Brachytherapy: Current Status and Future Strategies — Can High Dose Rate Replace Low Dose Rate and External Beam Radiotherapy?

Feasibility of a Tungsten-181 HDR brachytherapy source: Analysis of isotope production and source dosimetry

BACKGROUND

Interest in Intensity Modulated Brachytherapy (IMBT) for High Dose Rate Brachytherapy (HDR) treatments has steadily increased in recent years. However, intensity modulation is not best optimized for currently used HDR sources since they emit high energy photons. To that end, the focus on IMBT has moved to middle energy sources, such as Ytterbium-169; yet even Yb-169 emits some high energy photons at a low yield. We present an alternative isotope, Tungsten-181 (T1/2 = 121 days) that is interesting due to its complete lack of high energy photon emissions. (Eavg = 58.9 keV, Emed = 57.5 keV) making it potentially favorable as high dose rate brachytherapy source from both a medical physics and health physics perspective.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of using W-181 as an HDR brachytherapy source; in this study we focused on W-181's production, dosimetric properties, and intensity modulation capabilities.

METHODS

We determined the isotope production kinetics, its Dose Rate Constant, Radial Dose Function, photon self-absorption, and the shielding intensity modulation capabilities for a W-181 pellet source geometry using the MCNP6.2 Computer Simulations Code. All simulations were performed using a personal computer running an AMD Ryzen 5 3600 6-Core Processor 3.59 GHz. The number of histories run for each study were selected to produce relative simulation convergence errors in the MCNP tally output of less than 2%. Dosimetric calculations were made using the MCNP6.2 computer simulations code and activation analyses were determined mathematically using a Catenary kinetics analysis (also known as a Bateman Analysis) of W-181 and Tantlum-182 production from the neutron activation of a pure Tungsten-180 stable target. Since W-181 emits middle energy photons and has a high density, we also assessed the effects of photon self-absorption within a tungsten pellet.

RESULTS

From our analysis, we determined that a 3.5 mm long and 0.6 mm in diameter is feasible for clinical applications. Our activation analyses found that these pellets can achieve W-181 activities up to 7.9Ci and 13Ci using neutron fluence rates of 4E14 cm-2 s-1 and 1E15 cm-2 s-1 respectively, which then would provide a dose rate of 1.84 ± 0.01 cG y/Ci/min at a depth of 1 cm from the source. Using our resulting Monte Carlo simulated Dose Rate Constant of 1.24 ± 0.02 cGy h-1∙U-1, a W-181 source in this geometry would require a source activity upwards of 10Ci for use in HDR treatments. In the intensity modulation analysis, only 0.1 mm of gold shielding was found to reduce a pellet's absorbed dose by over 50% while 0.3 mm of gold shielding, which is thin enough to theoretically fit between an HDR pellet and the inner catheter wall, was found to reduce the pellet's absorbed dose by over 85%.

CONCLUSIONS

While W-181 has a lower specific activity than Ir-192 and Yb-169, it shows great promise as an isotope for use in Intensity Modulated Brachytherapy due to its easily shielded photons. We therefore expect that W-181 may lend itself best for use as a multi-pellet configuration in IMBT.

Monte Carlo simulation study of an in vivo four-dimensional tracking system with a diverging collimator for monitoring radiation source (Ir-192) location during brachytherapy: proof of concept and feasibility

Introduction: The aim of this study was to demonstrate the potential of an in vivo four-dimensional (4D) tracking system to accurately localize the radiation source, Iridium-192 (Ir-192) in high-dose rate brachytherapy. Methods: To achieve time-dependent 3D positioning of the Ir-192 source, we devised a 4D tracking system employing multiple compact detectors. During the system's design phase, we conducted comprehensive optimization and analytical evaluations of the diverging collimator employed for detection purposes. Subsequently, we executed 3D reconstruction and positioning procedures based on the 2D images obtained by six detectors, each equipped with an optimized diverging collimator. All simulations for designing and evaluating the 4D tracking system were performed using the open-source GATE (v9.1) Monte Carlo platform based on the GEANT4 (v10.7) toolkit. In addition, to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed 4D tracking system, we conducted simulations and 3D positioning using a solid phantom and patient data. Finally, the error between the reconstructed position coordinates determined by the tracking system and the original coordinates of the Ir-192 radiation source was analyzed. Results: The parameters for the optimized diverging collimator were a septal thickness of 0.3 mm and a collimator height of 30 mm. A tracking system comprising 6 compact detectors was designed and implemented utilizing this collimator. Analysis of the accuracy of the proposed Ir-192 source tracking system found that the average of the absolute values of the error between the 3D reconstructed and original positions for the simulation with the solid phantom were 0.440 mm for the x coordinate, 0.423 mm for the y coordinate, and 0.764 mm for the z coordinate, and the average Euclidean distance was 1.146 mm. Finally, in a simulation based on data from a patient who underwent brachytherapy, the average Euclidean distance between the original and reconstructed source position was 0.586 mm. Discussion: These results indicated that the newly designed in vivo 4D tracking system for monitoring the Ir-192 source during brachytherapy could determine the 3D position of the radiation source in real time during treatment. We conclude that the proposed positioning system has the potential to make brachytherapy more accurate and reliable.

