BRCA1/2 Mutation-associated Breast Cancer, Wide Local Excision and Radiotherapy or Unilateral Mastectomy: A Systematic Review

A systematic review exploring the role of modern radiation for the treatment of Hereditary or Familial Breast Cancer

The diagnosis of hereditary or familial breast cancers influences the locoregional approach to breast cancer, with most patients undergoing mastectomy to avoid or minimize the use of adjuvant radiation therapy. We evaluated the current literature about known high- and moderate-penetrance genes and studied their impact on local control, toxicities, and contralateral breast cancers after adjuvant radiation therapy. The aim is to encourage the safe use of adjuvant radiation therapy when indicated in concordance with the updated guidelines.

Local treatment in patients with hereditary breast cancer: decision-making process in low-, moderate-, high-penetrance pathogenic germline mutation carriers

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We summarize recent evidence regarding commonly tested breast cancer susceptibility genes and review indications derived from recently published guidelines regarding management of carriers affected by early breast cancer (BC).

RECENT FINDINGS

Management of affected women with a known genetic predisposition to BC was matter of debate at the most relevant international conferences, such as St. Gallen International Consensus Conference and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium held both in 2021. At the same time, a joint Experts Panel from American Society of Clinical Oncology/American Society for Radiation Oncology/Society of Surgical Oncology (ASCO/ASTRO/SSO) convened to develop recommendations to support clinical decision-making in this specific setting and results about administration of new systemic therapies such as poly adenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors became available.

SUMMARY

Population of patients affected by BC and carriers of mutations in susceptibility genes is progressively increasing, but new mutations identified do not always have a clear clinical impact.To date, we have data to support consideration of different local management choices for affected patients carrying specific mutations, but some issues especially relating to breast-conserving surgery or administration of radiotherapy in these patients, still need to be better addressed. Opinions about the best way to treat these patients are still heterogeneous and information deriving from different sources seems to be conflicting at times. Our purpose is to offer a synopsis of the different evidence available that may be helpful in clinical decision making.

Overexpressed XRCC2 as an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in glioma patients

Background

XRCC2, a homologous recombination-related gene, has been reported to be associated with a variety of cancers. However, its role in glioma has not been reported. This study aimed to find out the role of XRCC2 in glioma and reveal in which glioma-specific biological processes is XRCC2 involved based on thousands of glioma samples, thereby, providing a new perspective in the treatment and prognostic evaluation of glioma.

Methods

The expression characteristics of XRCC2 in thousands of glioma samples from CGGA and TCGA databases were comprehensively analyzed. Wilcox or Kruskal test was used to analyze the expression pattern of XRCC2 in gliomas with different clinical and molecular features. The effect of XRCC2 on the prognosis of glioma patients was explored by Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) revealed the possible cellular mechanisms involved in XRCC2 in glioma. Connectivity map (CMap) was used to screen small molecule drugs targeting XRCC2 and the expression levels of XRCC2 were verified in glioma cells and tissues by RT-qPCR and immunohistochemical staining.

Results

We found the overexpression of XRCC2 in glioma. Moreover, the overexpressed XRCC2 was associated with a variety of clinical features related to prognosis. Cox and meta-analyses showed that XRCC2 is an independent risk factor for the poor prognosis of glioma. Furthermore, the results of GSEA indicated that overexpressed XRCC2 could promote malignant progression through involved signaling pathways, such as in the cell cycle. Finally, doxazosin, quinostatin, canavanine, and chrysin were identified to exert anti-glioma effects by targeting XRCC2.

Conclusions

This study analyzed the expression pattern of XRCC2 in gliomas and its relationship with prognosis using multiple datasets. This is the first study to show that XRCC2, a novel oncogene, is significantly overexpressed in glioma and can lead to poor prognosis in glioma patients. XRCC2 could serve as a new biomarker for glioma diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis evaluation, thus bringing new insight into the management of glioma.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10020-021-00316-0.

Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for management of patients with breast cancer (BC) with germline mutations in BC susceptibility genes.

