Dynamics of EGFR Mutation Load in Plasma for Prediction of Treatment Response and Disease Progression in Patients With EGFR-Mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

Revolutionizing Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Diagnosis: Ultra-High-Sensitive ctDNA Analysis for Detecting Hotspot Mutations with Long-term Stored Plasma

PURPOSE

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has great potential in clinical oncology. The prognostic and predictive values of cfDNA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been reported, with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), KRAS, and BRAF mutations in tumor-derived cfDNAs acting as biomarkers during the early stages of tumor progression and recurrence. However, extremely low tumor-derived DNA rates hinder cfDNA application. We developed an ultra-high-sensitivity lung version 1 (ULV1) panel targeting BRAF, KRAS, and EGFR hotspot mutations using small amounts of cfDNA, allowing for semi-quantitative analysis with excellent limit-of-detection (0.05%).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mutation analysis was performed on cfDNAs extracted from the plasma of 104 patients with NSCLC by using the ULV1 panel and targeted next-generation sequencing (CT-ULTRA), followed by comparison analysis of mutation patterns previously screened using matched tumor tissue DNA.

RESULTS

The ULV1 panel demonstrated robust selective amplification of mutant alleles, enabling the detection of mutations with a high degree of analytical sensitivity (limit-of-detection, 0.025%-0.1%) and specificity (87.9%-100%). Applying ULV1 to NSCLC cfDNA revealed 51.1% (23/45) samples with EGFR mutations, increasing with tumor stage: 8.33% (stage I) to 78.26% (stage IV). Semi-quantitative analysis proved effective for low-mutation-fraction clinical samples. Comparative analysis with PANAMutyper EGFR exhibited substantial concordance (κ=0.84).

CONCLUSION

Good detection sensitivity (~80%) was observed despite the limited volume (1 mL) and long-term storage (12-50 months) of plasma used and is expected to increase with high cfDNA inputs. Thus, the ULV1 panel is a fast and cost-effective method for early diagnosis, treatment selection, and clinical follow-up of patients with NSCLC.

Afatinib overcoming resistance to icotinib and osimertinib in NSCLC with leptomeningeal metastasis in patients with acquired EGFR L858R/T790M or L858R/S768I mutations: Two case reports

Background

Advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is often complicated by leptomeningeal metastases (LMs), especially in patients carrying EGFR mutations. EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line drug for patients with specific gene mutations, such as EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation. However, after long-term TKI use, patients eventually develop drug resistance and acquire new mutations. Acquiring the EGFR T790 M mutation during TKI treatment is a marker for first/second generation TKI resistance. Osimertinib (a third-generation TKI) could overcome this resistance, especially for patients who have already developed NSCLC-LM. Treating NSCLC patients with osimertinib resistance is challenging. Our aim was to investigate whether afatinib is effective in NSCLC-LM patient who showed resistance to osimertinib. Herein, we report two patients with resistance to first- and third-generation TKIs who benefited from second-generation TKI.

Case summary

Case one: A 43-year-old man was diagnosed with stage 3A NSCLC with EGFR exon 19 deletion. He underwent surgery and received 4 rounds of chemotherapy (oxaliplatin combined with liposomal paclitaxel), after which the disease was controlled by icotinib (a first-generation TKI) for 4 years. Then, he showed poor drug response and bone metastasis. A liquid biopsy was carried out, and the EGFR L858R/T790 M compound mutation was found. The patient was given osimertinib (a third-generation TKI). The patient was in a stable condition for 2 years and then he developed bilateral peripheral facial palsy. Brain MRI showed enhancement in the left temporal lobe and meninges, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology detected tumour cells in the CSF. NSCLC-LM was diagnosed. His performance status (PS) score was 3-4. Liquid biopsy and next-generation sequencing were performed again. Different gene mutations and copy number alterations were found this time, including EGFR L858R, but without the EGFR T790 M mutation. His disease was controlled with intrathecal methotrexate and oral afatinib (a second generation TKI). The patient has shown clinical remission (PS score: 1-2) until now, which is longer than 10 months.

Case two

A 50-year-old man was diagnosed with NSCLC in May 2020. He underwent one round of chemotherapy before thoracoscopic partial lobectomy of the right upper lung. Histological study of the lung tissue showed lung adenocarcinoma with the EGFR L858R mutation. Then, the disease was controlled with icotinib. One year later, he was diagnosed with NSCLC-LM. Liquid biopsy and sequencing showed an EGFR L858R/S768I compound mutation. The patient was treated with osimertinib. His condition was stable for 5 months before his central nervous system (CNS) symptoms were exacerbated. Liquid biopsy and sequencing were carried out again, and his gene mutation profile had not changed much. Then, the patient was given afatinib, and his condition has remained stable for 11 months.

Conclusion

Afatinib might be suitable for NSCLC-LM patients with EGFR compound mutations who show resistance to icotinib and osimertinib, since it might help overcome first- and third-generation TKI resistance.

