1
|
Gawne PJ, Bryant HE, DuBois SG, George SL, Gray J, Knox L, Matchett KB, Peet C, Vallis KA, Wallace HJ, Wan S, Gaze MN. Theranostics for Neuroblastoma: Making Molecular Radiotherapy Work Better. J Nucl Med 2025:jnumed.124.269121. [PMID: 39978816 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2025] [Indexed: 02/22/2025] Open
Abstract
Despite improvements in neuroblastoma treatment, survival figures lag behind those of many other childhood malignancies. New treatments, and better use of existing treatments, are essential to reduce mortality. Neuroblastoma expresses several molecular targets for radionuclide imaging and therapy, of which the most widely exploited is the norepinephrine transporter. [123I]metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) imaging and [131I]MIBG treatment, which target this physiologic pathway, have been in clinical practice for 40 y. Although therapy outcomes have been favorable, [131I]MIBG use has not yet been optimized. Somatostatin receptors and the disialoganglioside are alternative targets, but their use remains experimental. The charity Children's Cancer Research Fund organized a workshop bringing together a broad range of scientists including radiochemists, radiobiologists, radiation physicists, clinical researchers including pediatric oncologists and nuclear medicine physicians, and patient advocates from the United Kingdom, United States, and continental Europe to share their experiences with molecular imaging and radiotherapy of neuroblastoma and discuss potential ways of improving treatment outcomes and access. These include development of alternative vectors targeting somatostatin receptors and disialoganglioside, isotopes such as α-particle and Auger electron emitters with different radiation characteristics, and combinations with external-beam radiotherapy, immunotherapy, and DNA damage repair inhibitors. Barriers to progress discussed included the unpredictable radioisotope supply, production of novel radiopharmaceuticals, lack of data regarding which are the best combination therapies, and insufficient clinical facilities. The aim was to stimulate the development and assessment of more effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter J Gawne
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers and Biotherapeutics, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary, University of London, London, United Kingdom
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Helen E Bryant
- School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Steven G DuBois
- Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sally L George
- Division of Clinical Studies, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
- Children and Young People's Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Juliet Gray
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Leona Knox
- Solving Kids' Cancer, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kyle B Matchett
- Personalised Medicine Centre and Clinical Translational Research and Innovation Centre, Altnagelvin Area Hospital, School of Medicine, Ulster University, Derry-Londonderry, United Kingdom
| | - Connie Peet
- Department of Radiotherapy, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Hugh J Wallace
- Paediatric Nuclear Medicine, Royal Hospital for Children, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Physics and Bioengineering, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust/University College London, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom @ucl.ac.uk
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huesa-Berral C, Terry JF, Kunz L, Bertolet A. Sequencing microsphere selective internal radiotherapy after external beam radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: proof of concept of a synergistic combination. Br J Radiol 2025; 98:50-57. [PMID: 39418205 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2024] [Revised: 09/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/11/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to explore the synergistic effects of combining stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) in that specific sequence for treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly in patients at high risk of radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). METHODS We analysed a case of a patient with HCC who was treated with SBRT at our institution. A virtual 90Y dose distribution was added using our in-house MIDOS model to keep a minimum dose to the healthy liver tissue. BED and EUD metrics were calculated to harmonize the dose distributions of SBRT and SIRT. RESULTS Our radiation biology-based models suggest that the combination of SBRT and SIRT could maintain effective tumour control while reducing the dose to normal liver tissue. Specifically, an SBRT plan of 10 Gy×3 fractions combined with SIRT yielded comparable tumour control probability to an SBRT-only plan of 10 Gy×5 fractions. CONCLUSIONS The combination of SBRT and SIRT is a promising treatment strategy for HCC patients at high risk of RILD. While the LQ model and associated formalisms provide a useful starting point, further studies are needed to account for factors beyond these models. Nonetheless, the potential for significant dose reduction to normal tissue suggests that this combination therapy could offer substantial clinical benefits. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This article presents a proposal to combine SBRT and SIRT, in this specific order, for HCC, discussing its advantages. A framework for future research into optimizing combination therapy for HCC is provided, utilizing a novel HCC vascular model to simulate 90Y doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos Huesa-Berral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Jack F Terry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Louis Kunz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| | - Alejandro Bertolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cicone F, Gnesin S, Santo G, Stokke C, Bartolomei M, Cascini GL, Minniti G, Paganelli G, Verger A, Cremonesi M. Do we need dosimetry for the optimization of theranostics in CNS tumors? Neuro Oncol 2024; 26:S242-S258. [PMID: 39351795 PMCID: PMC11631076 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noae200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical theranostic treatments have grown exponentially worldwide, and internal