Efficacy and Safety of Selective Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Compared with Sorafenib for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials

The need for new algorithms of treatment sequencing in clear-cell metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Introduction: In recent years, the systemic treatment of patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC) has undergone profound innovations, offering the availability of new drugs, and raising the bar of the survival expectation in this, previously, almost-always, incurable disease. The likeliness of reaching durable response and long-term survival is still closely linked to good clinical management and smart treatment sequencing, rather than to a single systemic treatment choice.Areas covered: We review all systemic therapeutic options currently available, describe the evidence behind the current options available for mRCC patient treatment, and provide our personal cues to support clinical decisions.Expert opinion: The IMDC classification is still the only widely validated tool for the choice of primary therapy. Other elements should then be considered for selecting patients who can still receive TKI monotherapy (good-risk patients) or who deserve an 'all-at-once' approach with TKI plus ICI (poor-risk patients with the high metastatic burden and poor-prognosis organ involvement, likely not able to achieve a second chance), identifying these two 'extreme' situations and setting all the other treatment choices on the basis of several nuances. In the second- and further-line settings, ad-hoc prospective trials are awaited.

The Effectiveness of Sorafenib over Other Targeted Agents in the Second-Line Treatment of Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Meta-Analysis

The aim of the study was to perform a meta-analysis to compare the therapeutic effects and adverse events (AEs) of sorafenib in second-line treatments of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). We searched online electronic databases: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane library updated on November 2017.Trials of the effectiveness of sorafenib in second-line treatments of advanced RCC were included, of which the main outcomes were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and grade 3/4 AE. Other TAs significantly reduced the risk of PFS compared to sorafenib with respect to second-line treatment (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.65-0.83; p < 0.00001). No significant differences were, however, found in patients in terms of the ORR (HR = 1.82; 95% CI, 0.98-3.35; p = 0.06). Frequencies of the most common toxicities were overall similar and adverse events differed only in sensitivity analysis in rash with exclusion of other TAs (HR = 0.16; 95% CI, 0.05-0.52; p = 0.002). Overall survival was not debated between groups. In patients with mRCC, second-line sorafenib is associated with similar ORR as other target agents. While, sorafenib did not demonstrate a PFS advantage compared with other target agents, suggests sorafenib may not benefit patients with mRCC. Tolerability due to toxicities is similar compared sorafenib with other target agents. Further characterization of the RCC oncogenic pathway, and the ongoing clinical trials should help optimize the treatment option for second-line therapy of advanced renal cell carcinoma.