Evaluation of RAS Mutational Status in Liquid Biopsy to Monitor Disease Progression in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

In this study we evaluated both~ K- and N-RAS mutations in plasma samples from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer by means of the BEAMing technology, and we assessed their diagnostic performance compared to RAS analyses performed on tissue. The sensitivity of BEAMing in identifying KRAS mutations was of 89.5%, with a fair specificity. The agreement with tissue analysis was moderate. The sensitivity for NRAS was high with a good specificity, and the agreement between tissue analysis and BEAMing was fair. Interestingly, significantly higher mutant allele fraction (MAF) levels were detected in patients with G2 tumors, liver metastases, and in those who did not receive surgery. NRAS MAF level was significantly higher in patients with mucinous adenocarcinoma and for those with lung metastases. A sharp increase in the MAF values was observed in patients who moved towards disease progression. More strikingly, molecular progression always anticipated the radiological one in these patients. These observations pave the way to the possibility of using liquid biopsy to monitor patients during treatment, and to enable oncologists to anticipate interventions compared to radiological analyses. This will allow time to be saved and ensure a better management of metastatic patients in the near future.

Liquid Biopsies in Lung Cancer

As lung cancer has the highest cancer-specific mortality rates worldwide, there is an urgent need for new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches to detect early-stage tumors and to monitor their response to the therapy. In addition to the well-established tissue biopsy analysis, liquid-biopsy-based assays may evolve as an important diagnostic tool. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is the most established method, followed by other methods such as the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs), microRNAs (miRNAs), and extracellular vesicles (EVs). Both PCR- and NGS-based assays are used for the mutational assessment of lung cancer, including the most frequent driver mutations. However, ctDNA analysis might also play a role in monitoring the efficacy of immunotherapy and its recent accomplishments in the landscape of state-of-the-art lung cancer therapy. Despite the promising aspects of liquid-biopsy-based assays, there are some limitations regarding their sensitivity (risk of false-negative results) and specificity (interpretation of false-positive results). Hence, further studies are needed to evaluate the usefulness of liquid biopsies for lung cancer. Liquid-biopsy-based assays might be integrated into the diagnostic guidelines for lung cancer as a tool to complement conventional tissue sampling.

The Overview of Perspectives of Clinical Application of Liquid Biopsy in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The standard diagnostics procedure for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) requires a pathological evaluation of tissue samples obtained by surgery or biopsy, which are considered invasive sampling procedures. Due to this fact, re-sampling of the primary tumor at the moment of progression is limited and depends on the patient's condition, even if it could reveal a mechanism of resistance to applied therapy. Recently, many studies have indicated that liquid biopsy could be provided for the noninvasive management of NSCLC patients who receive molecularly targeted therapies or immunotherapy. The liquid biopsy of neoplastic patients harbors small fragments of circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) and cell-free RNA (cfRNA) secreted to the circulation from normal cells, as well as a subset of tumor-derived circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In NSCLC patients, a longitudinal assessment of genetic alterations in "druggable" genes in liquid biopsy might improve the follow-up of treatment efficacy and allow for the detection of an early progression before it is detectable in computed tomography or a clinical image. However, a liquid biopsy may be used to determine a variety of relevant molecular or genetic information for understanding tumor biology and its evolutionary trajectories. Thus, liquid biopsy is currently associated with greater hope for common diagnostic and clinical applications. In this review, we would like to highlight diagnostic challenges in the application of liquid biopsy into the clinical routine and indicate its implications on the metastatic spread of NSCLC or monitoring of personalized treatment regimens.

Monitoring Somatic Genetic Alterations in Circulating Cell-Free DNA/RNA of Patients with “Oncogene-Addicted” Advanced Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Real-World Clinical Study

Liquid biopsy has advantages over tissue biopsy, but also some technical limitations that hinder its wide use in clinical applications. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of liquid biopsy for the clinical management of patients with advanced-stage oncogene-addicted non-small-cell lung adenocarcinomas. The investigation was conducted on a series of cases—641 plasma samples from 57 patients—collected in a prospective consecutive manner, which allowed us to assess the benefits and limitations of the approach in a real-world clinical context. Thirteen samples were collected at diagnosis, and the additional samples during the periodic follow-up visits. At diagnosis, we detected mutations in ctDNA in 10 of the 13 cases (77%). During follow-up, 36 patients progressed. In this subset of patients, molecular analyses of plasma DNA/RNA at progression revealed the appearance of mutations in 29 patients (80.6%). Mutations in ctDNA/RNA were typically detected an average of 80 days earlier than disease progression assessed by RECIST or clinical evaluations. Among the cases positive for mutations, we observed 13 de novo mutations, responsible for the development of resistance to therapy. This study allowed us to highlight the advantages and disadvantages of liquid biopsy, which led to suggesting algorithms for the use of liquid biopsy analyses at diagnosis and during monitoring of therapy response.

Molecular biomarkers and liquid biopsies in lung cancer

Liquid biopsy refers to the identification of tumor-derived materials in body fluids including in blood circulation. In the age of immunotherapy and targeted therapies used for the treatment of advanced malignancies, molecular analysis of the tumor is considered a crucial step to guide management. In lung cancer, the concept of liquid biopsies is particularly relevant given the invasiveness of tumor biopsies in certain locations, and the potential risks of biopsy in a patient population with significant co-morbidities. Liquid biopsies have many advantages including non-invasiveness, lower cost, potential for genomic testing, ability to monitor tumor evolution through treatment, and the ability to overcome spatial and temporal intertumoral heterogeneity. The potential clinical applications of liquid biopsy are vast and include screening, detection of minimal residual disease and/or early relapse after curative intent treatment, monitoring response to immunotherapy, and identifying mutations that might be targetable or can confer resistance. Herein, we review the potential role of circulating tumor DNA and circulating tumor cells as forms of liquid biopsies and blood biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer. We discuss the methodologies/platforms available for each, clinical applications, and limitations/challenges in incorporation into clinical practice. We additionally review emerging forms of liquid biopsies including tumor educated platelets, circular RNA, and exosomes.

