1
|
[ 68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT for radiation therapy planning in biliary tract, pancreatic ductal adeno-, and adenoidcystic carcinomas. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16261. [PMID: 36171444 PMCID: PMC9519639 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20447-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 09/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary-tract-carcinomas (BTC), pancreatic-ductal-adenocarcinomas (PDAC) and adenoidcystic-carcinomas (AC) have in common that they are traditionally treated with large clinical-target-volumes (CTV). The aim of this study is to examine the impact of pretreatment-[68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT on target-volume-definition and posttreatment-[68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT-response-assessment for BTC-, PDAC- and AC-patients referred to radiation-therapy. All consecutive BTC-, PDAC-, and AC-patients who received pretreatment-[68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT±[18F]FDG-PET/CT were included from 01.01.2020 to 01.03.2022. MTV and SUVmax were separately generated based on [68Ga]FAPI- and [18F]FDG-PET/CT-images. A [68Ga]FAPI- and [18F]FDG-based-CTV was defined. Treatment-plans were compared. Treatment-response was reassessed by a second [68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT and [18F]FDG-PET/CT after treatment-completion. Intermodality comparison of lesion-to-background-ratios [SUVmax_lesion/SUVmean_background] for individual timepoints t1 and t2 revealed significant higher values for [68Ga]FAPI compared to [18F]FDG (t1, p = 0.008; t2, p = 0.005). Intermodality comparison of radiation-therapy-plans showed that [68Ga]FAPI-based planning resulted in D100% = 97.2% and V95% = 98.8% for the [18F]FDG-MTV. [18F]FDG-based-planning resulted in D100% = 35.9% and V95% = 78.1% for [68Ga]FAPI-MTV. [18F]FDG-based-planning resulted only in 2 patients in V95% > 95% for [68Ga]FAPI-MTV, and in 1 patient in D100% > 97% for [68Ga]FAPI-MTV. GTV-coverage in terms of V95% was 76.4% by [18F]FDG-based-planning and 99.5% by [68Ga]FAPI-based-planning. Pretreatment [68Ga]FAPI-PET/CT enhances radiation-treatment-planning in this particular group of patients. While perilesional and tumoral follow-up [18F]FDG-uptake behaved uniformly, perilesional and tumoral reaction may differ in follow-up [68Ga]FAPI-imaging. Complementary [68Ga]FAPI- and [18F]FDG-imaging enhance treatment-response-assessment.
Collapse
|
2
|
Falahatpour Z, Geramifar P, Mahdavi SR, Abdollahi H, Salimi Y, Nikoofar A, Ay MR. Potential advantages of FDG-PET radiomic feature map for target volume delineation in lung cancer radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13696. [PMID: 35699200 PMCID: PMC9512354 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the potential benefits of FDG PET radiomic feature maps (RFMs) for target delineation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) radiotherapy. METHODS Thirty-two NSCLC patients undergoing FDG PET/CT imaging were included. For each patient, nine grey-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) RFMs were generated. gross target volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV) were contoured on CT (GTVCT , CTVCT ), PET (GTVPET40 , CTVPET40 ), and RFMs (GTVRFM , CTVRFM ,). Intratumoral heterogeneity areas were segmented as GTVPET50-Boost and radiomic boost target volume (RTVBoost ) on PET and RFMs, respectively. GTVCT in homogenous tumors and GTVPET40 in heterogeneous tumors were considered as GTVgold standard (GTVGS ). One-way analysis of variance was conducted to determine the threshold that finds the best conformity for GTVRFM with GTVGS . Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean absolute percent error (MAPE) were calculated. Linear regression analysis was employed to report the correlations between the gold standard and RFM-derived target volumes. RESULTS Entropy, contrast, and Haralick correlation (H-correlation) were selected for tumor segmentation. The threshold values of 80%, 50%, and 10% have the best conformity of GTVRFM-entropy , GTVRFM-contrast , and GTVRFM-H-correlation with GTVGS , respectively. The linear regression results showed a positive correlation between GTVGS and GTVRFM-entropy (r = 0.98, p < 0.001), between GTVGS and GTVRFM-contrast (r = 0.93, p < 0.001), and between GTVGS and GTVRFM-H-correlation (r = 0.91, p < 0.001). The average threshold values of 45% and 15% were resulted in the best segmentation matching between CTVRFM-entropy and CTVRFM-contrast with CTVGS , respectively. Moreover, we used RFM to determine RTVBoost in the heterogeneous tumors. Comparison of RTVBoost with GTVPET50-Boost MAPE showed the volume error differences of 31.7%, 36%, and 34.7% in RTVBoost-entropy , RTVBoost-contrast , and RTVBoost-H-correlation , respectively. CONCLUSIONS FDG PET-based radiomics features in NSCLC demonstrated a promising potential for decision support in radiotherapy, helping radiation oncologists delineate tumors and generate accurate segmentation for heterogeneous region of tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Falahatpour
- Department of Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Parham Geramifar
