1
|
Tahir IM, Rauf A, Mehboob H, Sadaf S, Alam MS, Kalsoom F, Bouyahya A, El Allam A, El Omari N, Bakrim S, Akram M, Raza SK, Emran TB, Mabkhot YN, Zengin G, Derkho M, Natalya S, Shariati MA. Prognostic significance of programmed death-1 and programmed death ligand-1 proteins in breast cancer. Hum Antibodies 2022; 30:131-150. [PMID: 35938242 DOI: 10.3233/hab-220001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
In numerous studies related to tumor prognosis, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been identified as a biomarker. This work aimed to determine the prognostic importance of PD-L1 in breast cancer. We searched electronic databases such as PubMed, Google scholar, home pages of publishing groups, medical, clinical, and pharmaceutical sciences journals, as well as other relevant sources to discover the importance of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in breast cancer therapies and also recurrence. The keywords used in this search were autoimmunity, programmed cell death, PD-L1 or PD-1, and breast cancer. Our inclusion criteria included studies showing the synergy between the expression of PD-L1 and PD-1 in primary breast cancers as prognostic markers and this research was limited to humans only. We included review articles, original research, letters to the editor, case reports, and short communications in our study, published in English. We focused our work on PD-L1 mRNA expression in breast cancer cell lines. PD-L1 expression has been decisively demonstrated to be a high-risk factor for breast cancer with a bad prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imtiaz Mahmood Tahir
- College of Allied Health Professionals, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Abdur Rauf
- Department of Chemistry, University of Swabi, KPK, Pakistan
| | - Huma Mehboob
- Department of Biochemistry, Government College Women University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Samia Sadaf
- Department of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh
| | - Muhammad Shaiful Alam
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Science and Technology Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh
| | - Fadia Kalsoom
- College of Allied Health Professionals, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Abdelhakim Bouyahya
- Laboratory of Human Pathologies Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| | - Aicha El Allam
- Laboratory of Human Pathologies Biology, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Morocco
| | - Nasreddine El Omari
- Laboratory of Histology, Embryology, and Cytogenetics, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
| | - Saad Bakrim
- Geo-Bio-Environment Engineering and Innovation Laboratory, Molecular Engineering, Biotechnologies and Innovation Team, Polydisciplinary Faculty of Taroudant, Ibn Zohr University, Agadir, Morocco
| | - Muhammad Akram
- Department of Eastern Medicine, Government College University Faisalabad Pakistan, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Syed Kashif Raza
- College of Allied Health Professionals, Government College University, Faisalabad, Pakistan
| | - Talha Bin Emran
- Department of Pharmacy, BGC Trust University Bangladesh, Chittagong, Bangladesh.,Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Daffodil International University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Yahia N Mabkhot
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, King Khalid University, Abha, Saudi Arabia
| | - Gokhan Zengin
- Department of Biology, Science Faculty, Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Marina Derkho
- South-Urals State Agrarian University, Troitsk, Chelyabinsk Region, Russia
| | - Suray Natalya
- K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (The First Cossack University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Mohammad Ali Shariati
- K.G. Razumovsky Moscow State University of Technologies and Management (The First Cossack University), Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chowdhury S, Bappy MH, Clocchiatti-Tuozzo S, Cheeti S, Chowdhury S, Patel V. Current Advances in Immunotherapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme and Future Prospects. Cureus 2021; 13:e20604. [PMID: 35103180 PMCID: PMC8782638 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Glioblastoma is the most frequent and malignant type of brain tumor. It has a reputation for being resistant to current treatments, and the prognosis is still bleak. Immunotherapies have transformed the treatment of a variety of cancers, and they provide great hope for glioblastoma, although they have yet to be successful. The justification for immune targeting of glioblastoma and the obstacles that come with treating these immunosuppressive tumors are reviewed in this paper. Cancer vaccines, oncolytic viruses (OVs), checkpoint blockade medications, adoptive cell transfer (ACT), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells, and nanomedicine-based immunotherapies are among the novel immune-targeting therapies researched in glioblastoma. Key clinical trial outcomes and current trials for each method are presented from a clinical standpoint. Finally, constraints, whether biological or due to trial design, are discussed, along with solutions for overcoming them. In glioblastoma, proof of efficacy for immunotherapy approaches has yet to be demonstrated, but our rapidly growing understanding of the disease’s biology and immune microenvironment, as well as the emergence of novel promising combinatorial approaches, may allow researchers to finally meet the medical need for patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).
Collapse
|
3
|
Youssef G, Dietrich J. Ipilimumab: an investigational immunotherapy for glioblastoma. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2020; 29:1187-1193. [PMID: 32945231 DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2020.1826436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant central nervous system tumor and has a poor overall outcome despite an aggressive standard-of-care treatment. Hence, better therapeutic modalities are necessary. Immunotherapy is a novel modality that has an indirect action against the tumor cells through activation of an anti-tumor immune response. AREAS COVERED Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) belongs to a class of molecules called immune checkpoints that are inherently expressed on immune cells and lead to attenuation of the immune response. Inhibition of such molecules has been approved for the treatment of melanoma, and prolonged survival and complete responses have been reported in preclinical GBM mouse models. Ipilimumab inhibits CTLA-4 and is being investigated for the treatment of GBM, alone or in combination with other treatment modalities, in various preclinical and clinical studies, the results of the most relevant of which are discussed in this review. EXPERT OPINION Combining ipilimumab with other immunotherapy modalities and using it in specific conditions may increase the rate of objective responses in patients with GBM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gilbert Youssef
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jorg Dietrich
- MGH Cancer Center, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Division of Neuro-Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School , Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Esteva FJ, Hubbard-Lucey VM, Tang J, Pusztai L. Immunotherapy and targeted therapy combinations in metastatic breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2020; 20:e175-e186. [PMID: 30842061 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30026-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 267] [Impact Index Per Article: 66.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 01/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Immunotherapy is emerging as a new treatment modality in breast cancer. After long-standing use of endocrine therapy and targeted biological therapy, improved understanding of immune evasion by cancer cells and the discovery of selective immune checkpoint inhibitors have created novel opportunities for treatment. Single-drug therapies with monoclonal antibodies against programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have shown little efficacy in patients with metastatic breast cancer, in part because of the low number of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes in most breast cancers. There is growing interest in the development of combinations of immunotherapy and molecularly targeted therapies for metastatic breast cancer. In this Personal View, we review the available data and ongoing efforts to establish the safety and efficacy of immunotherapeutic approaches in combination with HER2-targeted therapy, inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6, angiogenesis inhibitors, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, as well as chemotherapy and radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco J Esteva
- Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Jun Tang
- Anna-Maria Kellen Clinical Accelerator, Cancer Research Institute, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lajos Pusztai
- Yale School of Medicine, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|