Pre- and post-treatment blood-based genomic landscape of patients with ROS1 or NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours treated with entrectinib

Genomic tumour profiling informs targeted treatment options. Entrectinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with efficacy in NTRK fusion-positive (-fp) solid tumours and ROS1-fp non-small cell lung cancer. FoundationOne® Liquid CDx (F1L CDx), a non-invasive in vitro next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based diagnostic, detects genomic alterations in plasma circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). We evaluated the clinical validity of F1L CDx as an aid in identifying patients with NTRK-fp or ROS1-fp tumours and assessed the genomic landscape pre- and post-entrectinib treatment. Among evaluable pre-treatment clinical samples (N = 85), positive percentage agreements between F1L CDx and clinical trial assays (CTAs) were 47.4% (NTRK fusions) and 64.5% (ROS1 fusions); positive predictive value was 100% for both. The objective response rate for CTA+ F1L CDx+ patients was 72.2% in both cohorts. The median duration of response significantly differed between F1L CDx+ and F1L CDx- samples in ROS1-fp (5.6 vs. 17.3 months) but not NTRK-fp (9.2 vs. 12.9 months) patients. Fifteen acquired resistance mutations were detected. We conclude that F1L CDx is a clinically valid complement to tissue-based testing to identify patients who may benefit from entrectinib and those with acquired resistance mutations associated with disease progression.

Monitoring of the presence of EGFR-mutated DNA during EGFR-targeted therapy may assist in the prediction of treatment outcome

The aim of our trial was to evaluate the prognostic significance of qualitative ctDNA analysis on different stages of EGFR mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We included 99 patients amendable for the first line treatment with either gefitinib/erlotinib (n = 87), afatinib (n = 10) or osimertinib (n = 2). Sequential qualitative analysis of ctDNA with cobas® EGFR Mutation Test v2 were performed before first dose, after 2 and 4 months of treatment, and on progression. Our analysis showed clinically significant heterogeneity of EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with 1st line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in terms of progression-free and overall survival. When treated with conventional approach, i.e. monotherapy with TKIs, the patients falls into three subgroups based on ctDNA analysis before and after 2 months of treatment. Patients without detectable ctDNA at baseline (N = 32) possess the best prognosis on duration of treatment (PFS: 24.07 [16.8-31.3] and OS: 56.2 [21.8-90.7] months). Those who achieve clearance after two months of TKI (N = 42) have indistinguishably good PFS (19.0 [13.7 - 24.2]). Individuals who retain ctDNA after 2 months (N = 25) have the worst prognosis (PFS: 10.3 [7.0 - 13.5], p = 0.000). 9/25 patients did not develop ctDNA clearance at 4 months with no statistical difference in PFS from those without clearance at 2 months. Prognostic heterogeneity of EGFR-mutated NSCLC should be taken into consideration in planning further clinical trials and optimizing the outcome of patients.

Monitoring and adapting cancer treatment using circulating tumor DNA kinetics: Current research, opportunities, and challenges

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a biomarker with wide-ranging applications in cancer management. While its role in guiding precision medicine in certain tumors via noninvasive detection of susceptibility and resistance alterations is now well established, recent evidence has pointed to more generalizable use in treatment monitoring. Quantitative changes in ctDNA levels over time (i.e., ctDNA kinetics) have shown potential as an early indicator of therapeutic efficacy and could enable treatment adaptation. However, ctDNA kinetics are complex and heterogeneous, affected by tumor biology, host physiology, and treatment factors. This review outlines the current preclinical and clinical knowledge of ctDNA kinetics in cancer and how early on-treatment changes in ctDNA levels could be applied in clinical research to collect evidence to support implementation in daily practice.

Clinical utility of liquid biopsy-based companion diagnostics in the non-small-cell lung cancer treatment

Recently, technological advances in the detection and biological characterization of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) have enabled the implementation of liquid biopsy testing into clinical practice. Methods for analysis of liquid biopsies have rapidly evolved over the past few years and have continued to advance, thus providing details about tumor biological characteristics such as tumor progression, metastasis, tumor heterogeneity, genomic mutation profile, clonal evolution, etc. In tandem with technological advances, the implementation of liquid biopsy in routine clinical settings has proceeded. In 2016, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first ctDNA liquid biopsy test to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as a companion diagnostic for molecular targeted drug of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI, EGFR-TKI). More recently, multigene panel assays of liquid biopsy have been approved as companion diagnostics and have been used in routine clinical settings. The estimation of blood tumor mutation burden (bTMB) to predict the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment can be one of the promising approaches to liquid biopsy. The next stage of implementation of liquid biopsy for routine clinical settings is for monitoring of ctDNA after surgical treatment to predict prognosis and to detect disease relapse earlier than conventional imaging diagnosis. Its clinical utility is under assessment in several clinical trials. This review introduces recent advances in liquid biopsy methodology, the development of biomarkers, and its clinical utility in the treatment of NSCLC patients.

Use of Liquid Biopsy in the Care of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Recent technological advances have enabled the development of liquid biopsy-based approaches, which have revolutionized the diagnostic world. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has several clinical applications. First, ctDNA genotyping is becoming widely used for non-invasive biomarker testing. Of note, in lung cancer patients in whom biopsies are difficult to obtain, ctDNA has led to significant improvement in the diagnosis and identification of therapeutic targets. In addition, ctDNA quantification over the course of the disease can be useful for tumor response to treatment monitoring and for early detection of resistance mutations. ctDNA levels per se are also of prognostic significance and could be used to tailor treatments. Finally, improvements in assay sensitivity are facilitating the development of liquid biopsy-based tests for the detection of ctDNA at very low allele frequencies (AFs), which can be used for the measurement of minimal residual disease and ultimately for the development of strategies (by complementing imaging techniques) aimed to improve the efficiency of lung cancer screening programs.

