Disease and Clinical Characteristics of Patients With a Clinical Diagnosis of Myelofibrosis Enrolled in the MOST Study

Management of Patients with Early Myelofibrosis: A Discussion of Best Practices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Summarize best practices for management of patients with early myelofibrosis (MF).

RECENT FINDINGS

Myelofibrosis is a progressive myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) that generally produces burdensome symptoms and ultimately leads to worse overall survival than that observed in healthy controls or patients with other MPNs. Several Janus kinase inhibitors and various interferon formulations are now available for treatment of MF, with ruxolitinib notable for extending overall survival in addition to improving MF signs and symptoms. The chronic nature of the disease can lead some patients to avoid immediate treatment in favor of a watch-and-wait approach. This review summarizes the patient management approach taken in my practice, providing guidance and a discussion of best practices with an emphasis on the importance and clinical benefits of active treatment in early MF. In particular, a case is made to consider treatment with ruxolitinib for patients with intermediate-1 risk disease and to minimize delay between diagnosis and treatment initiation for patients with intermediate or high-risk disease.

Myelofibrosis

The clinical phenotype of primary and post-polycythemia vera and postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis (MF) is dominated by splenomegaly, symptomatology, a variety of blood cell alterations, and a tendency to develop vascular complications and blast phase. Diagnosis requires assessing complete cell blood counts, bone marrow morphology, deep genetic evaluations, and disease history. Driver molecular events consist of JAK2V617F, CALR, and MPL mutations, whereas about 8% to 10% of MF are "triple-negative." Additional myeloid-gene variants are described in roughly 80% of patients. Currently available clinical-based and integrated clinical/molecular-based scoring systems predict the survival of patients with MF and are applied for conventional treatment decision-making, indication to stem cell transplant (SCT) and allocation in clinical trials. Standard treatment consists of anemia-oriented therapies, hydroxyurea, and JAK inhibitors such as ruxolitinib, fedratinib, and pacritinib. Overall, spleen volume reduction of 35% or greater at week 24 can be achieved by 42% of ruxolitinib-, 47% of fedratinib-, 19% of pacritinib-, and 27% of momelotinib-treated patients. Now, it is time to move towards new paradigms for evaluating efficacy like disease modification, that we intend as a robust and unequivocal effect on disease biology and/or on patient survival. The growing number of clinical trials potentially pave the way for new strategies in patients with MF. Translational studies of some molecules showed an early effect on bone marrow fibrosis and on variant allele frequencies of myeloid genes. SCT is still the only curative option, however, it is associated with relevant challenges. This review focuses on the diagnosis, prognostication, and treatment of MF.

Patient-reported outcomes of patients with myelofibrosis or essential thrombocythemia enrolled in the MOST study

The Myelofibrosis and Essential Thrombocythemia Observational STudy (MOST; NCT02953704) is an ongoing, noninterventional study assessing clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients with myelofibrosis (MF) or essential thrombocythemia (ET). This analysis assessed PROs at enrollment; symptom burden and quality of life (QoL), work productivity, and activity were assessed using validated questionnaires in patients with low- or intermediate-1-risk (age-alone) MF, or high- or low-risk ET (receiving ET-directed therapy) at enrollment. In MF and ET cohorts, fatigue had highest mean symptom score. Women had higher mean total symptom scores (TSS), mean symptom scores, and reduced QoL versus men. In patients with MF, mean TSS and symptom scores were similar between risk groups. Patients with low-risk ET had higher mean TSS and symptom scores than patients with high-risk ET. In conclusion, patients with lower risk MF and low- or high-risk ET experience significant symptom burden affecting QoL and ability to work.