Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis--an update of its clinical effects

Synthesis and Anti-Breast Cancer Potency of Mono- and Bis-(pyrazolyl[1,2,4]triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazine) Derivatives as EGFR/CDK-2 Target Inhibitors

The target mono- and bis-(6-pyrazolyltriazolo-thiadiazine) derivatives 4a-c and 6a-d were synthesized using a straightforward protocol via reaction of 3-bromoacetylpyrazole 2 with 4-amino-s-triazole-3-thiols 3a-c and bis(4-amino-5-mercapto-s-triazol-3-yl)alkanes 5a-d, respectively. The bis(6-pyrazolyl-s-triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazine) derivatives 8a,b and 10 were also constructed by reaction of the triazolo[3,4-b][1,3,4]thiadiazine-3-thiol 4c with the proper dibromo compounds 7a,b and 9, respectively. Structures of the new substances were determined by spectroscopic and analytical data. Compounds 4b, 4c, and 6a showed potent cytotoxicity against MCF-7 (IC50 = 3.16, 2.74, and 0.39 μM, respectively) and were safe against the MCF-10A cells. Compounds 4b, 4c, and 6a also showed promising dual EGFR and CDK-2 inhibition activities, particularly 6a was the most effective (IC50 = 19.6 and 87.9 nM, respectively), better than Erlotinib and Roscovitine. Compound 6a treatment induced EGFR and CDK-2 enzyme inhibition by 97.18% and 94.11%, respectively, at 10 μM (the highest concentration). Compound 6a notably induced cell apoptosis in MCF-7 cells, increasing the cell population by total apoptosis 43.3% compared to 1.29% for the untreated control group, increasing the cell population at the S-phase by 39.2% compared to 18.6% (control).

Synthesis of novel mono- and bis-pyrazolylthiazole derivatives as anti-liver cancer agents through EGFR/HER2 target inhibition

3-Bromoacetyl-4-(2-naphthoyl)-1-phenyl-1H-pyrazole (6) was synthesized from 2-acetylnaphthalene and was used as a new key building block for constructing the title targets. Thus, the reaction of 6 with the thiosemicarbazones 7a-d and 9-11 afforded the corresponding simple naphthoyl-(3-pyrazolyl)thiazole hybrids 8a-d and 12 ~ 14. The symmetric bis-(2-naphthoyl-pyrazol-3-yl)thiazol-2-yl)hydrazono)methyl)phenoxy)alkanes 18a-c and 21a-c were similarly synthesized from reaction of 6 with the appropriate bis-thiosemicarbazones 17a-c and 19a-c, respectively. The synthesized two series of simple and symmetrical bis-molecular hybrid merging naphthalene, thiazole, and pyrazole were evaluated for their cytotoxicity. Compounds 18b,c and 21a showed the most potent cytotoxicity (IC₅₀ = 0.97-3.57 µM) compared to Lapatinib (IC₅₀ = 7.45 µM). Additionally, they were safe (non-cytotoxic) against the THLE2 cells with higher IC₅₀ values. Compounds 18c exhibited promising EGFR and HER-2 inhibitory activities with IC₅₀ = 4.98 and 9.85 nM, respectively, compared to Lapatinib (IC₅₀ = 6.1 and 17.2 nM). Apoptosis investigation revealed that 18c significantly activated apoptotic cell death in HepG2 cells, increasing the death rate by 63.6-fold and arresting cell proliferation at the S-phase. Compound 18c upregulated P53 by 8.6-fold, Bax by 8.9-fold, caspase-3,8,9 by 9, 2.3, and 7.6-fold, while it inhibited the Bcl-2 expression by 0.34-fold. Thereby, compound 18c exhibited promising cytotoxicity against EGFR/HER2 inhibition against liver cancer.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ruxolitinib: A Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Ruxolitinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting the Janus kinase (JAK) and signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathways. Ruxolitinib is used to treat myelofibrosis, polycythemia vera and steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease in the setting of allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. This review describes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ruxolitinib.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and web of Science were searched from the time of database inception to march 15, 2021 and was repeated on November 16, 2021. Articles not written in English, animal or in vitro studies, letters to the editor, case reports, where ruxolitinib was not used for hematological diseases or not available as full text were excluded.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib is well absorbed, has 95% bio-availability, and is bound to albumin for 97%. Ruxolitinib pharmacokinetics can be described with a two-compartment model and linear elimination. Volume of distribution differs between men and women, likely related to bodyweight differences. Metabolism is mainly hepatic via CYP3A4 and can be altered by CYP3A4 inducers and inhibitors. The major metabolites of ruxolitinib are pharmacologically active. The main route of elimination of ruxolitinib metabolites is renal. Liver and renal dysfunction affect some of the pharmacokinetic variables and require dose reductions. Model-informed precision dosing might be a way to further optimize and individualize ruxolitinib treatment, but is not yet advised for routine care due to lack of information on target concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to explain the interindividual variability of the ruxolitinib pharmacokinetic variables and to optimize individual treatment.

