A randomized, controlled, double-blind crossover study on the effects of isoeffective and isovolumetric intravenous crystalloid and gelatin on blood volume, and renal and cardiac hemodynamics

Comparisons of Electrolyte Balance Efficacy of Two Gelatin-Balanced Crystalloid for Surgery Patients Under General Anesthesia: A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Controlled Study

Purpose

This study aimed to compare the electrolyte balance efficacies of two Gelatin-Balanced Crystalloid in clinical applications.

Methods

A multi-center, prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel controlled study was conducted among non-cardiac surgery patients, with clinical registration number ChiCTR2200062999. They were randomized into Succinylated Gelatin, Multiple Electrolytes and Sodium Acetate Injection (SG-MESAI) group (experimental group) and Succinylated Gelatin Injection (SGI) infusion group (control group). The same anesthetic induction technique, anesthetic method, and calculation method for the volume of colloid infusion were used in the two groups. Between-group differences in the changes in base excess (BE), Chloride ion (Cl-), bicarbonate radical (HCO3⁻) and other parameters were recorded at 15 min, 30 min after the infusion relative to the baseline. Hemodynamic indicators were determined at 30 min after colloid infusion. Safety follow-up was conducted by administering the following tests within 48 h±12 h after surgery.

Results

A total of 225 subjects (full analysis set) were finally enrolled, with 110 subjects in the experimental group and 115 subjects in the control group. The baseline data were comparable between the two groups. At 15 min after infusion, the mean changes in BE, Cl- and HCO3⁻ concentration in the experimental group were smaller than those of the control group (P<0.001). At 30 min after surgery, the mean changes in BE, Cl-, HCO3⁻concentration and pH value were smaller in the experimental group than in the control group (P<0.05). The incidences of adverse events and adverse reactions in the experimental group was less than the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P≥0.05). Besides, no serious adverse events or adverse reactions were reported in any subjects.

Conclusion

Succinylated Gelatin, Multiple Electrolytes and Sodium Acetate Injection maintained the balance of BE, Cl-, HCO3⁻ and pH value in a better way than Succinylated Gelatin Injection in non-cardiac surgery patients under general anesthesia.

The 2023 Sir David Cuthbertson Lecture. A fluid journey: Experiments that influenced clinical practice

This review summarises some of my work on fluid and electrolyte balance over the past 25 years and shows how the studies have influenced clinical practice. Missing pieces in the jigsaw are filled in by summarising the work of others. The main theme is the biochemical, physiological and clinical problems caused by inappropriate use of saline solutions including the hyperchloraemic acidosis caused by 0.9% saline. The importance of accurate and near-zero fluid balance in clinical practice is also emphasised. Perioperative fluid and electrolyte therapy has important effects on clinical outcome in a U-shaped dose response fashion, in which excess or deficit progressively increases complications and worsens outcome. Salt and water overload, with weight gain in excess of 2.5 kg worsens surgical outcome, impairs gastrointestinal function and increases the risk of anastomotic dehiscence. Hyperchloraemic acidosis caused by overenthusiastic infusion of 0.9% saline leads to adverse outcomes and dysfunction of many organ systems, especially the kidney. Salt and water deficit causes similar adverse effects as fluid overload at the cellular level and also leads to worse outcomes. Serum albumin is shown to be affected mainly by dilution and inflammation and is not a good nutritional marker. These findings have been incorporated in the British consensus Guidelines on Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Adult Surgical Patients (GIFTASUP) and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines on intravenous fluid therapy in adults in hospital and are helping change clinical practice and improve outcomes.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Clinical Trials of Diabetic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) associated with diabetes mellitus (DM) (known as diabetic kidney disease, DKD) is a serious and growing healthcare problem worldwide. In DM patients, DKD is generally diagnosed based on the presence of albuminuria and a reduced glomerular filtration rate. Diagnosis rarely includes an invasive kidney biopsy, although DKD has some characteristic histological features, and kidney fibrosis and nephron loss cause disease progression that eventually ends in kidney failure. Alternative sensitive and reliable non-invasive biomarkers are needed for DKD (and CKD in general) to improve timely diagnosis and aid disease monitoring without the need for a kidney biopsy. Such biomarkers may also serve as endpoints in clinical trials of new treatments. Non-invasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), particularly multiparametric MRI, may achieve these goals. In this article, we review emerging data on MRI techniques and their scientific, clinical, and economic value in DKD/CKD for diagnosis, assessment of disease pathogenesis and progression, and as potential biomarkers for clinical trial use that may also increase our understanding of the efficacy and mode(s) of action of potential DKD therapeutic interventions. We also consider how multi-site MRI studies are conducted and the challenges that should be addressed to increase wider application of MRI in DKD.

