Management of Adverse Events From the Combination of Rituximab and Lenalidomide in the Treatment of Patients With Follicular and Low-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma

Ayurveda Rasayana Therapy (ART) leads to tumor regression and increased survival in chemo-intolerance high-grade stage IV follicular lymphoma: A case study

Key clinical message

Ayurveda Rasayana Therapy (ART) may serve as a safe and effective alternative treatment option for chemo-intolerance high-grade stage IV follicular lymphoma patients for increasing survival and tumor regression.

Abstract

Follicular lymphoma (FL), also called follicle center lymphoma/nodular lymphoma, observed in the B lymphocytes (B-cells). Available therapeutic options for follicular lymphoma are associated with various side effects and, patients with co-morbidities can seldom tolerate the chemotherapy regimens. Rasayana therapy not only resulted in tumor regression and improved survival but also dealt with the adverse effects of previous chemotherapy drugs. Herein, we present a case of a 74-year-old female diagnosed with Follicular lymphoma who had undergone three cycles of chemotherapy with unresolved disease outcome and serious adverse events. The patient refused to undergo further cycles of chemotherapy. Her family decided to start Ayurveda treatment for her as an alternative therapy for cancer care. On thorough case taking considering the Ayurveda parameters personalized Rasayana therapy as planned for the patient with an aim for improvement in Quality of Life (QoL), increasing survival, and optimizing body's immune response to fight the tumor. After treatment of 8 months, this case demonstrated partial tumor response as evidenced by PET-CT-scan. Quality of Life as evaluated using FACT-G was also seen improved besides significant improvement in physical performance status evaluated using ECOG. The patient showed a survival of 3.5 years after starting Ayurveda Rasayana Therapy (ART). Rasayana therapy was well tolerated by the patient. This case report indicates the potential role of ART as a therapeutic option in geriatric cancer patients who are not eligible for cytotoxic interventions. Case warrants further systematic investigation to evaluate the potential role of ART in the treatment of geriatric cancer patients.

Antitumoral Agent-Induced Constipation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Constipation is a common symptom in patients receiving antitumoral treatment. The mechanisms underlying antitumoral agent-induced constipation (ATAIC) are poorly defined. This systematic review aimed to analyze and synthesize the available information related to the prevalence, etiology, and treatment of ATAIC.

METHODS

A systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines was conducted. The review included human studies written in English, French, or Spanish involving patients with cancer and containing information about the prevalence, etiology, and treatment of ATAIC.

RESULTS

A total of 73 articles were included. The reported prevalence ranged from 0.8% to 86.6%. Six studies reported an ATAIC prevalence of over 50%. The prevalence rates of constipation of grades 3 and 4 ranged between 0 and 11%. The importance of enteric neuronal integrity in gastrointestinal function was reported. The articles with the highest levels of evidence in relation to ATAIC treatment obtained in this systematic review studied treatments with acupuncture, sweet potato, osteopath, probiotics, and moxibustion.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of constipation in patients undergoing antitumoral treatment is very diverse. Studies specifically designed to report the prevalence of antineoplastic treatment-induced constipation are needed. The importance of enteric neuronal integrity in gastrointestinal function was described. Thus, neuroprotection could be an area of research for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal disorders.

Toward Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Lenalidomide in Hematological Malignancy? Results of an Observational Study of the Exposure-Safety Relationship

Objective: Continuous lenalidomide (LEN) therapy is important to achieve a therapeutic effect in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, despite dose adjustment according to kidney function, many patients discontinue LEN therapy because of hematological toxicity. To date, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of LEN has not been performed in oncology, and no target concentration level has been yet defined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the exposure-safety relationship of LEN and determine the target concentration for toxicity.

Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was designed and implemented. Blood samples were collected at 0.5 h (trough concentration, C_min) before oral administration and 1 h (C_1h) thereafter on the day. Clinical data were gathered from patients’ medical records and laboratory reports. Outcome measures of hematological toxicity were defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The concentration values were dichotomized by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the association between exposure and outcome was determined using the logistic regression model.

Results: Out of the 61 patients enrolled in this study, 40 (65.57%) had MM, and 21 (34.43%) had NHL. Hematological toxicity was reported in 15 (24.59%) patients. The LEN C_min showed remarkable differences (p = 0.031) among patients with or without hematological toxicity, while no association between C_1h values and toxicity was noted (p>0.05). By ROC analysis, a C_min threshold of 10.95 ng/mL was associated with the best sensitivity/specificity for toxicity events (AUC = 0.687; sensitivity = 0.40; specificity = 0.935). By multivariate logistic regression, an LEN C_min below 10.95 ng/mL was associated with a markedly decreased risk of hematological toxicity (<10.95 ng/mL vs. >10.95 ng/mL: OR = 0.023, 95% CI = 0.002–0.269; p = 0.003).