METHODS

The American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Surgical Oncology convened an Expert Panel to develop recommendations based on a systematic review of the literature and a formal consensus process.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight articles met eligibility criteria and formed the evidentiary basis for the local therapy recommendations; six randomized controlled trials of systemic therapy met eligibility criteria.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients with newly diagnosed BC and BRCA1/2 mutations may be considered for breast-conserving therapy (BCT), with local control of the index cancer similar to that of noncarriers. The significant risk of a contralateral BC (CBC), especially in young women, and the higher risk of new cancers in the ipsilateral breast warrant discussion of bilateral mastectomy. Patients with mutations in moderate-risk genes should be offered BCT. For women with mutations in BRCA1/2 or moderate-penetrance genes who are eligible for mastectomy, nipple-sparing mastectomy is a reasonable approach. There is no evidence of increased toxicity or CBC events from radiation exposure in BRCA1/2 carriers. Radiation therapy should not be withheld in ATM carriers. For patients with germline TP53 mutations, mastectomy is advised; radiation therapy is contraindicated except in those with significant risk of locoregional recurrence. Platinum agents are recommended versus taxanes to treat advanced BC in BRCA carriers. In the adjuvant/neoadjuvant setting, data do not support the routine addition of platinum to anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and talazoparib) are preferable to nonplatinum single-agent chemotherapy for treatment of advanced BC in BRCA1/2 carriers. Data are insufficient to recommend PARP inhibitor use in the early setting or in moderate-penetrance carriers. Additional information available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Breast-conserving therapy is safe both within BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers with breast cancer in the Chinese population

Background

BRCA1/2 mutation is associated with a high risk of breast cancer, which may preclude breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutation from breast-conserving therapy (BCT) [breast-conserving surgery (BCS), followed by radiotherapy, BCT]. It is debatable whether BCT could be a rational choice for Chinese breast cancer patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation.

Methods

The study comprised a cohort of women with invasive breast cancer either receiving BCT or mastectomy following the criteria for the germline BRCA1/2 mutation test. Germline DNA for BRCA1/2 testing was derived from blood samples. Survival analyses were performed. The correlations were analyzed between survival and distinct types of surgery. To compare the survival between different surgical management, Kaplan-Meier univariate analysis and multivariate Cox regression was used.

Results

In BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (N=176) and noncarriers (N=293), 25% and 27.3% of the patients received BCT, respectively (P=0.675). Patients receiving mastectomy (without radiotherapy or followed by radiotherapy) have larger tumor size (P<0.05 both in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers), prognostically worse tumor characteristics including significantly more advanced TNM stage (P=0.017 and P<0.0001 respectively) and more positive lymph nodes (P=0.008 and P<0.0001, respectively) both in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers. Still, more often received systemic therapy has also been observed. After adjustment for clinical-pathological characteristics and systemic treatment, patients who received BCT had a similar breast cancer disease-free survival compared with patients who received mastectomy, both in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and noncarriers [HR _BRCA1/2 =1.17, confidence interval (CI): 0.57-2.39, P=0.68; HR_noncarriers =0.91, CI: 0.47-1.77, P=0.79, respectively). The recurrence free survival after BCT did not differ from mastectomy in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers [BCT, 5-year cumulative recurrence-free survival (RFS) =0.95, CI: 0.89-1.00; mastectomy, 5-year cumulative RFS =0.93, CI: 0.85-1.00], even better for BCT in noncarriers (BCT, 5-year cumulative RFS =0.67, CI: 0.42-0.89; mastectomy, 5-year cumulative RFS =0.83, CI: 0.71-0.95).

Conclusions

Thus, BCT may be a safe and rational choice for Chinese female breast cancer patients with a BRCA1/2 mutation. However, tumor size, the TNM stage, the number of positive lymph nodes, might be taken into consideration when choosing surgical management.

The inhibitory effects of cisplatin-radiation combination treatment on malignant osteosarcoma MG-63 cells and BRCA1-p53 pathways are more efficient than single treatments

The poor prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma remains a persistent problem, in particular for patients with unresectable tumors or metastasis. Therefore, combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy has been considered for patients with metastasis or recurrence, patients unsuitable for surgery and patients refusing surgery. The present study aimed to investigate the effect of the combined treatment with cisplatin and radiation therapy on the biological characteristics of the osteosarcoma cell line MG-63 and the breast cancer 1 (BRCA1)-associated signaling pathways. Cell proliferation was determined using Cell Counting kit-8 assay, and cell apoptosis and cell cycle were assessed by flow cytometry. Cell migration was examined by Transwell assay. The mRNA and protein expression levels of candidate genes, including BRCA1 and p53, were determined by reverse transcription-quantitative PCR and western blotting, respectively. The results demonstrated that combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin significantly inhibited MG-63 cell proliferation compared with radiation or cisplatin treatment alone. Furthermore, radiation, cisplatin or the combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin increased the apoptosis rate of MG-63 cells, which resulted in G₂ phase arrest, and significantly decreased the migratory capacity of MG-63 cells. In addition, the apoptosis rate of MG-63 cells following combined radiation and cisplatin treatment was higher compared with the cisplatin group, but lower compared with the radiation group. Furthermore, combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin decreased the mRNA and protein expression levels of BRCA1 and p53. Additionally, combined treatment with radiation and cisplatin had a more potent inhibitory effect on p53 expression than on BRCA1 expression. In addition, combination of radiation and cisplatin had a higher inhibitory effect on Bax protein level and a higher inductive effect on Bcl-2 protein level compared with treatments with radiation and cisplatin alone. The results demonstrated that combined treatment of radiation and cisplatin exhibited superior therapeutic effects on osteosarcoma MG-63 cells compared with radiation or cisplatin treatment alone, which may be mediated by the BRCA1-p53 signaling pathway.

