Outcomes of Transplant-Eligible Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma After Second-Line Salvage Chemotherapy: The Gustave Roussy Experience

Immunogenic Cell Death-related Signature Evaluates the Tumor Microenvironment and Predicts the Prognosis in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Current literatures suggest a growing body of evidence highlighting the pivotal role of Immunogenic Cell Death (ICD) in multiple tumor types. Nevertheless, the potential and mechanisms of ICD in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) remain inadequately studied. To address this gap, our current study aims to examine the impact of ICD on DLBCL and identify a corresponding gene signature in DLBC. Using the expression profiles of ICD-associated genes, the gene expression omnibus (GEO) samples were segregated into ICD-high and ICD-low subtypes utilizing non-negative matrix factorization clustering. Next, univariate and LASSO Cox regression analyses were employed to establish the ICD-related gene signature. Subsequently, the CIBERSORT tool, ssGSEA, and ESTIMATE algorithm were utilized to examine the association between the signature and tumor immune microenvironment of DLBC. Finally, the oncoPredict algorithm was implemented to evaluate the drug sensitivity prediction of DLBCL patients. These findings suggest that the immune microenvironment of the ICD-high group with a poor prognosis was significantly suppressed. An 8-gene ICD-related signature was identified and validated to prognosticate and evaluate the tumor immune microenvironment in DLBCL. Similarly, the high-risk group exhibited a worse prognosis compared to the low-risk group, and the immune function was considerably suppressed. Moreover, the results of oncoPredict algorithm indicated that patients in the high-risk group exhibited higher sensitivity to Cisplatin, Cytarabine, Epirubicin, Oxaliplatin, and Vincristine with low IC50. In conclusion, the present study provides novel insights into the role of ICD in DLBCL by identifying a new biomarker for the disease and may have implications for the development of immune-targeted therapies for the tumor.

A paradox of choice: Sequencing therapy in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

The available treatments for relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have experienced a dramatic change since 2017. Incremental advances in basic and translational science over several decades have led to innovations in immune-oncology. These innovations have culminated in eight separate approvals by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of patients with R/R DLBCL over the last 10 years. High-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplant (HDT-ASCT) remains the standard of care for transplant-eligible patients who relapse after an initial remission. For transplant-ineligible patients or for those who relapse following HDT-ASCT, multiple options exist. Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD19, antibody-drug conjugates, bispecific antibodies, immune effector cell products, and other agents with novel mechanisms of action are now available for patients with R/R DLBCL. There is increasing use of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells as second-line therapy for patients with early relapse of DLBCL or those who are refractory to initial chemoimmunotherapy. The clinical benefits of these strategies vary and are influenced by patient and disease characteristics, as well as the type of prior therapy administered. Therefore, there are multiple clinical scenarios that clinicians might encounter when treating R/R DLBCL. An optimal sequence of drugs has not been established, and there is no evidence-based consensus on how to best order these agents. This abundance of choices introduces a paradox: proliferating treatment options are initially a boon to patients and providers, but as choices grow further they no longer liberate. Rather, more choices make the management of R/R DLBCL more challenging due to lack of direct comparisons among agents and a desire to maximize patient outcomes. Here, we provide a review of recently-approved second- and subsequent-line agents, summarize real-world data detailing the use of these medicines, and provide a framework for sequencing therapy in R/R DLBCL.

Clinical outcomes in transplant-eligible patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after second-line salvage chemotherapy: A retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

The prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is poor. Although patients who fail first-line salvage chemotherapy are candidates for second-line salvage chemotherapy, the optimal treatment strategy for these patients has not yet been established.