- Research Center for Nuclear Medicine, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Rabie Mahdavi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hamid Abdollahi
- Department of Radiology Technology, Faculty of Allied Medicine, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran
| | - Yazdan Salimi
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Medical Physics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Alireza Nikoofar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Reza Ay
- Department of Medical Physics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bowen SR, Hippe DS, Thomas HM, Sasidharan B, Lampe PD, Baik CS, Eaton KD, Lee S, Martins RG, Santana-Davila R, Chen DL, Kinahan PE, Miyaoka RS, Vesselle HJ, Houghton AM, Rengan R, Zeng J. Prognostic Value of Early Fluorodeoxyglucose-Positron Emission Tomography Response Imaging and Peripheral Immunologic Biomarkers: Substudy of a Phase II Trial of Risk-Adaptive Chemoradiation for Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100857. [PMID: 35387421 PMCID: PMC8977846 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We sought to examine the prognostic value of fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (PET) imaging during chemoradiation for unresectable non-small cell lung cancer for survival and hypothesized that tumor PET response is correlated with peripheral T-cell function. Methods and Materials Forty-five patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer version 7 stage IIB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer enrolled in a phase II trial and received platinum-doublet chemotherapy concurrent with 6 weeks of radiation (NCT02773238). Fluorodeoxyglucose-PET was performed before treatment start and after 24 Gy of radiation (week 3). PET response status was prospectively defined by multifactorial radiologic interpretation. PET responders received 60 Gy in 30 fractions, while nonresponders received concomitant boosts to 74 Gy in 30 fractions. Peripheral blood was drawn synchronously with PET imaging, from which germline DNA sequencing, T-cell receptor sequencing, and plasma cytokine analysis were performed. Results Median follow-up was 18.8 months, 1-year overall survival (OS) 82%, 1-year progression-free survival 53%, and 1-year locoregional control 88%. Higher midtreatment PET total lesion glycolysis was detrimental to OS (1 year 87% vs 63%, P < .001), progression-free survival (1 year 60% vs 26%, P = .044), and locoregional control (1 year 94% vs 65%, P = .012), even after adjustment for clinical/treatment factors. Twenty-nine of 45 patients (64%) were classified as PET responders based on a priori definition. Higher tumor programmed death-ligand 1 expression was correlated with response on PET (P = .017). Higher T-cell receptor richness and clone distribution slope were associated with improved OS (P = .018-0.035); clone distribution slope was correlated with PET response (P = .031). Conclusions Midchemoradiation PET imaging is prognostic for survival; PET response may be linked to tumor and peripheral T-cell biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen R. Bowen
- Radiation Oncology and
- Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Daniel S. Hippe
- Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hannah M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India
| | | | - Paul D. Lampe
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christina S. Baik
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Keith D. Eaton
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sylvia Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Renato G. Martins
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Rafael Santana-Davila
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Delphine L. Chen
- Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Paul E. Kinahan
- Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Robert S. Miyaoka
- Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - Hubert J. Vesselle
- Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
| | - A. McGarry Houghton
- Human Biology Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Ramesh Rengan
- Radiation Oncology and
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chau O, Islam A, Yu E, Qu M, Butler J, Biernaski H, Sun A, Bissonnette JP, MacDonald A, Graf C, So A, Wisenberg G, Lee T, Prato FS, Gaede S. Multi-Modality Imaging Assessment of the Heart Before and After Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Radiotherapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100927. [PMID: 35434423 PMCID: PMC9006649 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.100927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|
5
|
