Types, Clinical Features, and Survival Outcomes of Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Thailand: A 3-Year Prospective Multicenter Study from the Thai Acute Leukemia Study Group (TALSG)

Navigating acute myeloid leukemia towards better outcomes: Treatment pathways and challenges for patients ineligible for intensive chemotherapy

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive hematologic malignancy that affects primarily older individuals. Patients ineligible to receive intensive standard chemotherapy followed by consolidation with/without hematopoietic stem cell transplant have a suboptimal prognosis. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the AML field leading to the development of new anti-leukemic approaches, including lower-intensity therapies specifically developed for patients who are ineligible for intensive chemotherapy. As the available options for this hard-to-manage and historically undertreated patient category are increasing, selecting the best treatment for each patient is crucial and ever more challenging. Accordingly, accurate patient evaluation is required to guide this decision-making process. There is currently no consensus on how to evaluate patients' fitness status, and the available tools that were originally developed for this purpose might not be adequate in the setting of the new treatment options. In this review we describe current management of AML patients unfit for intensive chemotherapy, aiming to highlight current challenges and suggest possible strategies for an accurate therapeutic selection. For this purpose, we will first provide an overview of epidemiology and classification of AML, and then move to current anti-leukemic treatments for unfit patients and the tools used for evaluating patient eligibility for a specific treatment. Finally, we will suggest possible measures to improve the management of AML patients in the era of novel lower-intensity regimens.

The cost-utility analysis of antifungal prophylaxis for invasive fungal infections in acute myeloid leukaemia patients receiving chemotherapy: a study from a middle-income country

BACKGROUND

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) contribute to morbidity and mortality during acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) treatment. Without prophylaxis, IFI rate during AML treatment in Thailand is high and results in a high mortality rate and a prolonged hospital stay.

AIM

To evaluate the cost-utility of antifungal therapy (AFT) prophylaxis during AML treatment.

METHODS

We assessed the cost-utility of AFT available in Thailand, including posaconazole (solution), itraconazole (solution and capsule), and voriconazole. A hybrid model consisting of a decision tree and the Markov model was established.

RESULTS

The costs to prevent overall IFI using any AFT were all lower than the treatment cost of a non-prophylaxis group, resulting in a saving of 808-1507 USD per patient. Prevention with voriconazole prophylaxis showed the highest quality-adjusted life years (QALYs = 3.51, incremental QALYs = 0.23), followed by posaconazole (QALYs = 3.46, incremental QALY = 0.18) and itraconazole solution (QALYs = 3.45, incremental QALYs = 0.17). Itraconazole capsule reduced QALY in the model. For invasive aspergillosis prevention, posaconazole and voriconazole both resulted in better QALYs and life year savings compared with no prophylaxis. However, posaconazole prophylaxis was the only cost-saving option (976 USD per patient).

CONCLUSION

Posaconazole, itraconazole solution and voriconazole were all cost saving compared with no prophylaxis for overall IFI prophylaxis, with voriconazole being the most cost-effective option. Posaconazole and voriconazole were both cost effective for invasive aspergillosis prevention but only posaconazole was cost saving. A change in reimbursement policy for the use of AFT prophylaxis during intensive AML treatment could provide both clinical benefits to patients and substantial economic benefits to healthcare systems.

Simplified predictive scores for thrombosis and bleeding complications in newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients

BACKGROUND

Bleeding and thrombotic complications are the leading causes of death in acute leukemia patients. The Conventional International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (ISTH DIC) scoring system is utilized to assess DIC diagnoses in various conditions. Nevertheless, limited studies have tested the system's accuracy in predicting thrombo-hemorrhagic events in individuals with acute leukemia. This study aimed to (1) validate the ISTH DIC scoring system and (2) propose a new Siriraj Acute Myeloid/Lymphoblastic Leukemia (SiAML) bleeding and thrombosis scoring system for thrombohemorrhagic risk assessment in acute leukemia.

METHODS

We conducted a retro-prospective observational study of newly diagnosed acute leukemia patients between March 2014 and December 2019. We recorded thrombohemorrhagic episodes within 30 days postdiagnosis and DIC profiles, including prothrombin time, platelet level, D-dimer, and fibrinogen. The sensitivities, specificities, positive and negative predictive values, and areas under receiver operating characteristic curves for the ISTH DIC and SiAML scoring systems were calculated.

RESULTS

In all, 261 acute leukemia patients were identified: 64% with acute myeloid leukemia, 27% with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 9% with acute promyelocytic leukemia. Overall bleeding and thrombotic events were 16.8% and 6.1%, respectively. With a cutoff of 5 for the ISTH DIC score, the sensitivity and specificity for bleeding prediction were 43.5% and 74.4%, respectively, while the corresponding values for thrombotic prediction were 37.5% and 71.8%, respectively. D-dimer > 5000 µg FEU/L and fibrinogen ≤ 150 mg/dL were significantly associated with bleeding. A SiAML-bleeding score was calculated using these factors, with a sensitivity and specificity of 65.2% and 65.6%, respectively. Conversely, D-dimer > 7000 µg FEU/L, platelet > 40 × 10⁹/L, and white blood cell level > 15 × 10⁹/L were significant variables related to thrombosis. Using these variables, we established a SiAML-thrombosis score with a sensitivity and specificity of 93.8% and 66.1%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed SiAML scoring system might be valuable for prognosticating individuals at risk for bleeding and thrombotic complications. Prospective validation studies are needed to verify its usefulness.