1
|
Chey WD, Hashash JG, Manning L, Chang L. AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Role of Diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Expert Review. Gastroenterology 2022; 162:1737-1745.e5. [PMID: 35337654 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.12.248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2021] [Revised: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
DESCRIPTION Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a commonly diagnosed gastrointestinal disorder that can have a substantial impact on quality of life. Most patients with IBS associate their gastrointestinal symptoms with eating food. Mounting evidence supports dietary modifications, such as the low-fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet, as a primary treatment for IBS symptoms. The aim of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to provide best practice advice statements, primarily to clinical gastroenterologists, covering the role of diet in IBS treatment. METHODS This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA CPU Committee and the AGA Governing Board to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership, and underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through standard procedures of Gastroenterology. The best practice advice statements were drawn from reviewing existing literature combined with expert opinion to provide practical advice on the role of diet in treating patients with IBS. Because this was not a systematic review, formal rating of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations was not performed. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Dietary advice is ideally prescribed to patients with IBS who have insight into their meal-related gastrointestinal symptoms and are motivated to make the necessary changes. To optimize the quality of teaching and clinical response, referral to a registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) should be made to patients who are willing to collaborate with a RDN and patients who are not able to implement beneficial dietary changes on their own. If a gastrointestinal RDN is not available, other resources can assist with implementation of diet interventions. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Patients with IBS who are poor candidates for restrictive diet interventions include those consuming few culprit foods, those at risk for malnutrition, those who are food insecure, and those with an eating disorder or uncontrolled psychiatric disorder. Routine screening for disordered eating or eating disorders by careful dietary history is critical because they are common and often overlooked in gastrointestinal conditions. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Specific diet interventions should be attempted for a predetermined length of time. If there is no clinical response, the diet intervention should be abandoned for another treatment alternative, for example, a different diet, medication, or other form of therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: In preparation for a visit with a RDN, patients should provide dietary information that will assist in developing an individualized nutrition care plan. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Soluble fiber is efficacious in treating global symptoms of IBS. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: The low-FODMAP diet is currently the most evidence-based diet intervention for IBS. Healthy eating advice as described by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Guidelines, among others, also offers benefit to a subset of patients with IBS. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: The low-FODMAP diet consists of the following 3 phases: 1) restriction (lasting no more than 4-6 weeks), 2) reintroduction of FODMAP foods, and 3) personalization based on results from reintroduction. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Although observational studies found that most patients with IBS improve with a gluten-free diet, randomized controlled trials have yielded mixed results. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: There are limited data showing that selected biomarkers can predict response to diet interventions in patients with IBS, but there is insufficient evidence to support their routine use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William D Chey
- Division of Gastroenterology, Michigan Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jana G Hashash
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Laura Manning
- Division of Gastroenterology, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Lin Chang
- Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Division of Digestive Diseases, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kindt S, Louis H, De Schepper H, Arts J, Caenepeel P, De Looze D, Gerkens A, Holvoet T, Latour P, Mahler T, Mokaddem F, Nullens S, Piessevaux H, Poortmans P, Rasschaert G, Surmont M, Vafa H, Van Malderen K, Vanuytsel T, Wuestenberghs F, Tack J. Belgian consensus on irritable bowel syndrome. Acta Gastroenterol Belg 2022; 85:360-382. [PMID: 35709780 DOI: 10.51821/85.2.10100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is characterised by recurrent abdominal pain related to defaecation or associated with altered stool frequency or consistency. Despite its prevalence, major uncertainties in the diagnostic and therapeutic management persist in clinical practice. METHODS A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of literature review and voting process on 78 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement. RESULTS Consensus was reached for 50 statements. The Belgian consensus agreed as to the multifactorial aetiology of IBS. According to the consensus abdominal discomfort also represents a cardinal symptom, while bloating and abdominal distension often coexist. IBS needs subtyping based on stool pattern. The importance of a positive diagnosis, relying on history and clinical examination is underlined, while additional testing should remain limited, except when alarm features are present. Explanation of IBS represents a crucial part of patient management. Lifestyle modification, spasmolytics and water-solube fibres are considered first-line agents. The low FODMAP diet, selected probiotics, cognitive behavioural therapy and specific treatments targeting diarrhoea and constipation are considered appropriate. There is a consensus to restrict faecal microbiota transplantation and gluten-free diet, while other treatments are strongly discouraged. CONCLUSIONS A panel of Belgian gastroenterologists summarised the current evidence on the aetiology, symptoms, diagnosis and treatment of IBS with attention for the specificities of the Belgian healthcare system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Kindt
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - H Louis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Route de Lennik 808, 1070 Brussels, Belgium
| | - H De Schepper
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - J Arts
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Brugge, Belgium
| | - P Caenepeel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Campus Sint-Jan, Genk, Belgium
- UHasselt, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - D De Looze
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | - A Gerkens
- Boitsfort Medical Center, Brussels, Belgium
| | - T Holvoet
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint Niklaas, Belgium
| | - P Latour
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - T Mahler
- Department of Pediatrics, Universitair Ziekenuis Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - F Mokaddem
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Vivalia-Centre Sud Luxembourg, Arlon, Belgium
| | - S Nullens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - H Piessevaux
- Department of Hepato-gastroenterology, Cliniques universitaires St-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - P Poortmans
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - G Rasschaert
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - M Surmont
- Department of gastroenterology and Hepatology, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - H Vafa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chirec-Site Delta, Brussels, Belgium
| | - K Van Malderen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - T Vanuytsel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - F Wuestenberghs
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - J Tack
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the prevalence of non-malignant, organic gastrointestinal disorders misdiagnosed as irritable bowel syndrome. Sci Rep 2022; 12:1949. [PMID: 35121775 PMCID: PMC8817019 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-05933-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatable gastrointestinal disorders in patients with symptoms typical for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) may be overlooked. The prevalence of five gastrointestinal conditions—bile acid diarrhoea (BAD), carbohydrate malabsorption (CM), microscopic colitis (MC), pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (PEI) and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) was systematically assessed from studies including consecutive patients meeting diagnostic criteria for IBS. 4 databases were searched from 1978 to 2020. Studies were included if they evaluated the prevalence of these conditions in secondary healthcare setting. Estimated pooled rates were calculated and statistical heterogeneity between studies was evaluated using Q and I2 statistics. Seven studies (n = 597) estimated the pooled prevalence for BAD as 41% (95% CI 29–54). 17 studies (n = 5068) estimated that of MC as 3% (95% CI 2–4%). Two studies (n = 478) suggested a rate of 4.6% (range: 1.8–6.1%) for PEI. Using breath testing, 26 studies (n = 6700) and 13 studies (n = 3415) estimated the prevalence of lactose and fructose malabsorption as 54% (95% CI 44–64%) and 43% (95% CI 23–62%); 36 studies (n = 4630) and 22 studies (n = 2149) estimated that of SIBO as 49% (95% CI 40–57%) with lactulose and 19% (95% CI 13–27%) with glucose. Rates of all conditions were significantly higher than in healthy controls. A significant proportion of patients presenting to secondary care with IBS have an organic condition which may account for their symptoms. Failure to exclude such conditions will deny patients effective treatment.
