Effect of t (11;14) Abnormality on Outcomes of Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the Connect MM Registry

Precision medicine for multiple myeloma: The case for translocation (11;14)

The t(11;14) translocation is among the most prevalent cytogenetic abnormalities in multiple myeloma (MM), distinguished by its unique features and biology that have been thoroughly explored for decades. What further sets this MM subtype apart is its oscillating prognostic significance, from initially being considered a favorable alteration to intermediate risk and potential future reclassification as favorable risk. Despite not being inherently a high-risk alteration indicative of an aggressive phenotype, it appears that t(11;14)-MM is less responsive to novel agents like proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs which have otherwise transformed the disease's treatment landscape, perhaps partially explained by its reduced propensity for immunoglobulin production and oligosecretory nature. However, its distinct reliance on Bcl-2 has heightened its sensitivity to venetoclax. Further subclassification based on morphological and genomic characteristics could enhance our prediction models of treatment responses and enable more tailored therapeutic strategies for patients. This review aims to encapsulate the existing research evidence in this area.

The Role of t(11;14) in Tailoring Treatment Decisions in Multiple Myeloma

Multiple myeloma (MM) represents a hematological neoplasia with an uncontrolled proliferation of malignant plasma cells and complex cytogenetic abnormalities. t(11;14) has emerged as a crucial genetic aberration and is one of the most common primary translocations in MM. Patients harboring t(11;14) represent a distinctive subgroup with a clinical profile that differs from t(11;14)-negative MM risk categories. One of the key features linked with t(11;14) is the BCL2 dependency, indicating vulnerability to BCL2 inhibition. BCL2 inhibitors, such as venetoclax, demonstrated impressive efficacy alone or in combination with other anti-myeloma drugs in patients with RRMM accompanied by t(11;14) and BCL2 overexpression. Therefore, t(11;14) plays a key role in both risk stratification and informed decision making towards a tailored therapy. In this review, we highlight the biology of t(11;14) in MM cells, summarize the current evolving role of t(11;14) in the era of novel agents and novel targeted therapies, illuminate current efficacy and safety data of BCL2-based treatment options and explore the future prospects of individualized precision medicine for this special subgroup of patients with MM.

The prognostic impact of t(11;14) in multiple myeloma: A real-world analysis from the Australian Lymphoma Leukaemia Group (ALLG) and the Australian Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry (MRDR)

The prognostic impact of t(11;14) in multiple myeloma (MM) needs to be better understood to inform future treatment decisions. The Australian Lymphoma Leukaemia Group embarked on a retrospective, observational cohort study using real-world data to interrogate treatment patterns and outcomes in 74 MM patients with t(11;14) [t(11;14)-MM] diagnosed over 10 years. This was compared to 159 and 111 MM patients with high-risk IgH translocations (IgH HR-MM) and hyperdiploidy (Hyperdiploid-MM), respectively, from the Australian Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry. No appreciable differences in age, gender, ISS, LDH levels, 1q21 or del(17p) status, or treatment patterns were observed between groups. Median PFS-1 was not different between groups but both t(11;14)-MM and IgH HR-MM had an inferior PFS-2 vs. Hyperdiploid-MM: median PFS-2 8.2 months, 10.0 months, and 19.8 months (p = 0.002), respectively. The 3-year OS were 69%, 71%, and 82% (p = 0.026), respectively. In the t(11;14)-MM group, gain or amplification of 1q21 at diagnosis predicted for poorer OS (HR 3.46, p = 0.002). Eleven patients had received venetoclax with 45% achieving better than a very good partial response. Results suggest that t(11;14) MM may confer an unfavorable risk profile and that the use of targeted therapies such as venetoclax earlier in the treatment algorithm should be explored.

Multiple myeloma with t(11;14): impact of novel agents on outcome

Multiple myeloma (MM) patients with t(11;14) present unique biological features and their prognosis is not well established. We report a retrospective study of 591 MM patients, 17.3% of whom had t(11;14). It was designed to determine the prognostic impact of this abnormality and the effect of novel agents on the response and outcomes. Three groups were established based on their cytogenetics: (1) t(11;14); (2) high-risk chromosomal abnormalities; and (3) standard risk (SR). After 80.1 months (1.2-273.8 months) of follow-up, no differences were observed in overall survival (OS) between the t(11;14) and SR groups (75.8 vs. 87.2 months; P = 0.438). Treatment of MM t(11;14) with novel agents did not improve their overall response rate (ORR) or complete response (CR) compared with those who received conventional therapy (ORR: 87.2 vs. 79.5%, P = 0.336; CR: 23.4 vs. 12.8%, P = 0.215). This effect translated into a similar PFS (39.6 vs. 30.0 months; P = 0.450) and OS (107.6 vs. 75.7 months; P = 0.175). In summary, MM t(11;14) patients did not benefit from the introduction of novel agents as much as SR patients did, indicating that other therapies are needed to improve their outcomes.