EGFR-plasma mutations in prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer treated with EGFR TKIs: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The plasma-based epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing is approved recently to use in clinical practice. However, it has not been used as a prognostic marker yet because of contradictory results.

AIM

This meta-analysis aims to clarify the role of the EGFR-plasma test in prognosis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have mutant tumors and receive EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases were searched for relevant studies by April 10, 2021. The hazard ratio (HR) from reports was extracted and used to assess the correlation of EGFR-plasma status with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A total of 35 eligible studies with 4106 patients were enrolled in the final analysis. Patients with concurrent EGFR mutations in pretreatment plasma have shorter PFS (HR = 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.73-2.31, p < .001) and OS time (HR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.89-2.83, p < .001) compared to the tumor-only mutation cases. Besides, the persistence of EGFR-activating mutations in post-treatment plasma is associated with worse PFS (HR = 3.84, 95% CI: 2.96-4.99, p < .001) and OS outcome (HR = 3.22, 95% CI: 2.35-4.42, p < .001) compared to others. Notably, the prognostic value of the EGFR-plasma test is also validated in treatment with third-generation EGFR TKI and significance regardless of different detection methods.

CONCLUSION

The presence of EGFR-plasma mutations at pretreatment and after EGFR TKI initiation is the worse prognostic factor for PFS and OS in NSCLC.

Technical Evaluation of the COBAS EGFR Semiquantitative Index (SQI) for Plasma cfDNA Testing in NSCLC Patients with EGFR Exon 19 Deletions

The cobas^® EGFR Test provides a semiquantitative index (SQI) that reflects the proportion of mutated versus wild-type copies of the EGFR gene in plasma. The significance of SQI as an indirect measure of the variant allele frequency (VAF) or mutated copies/mL remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation of SQI with the VAF and the number of mutated copies/mL obtained by a digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) test in NSCLC samples. The study included 118 plasma samples from a retrospective cohort of 25 stage IV adenocarcinoma patients with EGFR exon 19 deletions (Ex19Del), obtained before and during tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. Both SQI and VAF and SQI and mutated copies/mL showed the same significant correlation (r² = 0.79, p < 0.00001) across the whole study cohort. We found better correlation in samples collected at the baseline between SQI and VAF (r² = 0.94, p < 0.00001) and SQI and mutated copies/mL (r² = 0.97, p < 0.00001) compared to samples collected during TKI treatment: r² = 0.76; p < 0.00001 for SQI and VAF and r² = 0.75; p < 0.00001 for SQI and mutated copies/mL. The study indicates that SQI is a robust quantitative indirect measure of VAF and the number of mutated copies/mL in plasma from patients with an EGFR Ex19Del mutation. Further studies are desirable to assess the SQI cut-off values related to the clinical status of the patient.

Liquid biopsy for therapy monitoring in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer

Liquid biopsy is now considered a valuable diagnostic tool for advanced metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In NSCLC, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis has been shown to increase the chances of identifying the presence of targetable mutations and has been adopted by many clinicians owing to its low risk. Serial monitoring of ctDNA may also help assess the treatment response or for monitoring relapse. As the presence of detectable plasma ctDNA post-surgery likely indicates residual tumor burden, studies have been performed to quantify plasma ctDNA to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) in early-stage resected NSCLC. Most data on utilizing liquid biopsy for monitoring MRD in early-stage NSCLC are from small-scale studies using ctDNA. Here, we review the recent research on liquid biopsy in NSCLC, not limited to ctDNA, and focus on novel methods such as micro RNAs (miRNA) and long non-coding (lncRNA).

Content of circulating tumor DNA depends on the tumor type and the dynamics of tumor size, but is not influenced significantly by physical exercise, time of the day or recent meal

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate factors, which influence the content of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA).

METHODS

398 serial plasma samples were collected within 1-7 consecutive days from patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer (n = 13), RAS/RAF-mutated colorectal cancer (n = 54) and BRAF-mutated melanoma (n = 17), who presented with measurable tumor disease. The amount of ctDNA was determined by ddPCR.

RESULTS

Among 82 patients, who donated 2-6 serial plasma samples, 42 subjects were classified as ctDNA-positive; only 22% cases were mutation-positive across all consecutive tests, while 24/82 (29%) patients showed presence of mutated ctDNA in some but not all blood draws. Subjects with progressing tumors had higher probability of being detected ctDNA-positive as compared to patients, who responded to therapy or had stable disease (39/55 (71%) vs. 4/24 (17%); p = 0.0001). Our study failed to reveal the impact of the time of the day, recent meal or prior physical exercise on the results of ctDNA testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Presence of ctDNA in plasma is particularly characteristic for patients, who experience clinical progression of tumor disease. Consecutive plasma tests may occasionally provide discordant data; thus, the repetition of analysis may be advised in certain cases in order to ensure the validity of negative ctDNA result.

Co-occurring MET Amplification Predicts Inferior Clinical Response to First-Line Erlotinib in Advanced Stage EGFR-Mutated NSCLC Patients

BACKGROUND

Intrinsic resistance is a major obstacle in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with an activating mutation in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). We investigated co-occurring genetic alterations in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as predictive markers of clinical response to first-line erlotinib.

