Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) 87--the management of oesophageal and gastric cancer

Follow-Up Practices of Surgeons and Medical Oncologists in Australia and New Zealand Following Resection of Esophagogastric Cancers

PURPOSE

Follow-up practices for patients who have undergone surgical resection of esophagogastric malignancies are variable and poorly documented. To better understand practice, a questionnaire was used to survey surgeons and medical oncologists to determine whether any consensus exists.

METHODS

An opt-in online questionnaire was sent to esophagogastric surgeons and medical oncologists via the membership lists for the Australian and New Zealand Gastric and Oesophageal Surgery Association (ANZGOSA), the Australian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Groups (AGITG), and the Medical Oncology Group of Australia (MOGA). The questionnaire proposed five clinical scenarios and provided a range of follow-up options for each scenario. Clinicians were asked to indicate which best matched their clinical practice.

RESULTS

Most clinicians follow patients for at least 3-5 years following resection of gastric or esophageal cancer. In total, 52% perform routine surveillance imaging, with individual scenarios not altering this. Tumor markers are infrequently used. Endoscopy and routine blood tests are used by around half the respondents.

CONCLUSION

There was little consensus about the use of investigations to monitor patients following esophagogastric cancer surgery. Choices do not follow guidelines or evidence. The identified patterns of postoperative surveillance practice appear not to be evidence based, and generally do not match recently published Australian guidelines.

The prognostic significance of extramural venous invasion detected by multiple-row detector computed tomography in stage III gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To determine the 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) of extramural venous invasion (EMVI), detected with contrast-enhanced multiple-row detector computed tomography (ceMDCT), in patients with stage III gastric cancer.

METHODS

Between January 2009 and December 2013, 117 patients with pathological-proved stage III gastric cancer based on the criteria of the AJCC 7th were included in this retrospective study. All patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy postoperatively and had been monitored with the follow-up chest/abdomen/pelvis ceMDCT on 3, 6, and 12 months post-operation. Two radiologists reviewed preoperative images regarding the presence of EMVI, categories of tumor and categories of lymph node. Conventional prognostic histological factors including pathological T/N status, tumor location/growth pattern, histological type/tumor differentiation, and tumor size were also recorded. Disease progression was defined as the presence of radiological or/and pathology-confirmed metachronous metastases, local recurrence, or gastric cancer-related death. The 1-year PFS for both EMVI-positive and EMVI-negative was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit. Hazard ratios for 1-year PFS were generated using a Cox proportional hazard regression on ceMDCT tumor characteristics.

RESULTS

The prevalence of EMVI detected with ceMDCT was 43.6% (51/117) in patients with stage III gastric cancer. The EMVI-positive patients had significantly lower 1-year PFS rates (45.1%), than the EMVI-negative patients (75.8%), (Log-rank test, P = 0.0008). In a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, EMVI and tumor location/growth pattern were identified as independent prognostic factors of 1-year PFS with hazard ratio of 2.272 (95% CI 1.133-4.556, P = 0.021) and 1.982 (95% CI 1.040-3.780, P = 0.039), respectively.

CONCLUSION

EMVI status, detected with ceMDCT, could be used to counsel patients regarding ongoing risks of metastatic disease, implications for surveillance, and systemic chemotherapy.

Towards personalized perioperative treatment for advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers worldwide. Although the rate of gastric cancer has declined dramatically over the past decades in most developed Western countries, it has not declined in East Asia. Currently, a radical gastrectomy is still the only curative treatment for gastric cancer. Over the last twenty years, however, surgery alone has been replaced by a multimodal perioperative approach. To achieve the maximum benefit from the perioperative treatment, a thorough evaluation of the tumor must first be performed. A complete assessment of gastric cancer is divided into two parts: staging and histology. According to the stage and histology of the cancer, perioperative chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy can be implemented, and perioperative targeted therapies such as trastuzumab may also play a role in this field. However, perioperative treatment approaches have not been widely accepted until a series of clinical trials were performed to evaluate the value of perioperative treatment. Although multimodal perioperative treatment has been widely applied in clinical practice, personalization of perioperative treatment represents the next stage in the treatment of gastric cancer. Genomic-guided treatment and efficacy prediction using molecular biomarkers in perioperative treatment are of great importance in the evolution of treatment and may become an ideal treatment method.

Gastric cancer-related information on the Internet: incomplete, poorly accessible, and overly commercial

BACKGROUND

Patients increasingly use the Internet for gastric cancer information. However, the quality of the information is questionable. We evaluated the accuracy, completeness, accessibility, reliability, and readability of gastric cancer websites.

METHODS

The Internet was searched for the terms "gastric cancer" or "stomach cancer" using general search engines. Websites were evaluated for completeness (CS) and accuracy (AS) using predefined quality appraisal instruments (QAIs), reliability using an integrity score (IS), readability using the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) grade level, and accessibility using automated accessibility appraisal tools. Site sponsor and the presence of quality labels were noted.

RESULTS

Fifty-one websites were evaluated. The mean CS was 100.3 (SD ±44.9), AS was 107.22 (SD ±47.9), IS was 15.3 (SD ±3.7), and the mean readability grade level was 10.4 (SD ±2.5). Only 5 websites had the minimum mandatory basic accessibility. Commercial sites and sites with quality labels had significantly more accessibility violations.

CONCLUSIONS

Internet gastric cancer information is overtly commercial, generally incomplete, and poorly accessible.

Factors predicting outcome for advanced gastroesophageal cancer in elderly patients receiving palliative chemotherapy

AIMS

Most patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer are elderly, but current standard regimens have emerged from trials predominantly involving patients with a median age <65 years. The aim of this study was to assess the factors influencing survival outcome for an elderly gastroesophageal cancer non-trial population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the case notes of all patients in our centre over the age of 65 years who received palliative chemotherapy for gastroesophageal cancer over a period of 3.5 years. Patients were classified as having received standard, non-standard combination or single-agent chemotherapy. After an initial univariate analysis, a multivariate analysis of the most significant prognostic factors was carried out.

RESULTS

In total, 120 patients were suitable for analysis. The median overall survival for patients receiving standard chemotherapy was 8.1 months, non-standard combination 8.3 months and single-agent fluoropyrimidines 3.9 months. Poor prognosis was predicted by two independent factors: poor performance status (hazard ratio 2.402; 95% confidence interval 1.53-3.77, P<0.001) and the presence of cancer symptoms (hazard ratio 2.235; 95% confidence interval 1.32-3.79, P=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

An assessment of the performance status and the level of symptoms is vital in this vulnerable group of patients. Prospective randomised trials to assess the benefit of chemotherapy in elderly patients with gastroesophageal cancer are required.