Conclusions: We demonstrate that the LEN trough concentration correlates with hematological toxicity, and the C_min threshold for hematological toxicity (10.95 ng/mL) is proposed. Altogether, LEN TDM appears to be a new approach to improve medication safety and achieve continuous treatment for patients with NHL or MM in routine clinical care.

Lenalidomide-induced arthritis: A case report and review of literature and pharmacovigilance databases

INTRODUCTION

Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory agent with multiple mechanisms of action, and treatment with lenalidomide is associated with adverse events such as thrombosis and abdominal pain; nonetheless, other rarer adverse events do exist, with few knowledge from physicians and pharmacists. For such adverse events, pharmacovigilance databases are of great interest.

CASE REPORT

A 71-year-old patient with no rheumatologic history, in complete remission of a mantle-cell lymphoma following rituximab, doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone induction, received a maintenance treatment with rituximab and lenalidomide. After each course of lenalidomide and with no other new medication, the patient presented with fever and high inflammatory markers level, and a scapular-belt arthritis.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient was managed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and colchicine, with symptomatology and inflammation improvement. After discontinuation of lenalidomide, he had no arthritis relapse; it was then concluded that the patient had a lenalidomide-induced arthritis. We interrogated the national and international (VigiBase®) pharmacovigilance databases and found that arthritis in the context of lenalidomide exposure is a rare finding, with only three reported cases in France; 0.13% of adverse events reported with lenalidomide in the international database VigiBase® were arthritis.

DISCUSSION

Our case then reports an uncommon finding, of which both pharmacists and physicians should be aware due to the wide and increasing use of lenalidomide.

An Overview of Lenalidomide in Combination with Rituximab for the Treatment of Adult Patients with Follicular Lymphoma: The Evidence to Date

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent (low-grade) malignancy of B cells and is among the most common hematological cancers affecting adults. Its clinical presentation, natural course, and severity are highly variable. Management of FL depends on the clinical setting; most patients require multiple lines of treatment. Chemoimmunotherapy is the standard of care for FL patients needing treatment; however, alternative treatments are limited for refractory patients or those unfit for chemoimmunotherapy. Multiple alternatives to chemoimmunotherapy for FL are being developed, with some showing significant promise. Lenalidomide combination with rituximab (LR) is among the most successful and extensively studied novel approaches. LR has been compared head-to-head in clinical trials with rituximab monotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in the frontline and to lenalidomide or rituximab monotherapy in the relapsed or refractory setting for the treatment of FL. Initial reports of these nine trials have been published in the last decade, and their long-term data will be available in the coming years. LR offered superior efficacy to either lenalidomide or rituximab monotherapy alone. The RELEVANCE trial compared the efficacy of LR with chemoimmunotherapy among 1030 FL patients and demonstrated similar efficacy with a different side effect profile. Myelosuppression, rash, and fatigue were among the significant adverse events. Most patients treated with LR received thromboprophylaxis. This paper aims to summarize and comment on the published evidence regarding LR treatment for FL through a literature review. The clinical trials will be presented in detail, and methodological differences complicating their comparisons will be discussed.

Long-term Follow-up and Correlative Analysis of Two Phase II Trials of Rituximab and Lenalidomide Followed by Continuous Lenalidomide in Untreated and Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Lymphoma

PURPOSE

Rituximab and lenalidomide are effective for previously untreated and relapsed/refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). However, long-term survival and predictive biomarkers are not well described.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted two phase II open-label trials involving 60 patients with previously untreated and R/R advanced-stage iNHL. Patients received lenalidomide and rituximab induction followed by continuous lenalidomide until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR). Correlative studies included plasma cytokine monitoring, flow cytometry of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC; days 0, 15, 30, and 60), and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) of pretreatment tumor biopsies.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up of 63 months for previously untreated and 100 months for R/R, ORR was 82% for both. The 11 R/R patients who achieved complete remission remained in continuous remission for 16 to 141 months, thereafter. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached in the previously untreated and was 140 months (95% confidence interval, 53.4-140) in the R/R group. A mixed-effects linear regression model identified significant associations between Granzyme B⁺ (GranB⁺) CD8⁺ T cells and long-term complete response (LTCR; P = 5.3e-4). Furthermore, prior to start of therapy, treatment response could be predicted by B-cell and GranB⁺ CD8⁺ T-cell levels (% total lymphocytes).