Population pharmacokinetics of ruxolitinib in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: focus on the drug-drug interactions

PURPOSE

The optimal dose regimen of ruxolitinib (RUX) in children with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) remains to be determined. The aim was to develop and verify a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model, and then provide references for the optimization of dose regimen of RUX in children with HLH.

METHODS

A total of 189 RUX concentrations from 32 children were included. The PPK model was established using the nonlinear mixed-effects model approach. Predictive performance and stability of the final PPK model were evaluated. The exposure of RUX in different clinical scenarios was simulated through Monte Carlo simulations.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination was identified to describe the disposition of RUX. The absorption rate constant (K_a) in the final PPK model was 1.05 h^-1, and the apparent clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F) were 9.80 L/h and 30.6 L, respectively. Coadministration with triazoles (TZS) and azithromycin (AZM) resulted in approximately 31.0% and 32.4% reductions in the CL/F of RUX, respectively. Multiple evaluation procedures showed satisfactory predictive performance and stability of the final model. Monte Carlo simulations showed that the exposure of RUX was significantly affected by the coadministration with TZS and/or AZM under different clinical scenarios.

CONCLUSION

For the first time, a PPK model of RUX in children with HLH was developed and evaluated. The coadministration with TZS and/or AZM were found to reduce the clearance of RUX in children. These findings could provide new insights for the precise treatment of RUX in children with HLH.

Remodeling the Bone Marrow Microenvironment - A Proposal for Targeting Pro-inflammatory Contributors in MPN

Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are malignant bone marrow (BM) disorders, typically arising from a single somatically mutated hematopoietic stem cell. The most commonly mutated genes, JAK2, CALR, and MPL lead to constitutively active JAK-STAT signaling. Common clinical features include myeloproliferation, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. This review covers the contributions of cellular components of MPN pathology (e.g., monocytes, megakaryocytes, and mesenchymal stromal cells) as well as cytokines and soluble mediators to the development of myelofibrosis (MF) and highlights recent therapeutic advances. These findings outline the importance of malignant and non-malignant BM constituents to the pathogenesis and treatment of MF.

Ruxolitinib-based combinations in the treatment of myelofibrosis: worth looking forward to

Ruxolitinib is a targeted drug to treat myelofibrosis (MF). Ruxolitinib has significant advantages in spleen reduction and increasing 5-year overall survival (OS), and ruxolitinib-based combinations might provide more benefits than ruxolitinib monotherapy. In this review, we focus on the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) and safety. We analyzed and summarized the data of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Ruxolitinib combined with prednisone + thalidomide + danazol (TPD), panobinostat, pracinostat, azacytidine, or hydroxyurea has well reduced spleen. Ruxolitinib combined with danazol or TPD had well therapies in improvement of hemoglobin (Hgb) and platelets (PLT). Most ruxolitinib-based combinations therapies showed a superior benefit on reduced treatment-related AEs than ruxolitinib monotherapy. Treatment-related AEs and dose modification affect the safety and tolerability of ruxolitinib-based combinations. Genetic testing before treatment is recommended. To provide better clinical guidance, comparisons of these randomized controlled trials with the trials of ruxolitinib alone are necessary. This review suggests that the clinical application of ruxolitinib-based combinations is worth waiting for.