Being certain about uncertainties: a robust evaluation method for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment plans including the combination of uncertainties

In high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy the combined effect of uncertainties cause a range of possible dose distributions deviating from the nominal plan, and which are not considered during treatment plan evaluation. This could lead to dosimetric misses for critical structures and overdosing of organs at risk. A robust evaluation method to assess the combination of uncertainties during plan evaluation is presented and demonstrated on one HDR prostate ultrasound treatment plan retrospectively. A range of uncertainty scenarios are simulated by changing six parameters in the nominal plan and calculating the corresponding dose distribution. Two methods are employed to change the parameters, a probabilistic approach using random number sampling to evaluate the likelihood of variation in dose distributions, and a combination of the most extreme possible values to access the worst-case dosimetric outcomes. One thousand probabilistic scenarios were run on the single treatment plan with 43.2% of scenarios passing seven of the eight clinical objectives. The prostate D90 had a standard deviation of 4.4%, with the worst case decreasing the dose by up to 27.2%. The urethra D10 was up to 29.3% higher than planned in the worst case. All DVH metrics in the probabilistic scenarios were found to be within acceptable clinical constraints for the plan under statistical tests for significance. The clinical significance of the results from the robust evaluation method presented on any individual treatment plan needs to be compared in the context of a historical data set that contains patient outcomes with robustness analysis data to ascertain a baseline acceptance.

Design of the novel ThermoBrachy applicators enabling simultaneous interstitial hyperthermia and high dose rate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVE

In High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for prostate cancer there is a need for a new way of increasing cancer cell kill in combination with a stable dose to the organs at risk. In this study, we propose a novel ThermoBrachy applicator that offers the unique ability to apply interstitial hyperthermia while simultaneously serving as an afterloading catheter for high dose rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer. This approach achieves a higher thermal enhancement ratio than in sequential application of radiation and hyperthermia and has the potential to decrease the overall treatment time.

METHODS

The new applicator uses the principle of capacitively coupled electrodes. We performed a proof of concept experiment to demostrate the feasibility of the proposed applicator. Moreover, we used electromagnetic and thermal simulations to evaluate the power needs and temperature homogeneity in different tissues. Furthermore we investigated whether dynamic phase and amplitude adaptation can be used to improve longitudinal temperature control.

RESULTS

Simulations demonstrate that the electrodes achieve good temperature homogeneity in a homogenous phantom when following current applicator spacing guidelines. Furthermore, we demonstrate that by dynamic phase and amplitude adaptation provides a great advancement for further adaptability of the heating pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

This newly designed ThermoBrachy applicator has the potential to revise the interest in interstitial thermobrachytherapy, since the simultaneous application of radiation and hyperthermia enables maximum thermal enhancement and at maximum efficiency for patient and organization.

Multipurpose ultrasound-based prostate phantom for use in interstitial brachytherapy

PURPOSE

While brachytherapy is an effective treatment for localized prostate cancer, there has been a noticeable decline in its use. Training opportunity for prostate brachytherapy has been in steady decline, with some residents receiving little to no hands-on training. This work was developed to design a training environment that uses a phantom-based simulator to teach the process of TRUS-based prostate brachytherapy METHODS AND MATERIALS: A prostate phantom was fabricated from a representative prostate patient TRUS scan. Three materials were used: gelatin powder, graphite powder, and water. The prostate was developed using 9% gelatin and 0.3% graphite per 100 ml water. Five radiation oncologists were asked to qualitatively score the phantom according to image quality, haptic feedback, needle insertion quality, and its compatibility with operative tools. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) was estimated using different concentrations of graphite. The elasticity of the phantom was evaluated based on ultrasound elastography measurements RESULTS: The prostate phantom had an average CNR of 3.94 ± 1.09 compared to real prostate images with a CNR of 2 ± 1.8. The average Young's modulus was computed to be 58.03 ± 6.24 kPa compared to real prostate tissue (58.8 ± 8.2 kPa). Oncologists ranked the phantom as "very good" for overall quality of the phantom. They reported that needle insertion quality was "very good" during a simulated brachytherapy procedure.

CONCLUSION

We have developed a 3D printing prostate phantom to be used for training purposes during prostate brachytherapy. The phantom has been evaluated for image quality and elasticity. The reconstructed phantom could be used as an anthropomorphic surrogate to train residents on prostate brachytherapy procedures.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer: Rationale, current applications, and clinical outcome

Background

High‐dose‐rate brachytherapy (HDR BRT) has been enjoying rapid acceptance as a treatment modality offered to selected prostate cancer patients devoid of risk group, employed either in monotherapy setting or combined with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and is currently one of the most active clinical research areas.

Recent findings

This review encompasses all the current evidence to support the use of HDR BRT in various clinical scenario and shines light to the HDR BRT rationale, as an ultimately conformal dose delivery method enabling safe dose escalation to the prostate.

Conclusion

Valid long‐term data, both in regard to the oncologic outcomes and toxicity profile, support the current clinical indication spectrum of HDR BRT. At the same time, this serves as solid, rigid ground for emerging therapeutic applications, allowing the technique to remain in the spotlight alongside stereotactic radiosurgery.

Acute and late side-effects after low dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer; incidence, management and technical considerations

PURPOSE

To review common reported side effects and complications after primary LDR-BT (monotherapy) and discuss some of the technical aspects that could impact the treatment outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A literature search was undertaken using medical subject headings (MeSH) complemented by the authors' personal and institutional expertise.