Shao Y, Chen H, Wang H, Feng A, Huang Y, Kong Q, Xu Z. Isotoxic investigation of 18F-FDG PET/CT-guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy for LA-NSCLC. Int J Radiat Biol 2021; 97:1641-1648. [PMID: 34597214 DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2021.1987557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This research compared differences of dosimetric and biological parameters between PET/CT-guided isotoxic SIB-IMRT plans and conventional radiotherapy plans for patients with LA-NSCLC, and it also evaluated the factors that affect dose escalation. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study consisted of a retrospective cohort of thirty patients with IIIA-IIIB NSCLC. SIB-IMRT (Plan_iso) and conventional radiotherapy (Plan_primary) plans were generated using auto-planning. Dosimetric parameters such as mean lung dose (MLD) and other indicators were compared. Tumor control probability (TCP) of PTV and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of total lung, heart, esophagus, and spinal cord were calculated. The relationships between dose escalation and 3 D length of PTV and other factors were analyzed. Paired-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Chi-Square test were performed for comparisons between datasets. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The dosimetric parameters of PTV in Plan_iso were higher than those of PTV in Plan_primary, and there were significant differences (p < .05). Compared with Plan_primary, Plan_iso slightly increased dosimetric parameters of the total lung, heart, spinal cord, esophagus, and MUs. The absolute differences were small. TCPs of PTV in Plan_iso were significantly higher than those in Plan_primary. NTCPs of the total lung, esophagus, and spinal cord in Plan_iso were higher than those in Plan_primary. There were significant differences, but the absolute differences were small. NTCP of heart in Plan_iso was slightly higher than that in Plan_primary, but there was no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS For LA-NSCLC, the SIB based on isotoxic radiotherapy can significantly increase TCP under the premise that the toxicity of OARs is comparable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Shao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hua Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.,Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Aihui Feng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qing Kong
- Institute of Modern Physics, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhiyong Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guberina M, Pöttgen C, Metzenmacher M, Wiesweg M, Schuler M, Aigner C, Ploenes T, Umutlu L, Gauler T, Darwiche K, Stamatis G, Theegarten D, Hautzel H, Jentzen W, Guberina N, Herrmann K, Eberhardt WE, Stuschke M. PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF POST-INDUCTION CHEMOTHERAPY VOLUMETRIC PET/CT PARAMETERS FOR STAGE IIIA/B NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:jnumed.120.260646. [PMID: 34016730 PMCID: PMC8612197 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.260646] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 03/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose/Objective(s): The aim of this follow-up analysis of the ESPATUE phase-3 trial was to explore the prognostic value of post-induction chemotherapy PET metrics in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who were assigned to receive definitive chemoradiotherapy. Materials/Methods: All eligible patients stage IIIA (cN2) and stage IIIB of the trial received induction chemotherapy consisting of 3 cycles of cisplatin/paclitaxel and chemoradiotherapy up to 45 Gy/1.5 Gy per fraction twice-a-day, followed by a radiation-boost with 2 Gy once per day with concurrent cisplatin/vinorelbine. The protocol definition prescribed a total dose of 65-71 Gy. 18F-FDG-PET/CT (PETpre) was performed at study entry and before concurrent chemoradiotherapy (interim-PET; PETpost). Interim PETpost metrics and known prognostic clinical parameters were correlated in uni- and multivariable survival analyses. Leave-one-out cross-validation was used to show internal validity. Results: Ninety-two patients who underwent 18F-FDG-PET/CT after induction chemotherapy were enrolled. Median MTVpost value was 5.9 ml. Altogether 85 patients completed the whole chemoradiation with the planned total dose of 60-71 Gy. In univariable proportional hazard analysis, each of the parameters MTVpost, SUVmax(post) and TLGmax(post) was associated with overall survival (P < 0.05). Multivariable survival analysis, including clinical and post-induction PET parameters, found TLGmax(post) (hazard ratio: 1.032 (95%-CI: 1.013-1.052) per 100 ml increase) and total radiation dose (hazard ratio: 0.930 (0.902-0.959) per Gray increase) significantly related with overall survival in the whole group of patients, and also in patients receiving a total dose ≥ 60 Gy. The best leave-one-out cross-validated 2 parameter classifier contained TLGmax(post) and total radiation dose. TLGmax(post) was associated with time to distant metastases (P = 0.0018), and SUVmax(post) with time to loco-regional relapse (P = 0.039) in multivariable analysis of patients receiving a total dose ≥ 60 Gy. Conclusion: Post-induction chemotherapy PET parameters demonstrated prognostic significance. Therefore, an interim 18F-FDG-PET/CT is a promising diagnostic modality for guiding individualized treatment intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Guberina
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Metzenmacher
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Marcel Wiesweg
