combination with other drugs to treat brain metastasis have also emerged. This review summarizes the biological principles of PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for brain metastasis of lung cancer, as well as ongoing clinical trials to explore unmet needs.

PD-L1 Testing in Gastric Cancer by the Combined Positive Score of the 22C3 PharmDx and SP263 Assay with Clinically Relevant Cut-offs

Purpose

We provide a comparison between 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assay, for evaluating programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients.

Materials and Methods

The PD-L1 immunohistochemistry by 22C3 pharmDx and SP263 assays was performed in the center of the tumor (CT) and invasive margin (IM) in 379 GC tissues using tissue microarrays and interpreted as combined positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS). Of the total samples, 55 samples were independently reviewed by five pathologists.

Results

The two assays showed a high correlation in both the CPS and TPS. At a CPS ≥ 1 cut-off, 219 (57.8%) and 231 (60.9%) GCs were positive for PD-L1 with the 22C3 and SP263 assays, and at ≥ 10 cut-off, 37 (9.8%) and 36 (9.5%) GCs were positive, respectively. The overall percent agreement (OPA) was greater than 90% with CPS ≥ 1 and ≥ 10 cut-offs, and TPS ≥ 1% and ≥ 10% cut-offs. There was higher OPA between the two assays with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (99.2%) than ≥ 1 (94.7%). The percent agreement between the CT and IM was higher with a CPS cut-off ≥ 10 (92.9%) than ≥ 1 (77.6%). Patient with positive expression at CPS ≥ 5 cut-off had a significantly better outcomes in both assays. Interobserver variability among five pathologists was higher than the assay variability.

Conclusion

Two assays for PD-L1 expression in GC showed high agreement. These results provide guidance for selecting eligible patients with GC for pembrolizumab treatment.

Comparative evaluation of bolus and fractionated administration modalities for two antibody-cytokine fusions in immunocompetent tumor-bearing mice

Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins are being considered as biopharmaceuticals for cancer immunotherapy. Tumor-homing cytokine fusions typically display an improved therapeutic activity compared to the corresponding unmodified cytokine products, but toxicity profiles at equivalent doses are similar, since side effects are mainly driven by the cytokine concentration in blood. In order to explore avenues to harness the therapeutic potential of antibody-cytokine fusions while decreasing potential toxicity, we compared bolus and fractionated administration modalities for two tumor-targeting antibody-cytokine fusion proteins based on human interleukin-2 (IL2) and murine tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (i.e., L19-hIL2 and L19-mTNF) in two murine immunocompetent mouse models of cancer (F9 and C51). A comparative quantitative biodistribution analysis with radio-labeled protein preparations revealed that a fractionated administration of L19-hIL2 could deliver comparable product doses to the tumor with decreased product concentration in blood and normal organs, compared to bolus injection. By contrast, L19-mTNF (a product that causes a selective vascular shutdown in the tumor) accumulated most efficiently after bolus injection. Fractionated schedules allowed the safe administration of a cumulative dose of L19-mTNF, which was 2.5-times higher than the lethal dose for bolus injection. Dose fractionation led to a prolonged tumor growth inhibition for F9 teratocarcinomas, but not for C51 colorectal tumors, which responded best to bolus injection. Thus, dose fractionation may have different outcomes for the same antibody-cytokine product in different biological contexts.

The New Immunotherapy Combinations in the Treatment of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Reality and Perspectives

BACKGROUND

In the recent years, immunotherapeutics and specifically immunecheckpoints inhibitors have marked a significant shift in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), allowing us to use immunotherapeutics alone or combined with chemotherapy for a great subset of patients. However, new interesting approaches are being presently investigated, markedly immunotherapy combinations, that is, the use of two or more immunotherapeutics combined.

METHODS

In particular, the combination of anti-PD-1 nivolumab and anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab has already provided groundbreaking positive results in the advanced NSCLC and other combinations are currently under investigation.

RESULTS

Therefore, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art review about immunotherapy combination, along with suggestions about future directions. A comprehensive literature search was carried out to identify eligible studies from MEDLINE/PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov.

CONCLUSION

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab represent the most promising immunotherapy combination for the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients; safety, tolerability and efficacy of new immunotherapeutics (in monotherapy and in immunotherapy combinations) must be further assessed in future studies.