RESULTS

The reported incidence of acute and late grade 2 or above urinary, bowel and sexual side effects is very variable across the literature. The learning curve and the implant quality have a clear impact on the toxicity outcomes. Being aware of some of the technical challenges encountered during the procedure and ways to mitigate them could decrease the incidence of side effects. Careful planning of seed placement and seed deposition allow sparing of the organs at risk and a lower incidence of urinary and gastro-intestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Low dose-rate brachytherapy remains a standard monotherapy treatment in the setting of favorable-risk prostate cancer. High disease control and low long-term toxicities are achievable in expert hands with a good technique.

Comparative dosimetrical analysis of intensity-modulated arc therapy, CyberKnife therapy and image-guided interstitial HDR and LDR brachytherapy of low risk prostate cancer

Background

The objective of the study was to dosimetrically compare the intensity-modulated-arc-therapy (IMAT), Cyber-Knife therapy (CK), single fraction interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) and low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy (BT) in low-risk prostate cancer.

Materials and methods

Treatment plans of ten patients treated with CK were selected and additional plans using IMAT, HDR and LDR BT were created on the same CT images. The prescribed dose was 2.5/70 Gy in IMAT, 8/40 Gy in CK, 21 Gy in HDR and 145 Gy in LDR BT to the prostate gland. EQD2 dose-volume parameters were calculated for each technique and compared.

Results

EQD2 total dose of the prostate was significantly lower with IMAT and CK than with HDR and LDR BT, D90 was 79.5 Gy, 116.4 Gy, 169.2 Gy and 157.9 Gy (p < 0.001). However, teletherapy plans were more conformal than BT, COIN was 0.84, 0.82, 0.76 and 0.76 (p < 0.001), respectively. The D₂ to the rectum and bladder were lower with HDR BT than with IMAT, CK and LDR BT, it was 66.7 Gy, 68.1 Gy, 36.0 Gy and 68.0 Gy (p = 0.0427), and 68.4 Gy, 78.9 Gy, 51.4 Gy and 70.3 Gy (p = 0.0091) in IMAT, CK, HDR and LDR BT plans, while D_0.1 to the urethra was lower with both IMAT and CK than with BTs: 79.9 Gy, 88.0 Gy, 132.7 Gy and 170.6 Gy (p < 0.001). D₂ to the hips was higher with IMAT and CK, than with BTs: 13.4 Gy, 20.7 Gy, 0.4 Gy and 1.5 Gy (p < 0.001), while D₂ to the sigmoid, bowel bag, testicles and penile bulb was higher with CK than with the other techniques.

Conclusions

HDR monotherapy yields the most advantageous dosimetrical plans, except for the dose to the urethra, where IMAT seems to be the optimal modality in the radiotherapy of low-risk prostate cancer.

Impact of High-Dose-Rate and Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy Boost on Toxicity, Functional and Cancer Outcomes in Patients Receiving External Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A National Population-Based Study

PURPOSE

External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with brachytherapy boost reduces cancer recurrence in patients with prostate cancer compared with EBRT monotherapy. However, randomized controlled trials or large-scale observational studies have not compared brachytherapy boost types directly.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This observational cohort study used linked national cancer registry data, radiation therapy data, administrative hospital data, and mortality records of 54,642 patients with intermediate-risk, high-risk, and locally advanced prostate cancer in England. The records of 11,676 patients were also linked to results from a national patient survey collected at least 18 months after diagnosis. Competing risk regression analyses were used to compare gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity, genitourinary (GU) toxicity, skeletal-related events (SRE), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) at 5 years with adjustment for patient and tumor characteristics. Linear regression was used to compare Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite 26-item version domain scores (scale, 0-100, with higher scores indicating better function).

RESULTS

Five-year GI toxicity was significantly increased after low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (LDR-BB) (32.3%) compared with high-dose-rate brachytherapy boost (HDR-BB) (16.7%) or EBRT monotherapy (18.7%). Five-year GU toxicity was significantly increased after both LDR-BB (15.8%) and HDR-BB (16.6%), compared with EBRT monotherapy (10.4%). These toxicity patterns were matched by the mean patient-reported bowel function scores (LDR-BB, 77.3; HDR-BB, 85.8; EBRT monotherapy, 84.4) and the mean patient-reported urinary obstruction/irritation function scores (LDR-BB, 72.2; HDR-BB, 78.9; EBRT monotherapy, 83.8). Five-year incidences of SREs and PCSM were significantly lower after HDR-BB (2.4% and 2.7%, respectively) compared with EBRT monotherapy (2.8% and 3.5%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with EBRT monotherapy, LDR-BB has worse GI and GU toxicity and HDR-BB has worse GU toxicity. HDR-BB has a lower incidence of SREs and PCSM than EBRT monotherapy.

Curcumin against Prostate Cancer: Current Evidence

Cancer is a condition characterized by remarkably enhanced rates of cell proliferation paired with evasion of cell death. These deregulated cellular processes take place following genetic mutations leading to the activation of oncogenes, the loss of tumor suppressor genes, and the disruption of key signaling pathways that control and promote homeostasis. Plant extracts and plant-derived compounds have historically been utilized as medicinal remedies in different cultures due to their anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and antimicrobial properties. Many chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of cancer are derived from plants, and the scientific interest in discovering plant-derived chemicals with anticancer potential continues today. Curcumin, a turmeric-derived polyphenol, has been reported to possess antiproliferative and proapoptotic properties. In the present review, we summarize all the in vitro and in vivo studies examining the effects of curcumin in prostate cancer.