METHODS

Pretreatment plasma samples were collected from 76 patients with EGFR-mutated, advanced-stage NSCLC treated with first-line erlotinib. We isolated ctDNA from plasma for next-generation sequencing.

RESULTS

Co-occurring oncogenic drivers were detected in 21% of pretreatment samples and correlated with decreased progression-free survival (PFS) (6.9 months vs 14.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 2.088; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8119-5.370; P = .0355). Concurrent MET amplification was identified in 9 samples (12%), predicting inferior PFS (5.5 months vs 14.4 months; HR, 4.750; 95% CI, 0.5923-38.10; P = .0007) and overall survival (7.6 months vs 28.3 months; HR, 3.952; 95% CI, 0.8441-18.50; P = .0005). Co-occurring non-MET-amplification oncogenic alterations showed a tendency for shorter PFS (9.9 months vs 14.4 months; HR, 1.199; 95% CI, 0.3373-4.265; P = .7586). Clearing EGFR-mutated ctDNA during erlotinib treatment is a positive predictor of clinical outcomes. Among patients who cleared the EGFR mutation, 12% had a co-occurring oncogenic driver, with a tendency toward inferior PFS (8.7 months vs 16.1 months; HR, 1.703; 95% CI, 0.5347-5.424; P = .2508).

CONCLUSION

Co-occurring MET amplification in pretreatment ctDNA samples predict inferior clinical response to first-line erlotinib in advanced-stage, EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Co-occurring oncogenic alterations were associated with inferior response and may be potential predictors of clinical outcome.

Future Perspectives in Detecting EGFR and ALK Gene Alterations in Liquid Biopsies of Patients with NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of death worldwide. Alterations in such genes as EGFR and ALK are considered important biomarkers in NSCLC due to the existence of targeted therapies with specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, specific resistance-related mutations can occur during TKI treatment, which often result in therapy inefficacy. Liquid biopsies arise as a reliable tool for the early detection of these types of alterations, allowing a non-invasive follow-up of the patients. Furthermore, they can be essential for cancer screening, initial diagnosis and to check surgery success. Despite the great advantages of liquid biopsies in NSCLC and the high input that next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches can provide in this field, its use in oncology is still limited. With improvement of assay sensitivity and the establishment of clinical guidelines for liquid biopsy analysis, it is expected that they will be used in routine procedures. This review focuses on the usefulness of liquid biopsies of NSCLC patients as a means to detect alterations in EGFR and ALK genes and in disease management, highlighting the impact of NGS methods.

The Impact of Acquired EGFR T790M Mutation and EGFR Circulating Cell-Free DNA on Survival in Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma Following EGFR-TKI Therapy

Objective

To utilize liquid biopsy to investigate the potential clinical factors influencing the incidence of the acquired epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation, and the impact of EGFR circulating cell-free DNA (CfDNA) on overall survival for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma resistant to first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted to analyze EGFR-mutated stage IIIB-IV adenocarcinoma patients who received an EGFR-TKI (gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib) as first-line therapy and then underwent a liquid biopsy exam at disease progression.

Results

A total of 135 patients were included, and the T790M mutation was detected in 51 patients (37.7%). The incidence of T790M mutation increased with the number of initial metastatic sites (p = 0.015). Liver metastasis (odds ratio [OR], 3.373; p = 0.017) and other metastasis (OR, 3.063; p = 0.023) were also independently correlated with T790M mutation incidence. T790M mutation was also associated with more than two progressive sites (OR, 3.382; p = 0.006), liver progression (OR, 6.204; p = 0.002), and bone progression (OR, 3.366; p = 0.004). However, central nervous system progression was inversely correlated with T790M mutation (OR, 0.183; p = 0.027). Overall survival was the longest among the patients without CfDNA, followed by those shedding T790M mutation and those shedding Del 19/L858R mutations (p = 0.005).

Conclusion

Initial metastasis to the liver and other sites may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation. T790M-positive lung adenocarcinoma has specific progression patterns. Moreover, not having EGFR CfDNA, being positive for Del19/L858R mutations, and being positive for T790M mutation have differing impacts on overall survival for patients with advanced EGFR-mutated adenocarcinoma resistant to first-line EGFR-TKI.

The prognostic value of longitudinal circulating tumor DNA profiling during osimertinib treatment

Background

Serial profiling of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could reflect dynamic molecular changes in response to treatment and potentially predict impending disease progression (PD). Herein, we investigated the molecular factors and dynamic changes in ctDNA that can serve as predictors of survival outcomes of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received osimertinib therapy after progression from prior EGFR inhibitor regimen.

Methods

Capture-based targeted sequencing was performed on the baseline and longitudinal plasma samples collected from 72 and 57 patients, respectively, using a 168-gene panel.

Results

Analysis revealed that inferior overall survival (OS) was correlated with various baseline molecular features including high allelic fraction (AF) of EGFR sensitizing mutations (P=0.045), high maximum AF (maxAF, P=0.060), or harboring concurrent genomic alterations such as copy number amplification (CNA) in EGFR (P=0.026) or in other genes (P=0.026), and genes involved in the cell cycle (P=0.004) or TP53 signaling pathway (P=0.032). Moreover, ctDNA clearance at first follow-up after 6 weeks of osimertinib therapy was correlated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.022) and OS (P=0.009). Molecular PD, reflected by the emergence of new mutation or increased AF of existing mutations, was detected at an average lead time of 2.5 months prior to radiological PD. Patients with molecular PD were more likely to harbor CNA (P=0.035) and TP53 mutations (P=0.023).

