Hematopoietic cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: predictive value of pretransplant positron emission tomography/computed tomography and bone marrow evaluations for outcomes

The value of complete remission according to positron emission tomography prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a population-based study showing improved outcome

Background

Chimeric antigen-receptor T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies will likely necessitate a reconsideration of the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in lymphoma. Patients who are likely to profit from ASCT need to be better identified.

Methods

Here, we investigated the value of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) before ASCT. All 521 patients transplanted for lymphoma 1994–2019 at Karolinska (497 conditioned with BEAM) were included.

Results

Outcome improved over three calendar periods 1994–2004, 2005–2014, 2015–2019 (2-year overall survival [OS]: 66, 73, 83%; P = 0.018). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days over the three periods were 9.8, 3.9, 2.9%, respectively. The OS improvement between 1994 and 2004 and 2005–2014 was due to lower NRM (P = 0.027), but the large OS advance from 2015 was not accompanied by a significant reduction in NRM (P = 0.6). The fraction of PET/CT as pre-ASCT assessment also increased over time: 1994–2004, 2%; 2005–2014, 24%; 2015–2019, 60% (P < 0.00005). Complete responses (PET/CT-CR) were observed in 77% and metabolically active partial responses (PET/CT-PR) in 23%. PET/CT-CR was a predictor for survival in the entire population (P = 0.0003), also in the subpopulations of aggressive B-cell (P = 0.004) and peripheral T-cell (P = 0.024) lymphomas. Two-year OS and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) for patients in PET/CT-CR were in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma 87%/75% and peripheral T-cell lymphoma 91%/78%. The corresponding figures in PET/CT-PR were 43%/44 and 33%/33%. Patients with solitary PET/CT-positive lesions showed acceptable outcome with ASCT followed by local irradiation (2-year OS/PFS 80%/60%). CT was less discriminative: 2-year OS/PFS: CT-CR, 76%/66%; CT-PR, 62%/51%. Outcome was inferior after BEAC compared with BEAM conditioning.

Conclusions

We conclude that the improved outcome reflects better, PET/CT-informed, identification of patients who should proceed to ASCT. The excellent survival of patients in PET/CT-CR indicates that ASCT should remain part of standard therapy for lymphoma.

Application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in mantle cell lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

The study is to investigate the application of F-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/computerized tomography (CT) for the evaluation of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 39 patients who were pathologically diagnosed with MCL and underwent F-FDG PET/CT before treatment between August 2007 and August 2018. We compared the clinical information and PET/CT imaging characteristics in different groups based on bone marrow invasion, spleen invasion or International Prognostic Index (IPI) score. We also assessed the efficacy of PET/CT evaluation basing on the follow-up PET CT findings of 21 MCL patients and their biopsies.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients were stage IV according to the Revised Ann Arbor Staging System. Lymph node involvement was observed in all 39 cases. The maximum diameter of the affected lymph nodes (4.33 ± 3.09 cm) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) (8.38 ± 4.99) was positively correlated (r = 0.486, P = 0.002). Extranodal invasion was identified in 38 patients with MCL, and the SUVmax of extranodal invasion was 7.34 ± 3.31. Extranodal invasion was most common in the spleen (25/38) and bone marrow (18/38). The group with bone marrow invasion was more prone to nasopharyngeal, lung and renal invasions (all P < 0.05). The groups with bone marrow invasion or spleen invasion were more likely to have decreased hemoglobin (Hgb) and platelets (all P < 0.01). The IPI high-risk group was more prone to lung involvement, elevated LDH and CRP, and decreased Hgb (all P < 0.05). Among the follow-up of 30 MCL patients, the 2-year progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 73.33 and 87.50%, respectively. PET/CT reexaminations of 21 MCL patients after treatment showed that the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value and accuracy of the efficacy evaluation were 80, 90.91, 88.89, 83.33 and 85.71%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

F-FDG PET/CT imaging has important application value in the diagnosis, staging, treatment efficacy assessment and prognosis monitoring of MCL, especially in the systemic assessment of advanced MCL.

Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Mantle Cell Lymphoma in the Era of New Drugs and CAR-T Cell Therapy

MCL is an uncommon lymphoproliferative disorder that has been regarded as incurable since its identification as a distinct entity. Allogeneic transplantation for two decades has represented the only option capable of ensuring prolonged remissions and possibly cure. Despite its efficacy, its application has been limited by feasibility limitations and substantial toxicity, particularly in elderly patients. Nevertheless, the experience accumulated over time has been wide though often scattered among retrospective and small prospective studies. In this review, we aimed at critically revise and discuss available evidence on allogeneic transplantation in MCL, trying to put available evidence into the 2020 perspective, characterized by unprecedented development of novel promising therapeutic agents and regimens.

