1
|
Bergin K, Wellard C, Augustson B, Cooke R, Blacklock H, Harrison SJ, Ho J, King T, Quach H, Mollee P, Walker P, Moore E, McQuilten Z, Wood E, Spencer A. Real-world utilisation of ASCT in multiple myeloma (MM): a report from the Australian and New Zealand myeloma and related diseases registry (MRDR). Bone Marrow Transplant 2021; 56:2533-2543. [PMID: 34011965 DOI: 10.1038/s41409-021-01308-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2020] [Revised: 03/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Supported by clinical trial proven survival benefit, clinical guidelines recommend upfront autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for eligible MM patients. However, reported real-world utilisation is lower than expected (40-60%). We reviewed ASCT utilisation, demographics and outcomes for MM patients (≤70 years, ≥12-month follow-up) enroled onto the Australian/New Zealand MRDR from June 2012 to May 2020. In 982 patients (<65 years: 684, 65-70 years: 298), ASCT utilisation was 76% overall (<65 years: 83%, 65-70 years: 61%, front-line therapy: 67%). Non-ASCT recipients were older (median age: 65 years vs 60 years, p < 0.001), had more comorbidities (cardiac disease: 16.9% vs 5.4%, p < 0.001; diabetes: 19.1% vs 7.0%, p < 0.001; renal dysfunction: median eGFR(ml/min): 68 vs 80, p < 0.001), inferior performance status (ECOG ≥ 2: 26% vs 13%, p < 0.001) and higher-risk MM (ISS-3: 37% vs 26%, p = 0.009, R-ISS-3 18.6% vs 11.8%, p = 0.051) than ASCT recipients. ASCT survival benefit (median progression-free survival (PFS): 45.3 months vs 35.2 months, p < 0.001; overall survival (OS): NR vs 64.0 months, p < 0.001) was maintained irrespective of age (<65 years: median PFS: 45.3 months vs 37.7 months, p = 0.04, OS: NR vs 68.2 months, p = 0.002; 65-70 years: median PFS: 46.7 months vs 29.2 months, p < 0.001, OS: 76.9 months vs 55.6 months, p = 0.005). This large, real-world cohort reaffirms ASCT survival benefit, including in 'older' patients necessitating well-designed studies evaluating ASCT in 'older' MM to inform evidence-based patient selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystal Bergin
- Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Cameron Wellard
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | | | - Simon J Harrison
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre/Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Dept of Oncology, Melbourne University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Joy Ho
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Tracy King
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hang Quach
- St.Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Peter Mollee
- Princess Alexandra Hospital and University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | | | - Elizabeth Moore
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Zoe McQuilten
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Erica Wood
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Andrew Spencer
- Alfred Health-Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Er J, Routledge D, Hempton J, Wood C, Joyce T, Harrison S, Campbell P. Autologous stem cell transplantation in elderly multiple myeloma patients aged ≥65 years: a two-centre Australian experience. Intern Med J 2021; 51:280-283. [PMID: 33631863 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
There are currently limited Australian data on the outcomes of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) in elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We present the largest cohort of elderly MM patients aged ≥65 years undergoing ASCT in Australia and report their outcomes based on our two-centre experience. Our study affirms that ASCT is well tolerated, safe and effective in elderly MM patients aged ≥65 years and should be considered an important component of treatment in patients who are fit enough for the procedure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy Er
- University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.,Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - David Routledge
- University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.,Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer Hempton
- University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| | - Colin Wood
- Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Trish Joyce
- Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Simon Harrison
- Clinical Haematology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Philip Campbell
- University Hospital Geelong, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia.,Deakin University, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ganguly S, Mailankody S, Ailawadhi S. Many Shades of Disparities in Myeloma Care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2019; 39:519-529. [PMID: 31099639 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_238551] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) has notably evolved with improved patient outcomes over the past few years. Several new drugs have become available, and large national and international clinical trials have set the stage for evidence-based medicine guidelines for the treatment of patients with MM. Although patient outcomes have undoubtedly improved, data increasingly show that several disparities exist at varying levels of health care and that these disparities make the care of patients heterogenous and potentially result in inferior outcomes. These disparities have been described with regard to patient age, race/ethnicity, rural-urban residence, socioeconomic status, and insurance type, among other factors. Looking at the global picture of MM care, there is substantial variation among different countries, primarily depending on the disparate availability of anti-MM drugs and access to quality health care across the world, limiting the delivery of innovative therapeutic approaches at the individual patient level. The causes of these national and international disparities could be multifactorial, intricate, and difficult to isolate. Yet the ongoing research in this field is encouraging, and there seems to be growing momentum to understand such disparities and their causes. It is hoped that this research will lead to solutions that can be implemented in the near future. This review focuses on certain aspects of disparities in MM care, highlighting disparities among different racial/ethnic subgroups, rural-urban differences in America, and global disparities at an international level.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siddhartha Ganguly
- 1 Department of Hematologic Malignancy and Cellular Therapeutics, University of Kansas Health System, Westwood, KS
| | - Sham Mailankody
- 2 Myeloma Service, Cellular Therapeutics Center, Center for Health Policy and Outcomes, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Myeloma in the Real World: What Is Really Happening? CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2016; 17:133-144.e1. [PMID: 28153487 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2016.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2016] [Revised: 11/16/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy and is predominantly a disease of the elderly. In the past 2 decades, a range of new therapeutic options have become available, leading to improvements in patient outcomes, including both attainment of remission and overall survival. These improved outcomes have heralded a paradigm shift from a palliative approach toward more active management, including the use of sequential therapies, with the goal of prolonging progression-free and overall survival and preserving organ function to enable delivery of further therapy at relapse. Until now, most outcome data for MM have come from clinical trials, with few reports available on patients treated outside the clinical trial setting-in the "real world." Clinical trials are routinely undertaken in specialist centers, and extrapolation of these trial data to broader clinical practice might not accurately reflect "real-world" patient outcomes. Optimal management of MM is of key importance for positive patient outcomes, and further scrutiny of the efficacy and safety of the various reported therapies and how clinical trial findings are being translated or applied in the real-world management of MM is required. In the present review, we have described the minimal published evidence available through a comprehensive published data search of MEDLINE using the OvidSP interface on the management and outcomes of MM outside the setting of clinical trials, including evidence on the uptake of new therapies and their efficacy and tolerability in standard practice. Clinical registries might be able to help provide these data in the future.
Collapse
|