Conclusions

Molecular factors derived from serial ctDNA profiling can serve as predictive and prognostic markers, which could allow early detection of PD, preceding imaging modalities by 2.5 months.

Longitudinal multi-gene panel assessment of circulating tumor DNA revealed tumor burden and molecular characteristics along treatment course of non-small cell lung cancer

Background

Most studies associating circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with outcome in lung cancer treatment were either cross-sectional or, if longitudinal, only analyzed a limited number of genes. This study evaluated the potential of utilizing ctDNA profiled by a panel of common cancer genes to monitor tumor burden and to reveal molecular characteristics of tumor along treatment course.

Methods

Twenty Chinese non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with serial plasma samples collected (I) before starting on either first- or second-line treatment, (II) at stable disease on treatment, and (III) upon disease progression, were analyzed for mutations in ctDNA using the PGDx 64-gene panel. Paired statistics compared mutation profiles between any two of the three time points.

Results

Proportions with detectable ctDNA decreased from 65% at baseline to 35% at stable disease and rose to 80% at progression (P=0.012, between stable disease and progression); median ctDNA levels (mutated fragments per mL) were 7.8, 0, and 24.7 at the three time points, respectively (P=0.013 between baseline and progression; P=0.007 between stable disease and progression). Although plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were commonly detected, 15% of patients had mutations other than EGFR detected during progression, such as various types of TP53 mutations.

Conclusions

ctDNA profiling in serial blood samples reflected tumor burden over time, and a multi-gene panel was more sensitive in indicating lung cancer progression on treatment than a single gene approach. The detection of additional oncogenic mutations or their disappearance suggested evolution of tumor heterogeneity along treatment course.

[Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]

In 2011, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) initiated a joint project to establish guidelines for biomarker testing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer based on the information available at the time. As this field is constantly evolving, these guidelines were updated in 2012 and 2015 and now in 2019. Current evidence suggests it should be mandatory to test all patients with this kind of advanced lung cancer for EGFR and BRAF mutations, ALK and ROS1 rearrangements and PD-L1 expression. The growing need to study other emerging biomarkers has promoted the routine use of massive sequencing (next-generation sequencing, NGS). However, the coordination of every professional involved and the prioritisation of the most suitable tests and technologies for each case remain a challenge.

Liquid biopsy and tumor heterogeneity in metastatic solid tumors: the potentiality of blood samples

In a large number of cancer types, treatment selection depends on the presence of specific tumor biomarkers. Due to the dynamic nature of cancer, very often these predictive biomarkers are not uniformly present in all cancer cells. Tumor heterogeneity represents indeed one of the main causes of therapeutic failure, and its decoding remains a major ongoing challenge in the field.

Liquid biopsy is the sampling and analysis of non-solid biological tissue often through rapid and non-invasive methods, which allows the assessment in real-time of the evolving landscape of cancer. Samples can be obtained from blood and most other bodily fluids. A blood-based liquid biopsy can capture circulating tumor cells and leukocytes, as well as circulating tumor-derived nucleic acids.

In this review, we discuss the current and possibly future applications of blood-based liquid biopsy in oncology, its advantages and its limitations in clinical practice. We specifically focused on its role as a tool to capture tumor heterogeneity in metastatic cancer patients.

Current status and future perspectives of liquid biopsy in non-small cell lung cancer

With advances in target therapy, molecular analysis of tumors is routinely required for treatment decisions in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Liquid biopsy refers to the sampling and analysis of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in various body fluids, primarily blood. Because the technique is minimally invasive, liquid biopsies are the future in cancer management. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) ctDNA tests have been performed in routine clinical practice in advanced NSCLC patients to guide tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. In the near future, liquid biopsy will be a crucial prognostic, predictive, and diagnostic method in NSCLC. Here we present the current status and future perspectives of liquid biopsy in NSCLC.

Plasmatic KRAS Kinetics for the Prediction of Treatment Response and Progression in Patients With KRAS-mutant Lung Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

KRAS is the most common driver mutation in lung cancer. ctDNA-based assessment offers advantages over tumor as a minimally invasive method able to capture tumor heterogeneity. Monitoring KRAS mutational load in ctDNA may be useful in the management of the patients.

METHODS

Consecutive patients diagnosed with KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma in the tumor biopsy were included in this study. Plasma samples were obtained at different time points during the course of the disease. KRAS mutations in plasma were quantified using digital PCR and correlated with mutations in tumor and with radiological response and progression.

RESULTS

Two hundred and forty-five plasma samples from 56 patients were analyzed. The rate of detection of KRAS mutations in plasma in our previously characterized KRAS-mutant cases was 82% overall, reaching 96% in cases with more than 1 metastatic location. The dynamics of KRAS mutational load predicted response in 93% and progression in 63% of cases, 33 and 50 days respectively in advance of radiological evaluation. Progression-free survival for patients in whom ctDNA was not detectable in plasma after treatment initiation was significantly longer than for those in whom ctDNA remained detectable (7.7 versus 3.2 months; HR: 0.44, p=0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The detection of KRAS mutations in ctDNA showed a good correlation with that in tumor biopsy and, in most cases, predicted tumor response and progression to chemotherapy in advance of radiographic evaluation. The liquid biopsies for ctDNA-based molecular analyses are a reliable tool for KRAS testing in clinical practice.