Breast reconstruction after risk-reducing mastectomy in BRCA mutation carriers

BACKGROUND

Breast reconstruction is a favorable option for women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (BRCA1/2^Mut+) who undergo risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). We assessed characteristics of patients who underwent RRM, with or without breast reconstruction.

METHODS

We included 46 patients with BRCA1/2^Mut+ who underwent RRM from July 2011 to December 2017.

RESULTS

Among the 46 patients who underwent RRM, 3 had not been diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) and 43 had cancer in a single breast; 33 patients (71.7%) underwent breast reconstruction with RRM; and 13 patients (28.3%) did not undergo breast reconstruction. All of 3 patients who had not been diagnosed with BC underwent bilateral RRM with breast reconstruction. There was no significant difference of clinical characteristic between patients undergoing RRM with and without breast reconstruction. However, patients who decided to undergo RRM with the current diagnosis of BC had significantly higher rates of RRM with breast reconstruction than that of patients with a past history of BC (P = 0.043). The rate of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) in patients with breast reconstruction was significantly higher (28 of the 37 breasts, 75.7%) than that in patients without reconstruction (3 of the 14 breasts, 21.4%) (P < 0.001). Two patients who had complications underwent RRM with breast reconstruction, and one of them had a history of irradiation after lumpectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

For BRCA1/2^Mut+ patients, the decision of taking RRM with the diagnosis of current BC might affect whether they undergo immediate breast reconstruction with RRM. These patients who undergo RRM with breast reconstruction preferred NSM to skin-sparing mastectomies.

A novel loss-of-function heterozygous BRCA2 c.8946_8947delAG mutation found in a Chinese woman with family history of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer is the most frequent female malignancy worldwide. Among them, some cases have hereditary susceptibility in two leading genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Heterozygous germ line mutations in them are related with increased risk of breast, ovarian and other cancer, following autosomal dominant inheritance mode.

METHODS AND RESULTS

For purpose of early finding, early diagnosis and early treatment, mutation detecting of BRCA1/2 genes was performed in unselected 300 breast or ovarian patients and unaffected women using next-generation sequencing and then confirmed by Sanger sequencing. A non-previously reported heterozygous mutation c.8946_8947delAG (p.D2983FfsX34) of BRCA2 gene was identified in an unaffected Chinese woman with family history of breast cancer (her breast cancer mother, also carrying this mutation). The BRCA2-truncated protein resulted from the frame shift mutation was found to lose two putative nuclear localization signals and a Rad51-binding motif in the extreme C-terminal region by bioinformatic prediction. And then in vitro experiments showed that nearly all the mutant protein was unable to translocate to the nucleus to perform DNA repair activity. This novel mutant BRCA2 protein is dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

We classify the mutation into disease causing and conclude that it is the risk factor for breast cancer in this family. So, conducting the same mutation test and providing genetic counseling for this family is practically meaningful and significant. Meanwhile, the identification of this new mutation enriches the Breast Cancer Information Core database, especially in China.

A novel injectable phospholipid gel co-loaded with doxorubicin and bromotetrandrine for resistant breast cancer treatment by intratumoral injection

Systemically administered anticancer treatments were greatly limited by extensive side effects mainly due to nonspecific distributions in vivo, and multidrug resistance in various tumors. A phospholipids-based in situ-forming gel platform has been developed for the concurrent delivery of doxorubicin (DOX) and bromotetrandrin (W198). Phospholipid gel containing DOX and W198 remained in a solution (sol) state before injection and underwent rapid gelation after injection in vivo. The release of DOX and W198 from phospholipid gel (PG) was sustained in vitro for over 20 days (d). DOX and W198 from PG achieved prolonged release for over two weeks in rats via subcutaneous injection. Compared with repeated injections of free drug, eliminated cardiac toxicity and less bone marrow inhibition were observed for DOX and W198-loaded PG (DOX/W198-PG) in normal rats via subcutaneous injection. Also, a single intratumoral injection of DOX/W198-PG in the resistant MCF-7/Adr xenograft-bearing mice showed much better antitumor efficacy compared to other treatment groups. In sum, DOX/W198-PG was well demonstrated to achieve sustained drug release both in vitro and in vivo with eliminated toxicity and improved antitumor efficacy by reversing the multidrug resistance in breast cancers.