The value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in the prediction of clinical outcomes of patients with acute leukemia treated with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

The present study aimed to determine whether ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT performed before and/or after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) can predict clinical outcomes in acute leukemia (AL). A total of 79 examinations comprising 72 patients with AL who underwent ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before and/or after allo-HSCT were retrospectively enrolled between January 2011 and January 2019. Outcomes were assessed using overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A total of 63 examinations were PET-positive, while 16 examinations were PET-negative. Increased BM and splenic ¹⁸F-FDG uptake were observed in 24 (19/79) and 14% (11/79) of examinations, respectively. ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lymph nodes were observed in 38% (30/79) of examinations. E_NE_ME_S involvement was detected in 44% (35/79) of examinations. The presence of E_NE_ME_S involvement [OS hazard ratio (HR), 6.399; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.843–22.224; P=0.003; post-HSCT OS: HR, 7.203; 95% CI, 1.510–34.369; P=0.013; DFS HR, 3.671; 95% CI, 1.145–11.768; P=0.029], post-transplantation minimal residual disease (DFS HR, 4.381; 95% CI, 1.594–12.040; P=0.004; pre-HSCT OS HR, 11.455; 95% CI, 1.336–98.179; P=0.026) and disease status (OS HR, 0.330; 95% CI, 0.128–0.848; P=0.021; post-HSCT OS HR, 0.195; 95% CI, 0.050–0.762; P=0.019; DFS: HR, 0.278; 95% CI, 0.091–0.851; P=0.025) could serve as an adverse prognostic factor in patients with AL treated with allo-HSCT. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT before and/or after allo-HSCT was a predictor for OS and DFS in patients with AL. E_NE_ME_S involvement detected using ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may help identify patients with AL who are likely to have unfavorable clinical outcomes.

18F-FDG PET or PET/CT in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

The aim of this systematic review was to examine published data about the potential role of Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT) in patients affected by mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). A comprehensive computer literature search of Scopus, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase databases was conducted, including articles indexed up to November, 2019; 25 studies or subsets in studies analyzing the value of ¹⁸F-FDG PET or PET/CT in patients with MCL were eligible for inclusion. From the analyses of the selected studies, the following main findings are described: (1) MCL are ¹⁸F-FDG-avid in most of cases, especially nodal lesions, but bone marrow and gastrointestinal disease localizations have low ¹⁸F-FDG avidity; (2) ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT seems to be helpful in staging setting, showing a better diagnostic performance than conventional imaging and a positive impact on clinical stage; (3) ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is useful in evaluating treatment response, especially after chemotherapy and transplantation; and (4) metabolic response after therapy seems to have a prognostic role. Despite several limitations affecting this analysis, especially related to the heterogeneity of the studies included, MCL is an ¹⁸F-FDG-avid lymphoma in most of the cases, with the exception of bone marrow and gastrointestinal disease. Moreover, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT seems to be useful in evaluating treatment response and prognosis.

Diagnostic and Clinical Impact of Staging 18F-FDG PET/CT in Mantle-Cell Lymphoma: A Two-Center Experience

INTRODUCTION

The diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) in staging mantle-cell lymphoma has not yet investigated. The aim of this 2-center retrospective study was to investigate the utility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in assessing nodal, splenic, bone marrow (BM), and gastrointestinal (GI) disease compared to CT, BM, and GI endoscopy; and to assess its clinical impact.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-two patients with histologically proven mantle-cell lymphoma were included. PET/CT BM findings were considered positive if isolated/multiple focal uptake in the BM not explained by benign findings and/or diffuse BM uptake higher than liver with/without focal uptakes were present. PET/CT findings were considered positive for GI involvement in the presence of isolated/multiple focal uptake in the GI organ.

RESULTS

All patients had positive PET/CT showing the presence of at least one hypermetabolic lesion, with the exception of one case. PET/CT results, compared to CT, detected more nodal and/or splenic lesions in 26 patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of PET/CT for BM were 52%, 98%, 97%, 65%, and 74%; for GI 64%, 91%, 69%, 90%, and 85%; and for GI excluding diabetic patients, 78%, 92%, 72%, 94%, and 89%. PET/CT permitted upstaging of 21 cases and downstaging of 2.

