Improved Survival of Elderly-fit Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Requiring Intensive Therapy: 3-Year Multicenter Analysis From TALWG

Recent Advances in the Development of Anti-FLT3 CAR T-Cell Therapies for Treatment of AML

Following the success of the anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies against B-cell malignancies, the CAR T-cell approach is being developed towards other malignancies like acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Treatment options for relapsed AML patients are limited, and the upregulation of the FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) in malignant T-cells is currently not only being investigated as a prognostic factor, but also as a target for new treatment options. In this review, we provide an overview and discuss different approaches of current anti-FLT3 CAR T-cells under development. In general, these therapies are effective both in vitro and in vivo, however the safety profile still needs to be further investigated. The first clinical trials have been initiated, and the community now awaits clinical evaluation of the approach of targeting FLT3 with CAR T-cells.

The Real-Life Efficacy of Fixed-Dose Hypomethylating Agents in Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A 10-Year Experience

BACKGROUND

Hypomethylating agent (HMA) is one of recommended treatment for elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML); however, their high cost precludes their general use, especially in developing countries. Therefore, the fixed-dose HMAs approach was adopted to reduce the expenses. This study focuses on the clinical outcome of various treatment protocols, including intensive chemotherapy, fixed-dose HMAs, and palliative treatment in Thai elderly patients with AML. Fixed-dose HMAs include 5-azacitidine given at 100 mg per day for seven days and decitabine given at 30 mg per day for 5 days.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a 10-year cohort study focused on elderly AML patients aged over 60 years. The exclusion criteria were acute promyelocytic leukemia.

RESULTS

A total of 243 AML patients were enrolled. Comparing 3 groups of treatment regimens (intensive chemotherapy, fixed-dose HMAs, and palliative treatment), the proportions of patients in each category accounted for 23.5%, 21.4%, and 55.1%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) in each therapeutic option was 7.7, 11, and 2.5 months, respectively. From multivariate analysis, palliative treatment was significantly inferior OS comparing to the fixed-dose HMAs and intensive treatment (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.42; 95% CI, 0.29-0.60; P value <.001 and HR: 0.41; 95% CI, 0.28-0.61; P value <.001, respectively). Nevertheless, the OS outcome in patients with fixed-dose HMAs was comparable to those who received intensive treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the fixed-dose regimen of HMAs is the reasonable treatment for these patients, and this approach is not inferior to intensive therapy. Thai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR20210514007.

Efficacy and safety of consolidation therapy with intermediate and high dose cytarabine in acute myeloid leukemia patients

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to compare the efficacy of intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC) and high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) as consolidation chemotherapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in terms of a one-year-relapse-free survival rate (RFS). The secondary objectives were one-year-overall survival rate (OS) and adverse effects.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study conducted at Chiang Mai University Hospital. AML patients who achieved complete remission after 7 + 3 induction regimen and received consolidation therapy with either IDAC or HiDAC during January 2015 and January 2018 were eligible. Data about clinical characteristics, efficacy and safety of IDAC and HiDAC regimens were collected.

RESULTS

Sixty-two AML patients were enrolled (30 patients in IDAC and 32 patients in the HiDAC regimen). The one-year RFS in the IDAC group was 63.33% and 46.87% in the HiDAC group (P = 0.137). The 1-year OS was 93.33% and 84.37% in the IDAC and HiDAC, respectively (P = 0.691). The duration of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was significantly shorter in IDAC than HiDAC (mean duration 14.69 vs. 23.84 days; P = 0.045). There was no significant difference in other parameters including hemoglobin nadir, absolute neutrophil count nadir, platelet nadir, febrile neutropenia, duration of grade 3-4 neutropenia, and duration of hospitalization.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in the one-year RFS and OS between IDAC and HiDAC. The IDAC regimen is an acceptable option for consolidation treatment in AML.

Genetic alterations in Thai adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome-excess blasts detected by next-generation sequencing technique

Several molecular aberrations affect the prognosis of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts (EB). This study aimed to determine the incidence and clinical impact of molecular genetic aberrations in Thai patients with AML and MDS-EB, detected by the next-generation sequencing (NGS) technique. This prospective, observational study was conducted between 2018 and 2020 on newly diagnosed Thai AML or MDS-EB patients aged above 15 years. NGS was performed using a custom amplicon-based targeted enrichment assay for 42 genes recurrently mutated in myeloid neoplasms. The molecular results were correlated with baseline patient and disease characteristics as well as outcomes. Forty-nine patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 56 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44-64), with nearly equal proportions of males and females. The median number of mutations was 3 (IQR, 2-4). The most frequent alterations were FLT3 internal tandem duplications (ITD) (28.6%), DNMT3A (24.5%), and WT1 (22.4%) mutations. FLT3-ITD was more frequent in the de novo AML group than in the MDS/secondary AML group, whereas in the MDS/secondary AML group, ASXL1, ETV6, and SRSF2 mutations were more frequent. Patients aged greater than 65 years and patients with mutated TP53 were more likely to have inferior overall survival from multivariate analysis. FLT3-ITD was the most common mutation among newly diagnosed Thai AML patients. TP53 mutation and advanced age were independent adverse factors for survival outcome. The genetic landscapes of AML patients vary between national populations. Thai Clinical Trials Registry identifier: TCTR20190227003.

A systematic review and metaanalysis of the efficacy and adverse events of azacitidinepluslenalidomide treatment for patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia 1

OBJECTIVES

The addition of lenalidomide (LEN) to azacitidine (AZA) may further improve the outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients as well as patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients although the evidence for this combination treatment is still relatively limited. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects of AZA plus LEN for the treatment of patients with high-risk MDS, AML or CMML.

METHODS

The current study systematically identified all cohort studies of patients with AML and/or MDS and/or CMML who received AZA in combination with LEN that reported the overall complete remission (CR) rate and/or overall response rate (ORR). A DerSimonian-d random-effects model with double arcsine transformation was used for the pooled rates and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the all outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies with 406 patients were identified and included into the meta-analysis. The pooled CR rate after the treatment with AZA-plus-LEN regimen was 33.0% (95% CI, 27.7%-38.7%, I² = 18%) while the pooled ORR was 49.9% (95% CI, 38.4%-61.5%, I² = 72%). Nonetheless, adverse events including grade 3-4 neutrophil toxicity events, platelet toxicity events and febrile neutropenia were common with AZA-plus-LEN regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study may serve as a preliminary data to suggest that the addition of LEN may offer incremental benefit to patients with high-risk MDS, AML and CMML. However, randomized-controlled studies that directly compare the efficacy and adverse events of AZA-plus-LEN regimen versus AZA monotherapy are still needed.