METHODS

The present, single-center, retrospective study included transplant-eligible patients with R/R DLBCL who received second-line salvage chemotherapy with curative intent.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients with R/R DLBCL received second-line salvage chemotherapy. Eighteen (23.7%) patients were responders to the first-line salvage chemotherapy. The overall response rate was 39.5%, and overall survival (OS) was significantly longer in patients who responded to second-line salvage chemotherapy than those who did not. Forty-one patients who proceeded to potentially curative treatment (autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation [ASCT], chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cell therapy, or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation) had a better prognosis than those who did not. Among the 46 patients who failed to respond to the second-line salvage regimen, only 18 (39.1%) could proceed to the curative treatments. However, among the 30 patients who responded to the second-line salvage regimen, 23 (76.7%) received one of the potentially curative treatments. Among 34 patients who received CAR T-cell therapy, OS was significantly longer in those who responded to salvage chemotherapy immediately prior to CAR T-cell therapy than in those who did not respond. In contrast, the number of prior lines of chemotherapy was not identified as a statistically significant prognostic factor of survival. No significant difference was detected in OS between patients receiving ASCT and those receiving CAR T-cell therapy after the response to second-line salvage chemotherapy.

DISCUSSION

In this study, we demonstrated that chemosensitivity remained a crucial factor in predicting survival outcomes following CAR T-cell therapy irrespective of the administration timing, and that both ASCT and CAR T-cell therapy were acceptable after the response to second-line salvage chemotherapy.

Outcomes of Diffuse Large B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma After Gemcitabine-Based Second Salvage Chemotherapy: A Single-Center Study

Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with a five-year survival of 60%-70% with chemoimmunotherapy consisting of the R-CHOP combination (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and prednisone), with a relapse/refractory rate of 20-50%. Salvage therapy with HDT-ASCT is the treatment of choice for patients with relapsed/refractory disease with a success rate of 50%-60%. Patients who do not respond to the first salvage regimen or who relapsed after the first salvage regimen, with or without high-dose chemotherapy (HDT)-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), have poor overall responses and survival and should be offered novel therapies. The objective of our study was to evaluate responses to second salvage, gemcitabine-based therapy with or without HDT-ASCT in a resource-limited setting. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study, including 55 patients aged >18 years, diagnosed with DLBCL and having received gemcitabine-based second salvage chemotherapy. Results The median age was 34 years, only one patient achieved progression-free survival (PFS) of >12 months with ORR of 27% to two cycles of gemcitabine-based combination, two years PFS and OS of 9.6% and 34%, respectively, and a median PFS and OS of four months and 13 months, respectively. Conclusion DLBCL patients, refractory to first-line and first salvage chemotherapy, should be considered for novel therapies or opt for palliative care rather than second salvage chemotherapy and HDT-ASCT, which results in poor overall response and significant toxicities.

Attenuated cytarabine, etoposide, dexamethasone plus rituximab (R-Mini-CYVE) regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma not eligible for intensive chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of an attenuated immunochemotherapy regimen based on cytarabine, etoposide and dexamethasone plus rituximab (R-mini-CYVE) in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

We included pretreated adult patients with B-cell NHL who were ineligible for high-dose immunochemotherapy (HDT). Cytarabine and etoposide were given at four different dose levels, depending on the patient's frailty. Up to 8 cycles were administered.

RESULTS

Between 2013 and 2019, 56 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 45, 80%) and indolent B-cell lymphoma (n = 11, 20%) were included. Median age was 75 (range: 36-88). Nineteen patients (35%) had a performance status ≥2. Patients received a median of 4 cycles of R-mini-CYVE. The objective response and the complete response rates were 50% and 33%, respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 5.7 (95% CI: 0.5-10.9) and 14.7 (95% CI: 3.5-25.9) months, respectively. Grade ≥3 anaemia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia occurred in 44%, 55% and 60% of the patients, respectively. The most frequent non-haematological grade ≥3 adverse events were sepsis (21%), fatigue (13%) and cytarabine-related neurotoxicity (5%).

CONCLUSION

R-mini-CYVE demonstrated a meaningful antitumour efficacy and an acceptable safety profile in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL who were ineligible for HDT.