Brachytherapy in Belgium in 2018. A national survey of the brachytherapy study group of the Belgian SocieTy for Radiotherapy and Oncology (BeSTRO)

PURPOSE

To explore the current practices patterns and evaluate the actual brachytherapy (BT) resources in Belgium.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 2019, the Brachytherapy Study Group proposed to conduct a survey on behalf of the Belgian SocieTy of Radiation Oncology (BeSTRO) in order to identify current BT practice patterns. An electronic questionnaire was sent to all primary radiotherapy centers in Belgium. This questionnaire was based on the questionnaire that was used by the Italian Association of Radiation Oncology (AIRO) in 2016, asking for: (a) General information on the Radiation Oncology Centre; (b) BT equipment and human resources; (c) BT procedures; (d) BT assessment (number of patients treated annually, treated sites, and different modalities of treatments).

RESULTS

All 24 radiation oncology centers (100% response rate) answered the questionnaire and gave also information on the performance of brachytherapy in their (eventual) satellite centers. Eighteen (18) BT afterloader units were installed and operational in 2018. Thirteen centers mentioned a prostate seed implant program, one center a prostate and eye plaque program and one center only an eye plaque program. Less than 50% of centers have the infrastructure to offer the full-range of BT in their own department. In 2018, 1486 patients received a BT-treatment, 28% of them were treated by prostate seed implant, 8% were treated by eye-(seed) BT and 64% by high dose rate (HDR)/pulsed dose rate (PDR) BT. Forty-five percent of HDR/PDR patients were treated by vaginal dome BT, 22% by intra-uterine BT, 11% by skin BT, 10% by breast BT (almost exclusively in one centre), 8% for benign pathology (keloid) and the remaining 4% were treated for prostate (as a boost or as salvage in one centre), anal, penile, lung or oesophageal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Belgian radiotherapy departments often perform BT only in a (highly) selected group of pathologies, resulting in a limited number of patients treated by this technique despite the sufficient availability of BT equipment. Modern indications are often not covered, hence patients do not have regular access to recognized treatment options, possibly leading to inferior oncological outcome. BeSTRO will use the results of this survey to stimulate improvements in training, awareness, education, implementation, collaboration and cooperation in the field of brachytherapy.

Interventional therapy in malignant conditions of the prostate

Interventional therapies are emerging modalities for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Their aim is to reduce the morbidity associated with radical therapies (rT) by minimizing damage to non-cancerous tissue, with priority given to sparing key structures such as the neurovascular bundles, external sphincter, bladder neck, and rectum, while maintaining local cancer control. Interventional ablative technologies deliver energy in different ways to destroy cancer cells. The most widely investigated techniques are brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy, cryotherapy, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Although functional outcomes of focal therapies have been encouraging, with generally low rates of urinary incontinence and erectile dysfunction, robust medium- and long-term oncological outcomes are not available for all techniques. To date, major controversies in focal therapy concern appropriate patient selection, efficacy of focal therapies, as well as treatment paradigms based on the dominant index lesion hypothesis. This review articles discusses the current status of interventional therapies and the oncological and functional outcomes.

A comparison of outcomes for patients with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated with low dose rate and high dose rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy

•

Superior biochemical progression free survival for LDR in combination with EBRT.

•

On multivariable analysis, HDR and EBRT and Gleason ≥8 predicted for progression.

•

Low cumulative incidence of ≥grade 3 GU and GI toxicities.

Introduction

There is evidence to support use of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in combination with both low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR–EBRT) and high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR–EBRT) to treat intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.

Methods

Men with intermediate and high risk prostate cancer treated using LDR–EBRT (treated between 1996 and 2007) and HDR–EBRT (treated between 2007 and 2012) were identified from an institutional database. Multivariable analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between patient, disease and treatment factors with biochemical progression free survival (bPFS).

Results

116 men were treated with LDR-EBRT and 171 were treated with HDR–EBRT. At 5 years, bPFS was estimated to be 90.5% for the LDR–EBRT cohort and 77.6% for the HDR–EBRT cohort. On multivariable analysis, patients treated with HDR–EBRT were more than twice as likely to experience biochemical progression compared with LDR–EBRT (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.12–4.07). Patients with Gleason ≥8 disease were more than five times more likely to experience biochemical progression compared with Gleason 6 disease (HR 5.47, 95% CI 1.26–23.64). Cumulative incidence of ≥grade 3 genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities for the LDR–EBRT and HDR–EBRT cohorts were 8% versus 4% and 5% versus 1% respectively, although these differences did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

LDR–EBRT may provide more effective PSA control at 5 years compared with HDR–EBRT. Direct comparison of these treatments through randomised trials are recommended to investigate this hypothesis further.