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab plus lenalidomide followed by continuous lenalidomide is effective with manageable toxicity in patients with previously untreated and R/R iNHL. This regimen produces durable remissions, even in heavily pretreated patients, with some lasting greater than 10 years. GranB⁺ CD8⁺ T cells, B cells, and plasma IFNγ allowed prediction of LTCR but need validation in larger trials.

Factors Influencing Infusion-Related Reactions Following Dosing of Reference Rituximab and PF-05280586, a Rituximab Biosimilar

BACKGROUND

Infusion-related reactions (IRRs) are the most common adverse event (AE) associated with infusion of rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody.

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of dosing/infusion patterns and certain baseline characteristics on IRR occurrence during the first rituximab infusion administered as the biosimilar PF-05280586 (RTX-PF) or reference rituximab sourced from the EU (RTX-EU, MabThera^®) in patients with CD20+ low-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Rituximab (RTX-PF, n=196; RTX-EU, n=198) was administered (375 mg/m²) on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 (one cycle), with a follow-up period through 52 weeks. The relationships between infusion rate, drug exposure, and IRR incidence were assessed by logistic regression analysis and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation. Baseline CD20 level, antidrug antibody (ADA) status, and tumor burden according to IRR occurrence (yes/no) were compared descriptively.

RESULTS

Median rituximab infusion duration on day 1 was 3.50 h for each of the two groups. There was a positive correlation between infusion rate and all-grade IRRs occurring within 24 h after infusion (p < 0.0001). Patients who developed IRRs had a higher median baseline CD20+ level. IRR incidence was unaffected by baseline ADA status. Drug exposure did not predict IRR incidence. Baseline tumor burden was similar between patients with and without IRRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Results of this analysis provide a better understanding of IRRs after the first rituximab (RTX-PF or RTX-EU) infusion and demonstrate a potential correlation of infusion rate and other factors with IRR at the individual and population levels. Infusion-rate escalation steps continue to be needed to manage IRRs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION (DATE OF REGISTRATION)

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02213263 (11 August 2014); and EudraCT: 2014-000132-41 (10 October 2014).

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: new targets and novel therapies

Newer, more effective and non-cytotoxic therapies are an unmet need for patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and other B-cell malignancies. Recently approved agents include polatuzumab with bendamustine and rituximab, selinexor, and tafasitamab plus lenalidomide. Three CAR-T cell products are currently approved by the FDA, with others in clinical trials. Additional agents in development include bispecific antibodies and antibody drug conjugates. Combinations of targeted therapies should lead to further improvement in the outcome of patients with B-cell malignancies.

How we treat mature B-cell neoplasms (indolent B-cell lymphomas)

Mature B cell neoplasms, previously indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHLs), are a heterogeneous group of malignancies sharing similar disease courses and treatment paradigms. Most patients with iNHL have an excellent prognosis, and in many, treatment can be deferred for years. However, some patients will have an accelerated course and may experience transformation into aggressive lymphomas. In this review, we focus on management concepts shared across iNHLs, as well as histology-specific strategies. We address open questions in the field, including the influence of genomics and molecular pathway alterations on treatment decisions. In addition, we review the management of uncommon clinical entities including nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, hairy cell leukemia, splenic lymphoma and primary lymphoma of extranodal sites. Finally, we include a perspective on novel targeted therapies, antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific T cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy.

Lenalidomide: A Review in Previously Treated Follicular Lymphoma

Lenalidomide (Revlimid^®) is a targeted immunomodulatory drug with multiple mechanisms of action. In the USA and the EU, oral lenalidomide is indicated in combination with rituximab or a rituximab product for the treatment of patients with previously treated follicular lymphoma. In the pivotal, phase III AUGMENT trial, lenalidomide + rituximab significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) relative to placebo + rituximab in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, with the PFS benefit appearing to be specific to patients with follicular lymphoma and extending to elderly patients with this subtype. Lenalidomide + rituximab also demonstrated activity in an interim analysis of the phase III MAGNIFY trial in patients with relapsed or refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including those with rituximab-refractory disease. Lenalidomide had an acceptable tolerability profile. Although grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred more frequently with lenalidomide + rituximab than with placebo + rituximab, this was generally well managed with dosage adjustments and growth factor support. In conclusion, lenalidomide in combination with rituximab represents an important new treatment option for previously treated follicular lymphoma, including patients whose disease has become refractory to rituximab.