Cosmesis, Late Sequelae and Local Control after Breast-Conserving Therapy: Influence of Type of Tumour Bed Boost and Adjuvant Chemotherapy

Biological dose summation of external beam radiotherapy for the whole breast and image-guided high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost in early-stage breast cancer

Purpose

To develop an alternative method for summing biologically effective doses of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost in breast cancer. The total doses using EBRT boost were compared with BT boost using our method.

Material and methods

Twenty-four EBRT plus interstitial HDR-BT plans were selected, and additional plans using EBRT boost were created. The prescribed dose was 2.67/40.05 Gy to whole breast and 4.75/14.25 Gy BT or 2.67/10.7 Gy EBRT to planning target volume (PTV) boost. EBRT and BT computed tomography (CT) were registered twice, including fitting the target volumes and using the lung, and the most exposed volume of critical organs in BT were identified on EBRT CT images. The minimal dose of these from EBRT was summed with their BT dose, and these EQD2 doses were compared using BT vs. EBRT boost. This method was compared with uniform dose conception (UDC).

Results

D₉₀ of PTV boost was significantly higher with BT than with EBRT boost: 67.1 Gy vs. 56.7 Gy, p = 0.0001. There was no significant difference in the dose of non-target and contralateral breast using BT and EBRT boost. D₁ to skin, lung, and D_0.1 to heart were 58.6 Gy vs. 66.7 Gy (p = 0.0025), 32.6 Gy vs. 50.6 Gy (p = 0.0002), and 52.2 Gy vs. 58.1 Gy (p = 0.0009), respectively, while D_0.1 to ribs was 44.3 Gy vs. 37.7 Gy (p = 0.0062). UDC overestimated D₁ (lung) by 54% (p = 0.0001) and D₁ (ribs) by 28% (p = 0.0003).

Conclusions

Based on our biological dose summation method, the total dose of PTV in the breast is higher using BT boost than with EBRT. BT boost yields lower skin, lung, and heart doses, but higher dose to ribs. UDC overestimates lung and ribs doses.

Cosmetic Consequences of Breast-Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer: Something Worth Talking About

BACKGROUND

Breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for breast cancer can lead to deformation of the treated breast, resulting in patient dissatisfaction with the final cosmetic outcome. Currently, literature on the specific information needs of patients concerning the cosmetic effects of BCT is lacking. The aim of the present study was to investigate the information needs of breast cancer patients regarding the long-term cosmetic outcome after BCT.

SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS

The data from 115 women who had undergone BCT in a general teaching hospital breast cancer unit in The Netherlands were studied. Structured questionnaires and semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2012 and April 2013. A mixed model of quantitative and qualitative research was used to explore patient-reported information needs. A phenomenological approach was used to analyze the qualitative data.

RESULTS

This study shows that women undergoing BCT want to discuss long-term cosmetic effects. Most patients appreciate such information immediately after the diagnosis. Patients indicated that it is also important to pay attention to the cosmetic effects during the follow-up visits, because deformation of the breast can also occur at a later stage. Furthermore, half the patients indicated that they would not likely raise the subject of cosmetic effects of the treatment themselves.

CONCLUSION

Breast cancer patients have a need for long-term attention for cosmetic outcome of BCT, which should be tailored during the treatment and follow-up process.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Currently, no literature exists concerning patients' needs for information regarding the cosmetic effects of breast-conserving therapy (BCT). Bringing up the cosmetic effects of BCT by health care professionals does not appear to be a standard part of treatment and follow-up. It is expected that the quality of care and life will be improved by providing information and guidance regarding the cosmetic outcome of BCT within the existing structure of the breast cancer pathway. Discussion and visualization of the cosmetic effects prior to treatment will lead to more realistic expectations, and as a result, secondary interventions, such as partial prostheses and plastic surgery, may be easier to discuss and accept.

Perioperative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost for patients with early breast cancer

Aims and background

To evaluate the clinical results of perioperative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost treatment preceding whole breast external beam radiation therapy in patients with early breast cancer.

Methods and study design

From 2005–2010, 100 patients with early breast cancer who met the eligibility criteria were enrolled in the study. Brachytherapy implant was performed during the breast-conserving surgery procedure. The boost treatment was started on the 3rd postoperative day to deliver a dose of 15 Gy in 6 fractions over 3 days. Three weeks later, external beam radiation therapy to the whole breast was started for a prescription dose of 50 Gy. The study end points were local recurrence, acute toxicity and cosmetic outcome.