MRI artifact simulation for clinically relevant MRI sequences for guidance of prostate HDR brachytherapy

For the purpose of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance of prostate high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy, this paper presents a study on the potential of clinically relevant MRI sequences to facilitate tracking or localization of brachytherapy devices (HDR source/titanium needle), and which could simultaneously be used to visualize the anatomy. The tracking or localization involves simulation of the MRI artifact in combination with a template matching algorithm. Simulations of the MRI artifacts induced by an HDR brachytherapy source and a titanium needle were implemented for four types of sequences: spoiled gradient echo, spin echo, balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) and bSSFP with spectral attenuated inversion recovery (SPAIR) fat suppression. A phantom study was conducted in which mentioned sequences (in 2D) as well as the volumetric MRI sequences of the current clinical scan protocol were applied to obtain the induced MRI artifacts for an HDR source and a titanium needle. Localization of the objects was performed by a phase correlation based template matching algorithm. The simulated images demonstrated high correspondences with the acquired MR images, and allowed localization of the objects. A comparison between the object positions obtained for all applied MRI sequences showed deviations (from the average position) of 0.2-0.3 mm, proving that all MRI sequences were suitable for localization of the objects, irrespective of their 2D or volumetric nature. This study demonstrated that the MRI artifact induced by an HDR source or a titanium needle could be simulated for the four investigated types of MRI sequences (spoiled gradient echo, spin echo, bSSFP and bSSFP-SPAIR), valuable for real-time object localization in clinical practice. This leads to more flexibility in the choice of MRI sequences for guidance of HDR brachytherapy, as they are suitable for both object localization and anatomy visualization.

Focal Salvage Treatment of Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer: A Narrative Review of Current Strategies and Future Perspectives

Over the last decades, primary prostate cancer radiotherapy saw improving developments, such as more conformal dose administration and hypofractionated treatment regimens. Still, prostate cancer recurrences after whole-gland radiotherapy remain common, especially in patients with intermediate- to high-risk disease. The vast majority of these patients are treated palliatively with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), which exposes them to harmful side-effects and is only effective for a limited amount of time. For patients with a localized recurrent tumor and no signs of metastatic disease, local treatment with curative intent seems more rational. However, whole-gland salvage treatments such as salvage radiotherapy or salvage prostatectomy are associated with significant toxicity and are, therefore, uncommonly performed. Treatments that are solely aimed at the recurrent tumor itself, thereby better sparing the surrounding organs at risk, potentially provide a safer salvage treatment option in terms of toxicity. To achieve such tumor-targeted treatment, imaging developments have made it possible to better exclude metastatic disease and accurately discriminate the tumor. Currently, focal salvage treatment is being performed with different modalities, including brachytherapy, cryotherapy, high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Oncologic outcomes seem comparable to whole-gland salvage series, but with much lower toxicity rates. In terms of oncologic control, these results will improve further with better understanding of patient selection. Other developments, such as high-field diagnostic MRI and live adaptive MRI-guided radiotherapy, will further improve precision of the treatment.

UK & Ireland Prostate Brachytherapy Practice Survey 2014-2016

Purpose

To document the current prostate brachytherapy practice across the UK and Ireland and compare with previously published audit results.

Material and methods

Participants from 25 centers attending the annual UK & Ireland Prostate Brachytherapy Conference were invited to complete an online survey. Sixty-three questions assessed the center’s experience and staffing, clinician’s experience, clinical selection criteria and scheduling, number of cases per modality in the preceding three years, low-dose-rate (LDR) pre- and post-implant technique and high-dose-rate (HDR) implant technique. Responses were collated, and descriptive statistical analysis performed.

Results

Eighteen (72%) centers responded with 17 performing LDR only, 1 performing HDR only, and 6 performing both LDR and HDR. Seventy-one percent of centers have > 10 years of LDR brachytherapy experience, whereas 71% centers that perform HDR brachytherapy have > 5 years of experience. Thirteen centers have 2 or more clinicians performing brachytherapy with 61% of lead consultants performing > 25 cases (LDR + HDR) in 2016. The number of implants (range), that includes LDR and HDR, performed by individual practitioners in 2016 was > 50 by 21%, 25-50 by 38%, and < 25 by 41%. Eight centers reported a decline in LDR monotherapy case numbers in 2016. Number of center’s performing HDR brachytherapy increased in last five years. Relative uniformity in patient selection is noted, and LDR pre- and post-implant dosimetry adheres to published quality guidelines, with an average post-implant D₉₀ of > 145 Gy in 69% of centers in 2014 and 2015 compared to 63% in 2016. The median CT/US volume ratios were > 0.9 ≤ 1.0 (n = 4), > 1.0 ≤ 1.1 (n = 7), and > 1.1 (n = 2).

Conclusion

There is considerable prostate brachytherapy experience in the UK and Ireland. An apparent fall in LDR case numbers is noted. Maintenance of case numbers and ongoing compliance with published quality guidelines is important to sustain high quality outcomes.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy versus Low Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Localised Prostate Cancer: a Cost-Utility Analysis

AIMS

To conduct a cost-utility analysis comparing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with low dose rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) for localised prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A decision-analytic Markov model was developed from the healthcare payer perspective to simulate the history of a 66-year-old man with low-risk PCa. The model followed patients yearly over their remaining lifetimes. Health states included 'recurrence-free', 'biochemical recurrence' (BR), 'metastatic' and 'death'. Transition probabilities were based on a retrospective cohort analysis undertaken at our institution. Utilities were derived from the literature. Costs were assigned in 2015 Canadian dollars ($) and reflected Ontario's health system and departmental costs. Outcomes included quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. A willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY was used.

RESULTS

SBRT was the dominant strategy with 0.008LYs and 0.029QALYs gained and a reduction in cost of $2615. Under base case conditions, our results were sensitive to the BR probability associated with both strategies. LDR-BT becomes the preferred strategy if the BR with SBRT is 1.3*[baseline BR_SBRT] or if the BR with LDR-BT is 0.76*[baseline BR_LDR-BT]. When assuming the same BR for both strategies, LDR-BT becomes marginally more effective with 0.009QALYs gained at a cost of $272 848/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

SBRT represents an economically attractive radiation strategy. Further research should be carried out to provide longer-term follow-up and high-quality evidence.

