Efficacy and Safety of Ramucirumab With Docetaxel Versus Placebo With Docetaxel as Second-Line Treatment of Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Subgroup Analysis According to Patient Age in the REVEL Trial

Influence of Previous Therapy for Neutropenia Caused by Combination Therapy of Ramucirumab and Docetaxel

In the present study, the influence of previous immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy with ramucirumab (RAM) + docetaxel (DTX) therapy on the occurrence of severe neutropenia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was evaluated, taking into account the influences of cytotoxic chemotherapy used in pretreatment. The study participants included patients who received a combination therapy of RAM and DTX as cancer chemotherapy for NSCLC. The influences of previous ICI treatment and pretreatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents on the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia were analysed. A total of 89 patients, including 50 with and 39 without a history of ICI treatment, were analysed. Kaplan-Meier curves showed a significant difference in the influence of previous ICI treatment on the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.006). Moreover, Cox regression analysis identified a history of ICI treatment and prophylactic administration of G-CSF as factors associated with the development of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001, respectively). This study found that previous treatment with ICIs reduced the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia after RAM + DTX therapy in patients with NSCLC, regardless of the influences of pretreatment with cytotoxic anticancer agents.

Clinical Trial and Real-World Outcomes of Patients With Metastatic NSCLC in the Post-Platinum-Based Chemotherapy Failure Setting

Introduction

A literature review was undertaken to identify clinical trials and real-world studies of patients with stage IV NSCLC who had progressed on or after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy.

Methods

The EMBASE and MEDLINE databases were used to search for English-language studies published between September 28, 2017, and September 28, 2021. Studies were included in the review if they (1) were clinical trials or real-world analyses of one or more treatment regimens for patients with stage IV NSCLC who had progressed on or after treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy, (2) contained an end point including efficacy, effectiveness, or safety, and (3) included 45 or more patients.

Results

In total, there were 15 publications (nine unique trials and three real-world studies) included. Sample size ranged from 49 to 1253 patients. At least one treatment arm in eight of the nine clinical trials reported an overall response rate of ≥15%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival ranged from 1.9 to 5.2 months and 5.4 to 15.4 months in clinical trials and 4.4 to 6.8 months and 8.3 to 18.0 months in real-world studies, respectively. Within studies reporting median PFS, a median PFS of more than or equal to 3 months was reported in eight of 11 clinical trials and both real-world studies. Discontinuation due to adverse events ranged from 1.9% to 18% across all included studies.

Conclusions

Patients with stage IV NSCLC had limited response and a high burden of adverse events during treatment after progression on platinum-containing chemotherapy. There remains a pressing unmet need for additional, effective, and tolerable treatment options in this setting.

Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer with KRASG12C mutation: a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Sotorasib is a specific, irreversible inhibitor of the GTPase protein, KRASG12C. We compared the efficacy and safety of sotorasib with a standard-of-care treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the KRASG12C mutation who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

METHODS

We conducted a randomised, open-label phase 3 trial at 148 centres in 22 countries. We recruited patients aged at least 18 years with KRASG12C-mutated advanced NSCLC, who progressed after previous platinum-based chemotherapy and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Key exclusion criteria included new or progressing untreated brain lesions or symptomatic brain lesions, previously identified oncogenic driver mutation other than KRASG12C for which an approved therapy is available (eg EGFR or ALK), previous treatment with docetaxel (neoadjuvant or adjuvant docetaxel was allowed if the tumour did not progress within 6 months after the therapy was terminated), previous treatment with a direct KRASG12C inhibitor, systemic anticancer therapy within 28 days of study day 1, and therapeutic or palliative radiation therapy within 2 weeks of treatment initiation. We randomly assigned (1:1) patients to oral sotorasib (960 mg once daily) or intravenous docetaxel (75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks) in an open-label manner using interactive response technology. Randomisation was stratified by number of previous lines of therapy in advanced disease (1 vs 2 vs >2), ethnicity (Asian vs non-Asian), and history of CNS metastases (present or absent). Treatment continued until an independent central confirmation of disease progression, intolerance, initiation of another anticancer therapy, withdrawal of consent, or death, whichever occurred first. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, which was assessed by a blinded, independent central review in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04303780, and is active but no longer recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between June 4, 2020, and April 26, 2021, 345 patients were randomly assigned to receive sotorasib (n=171 [50%]) or docetaxel (n=174 [50%]). 169 (99%) patients in the sotorasib group and 151 (87%) in the docetaxel group received at least one dose. After a median follow-up of 17·7 months (IQR 16·4-20·1), the study met its primary endpoint of a statistically significant increase in the progression-free survival for sotorasib, compared with docetaxel (median progression-free survival 5·6 months [95% CI 4·3-7·8] vs 4·5 months [3·0-5·7]; hazard ratio 0·66 [0·51-0·86]; p=0·0017). Sotorasib was well tolerated, with fewer grade 3 or worse (n=56 [33%] vs n=61 [40%]) and serious treatment-related adverse events compared with docetaxel (n=18 [11%] vs n=34 [23%]). For sotorasib, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were diarrhoea (n= 20 [12%]), alanine aminotransferase increase (n=13 [8%]), and aspartate aminotransferase increase (n=9 [5%]). For docetaxel, the most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse were neutropenia (n=13 [9%]), fatigue (n=9 [6%]), and febrile neutropenia (n=8 [5%]).