Collapse
|
4
|
Hammer K, Hasanagic H, Memaran N, Huber WD, Hammer J. Relevance of Methane and Carbon Dioxide Evaluation in Breath Tests for Carbohydrate Malabsorption in a Paediatric Cohort. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2021; 72:e71-e77. [PMID: 33560761 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000003004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The relevance of methane measurement in breath tests for the detection of carbohydrate malabsorption in children is controversial. The need for correction for poor sample collection is disputed. We evaluated the relevance of methane/CO2 measurements for the diagnosis of paediatric carbohydrate malabsorption. METHODS A total of 132 breath tests (fructose: n = 54; lactose: n = 78) were performed in 91 children/adolescents with functional abdominal complaints. Breath samples were collected and analysed for hydrogen, methane, and CO2. Malabsorption was defined by a net increase over baseline of ≥20 parts per million (ppm) for hydrogen, ≥5 to ≥12 ppm for methane, and ≥10 to ≥15 ppm for hydrogen-plus-methane. The diagnosis was made before and after the use of a CO2-based correction factor (5.5% as the numerator). Hydrogen-based test results were compared with results obtained with other cut-off values. RESULTS Fifty-eight positive tests were obtained by hydrogen measurement (without CO2 correction). The addition of methane measurements did not significantly influence the test results (P > 0.05). Only under the use of extraordinary cut-offs (combined hydrogen-plus-methane smaller than ≥18 ppm) did the rate of malabsorbers increase significantly (P < 0.05). After CO2 correction, hydrogen ≥20 ppm was detected in 4 additional patients, but 1 patient lost the hydrogen-based diagnosis of malabsorption (Cohen kappa = 0.92). CONCLUSIONS Methane measurement did not significantly affect the detection rate of carbohydrate malabsorbers in children/adolescents with functional abdominal complaints when established cut-offs are used. The use of CO2 correction altered the diagnosis of malabsorption in a minority of patients but did not significantly alter overall test results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hana Hasanagic
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin 3; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Nima Memaran
- Department of Paediatric Kidney, Liver and Metabolic Diseases, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Wolf-Dietrich Huber
- Klinische Abteilung für Pädiatrische Nephrologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinik für Kinder- und Jugendheilkunde, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Johann Hammer
- Abteilung für Gastroenterologie und Hepatologie, Universitätsklinik für Innere Medizin 3; Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a chronic condition characterized by abdominal pain associated with altered bowel habits. Patients with IBS often complain of food-related gastrointestinal symptoms. Specifically, those with diarrhea-predominant IBS report a significantly higher effect on quality on life because of food avoidance compared with those with other IBS subtypes. Physicians and patients often use dietary therapies to mitigate IBS symptoms. In the last 10 years, several dietary interventions such as a gluten-free diet, a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diets have been studied in several studies. This review summarizes the current literature on the role of diets such as gluten-free diet, low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols diet, and other carbohydrate malabsorption in the pathophysiology and symptom management in patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review summarizes recent progress in the diagnosis and management of irritable bowel syndrome, with a focus on dietary and microbiota aspects. RECENT FINDINGS From a pathophysiological point of view, IBS is a multifactorial condition with both peripheral (transit) as central (visceral hypersensitivity, anxiety, depression) contribution in a cumulative fashion to the symptom pattern and severity. More recently, the focus has shifted to diet and microbiota. The number of dietary options that can be used for IBS and the understanding of determinants of their efficacy is rapidly increasing. Several studies have confirmed the efficacy of the low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet. Sucrose-isomaltase deficiency has emerged as pathogenetic mechanisms in a subset of patients, who do not respond to low FODMAP diet but may respond to starch and sucrose elimination. Herbal remedies, probiotics and secretagogues have been the topic of additional treatment trials. The efficacy of fecal microbiota transplantation in IBS is variable across studies, but donor selection is emerging as a critical factor. SUMMARY Irritable bowel syndrome has evolved into a disorder of interaction between dietary factors and gut microbiota, with impact on bowel symptoms as well as extra-intestinal, central, symptoms. Dietary adjustments and treatments targeting the gut microbiota are areas of active research and clinical progress.
Collapse
|