Focal therapy for prostate cancer: the technical challenges

Focal therapy for prostate cancer has been proposed as an alternative treatment to whole gland therapy, offering the opportunity for tumor dose escalation and/or reduced toxicity. Brachytherapy, either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate, provides an ideal approach, offering both precision in dose delivery and opportunity for a highly conformal, non-uniform dose distribution. Whilst multiple consensus documents have published clinical guidelines for patient selection, there are insufficient data to provide clear guidelines on target volume delineation, treatment planning margins, treatment planning approaches, and many other technical issues that should be considered before implementing a focal brachytherapy program. Without consensus guidelines, there is the potential for a diversity of practices to develop, leading to challenges in interpreting outcome data from multiple centers. This article provides an overview of the technical considerations for the implementation of a clinical service, and discusses related topics that should be considered in the design of clinical trials to ensure precise and accurate methods are applied for focal brachytherapy treatments.

A novel adaptive needle insertion sequencing for robotic, single needle MR-guided high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy

MR-guided high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has gained increasing interest as a treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer because of the superior value of MRI for tumor and surrounding tissues localization. To enable needle insertion into the prostate with the patient in the MR bore, a single needle MR-compatible robotic system involving needle-by-needle dose delivery has been developed at our institution. Throughout the intervention, dose delivery may be impaired by: (1) sub-optimal needle positioning caused by e.g. needle bending, (2) intra-operative internal organ motion such as prostate rotations or swelling, or intra-procedural rectum or bladder filling. This may result in failure to reach clinical constraints. To assess the first aforementioned challenge, a recent study from our research group demonstrated that the deposited dose may be greatly improved by real-time adaptive planning with feedback on the actual needle positioning. However, the needle insertion sequence is left to the doctor and therefore, this may result in sub-optimal dose delivery. In this manuscript, a new method is proposed to determine and update automatically the needle insertion sequence. This strategy is based on the determination of the most sensitive needle track. The sensitivity of a needle track is defined as its impact on the dose distribution in case of sub-optimal positioning. A stochastic criterion is thus presented to determine each needle track sensitivity based on needle insertion simulations. To assess the proposed sequencing strategy, HDR prostate brachytherapy was simulated on 11 patients with varying number of needle insertions. Sub-optimal needle positioning was simulated at each insertion (modeled by typical random angulation errors). In 91% of the scenarios, the dose distribution improved when the needle was inserted into the most compared to the least sensitive needle track. The computation time for sequencing was less than 6 s per needle track. The proposed needle insertion sequencing can therefore assist in delivering an optimal dose in HDR prostate brachytherapy.

Dosimetric impact of contouring and needle reconstruction uncertainties in US-, CT- and MRI-based high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy treatment planning

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The purpose was to evaluate the dosimetric impact of target contouring and needle reconstruction uncertainties in an US-, CT- and MRI-based HDR prostate BT treatment planning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

US, CT, and MR images were acquired post-needle insertion in 22 HDR-BT procedures for 11 consecutive patients. Dose plans were simulated for an US-, CT- and MRI-based HDR-BT treatment planning procedure. Planning uncertainties in US- and CT-based plans were evaluated using MRI-based planning as reference. Target (CTV_Prostate) was re-contoured on MRI. Dose results were expressed in total equivalent dose given in 2Gy fractionation dose for EBRT (46Gy) plus 2 HDR-BT fractions.

RESULTS

Uncertainties in US- and CT-based planning caused the planned CTV_Prostate-D_90% to decrease with a mean of 2.9±5.0Gy (p=0.03) and 2.9±2.9Gy (p=0.001), respectively. The intra-observer contouring variation on MRI resulted in a mean variation of 1.6±1.5Gy in CTV_Prostate-D_90%. Reconstruction uncertainties on US resulted in a dose variation of±3Gy to the urethra, whereas data for CT were not available for this.

CONCLUSIONS

Uncertainties related to contouring and reconstruction in US- and CT-based HDR-BT treatment plans resulted in a systematic overestimation of the prescribed target dose. Inter-modality uncertainties (US and CT versus MR) were larger than MR intra-observer uncertainties.

Prostate magnetic resonance imaging for brachytherapists: Anatomy and technique

PURPOSE

To present an overview of mp MRI techniques necessary for high-resolution imaging of prostate.

METHODS

We summarize examples from our clinical experience and concepts from the current literature that illustrate normal prostate anatomy on multiparametric MRI (mp MRI).

RESULTS

Our experience regarding optimal mp MRI image acquisition is provided, as well as a summary of prostate and periprostatic anatomy and anatomical variants that pose challenges for BT.

CONCLUSIONS

mp MRI provides unparalleled assessment of the prostate and periprostatic anatomy, making it the most appropriate imaging modality to facilitate prostate BT treatment planning, implantation, and followup. This work provides an introduction to prostate mp MR imaging, anatomy, and anatomical variants essential for successful integration mp MRI into prostate brachytherapy practice.

Is there a role for therapeutic cancer vaccines in the age of checkpoint inhibitors?

