Comparison of Real-time Quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction and Eight-color Flow Cytometry in Assessment of Minimal Residual Disease in Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Characterization of circRNA expression profiles associated with non-Mendelian inheritance in feather growth of chickens

1. Non-coding RNAs, such as miRNAs, play a crucial role in chicken feather growth rate. However, circular RNA (circRNA) expression profiles in fast- and slow-feathering chickens that follow and do not follow Mendelian inheritance are unclear.2. The circRNA expression profiles was analysed by RNA sequencing of hair follicles of slow-feathering chickens that follow genetic rules and fast-feathering chickens that did not follow genetic rules. Differentially expressed circRNA-miRNA-mRNA competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) network was then constructed and the key factors and regulation mechanisms controlling feather growth rate were identified.3. The results revealed that 67 circRNAs were significantly differentially expressed in hens, including 22 up-regulated and 45 down-regulated circRNAs in non-Mendelian inheritance-mediated fast-feathering hens compared with Mendelian inheritance-mediated slow-feathering hens. In addition, 16 significantly differentially expressed circRNAs were identified in cockerels, including nine up-regulated and seven down-regulated circRNAs in non-Mendelian inheritance-mediated fast- compared with Mendelian inheritance-mediated slow-feathering cocks. Moreover, circRNA-mediated ceRNA regulation of hair follicle formation was particularly abundant in the Jak-STAT, Wnt and Toll-like receptor signalling pathways. Furthermore, circABI3BP was seen to be a crucial circRNA in regulating feather growth rate, by binding with gga-miR-1649-5p to regulate SSTR2 expression.4. In conclusion, this study analysed circRNA expression profiles in fast- and slow-feathering chickens that follow and do not follow Mendelian inheritance, which laid the foundation for understanding the role of circRNA in chicken feather growth rate.

Low levels of minimal residual disease after induction chemotherapy for BCR-ABL1-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia in adults are clinically relevant

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the significance of low-level minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) during early consolidation treatment in adult BCR-ABL1-negative acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. The MRD load was monitored by immunoglobulin/T-cell receptor rearrangements and assessed as negative [complete MRD response (CMR)], positive non-quantifiable (MRDnq) and positive quantifiable (MRDq). MRDnq before the first and second consolidation blocks had a comparable negative effect on survival as MRDq. The 5-year overall survival for CMR, MRDnq and MRDq at week 11 was 74·0%, 42·3% and 35·0% respectively. No central nervous system infiltration and MRD at week 11 were independent prognostic factors for survival on multivariate analysis (hazard ratios 0·32 and 2·25).

Cytoplasmic CD79a is a promising biomarker for B lymphoblastic leukemia follow up post CD19 CAR-T therapy

Minimal residual disease (MRD) detection is an important prognostic parameter in patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL). CD79a has been reported to exhibit a high degree of linage-specificity for B-cell differentiation, with a specificity of 88% and a sensitivity of 100%. In this study, we investigated the efficiency and prognostic role of cytoplasmic CD79a (cCD79a) antibody-gated multicolor flow cytometry (MFC) in MRD detection in patients with B-ALL who received CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The retrospective analysis was carried on to 59 patients who accepted allo-HSCT after CD19-CAR-T infusion from June 2016 to May 2017. The MFC MRD statuses before and after allo-HSCT were both strongly correlated with the transplantation prognosis, the MFC panel with cCD79a gating can effectively monitor MRD after CD19 CAR T-cell therapy and predict the prognosis after allo-HSCT. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials#: ChiCTR-IIh-16008711.gov: NCT03173417. Registered 30 May 2017 - retrospectively registered, https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/.

Approach to the Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patient

During recent decades, understanding of the molecular mechanisms of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has improved considerably, resulting in better risk stratification of patients and increased survival rates. Age, white blood cell count (WBC), and specific genetic abnormalities are the most important factors that define risk groups for ALL. State-of-the-art diagnosis of ALL requires cytological and cytogenetical analyses, as well as flow cytometry and high-throughput sequencing assays. An important aspect in the diagnostic characterization of patients with ALL is the identification of the Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome, which warrants the addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) to the chemotherapy backbone. Data that support the benefit of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in high risk patient subsets or in late relapse patients are still questioned and have yet to be determined conclusive. This article presents the newly published data in ALL workup and treatment, putting it into perspective for the attending physician in hematology and oncology.