Results

Median age of the patients was 46 years, and median follow-up was 52 months. No patient developed a local recurrence but 5 patients developed distant metastases. The 5-year overall survival and disease-free survival were 86% and 77%, respectively. Eleven patients had acute toxicity; 4 wound complications and 7 grade III skin toxicity. Nine of the 11 patients had breast size of more than 1500 cc. Except for the breast volume (>1500 cc), there was no statistically significant correlation between any of the patient or dosimetry-related factors and acute toxicity. Good-excellent cosmesis was observed in 87% of patients.

Conclusions

Perioperative high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost followed by whole breast external beam radiation therapy provides excellent local control, acceptable acute toxicity and good-excellent breast cosmesis in patients with early breast cancer.

Long-Term Side Effects and Cosmetic Outcome in a Pool of Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Intraoperative Radiotherapy with Electrons as Sole Treatment

Aims

To evaluate late toxicity and cosmetic outcome after intraoperative radiotherapy using electrons (ELIOT) as sole treatment modality in early breast cancer patients.

Methods

A total of 119 patients selected randomly among 1200 cases was analyzed. Late toxicities were documented using the LENT-SOMA scoring system, cosmesis was evaluated with the Harvard scale, and a numeric rating scale was used to assess symptoms.

Results

After a median follow-up of 71 months, grade II fibrosis was observed in 38 patients (31.9%) and grade III fibrosis in 7 patients (5.9%). Postoperative complications (12.6%) did not correlate with late toxicity. Physicians and patients scored cosmesis as excellent or good in 84% and 77.3% of the cases, respectively. Patient satisfaction was higher than 90%.

Conclusions

In the study, ELIOT gives low and acceptable long-term toxicity. A longer follow-up and a larger number of patients are needed to confirm these promising results.

Determinants for patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic outcome and skin sensitivity after breast-conserving surgery

Background

With the development of new surgical techniques in breast cancer, such as oncoplastic breast surgery, increased knowledge of risk factors for poor satisfaction with conventional breast-conserving surgery (BCS) is needed in order to determine which patients to offer these techniques to. The aim of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction regarding aesthetic result and skin sensitivity in relation to patient, tumour, and treatment factors, in a consecutive sample of patients undergoing conventional BCS.

Methods

Women eligible for BCS were recruited between February 1, 2008 and January 31, 2012 in a prospective setup. In all, 297 women completed a study-specific questionnaire 1 year after conventional BCS and radiotherapy. Potential risk factors for poor satisfaction were investigated using logistic regression analysis.

Results

The great majority of the women, 84%, were satisfied or very satisfied with the overall aesthetic result. The rate of satisfaction regarding symmetry between the breasts was 68% and for skin sensitivity in the operated breast it was 67%. Excision of more than 20% of the preoperative breast volume was associated with poor satisfaction regarding overall aesthetic outcome, as was axillary clearance. A high BMI (≥30 kg/m²) seemed to affect satisfaction with symmetry negatively. Factors associated with less satisfied patients regarding skin sensitivity in the operated breast were an excision of ≥20% of preoperative breast volume, a BMI of 25–30 kg/m², axillary clearance, and radiotherapy. Re-excision and postoperative infection were associated with lower rates of satisfaction regarding both overall aesthetic outcome and symmetry, as well as with skin sensitivity.

Conclusions

Several factors affect patient satisfaction after BCS. A major determinant of poor satisfaction in this study was a large excision of breast volume. If the percentage of breast volume excised is estimated to exceed 20%, other techniques, such as oncoplastic breast surgery, with or without contralateral surgery, or mastectomy with reconstruction, may be considered.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12957-016-1053-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Breast cancer: An overview of published Indian data

The Incidence of breast cancer has been steadily increasing in the last two decades, more so in urban areas of the sub-continent. Cancer ceters across the country have large numbers of patients being treated with multiple publications in this field. Inspite of paucity of prospective data and randomised clinical trials from India, there are large number of retrospective publications on various aspects of the disease including pathology, radiology, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation, palliative care and alternatitive treatment modalities. These published data provide an insight into the trends of breast cancer in the country and this comprehensive data review of Indian data will provide a basis for designing trials relevant to our population and planning health care.