Drug resistance in cancer immunotherapy: new strategies to improve checkpoint inhibitor therapies

Recent advances in pharmacological immune modulation against tumor cells has dramatically changed the paradigm of cancer treatment. Checkpoint inhibitor therapy is a form of cancer immunotherapy already in clinical setting but also under active basic and clinical investigation. Nevertheless, some patients are primary unresponsive or develop ulterior resistance to these family of drugs. This review aims to update the basic molecular mechanism of resistance as well as the current strategies for checkpoint inhibitor selection in order to propose new approaches to individualize the use of these novel therapies.

Cancer immunotherapy with immunoadjuvants, nanoparticles, and checkpoint inhibitors: Recent progress and challenges in treatment and tracking response to immunotherapy

Chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation are accepted as the preferred treatment modalities against cancer, but in recent years the use of immunotherapeutic approaches has gained prominence as the fourth treatment modality in cancer patients. In this approach, a patient's innate and adaptive immune systems are activated to achieve clearance of occult cancerous cells. In this review, we discuss the preclinical and clinical immunotherapeutic (e.g., immunoadjuvants (in-situ vaccines, oncolytic viruses, CXC antagonists, device activated agents), organic and inorganic nanoparticles, and checkpoint blockade) that are under investigation for cancer therapy and diagnostics. Additionally, the innovations in imaging of immune cells for tracking therapeutic responses and limitations (e.g., toxicity, inefficient immunomodulation, etc.) are described. Existing data suggest that if immune therapy is optimized, it can be a real and potentially paradigm-shifting cancer treatment frontier.

Progress in PD-1/PD-L1 pathway inhibitors: From biomacromolecules to small molecules

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is a negative immune checkpoint pathway that inhibit immune responses, and upregulation of this pathway has implications in many malignancies. The search for effective PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has been at the forefront of academic and industrial medicinal chemistry, leading to 16 clinical candidates and the launch of six monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) drugs. Despite the unprecedented success achieved, the limitations of mAbs, including poor tissue and tumor penetration, long half-life time, poor oral bioavailability, and expensive production costs, impelled researchers to turn their attention to the development of peptide-based and non-peptide small-molecule inhibitors as potential alternatives or supplements to mAbs. However, no small-molecule inhibitors have been approved so far, indicating a challenging process of developing marketable small-molecule PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapeutics. This review will summarize and provide insight into recent advances in the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway, including its structural basis and biology, along with the crystal structures with mAbs, peptides and small molecules. We place great emphasis on design strategies underlying reported small-molecule inhibitors and attempt to provide an outlook at the future of small-molecule PD-1/PD-L1inhibitors.

Clinicopathologic Significance and Immunogenomic Analysis of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) Expression in Thymic Epithelial Tumors

Objectives: Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare malignant tumors that exhibit heterogeneous histology and clinical behavior. As immune check point inhibitors, drugs targeting anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have shown remarkable results against many cancers; thus, the importance of PD-1/PD-L1 immunohistochemistry as a predictive or prognostic biomarker has grown. However, limited data on PD-L1 and PD-1 expression in TETs have been reported; moreover, these results have been variable. Here, we examined the expression of PD-1/PD-L1 proteins in TETs and analyzed the clinicopathologic significance of this expression.

Patients and Methods: A tissue microarray was constructed using 368 samples of TETs, each in triplicate. Immunohistochemistry for PD-L1 (SP263 assay) and PD-1 in TETs and CD8 in thymic carcinoma (TC) was performed; next, correlations with clinicopathologic characteristics were analyzed. PD-L1^high was designated as ≥50% of tumor proportion score; PD-1^high and CD8^high were defined as ≥5% and 1% of tumoral immune cells, respectively.

Results: The cohort consisted of 308 patients with thymomas and 60 patients with TC. PD-L1 positivity was identified in 90.6% (328/362, ≥1%) of TETs, PD-1 expression of intra-/peritumoral T cells was identified in 53.6% (194/362) of TETs and CD8 positivity was identified in 11% (7/60, ≥1%) of TC. Of the 362 patients, 141 (39.0%) exhibited high PD-L1 expression (PD-L1^high). The PD-L1^high thymoma group was correlated with high Masaoka-Koga stage (p < 0.001), type B3 histology (p < 0.001), and myasthenia gravis (p < 0.001). This group exhibited poor overall survival (OS, p = 0.003, log-rank) and worse disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.042, log-rank). No survival differences were detected between PD-L1^high and PD-L1^low groups in TC. Additionally, there was no correlation between PD-1 expression and survival in patients with TETs. Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-L1^high expression was an independent poor prognostic factor (p = 0.047, HR 2.087, 95% CI, 1.009–4.318) in thymomas.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the largest study on TETs published in English literature. This study provides useful information regarding the prognosis of and potential therapeutic options for patients with TETs.

