Impact of Insurance Status on Survival Outcomes in Adults With Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL): A Single-center Experience

Disparity in hematological malignancies: From patients to health care professionals

In the recent few decades, outcomes in patients diagnosed with hematological malignancies have been steadily improving. However, the improved prognosis does not distribute equally among patients from different backgrounds. Besides cancer biology, demographic and geographic disparities have been found to impact overall survival significantly. Specifically, patients from underrepresented minorities including Black and Hispanics, and those with uninsured status, having low socioeconomic status, or from rural areas have had worse outcomes historically, which is uniformly true across all major subtypes of hematological malignancies. Similar discrepancy is also seen in the health care professional field, where a gender gap and a disproportionally low representation of health care providers from underrepresented minorities have been long existing. Thus, a comprehensive strategy to mitigate disparity in the health care system is needed to achieve equity in health care.

Impact of Insurance on Overall Survival in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: A SEER Database Study

INTRODUCTION

Insurance status at diagnosis remains an important barrier to health care access and adherence to treatment. Here, we aim to assess the impact of insurance status, and age on overall survival (OS) in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database, we identified all patients younger than 65 years of age diagnosed with ALL from 2010 to 2016. OS was estimated for each group using the Kaplan Meier curves and compared based on insurance type using a log-rank test. Multivariate analysis using Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to assess the effect of insurance status on OS.

RESULTS

A total of 9057 patients were included in the analysis. Medicaid beneficiaries had worse 5-year OS than insured patients (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.08-1.63, P = .006) in 0-18 years age group. Despite chemotherapy, patients older than 18 years showed poor OS in all insurance categories. Patients on Medicaid showed inferior OS compared to insured in 19-40 years (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.76, P < .001) and 41-65 years age group (HR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.49, P = .003). Interestingly, no significant difference was observed in the OS between the Medicaid and uninsured groups in each age category.

CONCLUSION

Our large database study demonstrates that insured status is associated with better OS in ALL across all age groups. Further studies to develop effective strategies to bridge health care disparities areessential.

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in adults: disparities in treatment intervention based on access to treatment facility

Adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with poor outcomes. We evaluated differences by facility type in the parameters of 6766 adult ALL patients ≥ 40 years of age diagnosed from 2004 to 2015 in the National Cancer DataBase (NCDB) and survival outcomes using two-sample t-tests or chi-square tests and Cox proportional hazards models. Those treated in academic facilities were younger (mean 58.5 versus 61.7 years, p < 0.001), Black (8.1% versus 5.6%, p < 0.001), had private insurance (50.9% versus 44.0%, p < 0.001), and more likely to receive chemotherapy (93.2% versus 81.4%, p < 0.001), any radiotherapy (14.9% versus 7.3%, p < 0.001), stem cell transplant (9.4% versus 2.5%, p < 0.001), or total body irradiation (TBI) (11.3% versus 4.3%, p < 0.001). Patients treated at an academic facility had a higher hazard of death (p<.05) while those that received any chemotherapy or TBI or CNS radiation had a lower risk of death (all p < 0.05). These parameters should be evaluated in future studies.

Blood cancer health disparities in the United States Hispanic population

Cancer is a challenging, multifaceted disease that involves a combination of biological and nonbiological factors. Aside from COVID-19, cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States and the first among Hispanic Americans. The Hispanic population is the largest minority group in the United States, which is rapidly growing in size. Unfortunately, U.S. Hispanics and other minority groups experience many different health disparities, resulting in poor survival outcomes and a reduced quality of life. Factors such as genomic mutations, lower socioeconomic status, lack of education, reduced access to health care, comorbidities, and environmental factors all contribute to these health-care inequalities. In the context of blood cancer health disparities, Hispanic patients are often diagnosed at a younger age and have worse outcomes compared with non-Hispanic individuals. In this commentary, we highlight the existing knowledge about cancer health disparities in the Hispanic population, with a focus on chronic and acute leukemia. In our experience at the U.S./Mexican border, analysis of several different blood cancers demonstrated that younger Hispanic patients with acute lymphoid or myeloid leukemia have higher incidence rates and worse prognoses. A combined approach, involving improved health-care access and better knowledge of the underlying factors, will allow for more timely diagnoses and the development of intervention strategies aimed at reducing or eliminating the disparities.