Synthesis and molecular docking study of new pyrazole derivatives as potent anti-breast cancer agents targeting VEGFR-2 kinase

Based on the previous studies that revealed the valuable role of pyrazole scaffold in cancer management and VEGFR-2 inhibition, a new set of pyrazole conjugated with pyrazoline, triazolopyrimidine and pyrazolone moieties were synthesized and investigated for their anticancer efficiency against human breast cancer MCF-7. The anticancer screening revealed the significant sensitivity of breast carcinoma towards compounds 4b, 5c, 6c, 7b, 7c and 12c with IC₅₀ values ranging from 16.50 - 26.73 µM in comparison with tamoxifen (IC₅₀ = 23.31 µM). Moreover, the new analogues were further examined for their VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity, among the tested derivatives 5c, 6c, 7b, 7c and 12c displayed prominent inhibitory efficiency versus VEGFR-2 kinase with % inhibition ranging from 70 to 79%. Compounds 6c, 7c and 12c revealed inhibitory efficiency in nanomolar level with IC₅₀ (913.51, 225.17 and 828.23 nM, respectively) comparing to sorafenib (IC₅₀ = 186.54 nM). Flow cytometric analysis revealed that the promising compound 12c prompted pre-G1 apoptosis and cell growth cessation at G2/M phase and stimulated apoptosis via activation of caspase-3. Moreover, molecular docking study of the promising derivatives was performed to highlight their binding modes and interactions with the amino acid residues of VEGFR-2 enzyme.

Classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms: focus on mutations and JAK2 inhibitors

Classical Philadelphia- negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) encompass three main myeloid malignancies: polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). Phenotype-driver mutations in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2), calreticulin (CALR), and myeloproliferative leukemia virus oncogene (MPL) genes are mutually exclusive and occur with a variable frequency. Driver mutations influence disease phenotype and prognosis. PV patients with JAK2 exon 14 mutation do not differ in number of thrombotic events, risk of leukemic and fibrotic transformation, and overall survival to those with JAK2 exon 12 mutation. Type 2-like CALR-mutated ET patients have lower risk of thrombosis if compared with those carrying JAK2 or type 1-like CALR mutation. For ET, overall survival is comparable between patients with JAK2 and either type 1-like and type 2-like CALR mutations. For MF, better OS is demonstrated for patients harboring a type 1-like CALR mutation than those with type 2-like CALR or JAK2. The discovery of driver mutations in MPNs has prompted the development of molecularly targeted therapy. Among JAK2 inhibitors, ruxolitinib (RUX) has been approved for (1) treatment of intermediate-2 and high-risk MF and (2) PV patients who are resistant to or intolerant to hydroxyurea. RUX reduces spleen size and alleviates disease symptoms in a proportion of MF patients. RUX in MF leads to prolonged survival and reduces risk of death. RUX controls hematocrit, reduces spleen size and alleviates symptoms in PV. Adverse events of RUX are moderate, however, its long-term use may be associated with opportunistic infections. Trials with other JAK2 inhibitors are ongoing.

Long-term effects of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy on bone marrow fibrosis in patients with myelofibrosis

BACKGROUND

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a life-shortening complication of myeloproliferative neoplasms associated with ineffective hematopoiesis, splenomegaly, and progressive bone marrow (BM) fibrosis. The oral Janus kinase (JAK) 1/JAK2 inhibitor ruxolitinib has been shown to improve splenomegaly, symptom burden, and overall survival in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk MF compared with placebo or best available therapy (BAT).