GLP-1 Promotes Cortical and Medullary Perfusion in the Human Kidney and Maintains Renal Oxygenation During NaCl Loading

Background GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists exert beneficial long-term effects on cardiovascular and renal outcomes. In humans, the natriuretic effect of GLP-1 depends on GLP-1 receptor interaction, is accompanied by suppression of angiotensin II, and is independent of changes in renal plasma flow. In rodents, angiotensin II constricts vasa recta and lowers medullary perfusion. The current randomized, controlled, crossover study was designed to test the hypothesis that GLP-1 increases renal medullary perfusion in healthy humans. Methods and Results Healthy male participants (n=10, aged 27±4 years) ingested a fixed sodium intake for 4 days and were examined twice during a 1-hour infusion of either GLP-1 (1.5 pmol/kg per minute) or placebo together with infusion of 0.9% NaCl (750 mL/h). Interleaved measurements of renal arterial blood flow, oxygenation (R₂*), and perfusion were acquired in the renal cortex and medulla during infusions, using magnetic resonance imaging. GLP-1 infusion increased medullary perfusion (32±7%, P<0.001) and cortical perfusion (13±4%, P<0.001) compared with placebo. Here, NaCl infusion decreased medullary perfusion (-5±2%, P=0.007), whereas cortical perfusion remained unchanged. R₂* values increased by 3±2% (P=0.025) in the medulla and 4±1% (P=0.008) in the cortex during placebo, indicative of decreased oxygenation, but remained unchanged during GLP-1. Blood flow in the renal artery was not altered significantly by either intervention. Conclusions GLP-1 increases predominantly medullary but also cortical perfusion in the healthy human kidney and maintains renal oxygenation during NaCl loading. In perspective, suppression of angiotensin II by GLP-1 may account for the increase in regional perfusion. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04337268.

Effects of rapid fluid infusion on hemoglobin concentration: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Rapid fluid administration may decrease hemoglobin concentration (Hb) by a diluting effect, which could limit the increase in oxygen delivery (DO₂) expected with a positive response to fluid challenge in critically ill patients. Our aim was to quantify the decrease in Hb after rapid fluid administration.

Methods

Our protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020165146). We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database, and Embase from inception until February 15, 2022. We selected studies that reported Hb before and after rapid fluid administration (bolus fluid given over less than 120 min) with crystalloids and/or colloids in adults. Exclusion criteria were studies that included bleeding patients, or used transfusions or extracorporeal circulation procedures. Studies were divided according to whether they involved non-acutely ill or acutely ill (surgical/trauma, sepsis, circulatory shock or severe hypovolemia, and mixed conditions) subjects. The mean Hb difference and, where reported, the DO₂ difference before and after fluid administration were extracted. Meta-analyses were conducted to assess differences in Hb before and after rapid fluid administration in all subjects and across subgroups. Random-effect models, meta-regressions and subgroup analyses were performed for meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Inconsistency among trial results was assessed using the I² statistic.

Results

Sixty-five studies met our inclusion criteria (40 in non-acutely ill and 25 in acutely ill subjects), with a total of 2794 participants. Risk of bias was assessed as “low” for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and ‘low to moderate’ for non-RCTs. Across 63 studies suitable for meta-analysis, the Hb decreased significantly by a mean of 1.33 g/dL [95% CI − 1.45 to − 1.12; p < 0.001; I² = 96.88] after fluid administration: in non-acutely ill subjects, the mean decrease was 1.56 g/dL [95% CI − 1.69 to − 1.42; p < 0.001; I² = 96.71] and in acutely ill patients 0.84 g/dL [95% CI − 1.03 to − 0.64; p = 0.033; I² = 92.91]. The decrease in Hb was less marked in patients with sepsis than in other acutely ill patients. The DO₂ decreased significantly in fluid non-responders with a significant decrease in Hb.

Conclusions

Hb decreased consistently after rapid fluid administration with moderate certainty of evidence. This effect may limit the positive effects of fluid challenges on DO₂ and thus on tissue oxygenation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13054-022-04191-x.

The impact of modified fluid gelatin 4% in a balanced electrolyte solution on plasma osmolality in children-A noninterventional observational study

BACKGROUND

Intravenous fluids for perioperative infusion therapy should be isotonic to maintain the body fluid homeostasis in children. Modified fluid gelatin 4% in a balanced electrolyte solution has a theoretical osmolarity of 284 mosmol L^-1 , and a real osmolality of 264 mosmol kg H₂ O^-1 . Because both values are lower than those of 0.9% saline or plasma, gelatin would be expected to be hypotonic in-vitro and in-vivo.

AIM

We thus hypothesized that the infusion of gelatin would be expected to decrease plasma osmolality. We performed an in-vitro experiment and an in-vivo study to evaluate the impact of gelatin on the osmolality in children.

METHODS

In the in-vitro experiment, full blood samples were diluted with gelatin 4% or albumin (50 g L^-1 ) from 0% (pure blood) to 100% (pure colloid), and the osmolality was measured by freezing-point depression. In the in-vivo study, blood gas analyses from children undergoing major pediatric surgery were collected before and after gelatin infusion, and the osmolality was calculated by a modified version of Zander's formula.

RESULTS

In the in-vitro experiment, 65 gradually diluted blood samples from five volunteers (age 25-55 years) were analyzed. The dilution with gelatin caused no significant changes in osmolality between 0% and 100%. Compared with gelatin, the osmolality in the albumin group was significantly lower between 50% and 100% dilution (p < .05). In the in-vivo study, 221 children (age 21.4 ± 30 months) were included. After gelatin infusion, the osmolality increased significantly (mean change 4.3 ± 4.8 [95% CI 3.7-4.9] mosmol kg H₂ O^-1 ; p < .01) within a normal range.

CONCLUSIONS

Gelatin in a balanced electrolyte solution has isotonic characteristics in-vitro and in-vivo, despite the low theoretical osmolarity, probably caused by the (unmeasured) negative charges in the gelatin molecules contributing to the plasma osmolality. For a better evaluation of the (real) tonicity of gelatin-containing solutions, we suggest to calculate the osmolality (mosmol kg H₂ O^-1 ) using Zander's formula.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT02495285).