Switching from first or second generation EGFR-TKI to osimertinib in EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC

Aim:

We evaluated the efficacy of a novel switch protocol for EGFR-TKIs for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

Materials & methods:

Clinical records were collected from the patients who had received one of two sequential combination strategies of EGFR-TKIs: Salvage use of osimertinib for T790M-mediated acquired resistance to an prior EGFR-TKI or switch use of osimertinib where an EGFR-TKI was switched to osimertinib before disease progression.

Results:

Progression-free survival of osimertinib and time from the start of treatment until progression to osimertinib was comparable between the salvage use and switch use of osimertinib.

Conclusion:

Switch use of osimertinib seemed to produce improved efficacy for patients with activating EGFR mutations, because of the lack of patient selection via T790M.

Clearing of circulating tumour DNA predicts clinical response to osimertinib in EGFR mutated lung cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are first line treatment choices for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, responses vary among patients, therefore good biomarkers predicting better responses are required. EGFR mutations are detected in the blood from patients as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Studies have shown that clearing ctDNA during first line TKI treatment predicts outcomes for first and second generation TKI treatments. We aimed to investigate the effects on outcome measures of ctDNA clearing in subsequent treatment lines to treatment with the third generation TKI osimertinib.

METHODS

In total, 225 patients were included in a prospective, multicentre study, where consecutive blood samples were monitored for EGFR mutations during systemic treatment lines, using the Cobas® EGFR mutation test v2. This study focused on EGFR mutations in ctDNA of 82 systemically pre-treated patients receiving osimertinib.

RESULTS

Clearing all EGFR mutations from the blood after osimertinib treatment, significantly predicted progression-free survival, objective response rates and disease control rates. Primary sensitising EGFR mutations were found in ctDNA in 70 % of patients, and were accompanied by the T790 M mutation in nearly two thirds of cases. The T790 M mutation was cleared in all cases, while the accompanying sensitising mutations did not necessarily clear. However, T790 M clearing without simultaneously clearing of the primary sensitising mutation did not predict clinical responses. Neither the detection of T790 M before osimertinib treatment, nor the presence of EGFR mutations at the time of osimertinib initiation predicted clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The clearing of EGFR mutations in ctDNA after osimertinib treatment initiation in patients with advanced NSCLC is useful as a positive predictor of clinical outcome.

[Liquid biopsy in oncology: A consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology]

The proportion of cancer patients with tumours that harbour a potentially targetable genomic alteration is increasing considerably. The diagnosis of these genomic alterations can lead to tailoring of treatment, at the onset of disease or during progression, as well as providing additional, predictive information on the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, in up to 25% of cases, the initial tissue biopsy is inadequate for precision oncology and, in many cases, tumour genomic profiling at progression is not possible due to technical limitations of obtaining new tumour tissue specimens. Efficient diagnostic alternatives are therefore required for molecular stratification, such as liquid biopsy. This technique enables the evaluation of the tumour genomic profile dynamically and as well as capturing intra-patient genomic heterogeneity. To date, there are several diagnostic techniques available for use in liquid biopsy, each with different precision and performance levels. The objective of this consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) is to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of the different methodological approaches of liquid biopsy in cancer patients, and the potential application of this method to current clinical practice. The experts contributing to this consensus statement agree that, according to current evidence, liquid biopsy is an acceptable alternative to tumour tissue biopsy for the study of biomarkers in various clinical settings. It is therefore important to standardise pre-analytical and analytical procedures to ensure reproducibility and to generate structured and accessible clinical reports. It is essential to appoint multidisciplinary tumour molecular committees to oversee these processes and to enable the most suitable therapeutic decisions for each patient according to the genomic profile.

Dynamic Treatment Stratification Using ctDNA

An accurate profiling of the genomic landscape is mandatory to establish the best clinical and therapeutic approach for patients with solid malignancies. Moreover, tumor cells constantly adapt to external pressures-i.e., systemic treatment-with the selection and expansion of resistant subclones and the emergence of heterogeneous overlapping genomic alterations of resistance. The current standard for molecular characterization in cancer is the performance of a tissue tumor biopsy at the time of diagnosis and, when possible, a re-biopsy at the time of progression. However, tissue biopsy is not always feasible or practical and may underestimate tumor heterogeneity and clonal dynamics. Circulating DNA fragments carrying tumor-specific sequence alterations (circulating tumor DNA, ctDNA) are released from cancer cells into the bloodstream, representing a variable and generally small fraction of the total circulating cell-free DNA. Tumor genotyping in ctDNA (liquid biopsy) offers potential advantages versus the standard tumor tissue biopsy, including non-invasiveness and representation of molecular heterogeneity. Technical advances in sequencing platforms have led to dramatic improvements in variant detection sensitivity and specificity that allow for the detection and quantification of low levels of ctDNA. This provides valuable information on both actionable mutations and captures real-time variations in tumor dynamics. Liquid biopsy clinical applications include molecular diagnosis, determination of tumor load as a surrogate marker of early response, monitoring of mutations of resistance to targeted therapy and detection of minimal residual disease after cancer surgery. The aim of this chapter is to provide an overview of the biological rational and technical background of ctDNA analysis, as well as on the main clinical applications of liquid biopsy in dynamic treatment stratification in solid tumors. Special emphasis will be made on the current and potential benefits of the implementation of ctDNA in clinical practice, mainly in melanoma, lung, and colorectal cancer.