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Clemens Aigner
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Endoscopy, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Till Ploenes
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Endoscopy, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Thomas Gauler
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Kaid Darwiche
- Section of Interventional Pneumology, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Georgios Stamatis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Endoscopy, West German Lung Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Dirk Theegarten
- Institute of Pathology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Jentzen
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nika Guberina
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen
- Department for Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wilfried E.E. Eberhardt
- Department of Medical Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- Division of Thoracic Oncology, West German Cancer Center, University Medicine Essen–Ruhrlandklinik, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Martin Stuschke
- Department for Radiotherapy, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg–Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zeng J, Bowen SR. Treatment Intensification in Locally Advanced/Unresectable NSCLC Through Combined Modality Treatment and Precision Dose Escalation. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 31:105-111. [PMID: 33610266 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The best survival for patients with unresectable, locally advanced NSCLC is currently achieved through concurrent chemoradiation followed by durvalumab for a year. Despite the best standard of care treatment, the majority of patients still develop disease recurrence, which could be distant and/or local. Trials continue to try and improve outcomes for patients with unresectable NSCLC, typically through treatment intensification, with the addition of more systemic agents, or more radiation dose to the tumor. Although RTOG 0617 showed that uniform dose escalation across an unselected population of patients undergoing chemoradiation is not beneficial, efforts continue to select patients and tumor subsets that are likely to benefit from dose escalation. This review describes some of the ongoing therapeutic trials in unresectable NSCLC, with an emphasis on quantitative imaging and precision radiation dose escalation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; Department of Radiology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kavanaugh J, Roach M, Ji Z, Fontenot J, Hugo GD. A method for predictive modeling of tumor regression for lung adaptive radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:2083-2094. [PMID: 33035365 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2020] [Revised: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this work is to create a decision support methodology to predict when patients undergoing radiotherapy treatment for locally advanced lung cancer would potentially benefit from adaptive radiotherapy. The proposed methodology seeks to eliminate the manual subjective review by developing an automated statistical learning model to predict when tumor regression would trigger implementation of adaptive radiotherapy based on quantified anatomic changes observed in individual patients on-treatment cone beam computed tomographies (CTs). This proposed process seeks to improve the efficacy and efficiency of both the existing manual and automated adaptive review processes for locally advanced stage III lung cancer. METHODS A predictive algorithm was developed as a decision support tool to determine the potential utility of mid-treatment adaptive radiotherapy based on anatomic changes observed on 1158 daily CBCT images across 43 patients. The anatomic changes on each axial slice within specified regions-of-interest were quantified into a single value utilizing imaging similarity criteria comparing the daily CBCT to the initial simulation CT. The range of the quantified metrics for each fraction across all axial slices are reduced to specified quantiles, which are used as the predictive input to train a logistic regression algorithm. A "ground-truth" of the need for adaptive radiotherapy based on tumor regression was evaluated systematically on each of the daily CBCTs and used as the classifier in the logistic regression algorithm. Accuracy of the predictive model was assessed utilizing both a tenfold cross validation and an independent validation dataset, with the sensitivity, specificity, and fractional accuracy compared to the ground-truth. RESULTS The sensitivity and specificity for the individual daily fractions ranged from 87.9%-94.3% and 91.9%-98.6% for a probability threshold of 0.2-0.5, respectively. The corresponding average treatment fraction difference between the model predictions and assessed ART "ground-truth" ranged from -2.25 to -0.07 fractions, with the model predictions consistently predicting the potential need for ART earlier in the treatment course. By initially utilizing a lower probability threshold, the higher sensitivity minimizes the chance of false negative by alerting the clinician to review a higher number of questionable cases. CONCLUSIONS The proposed methodology accurately predicted the first fraction at which individual patients may benefit from ART based on quantified anatomic changes observed in the on-treatment volumetric imaging. The generalizability of the proposed method has potential to expand to additional modes of adaptive radiotherapy for lung cancer patients with observed underlying anatomic changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Michael Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Zhen Ji