Because of the recent success of monoclonal antibody checkpoint inhibitors, and the disappointing results of most therapeutic cancer vaccine trials, it has been questioned whether there is any potential role for such products going forward. In my opinion the answer is “yes” based on the following: [1] there is a persistent unmet clinical need because the majority of patients do not benefit from anti-checkpoint therapy, [2] there is evidence that not all patients make immune responses to their tumors, [3] there is evidence that immune responses to autologous tumor antigens can be induced by patient-specific vaccines, [4] there is clinical evidence from the pre-checkpoint era that suggests survival can be positively impacted by such patient-specific vaccines, and [5] the 2 available therapeutic vaccines that have received regulatory approval are quite limited in terms of their therapeutic benefit.

American Brachytherapy Society Task Group Report: Combination of brachytherapy and external beam radiation for high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To review outcomes for high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined modality radiation therapy (CMRT) utilizing external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with a brachytherapy boost.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The available literature for high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined modality radiation therapy was reviewed and summarized.

RESULTS

At this time, the literature suggests that the majority of high-risk cancers are curable with multimodal treatment. Several large retrospective studies and three prospective randomized trials comparing CMRT to dose-escalated EBRT have demonstrated superior biochemical control with CMRT. Longer followup of the randomized trials will be required to determine if this will translate to a benefit in metastasis-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival. Although greater toxicity has been associated with CMRT compared to EBRT, recent studies suggest that technological advances that allow better definition and sparing of critical adjacent structures as well as increasing experience with brachytherapy have improved implant quality and the toxicity profile of brachytherapy. The role of androgen deprivation therapy is well established in the external beam literature for high-risk disease, but there is controversy regarding the applicability of these data in the setting of dose escalation. At this time, there is not sufficient evidence for the omission of androgen deprivation therapy with dose escalation in this population. Comparisons with surgery remain limited by differences in patient selection, but the evidence would suggest better disease control with CMRT compared to surgery alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Due to a series of technological advances, modern combination series have demonstrated unparalleled rates of disease control in the high-risk population. Given the evidence from recent randomized trials, combination therapy may become the standard of care for high-risk cancers.

Temporal changes in tumor oxygenation and perfusion upon normo- and hyperbaric inspiratory hyperoxia

BACKGROUND

Inspiratory hyperoxia under hyperbaric conditions has been shown to effectively reduce tumor hypoxia and to improve radiosensitivity. However, applying irradiation (RT) under hyperbaric conditions is technically difficult in the clinical setting since RT after decompression may be effective only if tumor pO2 remains elevated for a certain period of time. The aim of the present study was to analyze the time course of tumor oxygenation and perfusion during and after hyperbaric hyperoxia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Tumor oxygenation, red blood cell (RBC) flux for perfusion monitoring, and vascular resistance were assessed continuously in experimental rat DS-sarcomas by polarographic catheter electrodes and laser Doppler flowmetry at 1 and 2 atm (bar) of environmental pressure during breathing of pure O2 or carbogen (95 % O2 + 5 % CO2).

RESULTS

During room air breathing, the tumor pO2 followed very rapidly within a few minutes the change of the ambient pressure during compression or decompression. With O2 breathing under hyperbaric conditions, the tumor pO2 increased more than expected based on the rise of the environmental pressure, although the time course was comparably rapid. Breathing carbogen, the tumor pO2 followed with a slight delay of the pressure change, and within 10 min after decompression the baseline values were reached again. RBC flux increased during carbogen breathing but remained almost constant with pure O2, indicating a vasodilation (decrease in vascular resistance) with carbogen but a vasoconstriction (increase in vascular resistance) with O2 during hyperbaric conditions.

CONCLUSION

Since the tumor pO2 directly followed the environmental pressure, teletherapy after hyperbaric conditions does not seem to be promising as the pO2 reaches baseline values again within 5-10 min after decompression.

Physical and psychosocial side-effects of brachytherapy: a questionnaire survey

Purpose

Brachytherapy (BT) plays an important role in cancer treatment. Like any other medical therapy it may, however, induce side effects whose recognition can affect the patient's quality of life. Therefore, the present study evaluated the frequency and severity of physical and psychosocial adverse effects of BT.

Material and methods

Patients (n = 70) undergoing high-dose-rate (HDR) BT or low-dose-rate (LDR) of head and neck, breast, and prostate cancers were interviewed face-to-face at the end of their course of treatment. Interviews concerned the occurrence of 35 physical (dermatological, gastroenterological, neurological, ocular, pulmonological, and urological) and 10 psychosocial side effects of BT.

Results

A high percentage of patients reported that BT decreased their life satisfaction (54.3%), sense of security (41.4%), and self-esteem (34.3%). The highest frequency of gastroenterological and urological symptoms was reported by prostate cancer patients. Cigarette smoking increased the frequency of nausea, dyschezia, and weight loss. Overweight patients were characterized by an increased rate of urinary incontinence and dyschezia, as well as more pronounced decrease of self-esteem and sense of security following BT treatment.

Conclusions

These findings are not only highly relevant to the way patients can be prepared for the therapy but also have a bearing on ways to minimize the number and severity of BT side effects.

