The significance of SARC-F scores in predicting postoperative outcomes of older adults undergoing elective major surgery for urologic cancer

The role of geriatric assessment in the care of older adults undergoing urologic cancer surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Older adults undergoing urologic cancer surgery have unique needs and require unique risk assessment and management. This review will discuss recent literature on brief screening tools to identify high risk older adults in the preoperative period and the role of comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) in identifying and addressing geriatric vulnerabilities for older adults undergoing urologic cancer surgery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Frailty screening tools such as the G8 can be used to identify patients who are at an increased risk of adverse postoperative outcomes such as postoperative complications and prolonged length of stay. CGA can provide more detailed information about geriatric syndromes prior to urologic cancer surgery.

SUMMARY

Screening tools for geriatric vulnerabilities and CGA are valuable tools for the urologist in identifying high-risk older adults, counseling patients on perioperative risk and addressing vulnerabilities prior to surgery. Making health system-wide changes can allow this optimal practice to reach more older surgical patients.

The significance of G8 and other geriatric assessments in urologic cancer management: A comprehensive review

In urologic oncology, which often involves older patients, it is important to consider how to manage their care appropriately. Geriatric assessment (GA) is a method that can address the specific needs of older cancer patients. The GA encompasses various assessment domains, but these domains exhibit variations across the literature. Some of the common items include functional ability, nutrition, comorbidities, cognitive ability, psychosocial disorders, polypharmacy, social and financial support, falls/imbalance, and vision/hearing. Despite the diversity of domains, there is limited consensus on reliable measurement methods. This review discusses the role of GA in managing urologic cancer in unique scenarios, such as those necessitating temporary or permanent urinary catheters or stomas due to urinary diversion. A comprehensive GA is time and human-resource-intensive in real-world clinical practice. Hence, simpler tools such as the Geriatric-8 (G8), capable of identifying high-risk patients requiring a detailed GA, are also under investigation in various contexts. Therefore, we conducted a systematic literature review on the G8. Our findings indicate that patients with low G8 scores encounter difficulties with stoma self-care after urinary diversion and have higher risks of urinary tract infections and ileus after radical cystectomy. The utilization of G8 as a screening tool for urologic cancer patients may facilitate the delivery of appropriate and personalized treatment and care.

Preoperative geriatric assessment of urological patients: a narrative review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The proportion of older people is increasing disproportionately. The age between 60 and 65 years is seen as the transition to 'old age'. Frailty is a risk factor for morbidity, mortality, and complications in the context of medical interventions or adverse effects of drug therapies. One of the core components of frailty, the age-related loss of muscle mass, is sarcopenia. Is there an influence of frailty, as well as sarcopenia and some other aspects, i.e. malnutrition, on the outcome in elderly urologic patients?

RECENT FINDINGS

These phenomena of aging correlate with the incidence postoperative complication, infections, readmission rates or mortality. There are numerous studies on the value and informative value of the 5-item frailty index or the G8 questionnaire in older urological patients.

SUMMARY

Geriatric assessment is becoming increasingly important in urological surgery. Simple instruments that are practicable in clinical routine are required in this clinical setting. Which method of preoperative assessment is chosen is secondary. It is important that the risk of geriatric syndromes is assessed prior to surgical interventions in order to determine the most suitable therapeutic approach for each patient.

Comparing Preoperative Screening Tools for Elective Urologic Cancer Surgery: Insights from a Cluster Analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the features and benefits of different geriatric screening tools for enhancing the perioperative care of patients who undergo elective cancer surgery using cluster analysis.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, observational analysis of 1,019 consecutive patients who had elective major cancer surgery in the urology department of our hospital from October 2019 to January 2023. Before the surgery, a trained nurse screened the patients using six tools: Eastern Clinical Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS), flemish version of the triage risk screening tool (fTRST), geriatric-8 (G8), instrumental activities of daily living, patient health questionnaire-2 (PHQ-2), and simple questionnaire to rapidly diagnose sarcopenia (SARC-F). The study grouped the patients into four clusters based on their scores on these tools and compared their outcomes after the surgery. The outcomes included overall survival, ambulation failure, delirium, and severe complications. The study also examined how each screening tool was associated with the outcomes.

RESULTS

Based on their clinical data and screening results, we classified the patients into four groups: Healthy (73%), Depressive (11%), Intermediate (11%), and Unhealthy (5%). The Unhealthy group had the worst outcomes in overall survival (OS), ambulation failure, and delirium, followed by the Intermediate group. In addition, fTRST and SARC-F emerged as significant predictors of OS; ECOG-PS, fTRST, G8, and SARC-F of ambulation failure; ECOG-PS, fTRST, and G8 of delirium; and G8 of severe complications.

CONCLUSION

Various geriatric screening tools were found to have the potential to forecast diverse postoperative outcomes.

Value of Cystatin C-Based Sarcopenia Index in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Renal Tumors

INTRODUCTION

Sarcopenia is a condition of low muscle strength and quantity, severe if low physical performances. The sarcopenia index (SI), calculated by blood levels of creatinine and cystatin C, had been reported to be correlated with skeletal muscle mass and is a potential simple screening tool for sarcopenia. We hypothesized that patients with a low SI, meaning low muscle mass, would have an inflated estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) value based on serum creatinine levels. We also tested the prognostic value of the SI in a cohort of patients who had surgery for renal malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective, observational study of 322 patients that had surgery for renal tumors in National Cancer Center Hospital East (Kashiwa, Chiba) between April 2017 and June 2023. We assessed sarcopenia measuring psoas muscle index (PMI), psoas muscle density (PMD), and skeletal muscle area (SMA) by computed tomography. We assessed the association between SI and eGFR before and after surgery. We also assessed the association between SI and postoperative outcome, including overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 322 patients, 211 (66%) were males, with a median age of 69 years. SI had a weak correlation with both PMI and PMD in males (PMI: ρ = 0.25; PMD: ρ = 0.21). In females, SI and PMD exhibited a low correlation (ρ = 0.26), while SI and PMI displayed an insignificant correlation (ρ = 0.19). The correlation between SMA and SI was moderate for both males and females (males: ρ = 0.51; females: ρ = 0.46). After radical nephrectomy, eGFR decreased in 98% of patients with high SI, compared to 69% of patients with low SI. We also demonstrated that low SI predicted poor prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can recognize the possibility of overestimated eGFR in the low SI group by measuring SI around the surgery. Low SI may also help predict poor prognosis.