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| | - Jonas Fontenot
- Department of Physics, Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center, Baton Rouge, LA, 70809, USA.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803-4001, USA
| | - Geoffrey D Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Dosimetric comparison and biological evaluation of PET- and CT-based target delineation for LA-NSCLC using auto-planning. Phys Med 2019; 67:77-84. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.09.080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Revised: 08/08/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
|
10
|
Das SK, McGurk R, Miften M, Mutic S, Bowsher J, Bayouth J, Erdi Y, Mawlawi O, Boellaard R, Bowen SR, Xing L, Bradley J, Schoder H, Yin FF, Sullivan DC, Kinahan P. Task Group 174 Report: Utilization of [ 18 F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography ([ 18 F]FDG-PET) in Radiation Therapy. Med Phys 2019; 46:e706-e725. [PMID: 31230358 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Revised: 04/30/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The use of positron emission tomography (PET) in radiation therapy (RT) is rapidly increasing in the areas of staging, segmentation, treatment planning, and response assessment. The most common radiotracer is 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose ([18 F]FDG), a glucose analog with demonstrated efficacy in cancer diagnosis and staging. However, diagnosis and RT planning are different endeavors with unique requirements, and very little literature is available for guiding physicists and clinicians in the utilization of [18 F]FDG-PET in RT. The two goals of this report are to educate and provide recommendations. The report provides background and education on current PET imaging systems, PET tracers, intensity quantification, and current utilization in RT (staging, segmentation, image registration, treatment planning, and therapy response assessment). Recommendations are provided on acceptance testing, annual and monthly quality assurance, scanning protocols to ensure consistency between interpatient scans and intrapatient longitudinal scans, reporting of patient and scan parameters in literature, requirements for incorporation of [18 F]FDG-PET in treatment planning systems, and image registration. The recommendations provided here are minimum requirements and are not meant to cover all aspects of the use of [18 F]FDG-PET for RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva K Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ross McGurk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Moyed Miften
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sasa Mutic
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James Bowsher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - John Bayouth
- Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Yusuf Erdi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas, M D Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen R Bowen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Lei Xing
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Jeffrey Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Heiko Schoder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Daniel C Sullivan
- Department of Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Paul Kinahan
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bang A, Schoenfeld JD, Sun AY. PACIFIC: shifting tides in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2019; 8:S139-S146. [PMID: 31673518 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr.2019.09.04] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The treatment paradigm of stage III, unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has had few advancement since concurrent chemoradiotherapy was established as standard of care treatment. Despite modifications to radiotherapy, chemotherapy and surgical approaches, loco-regional and distant relapse remain high, which unfortunately has translated to poor survival outcomes. The PACIFIC study introduced immunotherapy to the domain of stage III NSCLC and has emerged as the fourth pillar in cancer treatment for these patients. The positive results of the study have excited both the radiation and medical oncology communities, demonstrating improvements in overall and progression-free survival (PFS). In this review, we discuss the details and impacts of the PACIFIC study, as well as the future implications for the treatment of stage III NSCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Bang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jonathan D Schoenfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Alexander Y Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kavanaugh J, Hugo G, Robinson CG, Roach MC. Anatomical Adaptation-Early Clinical Evidence of Benefit and Future Needs in Lung Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2019; 29:274-283. [PMID: 31027644 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2019.