Clearing of circulating tumour DNA predicts clinical response to first line tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor mutated non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations confer sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a subset of patients has limited or no response. We investigated the initial dynamics of EGFR mutations detected in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) during treatment as a predictive marker of outcome.

METHODS

A total of 225 patients with advanced EGFR mutated NSCLC were included for consecutive blood sampling in this prospective multicentre study. Out of these, 146 patients received first line TKI and had a baseline blood sample available for EGFR mutation testing with the Cobas® EGFR mutation test V2. For examinations on clearing and clinical outcome, 98 patients who had detectable ctDNA at baseline and at least one follow-up blood sample were included.

RESULTS

For patients with EGFR mutations present in plasma at baseline, clearing of mutations from the blood during first line TKI served as a positive predictor for objective response rate (p = 0.0008), progression-free survival (PFS) (p < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS) (p < 0.0001). This was seen both for patients who cleared the ctDNA within the first 7 weeks of treatment and patients who cleared the ctDNA at a slower pace. Baseline mutation presence was a negative predictor for PFS (p = 0.0069) and OS (p = 0.0340).

CONCLUSION

The current study is the first to confirm, in a sizeable Caucasian cohort, that clearing of EGFR mutations predict outcome to first line TKI in patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC.

Updated guidelines for predictive biomarker testing in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a National Consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

In 2011 the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) started a joint project to establish guidelines on biomarker testing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on current evidence. As this field is constantly evolving, these guidelines have been updated, previously in 2012 and 2015 and now in 2019. Current evidence suggests that the mandatory tests to conduct in all patients with advanced NSCLC are for EGFR and BRAF mutations, ALK and ROS1 rearrangements and PD-L1 expression. The growing need to study other emerging biomarkers has promoted the routine use of massive sequencing (next-generation sequencing, NGS). The coordination of every professional involved and the prioritisation of the most suitable tests and technologies for each case remains a challenge.

Liquid biopsy in oncology: a consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology

The proportion of cancer patients with tumours that harbour a potentially targetable genomic alteration is growing considerably. The diagnosis of these genomic alterations can lead to tailored treatment at the onset of disease or on progression and to obtaining additional predictive information on immunotherapy efficacy. However, in up to 25% of cases, the initial tissue biopsy is inadequate for precision oncology and, in many cases, tumour genomic profiling at progression is not possible due to technical limitations of obtaining new tumour tissue specimens. Efficient diagnostic alternatives are therefore required for molecular stratification, which includes liquid biopsy. This technique enables the evaluation of the tumour genomic profile dynamically and captures intra-patient genomic heterogeneity as well. To date, there are several diagnostic techniques available for use in liquid biopsy, each one of them with different precision and performance levels. The objective of this consensus statement of the Spanish Society of Pathology and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology is to evaluate the viability and effectiveness of the different methodological approaches in liquid biopsy in cancer patients and the potential application of this method to current clinical practice. The experts contributing to this consensus statement agree that, according to current evidence, liquid biopsy is an acceptable alternative to tumour tissue biopsy for the study of biomarkers in various clinical settings. It is therefore important to standardise pre-analytical and analytical procedures, to ensure reproducibility and generate structured and accessible clinical reports. It is essential to appoint multidisciplinary tumour molecular boards to oversee these processes and to enable the most suitable therapeutic decisions for each patient according to the genomic profile.

Comparison of BEAMing and Droplet Digital PCR for Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis

BACKGROUND

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays are increasingly used for clinical decision-making, but it is unknown how well different assays agree. We aimed to assess the agreement in ctDNA mutation calling between BEAMing (beads, emulsion, amplification, and magnetics) and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR), 2 of the most commonly used digital PCR techniques for detecting mutations in ctDNA.

METHODS

mutations in ctDNA with both BEAMing and ddPCR. Concordance between the 2 approaches was assessed, with exploratory analyses to estimate the importance of sampling effects.

RESULTS

= 0.019). The majority of discordant calls occurred at allele frequency <1%, predominantly resulting from stochastic sampling effects.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, clinically relevant comparison showed good agreement between BEAMing and ddPCR, suggesting sufficient reproducibility for clinical use. Much of the observed discordancy may be related to sampling effects, potentially explaining many of the differences in the currently available ctDNA literature.

Circulating free tumor DNA in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): clinical application and future perspectives

Major advances in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have been obtained during the last decade. Molecular testing of tumor samples is therefore mandatory in routine clinical practice. Tumor DNA is also present as cell-free molecules in blood, which is therefore a very useful and convenient source of tumor DNA. In this review, we discuss pre-analytical and analytical aspects of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. We also describe the use of ctDNA analysis in routine clinical practice, and discuss the potential use of ctDNA monitoring both to identify minimal residual disease and as a potential tool to early identify patients' response to treatment.

Potential Regulatory Roles of MicroRNAs and Long Noncoding RNAs in Anticancer Therapies

MicroRNAs and long noncoding RNAs have long been investigated due to their roles as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of cancers and regulators of tumorigenesis, and the potential regulatory roles of these molecules in anticancer therapies are attracting increasing interest as more in-depth studies are performed. The major clinical therapies for cancer include chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted molecular therapy. MicroRNAs and long noncoding RNAs function through various mechanisms in these approaches, and the mechanisms involve direct targeting of immune checkpoints, cooperation with exosomes in the tumor microenvironment, and alteration of drug resistance through regulation of different signaling pathways. Herein we review the regulatory functions and significance of microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in three anticancer therapies, especially in targeted molecular therapy, and their mechanisms.