NK Cell-Fc Receptors Advance Tumor Immunotherapy

Immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of cancer patients. Among immunotherapeutic approaches, antibodies targeting immune checkpoint inhibitors Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) are approved for treatment of metastatic melanoma and are in clinical trials for a variety of other cancers. The contribution of Natural Killer (NK) cells to the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors is becoming more evident. Enhancing both T and NK cell function in cancer could result in a robust and durable response. Along with the ability to directly kill tumor cells, NK cells can mediate antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) given the expression of Fragment Crystallizable (Fc) receptors. Promising novel antibodies modified with improved Fc-receptor-mediated functions or Fc-engagers to kill target cells have been tested in pre-clinical models with considerable results. Combination therapies with immune-therapeutic antibodies with enhancers of NK-cell Fc-receptor-mediated function can be exploited to increase the efficacy of these antibodies. Herein, I discuss possible strategies to improve the success of immunotherapy by boosting NK cell function.

Treatment patterns and overall survival in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer in a real-world, US setting

Aim: To conduct a retrospective analysis of electronic medical record data to understand real-world treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Materials & methods: We included n = 9656 adults (≥18 years) with metastatic NSCLC and no prior therapy. Data from 1 January 2013 to 31 January 2017 were analyzed. Results: Carboplatin plus paclitaxel was the most common first-line therapy (18.6%), and nivolumab was the most common second- (31.0%) and third-line (38.4%) therapy; 26.7% of all patients were untreated. Median OS from initial metastatic diagnosis was 11.1 months (95% CI: 10.8-11.5). Second-line immunotherapy extended OS by over 3 months versus second-line chemotherapy. Conclusion: Platinum-based therapy was the most common first-line therapy, and immunotherapy was the most common second- and third-line therapy. Median OS of patients with metastatic NSCLC was <1 year.

Immune Checkpoint Blockade: The New Frontier in Cancer Treatment

Immune checkpoint blockers have revolutionized cancer treatment in recent years. These agents are now approved for the treatment of several malignancies, including melanoma, squamous and non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Studies have demonstrated the significant impact of immunotherapy versus standard of care on patient outcomes, including durable response and extended survival. The use of immunotherapy-based combination therapy has been shown to further extend duration of response and survival. Immunotherapies function through modulation of the immune system, which can lead to immune-mediated adverse events (imAEs). These include a range of dermatologic, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and hepatic toxicities, as well as other less common inflammatory events. ImAEs are typically low grade and manageable when identified early and treated with appropriate measures. Identifying the right patient for the right therapy will become more important as new immunotherapies and immunotherapy-based combinations are approved and costs of cancer care continue to rise.

Correlation analysis of mRNA expression and prognosis of hOGG1 gene polymorphism in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Level of mRNA expression and gene polymorphism of human 8-hydroxyguanine glycosidase 1 (hOGG1) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were investigated. A polymorphism analysis of hOGG1 gene rs1052133 locus in 182 NSCLC patients (NSCLC group) surgically treated in Xiang Yang No. 1 People's Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine from January 2008 to January 2012 and 200 healthy individuals (control group) was performed. The expression level of hOGG1 was compared between cancer tissues and adjacent tissues of NSCLC patients, and the survival rate was analyzed. The expression level of hOGG1 was significantly higher in cancer tissues than that in adjacent tissues (P<0.001). Taqman probe method was used to detect the genotypes of hOGG1 polymorphism locus rs1052133, with the genotype distribution frequencies of NSCLC group (P=0.411) and control group (P=0.354) consistent with the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The proportion of C/C gene was significantly higher in NSCLC group than that in control group (P=0.008, OR=2.2, 95%, CI=1.27–4.52). The median value of the hOGG1 expression level in detection results as the boundary, NSCLC patients were divided into hOGG1 high expression group (≥3.61) with 91 cases and hOGG1 low expression group (<3.61) with 91 cases. The 1-, 2- and 3-year survival rates of patients in hOGG1 low expression group were significantly higher than those in hOGG1 high expression group (P=0.007). The 3-year survival rate in hOGG1 low expression group is significantly higher than that in hOGG1 high expression group (P=0.007). The sensitivity, specificity and AUC of hOGG1 to patient survival prediction were 83.33%, 64.29%, and 0.816, respectively. In conclusion, hOGG1 is highly expressed in NSCLC tissues. Compared to S/S and S/C genotypes, the C/C gene was found to be more common in NSCLC group than in control group. Thus, hOGG1 has a high predictive value for patient survival.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer: current status and future directions

