1
|
Thariat J, Ferrand FR, Fakhry N, Even C, Vergez S, Chabrillac E, Sarradin V, Digue L, Troussier I, Bensadoun RJ. Radiotherapy for salivary gland cancer: REFCOR recommendations by the formal consensus method. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2024; 141:221-226. [PMID: 38030445 DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the indications for radiotherapy in salivary gland cancer and to specify the modalities and target radiation volumes. MATERIAL AND METHODS The French Network of Rare Head and Neck Tumors (REFCOR) formed a steering group which drafted a narrative review of the literature published on Medline and proposed recommendations. The level of adherence to the recommendations was then assessed by a rating group, according to the formal consensus method. RESULTS Postoperatively, radiotherapy to the primary tumor site±to the lymph nodes is indicated if one or more of the following adverse histoprognostic factors are present (risk>10% of locoregional recurrence): T3-T4 category, lymph node invasion, extraglandular invasion, close or positive surgical margins, high tumor grade, perineural invasion, vascular emboli, and/or bone invasion. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is the gold standard. For unresectable cancers or inoperable patients, carbon ion hadrontherapy may be considered. CONCLUSION Radiotherapy in salivary gland cancer is indicated in postoperative situations in case of adverse histoprognostic factors and for inoperable tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Thariat
- Département de radiothérapie, centre François-Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - F-R Ferrand
- French Armed Forces Biomedical Research Institute, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - N Fakhry
- Département d'ORL et chirurgie cervico-faciale, hôpital La Conception, AP-HM, Aix-Marseille University, 147, boulevard Baille, 13005 Marseille, France.
| | - C Even
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - S Vergez
- Département de chirurgie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France; Département de chirurgie ORL et cervico-faciale, CHU de Toulouse-Larrey, université Toulouse III Paul-Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - E Chabrillac
- Département de chirurgie, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - V Sarradin
- Département d'oncologie médicale, institut universitaire du cancer Toulouse - Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - L Digue
- Département d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France
| | - I Troussier
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre de haute énergie, Nice, France
| | - R-J Bensadoun
- Département d'oncologie radiothérapie, centre de haute énergie, Nice, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van Herpen C, Vander Poorten V, Skalova A, Terhaard C, Maroldi R, van Engen A, Baujat B, Locati LD, Jensen AD, Smeele L, Hardillo J, Martineau VC, Trama A, Kinloch E, Even C, Machiels JP. Salivary gland cancer: ESMO-European Reference Network on Rare Adult Solid Cancers (EURACAN) Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100602. [PMID: 36567082 PMCID: PMC9808465 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
•This ESMO–EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing salivary gland cancer. •The guideline covers clinical and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •Treatment algorithms for parotid, submandibular, sublingual and minor salivary gland cancer are provided. •The author group encompasses a multidisciplinary group of experts from different institutions and countries in Europe. •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the authors’ collective expert opinion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C van Herpen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society, Geneva, Switzerland. https://twitter.com/myESMO
| | - V Vander Poorten
- Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Oncology, Section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Skalova
- Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - C Terhaard
- Multidisciplinary Salivary Gland Society, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R Maroldi
- Department of Radiology, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia-University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - A van Engen
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - B Baujat
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sorbonne Université Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - L D Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - A D Jensen
- Faculty of Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Marburg; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Gießen and Marburg (UKGM) Ltd, Gießen, Germany
| | - L Smeele
- Department of Head and Neck Oncology and Surgery, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis & Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam
| | - J Hardillo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - A Trama
- Evaluative Epidemiology, Department of Research, Fondazione IRCSS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - E Kinloch
- Salivary Gland Cancer UK, London, UK
| | - C Even
- Head and Neck Department, Gustave Roussy, Paris; French Network for Rare Head and Neck Cancers, Paris, France
| | - J-P Machiels