The use of an interstitial boost in the conservative treatment of breast cancer: how to perform it routinely in a radiotherapy department

Purpose

To demonstrate the utility of a boost with interstitial brachytherapy (BT) in breast-conserving therapy (BCT) by doing a thorough review of the literature and describing in detail our technique for delivering this boost.

Material and methods

Our department has been delivering the boost with interstitial BT since 1989, in most cases with rigid needles and a theoretical dosimetry. In the early years, we used low-dose-rate (LDR) with iridium-192 wires. The dose administered was 15 Gy if there were no risk factors for local relapse or 20-25 Gy in the presence of risk factors. The risk factors considered were the presence of a close margin (less than 10 mm) and an extensive intraductal component (more than 25%). After 2002, we switched to high-dose-rate (HDR); using the linear quadratic model we changed the low dose to 3 fractions of 4.5 Gy in the case of no risk factors for local relapse or to 3 fractions of 5 Gy in the presence of risk factors.

Results

In 79 consecutive boost patients treated in our department between 2010 and 2011, with a median follow-up of 46 months, the local control rate was 97.47%. With respect to cosmesis, fibrosis occurred in 17 cases (21.5%) and hyperpigmentation in 26 cases (32.9%). Our hospital's results are comparable in terms of local control and cosmesis to those of other authors.

Conclusions

This educational article describes our department's boost technique with rigid needles and comments briefly on our results using this technique in a group of consecutively treated patients in our department. A review of the literature and the published results on local control and cosmesis is also described.

Conservative surgery, external radiotherapy, and HDR brachytherapy in a single fraction of 7 Gy in early breast cancer: long-term toxicity and esthetic assessment

INTRODUCTION

The essential issue in conservative treatment is the quality in breast preservation. When risk factors for local relapse exist, a tumour bed boost is required, but the boost choice remains controversial. Prospectively, we studied long-term toxicity, cosmetic outcome and prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After conservative treatment, 115 patients received a single dose of 7 Gy HDR-brachytherapy (HDR-BT) boost between June 1996 and December 2005. Late toxicity was assessed using the LENT-SOMA scale. For esthetic assessment, a subjective scale was used for patients and a modified Fehlauer scale for physicians. Mean age was 56.6 years. Invasive ductal carcinoma (78 %) and lumpectomy (60 %) were predominantly reported. 48 % received chemotherapy (CT).

RESULTS

Regarding toxicity, 39 % of patients reported breast pain, 75 % fibrosis, 56 % telangiectasias, 19 % lymphoedema, and 51 % retraction/atrophy. Concerning management, 22 % of patients with pain and 45 % with lymphoedema were treated. The esthetic result was found satisfactory by 96 % of the patients and 85 % of the physicians. Fibrosis was influenced by CT and a larger irradiated volume and telangiectasias by a greater implant volume.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-BT boost shows good cosmetic effects with acceptable toxicity. Patients overestimate the esthetic outcome. LENT/SOMA is useful to assess chronic toxicity.

The role of high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost in breast-conserving therapy: Long-term results of the Hungarian National Institute of Oncology

AIM

To report the long-term results of high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost for breast cancer patients treated with conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 1995 and 2007, 100 early-stage breast cancer patients received an HDR BT boost after conservative surgery and whole breast irradiation. Ten patients (10%) received a single-fraction HDR boost of 8-10.35 Gy using rigid needles, while 90 (90%) were treated with a fractionated multi-catheter HDR BT boost. The latter consisted of 3 × 4 Gy (n = 19), 3 × 4.75 Gy (n = 70), and 2 × 6.4 Gy (n = 1). Breast cancer related events, cosmetic results and side effects were assessed.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 94 months (range: 8-152) only 7 (7%) ipsilateral breast failures were observed for a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of 4.5 and 7.0%, respectively. The 8-year disease-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival was 76.1, 82.8, and 80.4%, respectively. Cosmetic outcome was rated excellent in 17%, good in 39%, fair in 33%, and poor in 11%. Data on late radiation side effects were available for 91 patients (91%). Grade 3 fibrosis and grade 3 telangiectasia occurred in 6 (6.6%) and 2 (2.2%) patients, respectively. In univariate analysis only positive margin status had a significant negative effect on local control.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR BT boost using multi-catheter implants produce excellent long-term local tumour control with acceptable cosmetic outcome and low rate of grade 3 late radiation side effects.