CONCLUSION

¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT showed excellent detection rate in nodal and splenic disease-a rate better than CT. For BM and GI evaluation, in order to reach good accuracy, the selection of patients and the use of specific criteria for evaluation of these organs seems to be crucial. Moreover, PET/CT altered the management and therapeutic approach in about 20% of patients.

Interest of FDG-PET in the Management of Mantle Cell Lymphoma

FDG-PET changed response assessment and therapy strategy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Hodgkin disease lymphoma. The value of FDG-PET evaluation in MCL has not been extensively studied and a recent expert consensus highlighted the need for more studies addressing this question. Data of the literature show the value of FDG-PET at baseline in patients with MCL, underlining the good sensitivity of this examination for the initial staging of this pathology, but also the potential impact of semi-quantitative analysis in this indication. The determination of SUVmax at diagnosis might indeed provide important prognostic information. Some studies also suggest the potential value of early and end-of-treatment metabolic assessment in MCL, but these results need to be validated in standardized prospective studies. These results also underlie the need to integrate FDG-PET results into MCL treatment strategy to improve disease management in identifying patients who might benefit from more intensive therapy.

Toward a Risk-Tailored Therapeutic Policy in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) prognosis is strictly related to the characteristics of the disease, which can range from very indolent cases to highly aggressive and refractory ones. Here we will review the current knowledge on MCL biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biomarker-informed diagnosis is essential for differentiating MCL from other mature B cell tumors. Diagnosis of MCL relies on the identification of the t(11;14) translocation by FISH or the consequently aberrant expression of cyclin D1 by immunohistochemistry. For the few cases staining negative for cyclin D1, SOX11 may help to define the diagnosis. Prognostic biomarkers have been proposed to stratify MCL patients, including baseline clinical aspects (leukemic non-nodal presentation, in situ presentation, Mantle cell International Prognostic Index-MIPI), pathological aspects (blastoid morphology, Ki-67 proliferation index, SOX11 expression), genetic aspects (immunoglobulin gene mutation status, TP53 deletion or mutation, CDKN2A deletion), and depth of response after treatment (PET imaging, molecular minimal residual disease). Such tools are increasingly used as a guide for therapeutic decisions. Watchful waiting approach is recommended for patients harboring favorable clinico-biological features, such as leukemic non-nodal presentation, low MIPI score, non-blastoid disease, low Ki-67 proliferation rate, mutated immunoglobulin genes, and the lack of SOX11 expression. For patients in need of frontline therapy, the decision of whether to undertake intensive regimens is based upon patient's age and comorbidities. Central nervous system prophylaxis is recommended for cases showing blastoid morphology. The duration of remission is tightly correlated to the depth of response. With the aim of achieving a longer duration of remission and survival, younger patients may pursue more intensive regimens incorporating high-dose cytarabine, followed by myeloablative consolidation chemotherapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, and rituximab maintenance. Older patients could, on the other hand, benefit from lower intensity immunochemotherapy followed or not by a maintenance therapy depending on which frontline regimen is used. Despite the identification of several potential useful biomarkers that may inform the treatment decisions and the design of clinical trials, the treatment choice remains nowadays determined by the patient age and fitness rather than by the individual patient characteristics. Tailoring therapy toward a risk-adapted strategy to accommodate the wide spectrum of disease is an urgent challenge, and clinical trials may explore the feasibility of a biomarker-defined therapeutic policy.

Current Approaches to Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Diagnosis, Prognosis, and Therapies

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a unique lymphoma subtype, both biologically and clinically. Virtually all cases are characterized by a common genetic lesion, t(11;14), resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1. The clinical course is moderately aggressive, and the disease is considered incurable. Considerable biologic and clinical heterogeneity exists, with some patients experiencing a rapidly progressive course, while others have disease that is readily managed. New tools exist for risk stratification and may allow for a more personalized approach in the future. Landmark studies have been completed in recent years and outcomes appear to be improving. Randomized clinical trials have clarified the role of high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) for younger patients and have demonstrated a role for maintenance rituximab therapy. Multiple areas of uncertainty remain, however, and are the focus of ongoing research. This review focuses on (1) strategies to differentiate between aggressive and less aggressive cases, (2) understanding who should receive hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and (3) the role for maintenance therapy in MCL.