- Service d'Oncologie Médicale, Institut Roi Albert II, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels; Institut de Recherche Clinique et Expérimentale, Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colombo E, Van Lierde C, Zlate A, Jensen A, Gatta G, Didonè F, Licitra LF, Grégoire V, Vander Poorten V, Locati LD. Salivary gland cancers in elderly patients: challenges and therapeutic strategies. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1032471. [PMID: 36505842 PMCID: PMC9733538 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1032471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Salivary gland carcinomas (SGCs) are the most heterogeneous subgroup of head and neck malignant tumors, accounting for more than 20 subtypes. The median age of SGC diagnosis is expected to rise in the following decades, leading to crucial clinical challenges in geriatric oncology. Elderly patients, in comparison with patients aged below 65 years, are generally considered less amenable to receiving state-of-the-art curative treatments for localized disease, such as surgery and radiation/particle therapy. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy regimens are often dampened by the consideration of cardiovascular and renal comorbidities. Nevertheless, the elderly population encompasses a broad spectrum of functionalities. In the last decades, some screening tools (e.g. the G8 questionnaire) have been developed to identify those subjects who should receive a multidimensional geriatric assessment, to answer the question about the feasibility of complex treatments. In the present article, we discuss the most frequent SGC histologies diagnosed in the elderly population and the relative 5-years survival outcomes based on the most recent data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. Moreover, we review the therapeutic strategies currently available for locoregionally advanced and metastatic disease, taking into account the recent advances in precision oncology. The synergy between the Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and the Geriatrician aims to shape the most appropriate treatment pathway for each elderly patient, focusing on global functionality instead of the sole chronological age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Colombo
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Charlotte Van Lierde
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Alexandra Zlate
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Alexandra Jensen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Giessen and Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany
| | - Gemma Gatta
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabio Didonè
- Evaluative Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa F. Licitra
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Leon Berard, Lyon, France
| | - Vander Vander Poorten
- Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven and Department of Oncology, section Head and Neck Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laura D. Locati
- Head and Neck Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Biau J, Nutting C, Langendijk J, Frédéric-Moreau T, Thariat J, Piram L, Bellini R, Saroul N, Pham Dang N, O'Sullivan B, Giralt J, Blanchard P, Bourhis J, Lapeyre M. Radiographic-anatomy, natural history and extension pathways of parotid and submandibular gland cancers. Radiother Oncol 2022; 170:48-54. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
5
|
Patterns of care analysis for salivary gland cancer: a survey within the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) and recommendations for daily practice. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 198:123-134. [PMID: 34427717 PMCID: PMC8789700 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01833-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 07/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Background Salivary gland cancer (SGC) is rare and a heterogeneous type of cancer. Prospective randomized trials are lacking. No guideline focusing on standard procedures of radiotherapy (RT) in the treatment of SGC exists. Therefore, we surveyed the members of the German Society of Radiation Oncology (DEGRO) to gain information about current therapeutic strategies of SGC. Methods An anonymous questionnaire was designed and made available on the online platform umfrageonline.com. The corresponding link was sent to all DEGRO members who provided their user data for contact purposes. Alternatively, a PDF printout version was sent. Frequency distributions of responses for each question were calculated. The data were also analyzed by type of institution. Results Sixty-seven responses were received, including answers from 21 university departments, 22 non-university institutions, and 24 radiation oncology practices. Six participants reported that their departments (practice: n = 5, non-university hospital: n = 1) did not treat SGC, and therefore the questionnaire was not completed. Concerning radiation techniques, target volume definition, and concomitant chemotherapy, treatment strategies varied greatly among the participants. Comparing university vs. non-university institutions, university hospitals treat significantly more patients with SGC per year and initiated more molecular pathological diagnostics. Conclusion SGC represents a major challenge for clinicians, as reflected by the inhomogeneous survey results regarding diagnostics, RT approaches, and systemic therapy. Future prospective, multicenter clinical trials are warranted to improve and homogenize treatment of SGC and to individualize treatment according to histologic subtypes and risk factors. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00066-021-01833-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