INTERPRETATION

Sotorasib significantly increased progression-free survival and had a more favourable safety profile, compared with docetaxel, in patients with advanced NSCLC with the KRASG12C mutation and who had been previously treated with other anticancer drugs.

FUNDING

Amgen.

Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A multicenter retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Ramucirumab (RAM) plus Docetaxel (DOC) is one of the standard treatments after first-line treatment failure in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about the efficacy and safety of RAM plus DOC in older patients. We aimed to clarify these and elucidate the prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this multicenter retrospective study, conducted at four medical facilities in Japan, we evaluated the efficacy and safety data for two groups (<65 and ≥ 65 years). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to reveal the prognostic factors for better PFS and OS. Patient characteristics and adverse events (AEs) in both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney's U and Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 237 patients were included, of whom 43% (n = 103), and 57% (n = 134) were aged <65, and ≥ 65 years. Median OS was 12.2 (95% CI: 9.4-15.0), and 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.8-18.8), respectively, and there were no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.534). Multivariate analysis identified DOC dose reduction (none vs performed, HR: 2.66, 95% CI: 1.62-4.35, p < 0.001) as an independent prognostic factor for OS in older patients, and a similar result was shown for the PFS. Grade ≥ 3 all AEs were identified in 42.7% and 56.7% of younger and older patients, respectively, and there was a significant difference between the groups (p = 0.033); however, the difference between the groups disappeared with primary DOC dose reduction (p = 0.526).

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of RAM plus DOC administration in older, pretreated patients with advanced NSCLC was comparable to those of younger patients, whereas RAM plus DOC should be cautiously administered to older patients because of severe toxicity. Moreover, appropriate DOC dose reduction may be recommended for increased survival benefit and safety in such patients.

Real-world effectiveness of second-line Afatinib versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma in immunotherapy-naïve patients

Background

Limited treatment options exist for relapsed advanced lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), leading to poor outcomes compared with adenocarcinoma. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of second-line afatinib versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced lung SCC who progressed after first-line chemotherapy.

Methods

In this retrospective, multisite cohort study, we recruited patients with initial locally advanced or metastatic lung SCC from four institutes in Taiwan between June 2014 and October 2020. The primary endpoint of this study was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and overall survival (OS).

Results

The present study enrolled 108 patients: 19 received second-line afatinib, and 89 received second-line chemotherapy. The median ages were 71 and 67 years, respectively. PFS was significantly longer among patients who received afatinib than among those who received chemotherapy (median 4.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.1–7.5] vs. 2.6 months [95% CI, 0.9–6.7]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.53 [95% CI 0.32–0.88], p = 0.013). Compared with the chemotherapy group, OS was longer in the afatinib group but did not reach significance (median 16.0 months [95% CI, 6.1–22.0] vs. 12.3 months [6.2–33.9]; HR 0.65 [95% CI 0.38–1.11], p = 0.112).

Conclusions

Afatinib offered a longer PFS and comparable OS to chemotherapy in advanced lung SCC patients in a real-world setting, it may be considered as a 2nd line alternative treatment choice for immunotherapy unfit advanced lung SCC patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08920-3.

