Renal artery stenosis after radiotherapy for stage I seminoma, a case report

Stage I testicular seminoma: a SEER analysis of contemporary adjuvant radiotherapy trends

PURPOSE

Patients with clinical stage I testicular seminoma have historically been treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in the United States. However, nearly 80% of patients on surveillance will not experience relapse and even with relapse, salvage rates approach 100%. It remains unclear how practice patterns have changed with recently accumulating evidence and changes in guidelines. In a population based setting we evaluated contemporary trends and factors that may affect the use of adjuvant radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 8,151 men diagnosed with stage I testicular seminoma from 2000 to 2009 were identified in the national SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) registry. A multivariate regression model was constructed to analyze the association of year, age, race, socioeconomic status, SEER region, pathological stage and tumor size with the administration of adjuvant radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The use of adjuvant radiotherapy decreased significantly from 2000 to 2009. In 2000, 74.7% of patients received radiation, compared with only 37.7% of patients in 2009 (p <0.0001). Later year of diagnosis was significantly associated with decreased odds of receiving adjuvant radiotherapy (p <0.0001, 2000 to 2005 vs 2006 to 2009, OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.36-0.44). Men age 35 years or older (p <0.0002, OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.09-1.32) and men in the highest socioeconomic index quartile (p <0.0001, OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.16-1.54) were more likely to receive adjuvant radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of adjuvant radiotherapy for clinical stage I testicular seminoma has decreased significantly in the last decade. Older age and higher socioeconomic status are associated with higher rates of adjuvant radiotherapy.

Minimizing toxicity in early-stage testicular cancer treatment

Testicular cancer is the paradigm of a curable malignancy, with 10-year survival rates exceeding 95%. Cisplatin-based regimes offer a survival gain of several decades of life; however, measures of outcomes in testicular cancer are evolving. Survivorship issues are becoming increasingly important in this young adult population. Long-term risks of second malignancy and cardiovascular disease secondary to chemotherapy and radiotherapy have been extensively documented, leading to an increased uptake of surveillance. However, the optimal surveillance schedule is not universally agreed upon. Research into modalities to detect relapse and frequency is ongoing. Reducing the treatment burden with fewer cycles of chemotherapy (one cycle of bleomycin, cisplatin and etoposide instead of two for stage I high-risk nonseminomatous tumors) or less toxic alternatives (carboplatin instead of radiotherapy for stage I seminomas) is currently being explored. This article details the toxicities associated with the diagnosis and treatments of early-stage testicular cancer and current strategies used to minimize toxicity while retaining the excellent cure rates.

Long-term and late effects of germ cell testicular cancer treatment and implications for follow-up

Germ cell testicular cancer (TC) represents a malignancy with high cure rates. Since the introduction of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in the late 1970s, the 5-year survival rate has increased considerably, and it is currently above 95%. Because TC is usually diagnosed before the age of 40 years, these men can expect to live for another 40 to 50 years after being successfully treated. This success, however, is hampered by an increased risk of long-term and late effects of treatment. Secondary malignant neoplasms and cardiovascular disease represent the most common potentially life-threatening late effects, typically occurring more than 10 years after treatment. Other long-term effects include pulmonary toxicity, nephrotoxicity, neurotoxicity, decreased fertility, hypogonadism, and psychosocial problems. The incidence and time to onset of these various adverse effects vary according to treatment type and intensity. There is still little knowledge about underlying mechanisms and genetic susceptibility of the various adverse effects. Apart from treatment burden, it is not yet possible to identify patients who are at high risk for certain late effects after TC treatment. In this clinical review, we present the current status regarding different somatic and psychosocial long-term late effects after treatment for TC, based on Medline searches and our own research. Moreover, we postulate recommendations for general medical evaluations that should begin after treatment is completed and continue during follow-up.

Pure seminoma: a review and update

Pure seminoma is a rare pathology of the young adult, often discovered in the early stages. Its prognosis is generally excellent and many therapeutic options are available, especially in stage I tumors. High cure rates can be achieved in several ways: standard treatment with radiotherapy is challenged by surveillance and chemotherapy. Toxicity issues and the patients' preferences should be considered when management decisions are made. This paper describes firstly the management of primary seminoma and its nodal involvement and, secondly, the various therapeutic options according to stage.

