1
|
Petit C, Saillard C, Mohty B, Hicheri Y, Villetard F, Maisano V, Charbonnier A, Rey J, D'Incan E, Rouzaud C, Gelsi-Boyer V, Murati A, Lhoumeau AC, Ittel A, Mozziconacci MJ, Alary AS, Hospital MA, Vey N, Garciaz S. Azacitidine-venetoclax versus azacitidine salvage treatment for primary induction failure or first relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia patients. Eur J Haematol 2024; 112:530-537. [PMID: 38031389 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2023] [Revised: 11/09/2023] [Accepted: 11/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the efficacy of venetoclax-azacitidine (VEN-AZA) with AZA in the real-life for patients with first relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia (R/R AML). METHODS We retrospectively analysed R/R AML patients treated with VEN-AZA at the Institut Paoli Calmettes between September 2020 and February 2022. We compared them to a historical cohort of patients treated with AZA between 2010 and 2021. RESULTS Thirty-five patients treated with VEN-AZA were compared with 140 patients treated with AZA. There were more favourable cytogenetics (25.7% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.01) and less FLT3-ITD mutated AML (8.8% vs. 25.5%; p = .049) in the VEN-AZA group. The overall 30-day mortality rate was 7.4% and the overall 90-day mortality was 20%, with no difference between the groups. The complete remission rate was 48.6% in the VEN-AZA group versus 15% (p < .0001). The composite complete response rate was 65.7% in the VEN-AZA group versus 23.6% (p < .0001). OS was 12.8 months in the VEN-AZA group versus 7.3 months (p = 0.059). Patients with primary refractory AML, poor-risk cytogenetics, prior hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and FLT3-ITD mutated AML had lower response and survival rates. CONCLUSION VEN-AZA was associated with a better response rate and a longer survival than AZA monotherapy in AML patients who relapsed after or were refractory to intensive chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Petit
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - C Saillard
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - B Mohty
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - Y Hicheri
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - F Villetard
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - V Maisano
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Charbonnier
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - J Rey
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - E D'Incan
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - C Rouzaud
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - V Gelsi-Boyer
- Département de Biologie des Tumeurs CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - A Murati
- Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A C Lhoumeau
- Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Ittel
- Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M J Mozziconacci
- Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A S Alary
- Département de Biologie des Tumeurs, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - M-A Hospital
- Département d'hématologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - N Vey
- Département d'hématologie, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - S Garciaz
- Département d'hématologie, CRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hypomethylating agents in relapsed and refractory AML: outcomes and their predictors in a large international patient cohort. Blood Adv 2019; 2:923-932. [PMID: 29685952 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018016121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 106] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2018] [Accepted: 03/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Although hypomethylating agents (HMAs) are frequently used in the frontline treatment of older acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients, little is known about their effectiveness in relapsed or primary treatment-refractory (RR)-AML. Using an international multicenter retrospective database, we studied the effectiveness of HMAs in RR-AML and evaluated for predictors of response and overall survival (OS). A total of 655 patients from 12 centers received azacitidine (57%) or decitabine (43%), including 290 refractory (44%) and 365 relapsed (56%) patients. Median age at diagnosis was 65 years. Best response to HMAs was complete remission (CR; 11%) or CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi; 5.3%). Additionally, 8.5% experienced hematologic improvement. Median OS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.3). As expected, OS differed significantly by best response, with patients achieving CR and CRi having a median OS of 25.3 and 14.6 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the presence of ≤5% circulating blasts and a 10-day schedule of decitabine were associated with improved response rates, whereas the presence of >5% circulating blasts and >20% bone marrow blasts were associated with decreased OS. A significant subset of RR-AML patients (16%) achieved CR/CRi with HMAs and experienced a median OS of 21 months. Outside of a clinical trial, HMAs represent a reasonable therapeutic option for some patients with RR-AML.
Collapse
|
3
|
Tenneti P, Nagaiah G. Hypomethylating Agents for Treatment of Elderly Patients with Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia - A Case Report with a Focused Review of Literature. Cureus 2018; 10:e2734. [PMID: 30087810 PMCID: PMC6075624 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.2734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
The prognosis of elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is poor. Intensive chemotherapy with the combination of cytarabine and anthracyclines is typically used as the first-line treatment in the elderly with newly diagnosed AML who are able to tolerate this regimen. Unfortunately, many patients are refractory to this treatment approach. The role of hypomethylating agents in the treatment of elderly patients with refractory AML has not been clearly defined. Therefore, we conducted a focused literature review to assess the role of hypomethylating agents in elderly patients with refractory AML. In addition, we present a case report of a patient with refractory AML, who was subsequently treated with azacytidine and showed an immediate response after one treatment cycle. He then proceeded to undergo nine more cycles. Ten months after the start of treatment with azacytidine, he remains in complete remission with incomplete hematologic recovery. Given the positive results noted in multiple retrospective studies and in the presented case report, large-scale, prospective studies are needed to further define the role of hypomethylating agents in the treatment of elderly patients with refractory AML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan Tenneti
- Department of Medicine, Banner University Medical Center Tucson, Tucson, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ram R, Gatt M, Merkel D, Helman I, Inbar T, Nagler A, Avivi I, Ofran Y. Second line azacitidine for elderly or infirmed patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation—a retrospective national multicenter study. Ann Hematol 2017; 96:575-579. [PMID: 28058490 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-016-2914-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|