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Definitive treatment of locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with radiation is challenging. During the course of treatment, anatomical changes such as tumor regression, tumor displacement/deformation, pleural effusion, and/or atelectasis can result in a deviation of the administered radiation dose from the intended prescribed treatment and thereby worsen local control and toxicity. Adaptive radiotherapy can help correct for these changes and can be generally categorized into 3 philosophical paradigms: (1) maintenance of prescribed dose to the initially defined target volume; (2) dose reduction to healthy organs while maintaining initial prescribed dose to a regressing tumor volume; or (3) dose escalation to a regressing tumor volume with isotoxicity to healthy organs. Numerous single institution studies have investigated these methods, and results from large prospective clinical trials will hopefully provide consensus on the method, utility, and efficacy of implementing adaptive radiation therapy (ART) in a clinical setting. Additional development into standardization and automation of the ART workflow, specifically in identifying when ART is warranted and in reducing the manual clinical effort needed to produce an adaptive plan, will be paramount to making ART feasible for the broader radiation therapy community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Geoffrey Hugo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Cliff G Robinson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO
| | - Michael C Roach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dosani M, Yang R, McLay M, Wilson D, Liu M, Yong-Hing CJ, Hamm J, Lund CR, Olson R, Schellenberg D. Metabolic tumour volume is prognostic in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 26:e57-e63. [PMID: 30853810 DOI: 10.3747/co.26.4167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (sabr) is a relatively new technique for the curative-intent treatment of patients with inoperable early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (nsclc). Previous studies have demonstrated a prognostic value for positron emission tomography-computed tomography (pet/ct) parameters, including maximal standardized uptake value (suvmax), metabolic tumour volume (mtv), and total lesion glycolysis (tlg) in lung cancer patients. We aimed to determine which pet/ct parameter is most prognostic of local control (lc) and overall survival (os) in patients treated with sabr for nsclc. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients treated with sabr for stage I inoperable nsclc at BC Cancer between 2009 and 2013. The Akaike information criterion was used to compare the prognostic value of the various pet/ct parameters. Results The study included 134 patients with a median age of 76 years. Median tumour diameter was 2.2 cm, gross tumour volume was 8.1 mL, suvmax was 7.9, mtv was 2.4 mL, and tlg was 10.9 suv·mL. The 2-year lc was 92%, and os was 66%. On univariate and multivariate analysis, imaging variables including tumour size, gross tumour volume, suvmax, mtv, and tlg were all associated with worse lc. Tumour size was not associated with significantly worse os, but other imaging variables were. The pet/ct parameter most prognostic of lc was mtv. Compared with suvmax, tlg and mtv were more prognostic of os. Conclusions In patients with early-stage nsclc treated with sabr, mtv appears to be prognostic of lc and os.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Dosani
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC
| | - R Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC
| | - M McLay
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Centre for the North, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince George, BC
| | - D Wilson
- Department of Functional Imaging, BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC
| | - M Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Vancouver, BC
| | - C J Yong-Hing
- Department of Radiology, BC Cancer-Vancouver Centre, and Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - J Hamm
- Cancer Surveillance and Outcomes, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC
| | - C R Lund
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Fraser Valley Centre, Surrey, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| | - R Olson
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Centre for the North, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince George, BC
| | - D Schellenberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Developmental Therapeutics, BC Cancer-Fraser Valley Centre, Surrey, and Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC
| |
Collapse
|