Loss of core fucosylation enhances the anticancer activity of cytotoxic T lymphocytes by increasing PD-1 degradation

As an immune checkpoint, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) pathway plays a crucial role in CD8⁺ cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) activation and provides antitumor responses. The N-glycans of PD-1 and PD-L1 are highly core fucosylated, which are solely catalyzed by the core fucosyltransferase (Fut8). However, the precise biological mechanisms underlying effects of core fucosylation of PD-1 and PD-L1 on CTL activation have not been fully understood. In this study, we found that core fucosylation was significantly upregulated in lung adenocarcinoma. Compared to those of Fut8^+/+ OT-I mice, the lung adenocarcinoma formation induced by urethane was markedly reduced in Fut8^-/- OT-I mice. De-core fucosylation of PD-1 compromised its expression on Fut8^-/- CTL, resulted in enhanced Fut8^-/- CTL activation and cytotoxicity, leading to more efficient tumor eradication. Indeed, loss of core fucosylation significantly enhanced the PD-1 ubiquitination and in turn led to the degradation of PD-1 in the proteasome. Our current work indicates that inhibition of core fucosylation is a unique strategy to reduce PD-1 expression for the antilung adenocarcinoma immune therapy in the future.

The efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus docetaxel in older patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab plus docetaxel (RAM+DOC) is expected to prolong survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, the efficacy and safety for older patients remains unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAM+DOC in patients 75 years and older.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who had received RAM+DOC treatment at three institutions. We compared the efficacy and safety in patients 75 years and older to those under 75 years of age.

RESULTS

A total of 114 patients were identified. The median progression-free survival, time to treatment failure and overall survival was 3.6 (95% CI: 0.4-6.7), 3.1 (95% CI: 2.4-3.9) and 11.2 months (95% CI: 5.6-16.8) in the older group (N = 23), and 4.2 (95% CI: 3.3-5.0), 3.4 (95% CI: 3.3-5.0) and 12.2 months (95% CI: 9.1-15.4) in the younger group (N = 91), respectively. Survival curves were similar for each group, while the objective response rate was 30.4% (95% CI: 13.2-52.9%) in older patients and 35.2% (95% CI, 25.4-45.9%) for the younger group. A total of 22 older patients (95.7%) and 73 (80.2%) younger patients received primary prophylactic pegylated-granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (PEG-G-CSF). Four older patients (17.3%) and 14 younger patients (15.3%) discontinued RAM+DOC due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

RAM+DOC is expected to be efficacious and tolerable in older patients when supported with prophylactic PEG-G-CSF therapy.

KEY POINTS

Significant findings of the study ・PFS, OS, and ORR in older patients were similar to those under 75 years of age. ・Safety of RAM+DOC was well tolerated in older patients with prophylactic PEG-G-CSF. ・Prophylactic PEG-G-CSF with RAM+DOC may contribute to better efficacy. What this study adds ・This study suggests that RAM+DOC with prophylactic PEG-G-CSF is expected to be a useful option in older patients with advanced NSCLC.

The Impact of EGFR Mutation Status and Brain Metastasis for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Ramucirumab plus Docetaxel

OBJECTIVES

Currently, combination therapy of ramucirumab (RAM) + docetaxel (DOC) must play a more important role as a second-line treatment. Epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation accounts for around 50% of oncogenic driver mutations in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Asian subsets. The number of brain metastases (BM) is relatively higher in EGFR mutation-positive patients compared to EGFR wild-type patients. The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of RAM + DOC focusing on EGFR mutation and BM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive advanced NSCLC patients who received combination therapy of RAM + DOC at three institutions. A total of 112 patients with NSCLC were enrolled for efficacy analyses. We evaluated the efficacy of RAM + DOC for EGFR-mutated NSCLC with endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 5.7 months for the EGFR mutant group compared with 3.6 months for the EGFR wild-type group (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.32-0.87; p = 0.01). Median TTF was 5.1 months for the EGFR mutant group compared with 2.8 months for the EGFR wild-type group (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.33-0.85; p = 0.007). Median PFS and TTF of the EGFR mutant group was significantly longer than median PFS and TTF of the EGFR wild-type group. The multivariate analysis identified EGFR mutation status as an independent favorable factor of PFS. In subset analyses of BM, median PFS of the EGFR mutant group (2.8 months) was significantly shorter than that of the EGFR wild-type group (5.1 months) (HR 7.27, 95% CI 1.78-29.68; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This study revealed that EGFR mutation status and BM might be predictive or prognostic factors for PFS.