Since 2015, immunotherapies, especially immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), have made great breakthroughs in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Among them, nivolumab, pembrolizumab and atezolizumab have been granted US Food and Drug Administration approval for NSCLC. It is imperative to combine ICIs with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, antivascular therapy and targeted therapy. But in the bright future, there are two problems. One is how to use biomarkers to select the beneficiaries. The other is how to achieve a balance between drug effectiveness and safety. There are now seven drugs targeting the programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-1/PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) pathways that have been or are expected to enter clinical treatment. This review focuses on these drugs and summarizes clinical trials that have been reported or that ongoing ones have already entered the recruiting state.

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Epidemiology, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States. In the past decade, significant advances have been made in the science of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Screening has been introduced with the goal of early detection. The National Lung Screening Trial found a lung cancer mortality benefit of 20% and a 6.7% decrease in all-cause mortality with the use of low-dose chest computed tomography in high-risk individuals. The treatment of lung cancer has also evolved with the introduction of several lines of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with EGFR, ALK, ROS1, and NTRK mutations. Similarly, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have dramatically changed the landscape of NSCLC treatment. Furthermore, the results of new trials continue to help us understand the role of these novel agents and which patients are more likely to benefit; ICIs are now part of the first-line NSCLC treatment armamentarium as monotherapy, combined with chemotherapy, or after definite chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III unresectable NSCLC. Expression of programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 in malignant cells has been studied as a potential biomarker for response to ICIs. However, important drawbacks exist that limit its discriminatory potential. Identification of accurate predictive biomarkers beyond programmed cell death protein-ligand 1 expression remains essential to select the most appropriate candidates for ICI therapy. Many questions remain unanswered regarding the proper sequence and combinations of these new agents; however, the field is moving rapidly, and the overall direction is optimistic.

Prognostic Significance of Potential Immune Checkpoint Member HHLA2 in Human Tumors: A Comprehensive Analysis

Immunological checkpoint inhibitors have been immensely successfully applied in the treatment of cancer, however, a portion of tumor patients can't benefit from checkpoint therapy. The low PD-1/CTLA-4 positive rate and involvement of multiple immunosuppressive pathways are thought to be one of the reasons for treatment failure in non-responding patients. A new immune checkpoint molecule, HHLA2, which was widely expressed in PD-1 negative human tumors, may be a promising target for the improvement of recent immune therapy. Yet, the prognostic value and transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of HHLA2 remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value and transcriptional regulation mechanism of HHLA2 according to clinical and experimental data from multiple databases, including cBioPortal, TCGA, Cistrome, TIMER, Oncomine, Kaplan-Meier, GeneXplain. It was found that the expression of HHLA2 was significantly elevated in renal tumors, and significantly decreased in colorectal tumors. Pan-cancer survival analysis indicates that HHLA2 was an independent prognostic factor in 9/20 of human cancers. Especially in renal clear cell carcinoma (P = 3.0E-7). Through plotting survival curve in Kaplan-Meier Plotter, it was found that hypomethylation of HHLA2 DNA was a favorable prognostic factor for KIRC patients. Yet, the copy number variant of HHLA2 was not significantly correlated with the overall survival of KIRC patients. Finally, by analyzing the motif of HHLA2 co-expression genes, we identified 15 transcription factors that may be involved in the regulation of the HHLA2 co-expression network. Among these transcription factors, BATF in B lymphocyte and SMAD in monocyte were confirmed to be able to directly bind to HHLA2 DNA according to chip-seq experimental data from Cistrome database.