METHODS

The effects of ruxolitinib therapy for up to 66 months on BM morphology in 68 patients with advanced MF with variable BM fibrosis grade were compared with those in 192 matching patients treated with BAT. Available trephine biopsies underwent independent, blinded review by three hematopathologists for consensus-based adjudication of grades for reticulin fibrosis, collagen deposition, and osteosclerosis.

RESULTS

Ruxolitinib treatment versus BAT was associated with greater odds of BM fibrosis improvement or stabilization and decreased odds of BM fibrosis worsening based on changes from baseline in reticulin fibrosis grade. Generally, these changes were accompanied by a sustained higher level of individual spleen size reduction and regression of leukoerythroblastosis. Patients with more advanced baseline fibrosis showed lower spleen size response.

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that long-term ruxolitinib therapy may reverse or markedly delay BM fibrosis progression in advanced MF suggests that sustained JAK inhibition may be disease-modifying.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

INCB18424-251, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00509899 .

Monocytes with Oncogenic Mutation JAK2 V617F as a Tool for Studies of the Pathogenic Mechanisms of Myelofibrosis

We analyzed previously generated stable monocyte-derived cell line carrying mutation JAK2 V617F. Evaluation of the expression of pro- and antifibrotic factors revealed changes in the production of MMPs and their inhibitors, growth factors, galectin-3, and pentraxin 3 in cells carrying mutation JAK2 in comparison with control non-modified cells.

Re-examining HSPC1 inhibitors

HSPC1 is a critical protein in cancer development and progression, including colorectal cancer (CRC). However, clinical trial data reporting the effectiveness of HSPC1 inhibitors on several cancer types has not been as successful as predicted. Furthermore, some N-terminal inhibitors appear to be much more successful than others despite similar underlying mechanisms. This study involved the application of three N-terminal HSPC1 inhibitors, 17-DMAG, NVP-AUY922 and NVP-HSP990 on CRC cells. The effects on client protein levels over time were examined. HSPC1 inhibitors were also applied in combination with chemotherapeutic agents commonly used in CRC treatment (5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan). As HSPA1A and HSPB1 have anti-apoptotic activity, gene-silencing techniques were employed to investigate the significance of these proteins in HSPC1 inhibitor and chemotherapeutic agent resistance. When comparing the action of the three HSPC1 inhibitors, there are distinct differences in the time course of important client protein degradation events. The differences between HSPC1 inhibitors were also reflected in combination treatment-17-DMAG was more effective compared with NVP-AUY922 in potentiating the cytotoxic effects of 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. This study concludes that there are distinct differences between N-terminal HSPC1 inhibitors, despite their common mode of action. Although treatment with each of the inhibitors results in significant induction of the anti-apoptotic proteins HSPA1A and HSPB1, sensitivity to HSPC1 inhibitors is not improved by gene silencing of HSPA1A or HSPB1. HSPC1 inhibitors potentiate the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents in CRC, and this approach is readily available to enter clinical trials. From a translational point of view, there may be great variability in sensitivity to the inhibitors between individual patients.

Calreticulin mutant mice develop essential thrombocythemia that is ameliorated by the JAK inhibitor ruxolitinib

Mutations of calreticulin (CALR) are detected in 25–30% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) or primary myelofibrosis and cause frameshifts that result in proteins with a novel C-terminal. We demonstrate that CALR mutations activated signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (STAT5) in 293T cells in the presence of thrombopoietin receptor (MPL). Human megakaryocytic CMK11-5 cells and erythroleukemic F-36P-MPL cells with knocked-in CALR mutations showed increased growth and acquisition of cytokine-independent growth, respectively, accompanied by STAT5 phosphorylation. Transgenic mice expressing a human CALR mutation with a 52 bp deletion (CALRdel52-transgenic mice (TG)) developed ET, with an increase in platelet count, but not hemoglobin level or white blood cell count, in association with an increase in bone marrow (BM) mature megakaryocytes. CALRdel52 BM cells did not drive away wild-type (WT) BM cells in in vivo competitive serial transplantation assays, suggesting that the self-renewal capacity of CALRdel52 hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) was comparable to that of WT HSCs. Therapy with the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor ruxolitinib ameliorated the thrombocytosis in TG mice and attenuated the increase in number of BM megakaryocytes and HSCs. Taken together, our study provides a model showing that the C-terminal of mutant CALR activated JAK-STAT signaling specifically downstream of MPL and may have a central role in CALR-induced myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Going for broke: targeting the human cancer pseudokinome