Molecular Diagnostics of Plasma Cell Neoplasms

Genetic characterization of myeloma at diagnosis by interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization and next-generation sequencing (NGS) can assist with risk stratification and treatment planning. Measurable residual disease (MRD) status after treatment, as evaluated by next-generation flow cytometry or NGS on bone marrow aspirate material, is one of the most important predictors of prognosis. Less-invasive tools for MRD assessment such as liquid biopsy approaches have also recently emerged as potential alternatives.

Intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide and bortezomib for PBSC mobilization in multiple myeloma

Although the incorporation of bortezomib into induction regimens has improved, response rates in patients with multiple myeloma (MM), the role of bortezomib in the, peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization remains unclear. We assessed the, PBSC mobilization efficacy, safety, and disease response of intermediate-dose, cyclophosphamide and bortezomib in the PBSC mobilization. Twenty-one patients with, newly diagnosed MM were enrolled in a phase II, non-randomized study that used, bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2/day on days 1, 4, 8, and 11) and intermediate-dose, cyclophosphamide (2 g/m2/day on days 2, 3) (Bor-ID-CY). The data from 15 patients, who received intermediate-dose cyclophosphamide (ID-CY) were used as a historical, control group. The total CD34 + cell yield of Bor-ID-CY and ID-CY groups were not, significantly different (median 6.3 ×106/kg vs. 6.5 ×106/kg, p = 0.19). All three patients, with mobilization failure of two groups had t(11;14). Six patients in Bor-ID-CY group, were upgraded from a status that was less than a very good partial response (VGPR), at the time of PBSC mobilization to a VGPR or better after PBSC mobilization, (p = 0.014). Four patients in Bor-ID-CY group developed sepsis. The time to, engraftment was similar in the two groups. The addition of bortezomib to ID-CY did not, impact the stem cell yield or quality.

No needles needed: All-oral therapy options for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Immense progress has been made for the treatment of multiple myeloma over the past two decades, with patient outcomes improving dramatically as a result. Patient quality of life, however, is constantly challenged by complications of the disease, side effects of therapy and the overall burden receiving continuous treatment. Compared to parenteral agents, all-oral regimens can provide logistically favorable alternatives and are associated with improved quality of life. Here, we review the currently available and investigational oral therapies for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma and provide a practical clinical reference tool. We explore the factors that dictate the selection of therapy, such as prior drug refractoriness, disease biology and patient-specific considerations. Regimens with their respective supporting clinical data are organized by the degree of prior treatment, from lenalidomide-sensitive to heavily pretreated patients. We explore common challenges such as renal insufficiency and cytopenias. Lastly, we review investigational oral agents.

Incidence and effect of secondary cardiac amyloidosis on outcomes of patients with t(11;14) multiple myeloma

Background

The t(11;14)(q13;32) is a common chromosome translocation in multiple myeloma (MM), but its prognostic value remains controversial. Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis is commonly secondary to multiple myeloma, which can rapidly cause heart failure and high mortality. We aimed to investigate the prevalence of secondary cardiac amyloidosis in MM patients with t(11;14) and to evaluate its impact on survival outcomes.

Methods

We retrospectively identified 52 MM patients with t(11;14) in our center between October 2015 and April 2022. The associations between cardiac amyloidosis and clinical and biological parameters were statistically analyzed, and the impacts of concomitant of cardiac amyloidosis on survival and prognosis of MM patients with t(11;14) were also assessed.

Results

Concomitant presence of cardiac amyloidosis was observed in 15 (28.8%) of all cases. Patients with cardiac amyloidosis had significantly higher NT-proBNP (p = 0.002) and higher hs-cTnT (p < 0.001), while the patients without cardiac amyloidosis had higher percentage of bone marrow plasma cells (p = 0.027), higher incidence of hemoglobin <80 g/L (p = 0.021) and bone destruction (p < 0.001). The median overall survival (OS) for all patients was 33.4 months after a median follow-up of 23.8 months. The amyloidosis group showed a significantly shorter OS than the non-amyloidosis group (15.3 vs. 41.8 months, p < 0.001). Besides, patients harboring NT-proBNP >1,800 pg/ml (p < 0.001) or hs-cTnT ≧40 pg/ml (p = 0.001) or light chain (LC) only isotype (p = 0.033) had a significantly shorter mean OS compared with patients with lower NT-proBNP or hs-cTnT or other M-protein isotype. Univariate analyses showed that NT-proBNP >1,800 pg/ml, hs-cTnT ≧40 pg/ml, LC only isotype, and concomitant presence of cardiac amyloidosis were independently associated with shorter OS, while NT-proBNP >1,800 pg/ml still retained the prognostic value for OS in multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

The t(11;14) MM patients with coexisting cardiac amyloidosis may represent a distinct clinical entity that confers a poor outcome. These findings may have important clinical and biological implications.