Weekly Fluorouracil at 425mg/m2 plus Low-dose Folinic Acid for 24 Weeks as Adjuvant Treatment for Colorectal Cancer: Assessment of Toxicity and Delivery

Chronological Age and Risk of Chemotherapy Nonfeasibility: A Real-Life Cohort Study of 153 Stage II or III Colorectal Cancer Patients Given Adjuvant-modified FOLFOX6

OBJECTIVES

To assess nonfeasibility of adjuvant-modified FOLFOX6 chemotherapy in patients with stage II or III colorectal cancer.

METHODS

Consecutive patients managed between 2009 and 2013 in 2 teaching hospitals in the Paris urban area were included in the CORSAGE (COlorectal canceR, AGe, and chemotherapy fEasability study) cohort study. Nonfeasibility was defined by the frequencies of empirical first-cycle dose reduction (>15%), early discontinuation (<12 cycles), and low relative dose intensity (RDI) (<0.85). Risk factors for chemotherapy nonfeasibility were identified using multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 153 patients, 56.2% were male (median age, 65.6 y; 35.3%≥70 y; 7.3% with performance status [PS]≥2). For 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), 20.9% of patients had first-cycle dose reduction and 28.1% early discontinuation; RDI was 0.91 (25th to 75th percentiles, 0.68 to 0.99). Factors independently associated with first-cycle 5-FU dose reduction were aged 65 to 69 years versus those younger than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-19.9) but not age 70 years and older, PS≥2 (aOR, 6.02; 95% CI, 1.15-31.4), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (aOR1-point increase, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.05-1.82), or larger number of medications (aOR 1-medication increase, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.00-1.42). Oxaliplatin dose reduction occurred in 52.3% of patients and early discontinuation in 62.7%; the latter was more common in the 70 years and older group (92.6% vs. 74.6% in the <65-y group; P=0.01); RDI was 0.7 (95% CI, 0.55-0.88).

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world setting, compared with their younger and older counterparts, patients aged 65 to 69 years given modified FOLFOX6 for stage II or III colorectal cancer had higher frequencies of 5-FU nonfeasibility defined based on first-cycle dose reduction, early discontinuation, and RDI; and these differences were independent from PS, comorbidities, and number of medications.

Sex differences in the drug therapy for oncologic diseases

There are clear gender-dependent differences in response rates and the probability of side effects in patients treated with chemotherapy. Sex-biased expression levels of metabolic enzymes and transporters in liver and kidney leading to different pharmacokinetics have been described for most common anti-cancer drugs. In women, half-life is often longer, which is associated with improved survival, but also increased toxicity.Some chemotherapy protocols lead to a better response rate in women without increasing toxicity (e.g., cisplatin and irinotecan), while others only increase toxicity, but do not improve response rates in women (e.g., 5-fluorouracil). The increased toxicity often correlates with different pharmacokinetics, but women also show a higher sensitivity to some agents with shorter half-life (e.g., steroids). Organ-specific toxicities like cardiac toxicity after doxorubicin treatment or neurotoxicity associated with ifosfamide are more severe in women due to gender-specific changes in gene expression. Novel therapies like tyrosine kinase inhibitors or monoclonal antibodies show very complex, but clinical significant differences depending on gender. Antibodies often have a longer half-life in women, which is associated with an improved response to therapy.Side effects appear to be highly dependent on different tissue properties, as women have a higher incidence of oral mucositis, but lower rates of gut toxicity. Nausea and vomiting is a greater problem in females during therapy due to the lower activity of anti-emetic drugs. Nausea and vomiting pose a bigger challenge in female patients, as anti-emetic drugs seem to be less effective.

Pretherapeutic uracil and dihydrouracil levels of colorectal cancer patients are associated with sex and toxic side effects during adjuvant 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In Nordic countries, the standard treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) in the adjuvant setting is bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin alone or in combination with oxaliplatin. 5-FU competes with the natural occurring pyrimidine uracil (Ura) as a substrate for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD; enzyme commission number 1.3.1.2). Low DPD activity is associated with toxicity during treatment. Pretherapeutic detection of DPD deficiency could prevent severe toxicity otherwise limiting drug administration. Assays showing that DPD deficiency impairs breakdown of Ura to dihydrouracil (UH(2)) seem promising for clinical use.

METHODS

Urine was collected from 56 untreated volunteers and 143 patients with CRC before adjuvant treatment. Ura and UH(2) were analyzed using a column-switching high-performance liquid chromatography method that incorporates reversed-phase and cation-exchange columns. Ura, UH(2), and UH(2)/Ura levels were related to toxicity.

RESULTS

Ura and UH(2) in patients were not different from controls. UH(2) was significantly higher in women compared with men. The UH(2)/Ura ratio, however, did not differ according to sex. Low UH(2) and UH(2)/Ura levels were associated with diarrhea in men. Women experiencing thrombocytopenia had significantly higher Ura compared with women with no thrombocytopenia. The UH(2)/Ura ratio correlated negatively with total toxicity score in men (r = -0.39, P = .020).

CONCLUSION

Pretherapeutic Ura and UH(2) levels per se may be related to risk of side effects during adjuvant 5-FU-based treatment, whereas the UH(2)/Ura ratio may not always reveal such a risk. Sex is a strong risk factor for toxicity, showing the importance of evaluating male and female patients separately.

Do elderly cancer patients achieve an adequate dose intensity in common clinical practice?

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients rarely receive adequate dose intensity (DI) using conventional regimens. Possible causes are improper patient assessment, the chemotherapy (CT) regimen chosen, the number and severity of comorbidities, patient compliance and physician experience. To explore this issue, DI was retrospectively analyzed in elderly patients treated with conventional CT regimens for advanced solid cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients > or =69 years were evaluated. All patients had metastatic solid tumors. Comorbidities, performance status (PS), toxicities, number of CT cycles, dose reduction and discontinuation of treatment were recorded. Relative DI (RDI) was calculated and regressed against these parameters.

RESULTS

108 patients were eligible. The most frequent diagnoses were: lung, head-and-neck and colorectal cancer. In 48 patients (44%), their initially scheduled treatment was modified. Mean RDI was 79% (range 19-100%, SD 20.6). Grade 3/4 non-hematological and hematological toxicity occurred in 27 (35/130) and 8% of patients (11/130), respectively. In regression analysis, RDI was significantly associated with hematological toxicity. RDI affected response rate but not overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

RDI is significantly affected by toxicity. These data suggest the importance of the treatment schedule and patient selection as predictorsof adequate treatment. Some non-ratable variables, however, might also play a role regarding the dose intensity delivered.