18F-FDG PET/CT in the clinical management of patients with lymphoma

The aim of this work was to review the current recommendations for staging and response assessment of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in routine clinical practice after chemotherapy and/or stem cell transplantation. A five-point scale (5-PS) from the First International Workshop on PET in Lymphoma in Deauville, France, in 2009, was recommended as the standard tool to score imaging to assess treatment response in patients with lymphoma using ¹⁸F-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. Following the recommendations of the 11th and 12th International Conferences on Malignant Lymphoma held in Lugano (Switzerland), in 2011 and 2013, respectively, a consensus (the so-called Lugano Classification) was reached regarding the use of PET/CT for staging and response assessment in FDG-avid lymphomas. As a result, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT was formally incorporated into standard staging for FDG-avid lymphomas. A bone marrow biopsy is no longer indicated for the routine staging of HL and most diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. PET/CT will be used to assess response in FDG-avid histologies using the 5-point scale. The recent introduction of biological agents with immune mechanisms requires flexibility in interpretations of the Lugano criteria due to tumour flare or a pseudo-progression effect produced by these agents. Provisional criteria have been proposed (Lymphoma Response to Immunomodulatory Therapy Criteria) with the introduction of the term 'Indeterminate Response' in order to identify this phenomenon until confirmed as flare/pseudoprogression or true progression. All these recommendations will improve evaluations of patients with lymphoma, and allow comparison of results from clinical practice and trials.

Recommendations for Clinical Trial Development in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) comprises around 6% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) diagnoses. In younger patients, age less than 60 to 65 years, aggressive induction often followed by consolidation with autologous stem cell transplant has suggested improved outcomes in this population. Less intensive therapies in older patients often followed by maintenance have been studied or are under active investigation. However, despite recent advances, MCL remains incurable, with a median overall survival of around five years. Patients with high-risk disease have particularly poor outcomes. Treatment varies widely across institutions, and to date no randomized trials comparing intensive vs less intensive approaches have been reported. Although recent data have highlighted the heterogeneity of MCL outcomes, patient assessment for treatment selection has largely been driven by patient age with little regard to fitness, disease biology, or disease risk. One critical advance is the finding that minimal residual disease status (MRD) after induction correlates with long-term outcomes. As such, its use as a potential end point could inform clinical trial design. In order to more rapidly improve the outcomes of MCL patients, clinical trials are needed that prospectively stratify patients on the basis of MCL biology and disease risk, incorporate novel agents, and use MRD to guide the need for additional therapy.

Reduced-intensity or myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for mantle cell lymphoma: a systematic review

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is the only known treatment that can offer a cure in mantle cell lymphoma, but it is unclear if regimen dose-intensity offers any advantage. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to assess efficacy of allo-HCT using myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning. We report results according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. On the basis of a relatively lower nonrelapse mortality and a slightly better progression-free survival/event-free survival and overall survival rates, reduced-intensity allo-HCT regimens appear to be the preferred choice when an allo-HCT is being considered for mantle cell lymphoma. The higher rate of relapse when offering reduced-intensity regimens cannot be ignored but certainly highlights opportunities to incorporate post-transplant strategies to mitigate this risk. A prospective comparative study is ultimately needed to generate more conclusive evidence.

Role of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in mantle cell lymphoma

Despite a wide spectrum of treatment options, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a challenging hematologic malignancy to manage. Advances in front-line therapy, including the monoclonal antibody rituximab and increasing use of cytarabine, have improved remission rates. Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) can effectively consolidate remission of MCL, leading to encouraging survival beyond 5 yr. However, nearly all patients with MCL will relapse and require salvage therapy. Novel agents such as ibrutinib, bortezomib, and lenalidomide have dramatically expanded the options for treating relapsed MCL. In this review, we summarize the clinical evidence supporting the use of allogeneic donor HCT in MCL and make recommendations on indications for its use. Data suggest that allogeneic donor HCT is the only curative therapy for patients with poor prognosis or aggressive MCL. Patient selection, timing, and optimal use remain a matter of scientific debate and given the rapidly changing therapeutic landscape of MCL, the outcomes of allogeneic HCT should be interpreted in the context of novel therapeutics.

Next-generation surveillance strategies for patients with lymphoma

While remission and cure rates for Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma continue to improve, surveillance approaches remain controversial, especially in light of recent reports suggesting limited benefit for routine radiologic assessment. Routine cross-sectional imaging results in considerable patient expense and anxiety, and this approach does not clearly improve patient outcomes. Next-generation approaches including minimal residual disease detection may provide an opportunity to identify relapse early and intervene prior to progression of clinical disease. This review discusses the role of surveillance imaging in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma and provides an introduction to serologic assessment of minimal residual disease. Future studies will need to focus on the clinical application of minimal residual disease surveillance and its ability to predict relapse, treatment response and survival.