Sequelae of treatment in long-term survivors of testis cancer

CONTEXT

Testicular cancer patients are often diagnosed at a young age, and because of the advances in the treatment of this disease, the vast majority have a normal life expectancy after therapy. Thus, recognition of the long-term sequelae of treatment (ie, surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy) is particularly important in these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To review the adverse effects and the risk of secondary malignancy in long-term survivors of testicular cancer.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

We conducted a Medline search to identify original articles and reviews on the long-term effects of testicular cancer treatment. Although the search included articles from January 1948 to February 2011, the majority of the included articles were published in the last two decades.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

All studies examining the long-term sequelae of treatment in testicular cancer are retrospective in nature, with most classified as cohort, case-control, and/or epidemiologic studies. Given that no standardized method of reporting long-term complications exists, evidence synthesis is limited.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent evidence suggests an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, neurotoxicity, and mild reductions in renal function in survivors of testicular cancer. Treatment of testicular malignancy can also negatively affect gonadal function and fertility and has been shown to result in an increased risk of solid malignancy and leukemia.

[What's new in the treatment of seminomas?]

Pure testicular seminoma is a rare disease with an excellent prognosis. Its management is controversial. In stage I disease, several treatment options are considered. Those are radiation therapy alone, chemotherapy alone or active surveillance, which is becoming increasingly popular. For more advanced stages, treatment is based on chemotherapy with or without radiation therapy. In this article, we review thoroughly the existing literature and recent recommendations the various treatment options, their advantages and disadvantages in different stages of the disease.

Testicular cancer survivorship: research strategies and recommendations

Testicular cancer represents the most curable solid tumor, with a 10-year survival rate of more than 95%. Given the young average age at diagnosis, it is estimated that effective treatment approaches, in particular, platinum-based chemotherapy, have resulted in an average gain of several decades of life. This success, however, is offset by the emergence of considerable long-term morbidity, including second malignant neoplasms, cardiovascular disease, neurotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, hypogonadism, decreased fertility, and psychosocial problems. Data on underlying genetic or molecular factors that might identify those patients at highest risk for late sequelae are sparse. Genome-wide association studies and other translational molecular approaches now provide opportunities to identify testicular cancer survivors at greatest risk for therapy-related complications to develop evidence-based long-term follow-up guidelines and interventional strategies. We review research priorities identified during an international workshop devoted to testicular cancer survivors. Recommendations include 1) institution of lifelong follow-up of testicular cancer survivors within a large cohort setting to ascertain risks of emerging toxicities and the evolution of known late sequelae, 2) development of comprehensive risk prediction models that include treatment factors and genetic modifiers of late sequelae, 3) elucidation of the effect(s) of decades-long exposure to low serum levels of platinum, 4) assessment of the overall burden of medical and psychosocial morbidity, and 5) the eventual formulation of evidence-based long-term follow-up guidelines and interventions. Just as testicular cancer once served as the paradigm of a curable malignancy, comprehensive follow-up studies of testicular cancer survivors can pioneer new methodologies in survivorship research for all adult-onset cancer.

[Renal artery stenosis after abdominal radiotherapy]

INTRODUCTION

Renal artery stenosis represented 1 to 5% of all arterial hypertensions and is the leading cause of secondary hypertension. Renovascular hypertension is more common among women less than 30 years old (fibrodysplasia, 33%) and men older than 50 years old (66% atherosclerosis). Other causes are rare, especially radiation-induced renal artery stenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We report the case of Mr. D., 49 years old, with severe high blood pressure (230/125 mmHg) seven years after abdominal radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease. Echo-Doppler was performed and found a subocclusive right ostial renal artery stenosis probably radiation-induced taking into account the history of the patient. Renal angiography confirmed this diagnosis and percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty was performed with a final acceptable result (residual stenosis<50%).

DISCUSSION

Radiation-induced renal artery stenosis is rare (0.5/1000 to 1%). Most of the cases are proximal and the median time from radiation to referral is nine years. Radiation-induced nephritis disease was often referred to occurrence high blood pressure after abdominal radiotherapy but various data shows that radiation can also cause damage to larger vessels sizes (such as renal arteries) induced by atherosclerosis radiation. Patients should be successful treated by percutaneous intervention, as demonstrated by Fakhouri et al. [Am J Kidney Dis 38 (2001) 302-309] in a study of 11 patients.

CONCLUSION

This case shows that radiation-induced renal artery stenosis may occur many years after initial treatment, and patients developing severe arterial hypertension after abdominal radiation should be investigated for renal artery stenosis.