Protein phosphorylation lies at the heart of cell signalling, and somatic mutation(s) in kinases drives and sustains a multitude of human diseases, including cancer. The human protein kinase superfamily (the kinome) encodes approximately 50 'pseudokinases', which were initially predicted to be incapable of dynamic cell signalling when compared with canonical enzymatically active kinases. This assumption was supported by bioinformatics, which showed that amino acid changes at one or more key loci, making up the nucleotide-binding site or phosphotransferase machinery, were conserved in multiple vertebrate and non-vertebrate pseudokinase homologues. Protein kinases are highly attractive targets for drug discovery, as evidenced by the approval of almost 30 kinase inhibitors in oncology, and the successful development of the dual JAK1/2 (Janus kinase 1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib for inflammatory indications. However, for such a large (>550) protein family, a remarkable number have still not been analysed at the molecular level, and only a surprisingly small percentage of kinases have been successfully targeted clinically. This is despite evidence that many are potential candidates for the development of new therapeutics. Indeed, several recent reports confirm that disease-associated pseudokinases can bind to nucleotide co-factors at concentrations achievable in the cell. Together, these findings suggest that drug targeting using either ATP-site or unbiased ligand-discovery approaches should now be attempted using the validation technology currently employed to evaluate their classic protein kinase counterparts. In the present review, we discuss members of the human pseudokinome repertoire, and catalogue somatic amino acid pseudokinase mutations that are emerging as the depth and clinical coverage of the human cancer pseudokinome expand.

The future of JAK inhibition in myelofibrosis and beyond

The identification of aberrant JAK-STAT signaling in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms has served as the basis for the development of a new class of targeted agents. Ruxolitinib, the first-in-class oral small molecule JAK1/2 inhibitor, has demonstrated clinical efficacy and shown a potential overall survival benefit in two randomized phase III clinical trials. However, this agent has not been associated with improvements in cytopenias, molecular remissions, or resolution of bone marrow fibrosis. Therefore, further translational research is needed to improve the understanding of the pathogenetic mechanisms driving this myeloid malignancy to ultimately address remaining unmet clinical needs. A number of novel JAK inhibitors are being evaluated in ongoing clinical trials and the full clinical potential of these newer agents remains incompletely understood. The use of JAK inhibition in combination therapy approaches, as well as mono- and combination therapies in the treatment of advanced forms of polycythemia vera are also under active investigation. This review will update the reader on the current understanding of oncogenic JAK-STAT pathway activity in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms and the current success and limitations of anti-JAK therapy.

Pomalidomide in the treatment of multiple myeloma and perspectives in other hematological malignancies

SUMMARY 

Pomalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug recently approved by the US FDA and EMA for the treatment of refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma. Pomalidomide appears to be more potent and less toxic than thalidomide and lenalidomide and has proven to be effective in a proportion of patients already exposed and refractory to these agents. The approved combination of pomalidomide and weekly dexamethasone offers clinical benefit to at least one-third of patients with multiple myeloma that have failed both bortezomib and lenolidomide treatment. This review will focus on the preclinical data and clinical experience in this setting. Off-label use of pomalidomide, mainly its combination with other active drugs for multiple myeloma and the role of pomalidomide in other hematologic malignancies still remain to be explored in depth and are discussed briefly.