SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions | Myeloid/Lymphoid Neoplasms with Eosinophilia and Gene Rearrangements: Diagnostic Pearls and Pitfalls

Optimization of Advanced Molecular Genetic Testing Utilization in Hematopathology: A Goldilocks Approach to Bone Marrow Testing

PURPOSE

This study investigated the effectiveness of algorithmic testing in hematopathology at the Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI). The algorithm was predicated on test selection after an initial pathologic evaluation to maximize cost-effective testing, especially for expensive molecular and cytogenetic assays.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standard ordering protocols (SOPs) for 17 disease categories were developed and encoded in a decision support application. Six months of retrospective data from application beta testing was obtained and compared with actual testing practices during that timeframe. In addition, 2 years of prospective data were also obtained from patients at one community satellite site.

RESULTS

A total of 460 retrospective cases (before introduction of algorithmic testing) and 109 prospective cases (following introduction) were analyzed. In the retrospective data, 61.7% of tests (509 of 825) were concordant with the SOPs while 38.3% (316 of 825) were overordered and 30.8% (227 of 736) of SOP-recommended tests were omitted. In the prospective data, 98.8% of testing was concordant (244 of 247 total tests) with only 1.2% overordered tests (3 of 247) and 7.6% omitted tests (20 of 264 SOP-recommended tests; overall P < .001). The cost of overordered tests before implementing SOP indicates a potential annualized saving of $1,347,520 in US dollars (USD) in overordered testing at Brigham and Women's Hospital/DFCI. Only two of 316 overordered tests (0.6%) returned any additional information, both for extremely rare clinical circumstances.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of SOPs dramatically improved test ordering practices, with a just right number of ancillary tests that minimizes cost and has no significant impact on acquiring key informative test results.

Hematological Neoplasms with Eosinophilia

Eosinophils in peripheral blood account for 0.3-5% of leukocytes, which is equivalent to 0.05-0.5 × 109/L. A count above 0.5 × 109/L is considered to indicate eosinophilia, while a count equal to or above 1.5 × 109/L is defined as hypereosinophilia. In bone marrow aspirate, eosinophilia is considered when eosinophils make up more than 6% of the total nuclear cells. In daily clinical practice, the most common causes of reactive eosinophilia are non-hematologic, whether they are non-neoplastic (allergic diseases, drugs, infections, or immunological diseases) or neoplastic (solid tumors). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may be reactive or secondary to the production of eosinophilopoietic cytokines, and this is mainly seen in lymphoid neoplasms (Hodgkin lymphoma, mature T-cell neoplasms, lymphocytic variant of hypereosinophilic syndrome, and B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma). Eosinophilia that is associated with a hematological malignancy may also be neoplastic or primary, derived from the malignant clone, usually in myeloid neoplasms or with its origin in stem cells (myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and tyrosine kinase gene fusions, acute myeloid leukemia with core binding factor translocations, mastocytosis, myeloproliferative neoplasms, myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, and myelodysplastic neoplasms). There are no concrete data in standardized cytological and cytometric procedures that could predict whether eosinophilia is reactive or clonal. The verification is usually indirect, based on the categorization of the accompanying hematologic malignancy. This review focuses on the broad differential diagnosis of hematological malignancies with eosinophilia.

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm with eosinophilia and BCR/FGFR1 rearrangement with transformation to cortical T-lymphoblastic lymphoma and erythroid precursors: a case report

BACKGROUND

Myeloproliferative neoplasms are a group of diseases with diverse biological and clinical characteristics. As a provisional separate entity, myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and genetic rearrangement have been described, which may present an initial clinical behavior of myeloproliferation and be characterized by varied genetic rearrangements. One of these entities is associated with FGFR1 rearrangements, characterized by its low prevalence and few treatment options.

CASE PRESENTATION

We present the case of a 53-year-old Mestizo male patient of Hispanic origin who initially presented weight loss and fatigue, with a complete blood count showing leukocytosis and eosinophilia, with an initial diagnosis of nonspecific myeloproliferative disorder. In a next-generation sequencing study, BCR::FGFR1 rearrangement was documented, a diagnosis of myeloid/lymphoid neoplasia with eosinophilia and BCR::FGFR1 rearrangement was made, and hydroxyurea therapy was initiated. Subsequently, transformation to cortical T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma and erythroid precursors was documented, requiring management with chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with eosinophilia and genetic rearrangements constitute a group of deeply heterogeneous diseases with variable clinical and diagnostic characteristics and whose treatment is not clearly defined.