Prostate cancer radiotherapy: potential applications of metal nanoparticles for imaging and therapy

Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. There have been dramatic technical advances in radiotherapy delivery, enabling higher doses of radiotherapy to primary cancer, involved lymph nodes and oligometastases with acceptable normal tissue toxicity. Despite this, many patients relapse following primary radical therapy, and novel treatment approaches are required. Metal nanoparticles are agents that promise to improve diagnostic imaging and image-guided radiotherapy and to selectively enhance radiotherapy effectiveness in CaP. We summarize current radiotherapy treatment approaches for CaP and consider pre-clinical and clinical evidence for metal nanoparticles in this condition.

High dose-rate brachytherapy boost for intermediate risk prostate cancer: Long-term outcomes of two different treatment schedules and early biochemical predictors of success

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To report long-term cancer control rates following high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy boost for intermediate risk prostate cancer and explore early biochemical predictors of success.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Results of two sequential phase II trials are updated and compared: (1) Single 15 Gy HDR-boost followed by external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) 37.5 Gy/15fractions, (2) Two HDR fractions of 10 Gy followed by EBRT 45 Gy/25fractions. Patients were followed prospectively for clinical and biochemical outcomes. Nadir PSA (nPSA) and PSA at 3-years were analyzed as continuous variables, and ROC analysis was used to identify the optimal cutoff values. Kaplan-Meier bDFS curves were generated and the log-rank test used to compare different groups

RESULTS

183 patients were accrued; 123 to the single fraction trial and 60 to the standard fractionation trial, with a median follow-up of 74 months and 99 months, respectively. The 5-year biochemical relapse-free survival was 97.4% and 92.7%, respectively (p=0.995). Median nPSA was 0.08 ng/ml. Failure to achieve a nPSA <0.4 ng/ml was associated with a significantly higher rate of biochemical relapse (5-year bDFS: 100% vs. 72%; p<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

HDR boost with single fraction 15 Gy provides durable long-term biochemical disease-free survival. PSA nadir <0.4 ng/ml is associated with very low risk of biochemical failure.

Cancer vaccines: can they improve survival?

In patients with metastatic cancer, therapeutic anticancer vaccines are rarely associated with objective antitumor responses; so, many investigators have focused on progression-free survival (PFS) as a key endpoint for clinical trials. However, it is not clear that PFS is a surrogate for overall survival (OS), and OS may be a more appropriate endpoint because of the effects on long-term memory in the adaptive immune system. Recently, reported vaccine trials were reviewed to determine their primary and secondary endpoints and results. Randomized trials testing sipuleucel-T and prostvac-vf in prostate cancer and ipilimumab and eltrapuldencel-T in melanoma were associated with low objective response rates, no improvement in PFS, but statistically significant improvement in OS. Although compared with PFS, it takes longer to get a final result when OS is the primary endpoint; there is increasing evidence that if long-term memory recognition of tumor-associated antigens is the mechanism of action of an investigational product, then OS may be the only valid clinical endpoint for efficacy.

Radiation oncology: physics advances that minimize morbidity

ABSTRACT 

Radiation therapy has become an ever more successful treatment for many cancer patients. This is due in large part from advances in physics including the expanded use of imaging protocols combined with ever more precise therapy devices such as linear and particle beam accelerators, all contributing to treatments with far fewer side effects. This paper will review current state-of-the-art physics maneuvers that minimize morbidity, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, volummetric arc therapy, image-guided radiation, radiosurgery and particle beam treatment. We will also highlight future physics enhancements on the horizon such as MRI during treatment and intensity-modulated hadron therapy, all with the continued goal of improved clinical outcomes.

Dosimetric analysis of urethral strictures following HDR (192)Ir brachytherapy as monotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate dosimetric parameters related to urethral strictures following high dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) alone for prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Ten strictures were identified in 213 patients treated with HDRBT alone receiving 34Gy in four fractions, 36Gy in four fractions, 31.5Gy in 3 fractions or 26Gy in 2 fractions. A matched-pair analysis used 2 controls for each case matched for dose fractionation schedule, pre-treatment IPSS score, number of needles used and clinical target volume. The urethra was divided into membranous urethra and inferior, mid and superior thirds of the prostatic urethra.

RESULTS

Stricture rates were 3% in the 34Gy group, 4% in the 36Gy group, 6% in the 31.5Gy group and 4% in the 26Gy group. The median time to stricture formation was 26months (range 8-40). The dosimetric parameters investigated were not statistically different between cases and controls. No correlation was seen between stricture rate and fractionation schedule.

CONCLUSIONS

Urethral stricture is an infrequent complication of prostate HDRBT when used to deliver high doses as sole treatment, with an overall incidence in this cohort of 10/213 (4.7%). In a matched pair analysis no association with dose schedule or urethral dosimetry was identified, but the small number of events limits definitive conclusions.

Evolution of hypofractionated accelerated radiotherapy for prostate cancer - the sunnybrook experience

Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) is a newer method of ultra hypo fractionated radiotherapy that uses combination of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), to deliver high doses of radiation in a few fractions to a target, at the same time sparing the surrounding organs at risk (OAR). SABR is ideal for treating small volumes of disease and has been introduced in a number of disease sites including brain, lung, liver, spine, and prostate. Given the radiobiological advantages of treating prostate cancer with high doses per fraction, SABR is becoming a standard of care for low and intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients based upon the results from Sunnybrook and also the US-based prostate SABR consortium. This review examines the development of moderate and ultra hypo-fractionation schedules at the Odette Cancer centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences. Moderate hypo-fractionation protocol was first developed in 2001 for intermediate-risk prostate cancer and from there on different treatment schedules including SABR evolved for all risk groups.