|
6
|
Amit M, Bell D, Hunt PJ, Hanna E, Su SY, Kupferman M, Aashiq M, Takahashi H, Gidley PW, Nader ME, DeMonte F, Raza SM. Surgical management of carcinomas of the infratemporal fossa and skull base: patterns of failure and predictors of long-term outcomes. J Neurosurg 2021; 134:1392-1398. [PMID: 32534492 DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.jns192630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Infratemporal fossa (ITF) tumors are unique in histological characteristics and difficult to treat. Predictors of patient outcomes in this context are not known. The objective of this study was to identify independent predictors of outcome and to characterize patterns of failure in patients with ITF carcinoma. METHODS All patients who had been surgically treated for anterolateral skull base malignancy between 1999 and 2017 at the authors' institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, preoperative performance status, tumor stage, tumor characteristics, treatment modalities, and pathological data were collected. Primary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS) and local progression-free survival (LPFS) rates. Overall survival (OS) and patterns of progression were secondary outcomes. RESULTS Forty ITF malignancies with skull base involvement were classified as carcinoma. Negative margins were achieved in 23 patients (58%). Median DSS and LPFS were 32 and 12 months, respectively. Five-year DSS and OS rates were 55% and 36%, respectively. The 5-year LPFS rate was 69%. The 5-year overall PFS rate was 53%. Disease recurrence was noted in 28% of patients. Age, preoperative performance status, and margin status were statistically significant prognostic factors for DSS. Lower preoperative performance status and positive surgical margins increased the probability of local recurrence. CONCLUSIONS The ability to achieve negative margins was significantly associated with improved tumor control rates and DSS. Cranial base surgical approaches must be considered in multimodal treatment regimens for anterolateral skull base carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moran Amit
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Patrick J Hunt
- 3Baylor College of Medicine; and
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ehab Hanna
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | - Shirley Y Su
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Mohamed Aashiq
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Paul W Gidley
- 1Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Division of Surgery
| | | | - Franco DeMonte
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shaan M Raza
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gao Y, Zheng L, Zhang JG, Liu SM, Zhang JY, Dong S. Surgery combined with iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of parotid adenoid cystic carcinoma: A single-institution experience. Brachytherapy 2020; 20:383-392. [PMID: 33309285 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.09.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the combination of surgery plus postoperative iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for treatment of adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) of the parotid. METHODS AND MATERIALS This study included a retrospective analysis of the data of patients who underwent postoperative iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy for histology-confirmed ACC of the parotid between January 2002 and November 2018 in Peking University Hospital of Stomatology. Acute and long-term radiation-related toxicities were assessed by the criteria of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the factors affecting overall survival, disease-free survival (DFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). RESULTS A total of 86 patients (53 women; median age 50 years, SD = 13.1) were included. Median followup was for 45.5 months. About half the patients (44/86, 51.3%) had clinical stage IV disease. Local recurrence occurred in 11 of 86 (12.8%) patients. No patient had nodal metastases in the followup period. The five- and 10-year DFS rates were 74.8% and 66.6%, respectively. The mean DMFS was 60.6 months. On multivariate analysis, preoperative facial palsy, type of surgery, perineural spread (PNS), and distant metastases were independent prognostic factors for DFS; preoperative facial palsy, nodal metastases, and PNS were independent prognostic factors for overall survival; and preoperative facial palsy, type of surgery, PNS, and pathological type were independent prognostic factor for DMFS. CONCLUSIONS The combination of surgery and iodine-125 interstitial brachytherapy appears to be an effective and safe treatment for primary ACC of the parotid.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ya Gao
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Zheng
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China.
| | - Jian-Guo Zhang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China
| | - Shu-Ming Liu
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China
| | - Jian-Yun Zhang
- Department of Pathology, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China
| | - Shuang Dong
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School of Stomatology, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|