dosimetry has attracted attention and resources. Despite some similarities with chemotherapy, radiopharmaceutical treatments are essentially radiotherapy treatments, as the release of radiation into tissues is the determinant of the observed clinical effects. Therefore, absorbed dose calculations are key to explaining dose-effect correlations and individualizing radiopharmaceutical treatments. The present article introduces the basic principles of internal dosimetry and provides an overview of available loco-regional and systemic radiopharmaceutical treatments for central nervous system (CNS) tumors. The specific characteristics of dosimetry as applied to these treatments are highlighted, along with their limitations and most relevant results. Dosimetry is performed with higher precision and better reproducibility than in the past, and dosimetric data should be systematically collected, as treatment planning and verification may help exploit the full potential of theranostic of CNS tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Giulia Santo
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Caroline Stokke
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Diagnostic Physics and Computational Radiology, Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Oncology and Haematology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucio Cascini
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, “Magna Graecia” University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Minniti
- IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli (IS), Italy
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Anatomical Pathology, “Sapienza” University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanni Paganelli
- IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori,”Meldola, Italy
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU-Nancy, IADI, INSERM, UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Calistri S, Ottaviano G, Ubaldini A. Radiopharmaceuticals for Pancreatic Cancer: A Review of Current Approaches and Future Directions. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:1314. [PMID: 39458955 PMCID: PMC11510189 DOI: 10.3390/ph17101314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2024] [Revised: 09/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer requires novel treatment options. This review examines the evolution of radiopharmaceuticals in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Established strategies such as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) offer targeted and effective treatment, compared to conventional treatments. However, there are currently no radiopharmaceuticals approved for the treatment of pancreatic cancer in Europe, which requires further research and novel approaches. New radiopharmaceuticals including radiolabeled antibodies, peptides, and nanotechnological approaches are promising in addressing the challenges of pancreatic cancer therapy. These new agents may offer more specific targeting and potentially improve efficacy compared to traditional therapies. Further research is needed to optimize efficacy, address limitations, and explore the overall potential of these new strategies in the treatment of this aggressive and harmful pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Calistri
- Department of Pharmacy and Biotechnology, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
- ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, C.R. Bologna, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna, Italy; (G.O.); (A.U.)
| | - Giuseppe Ottaviano
- ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, C.R. Bologna, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna, Italy; (G.O.); (A.U.)
| | - Alberto Ubaldini
- ENEA, Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development, C.R. Bologna, Via Martiri di Monte Sole 4, 40129 Bologna, Italy; (G.O.); (A.U.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Adam DP, Grudzinski JJ, Marsh IR, Hill PM, Cho SY, Bradshaw TJ, Longcor J, Burr A, Bruce JY, Harari PM, Bednarz BP. Voxel-Level Dosimetry for Combined Iodine 131 Radiopharmaceutical Therapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy Treatment Paradigms for Head and Neck Cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:1275-1284. [PMID: 38367914 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) shows promise as a method to increase tumor control and mitigate potential high-grade toxicities associated with re-treatment for patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. This work establishes a patient-specific dosimetry framework that combines Monte Carlo-based dosimetry from the 2 radiation modalities at the voxel level using deformable image registration (DIR) and radiobiological constructs for patients enrolled in a phase 1 clinical trial combining EBRT and RPT. METHODS AND MATERIALS Serial single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/computed tomography (CT) patient scans were performed at approximately 24, 48, 72, and 168 hours postinjection of 577.2 MBq/m2 (15.6 mCi/m2) CLR 131, an iodine 131-containing RPT agent. Using RayStation, clinical EBRT treatment plans were created with a treatment planning CT (TPCT). SPECT/CT images were deformably registered to the TPCT using the Elastix DIR module in 3D Slicer software and assessed by measuring mean activity concentrations and absorbed doses. Monte Carlo EBRT dosimetry was computed using EGSnrc. RPT dosimetry was conducted using RAPID, a GEANT4-based RPT dosimetry platform. Radiobiological metrics (biologically effective dose and equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions) were used to combine the 2 radiation modalities. RESULTS The DIR method provided good agreement for the activity concentrations and calculated absorbed dose in the tumor volumes for the SPECT/CT and TPCT images, with a maximum mean absorbed dose difference of -11.2%. Based on the RPT absorbed dose calculations, 2 to 4 EBRT fractions were removed from patient EBRT treatments. For the combined treatment, the absorbed dose to target volumes ranged from 57.14 to 75.02 Gy. When partial volume corrections were included, the mean equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions to the planning target volume from EBRT + RPT differed -3.11% to 1.40% compared with EBRT alone. CONCLUSIONS This work demonstrates the clinical feasibility of performing combined EBRT + RPT dosimetry on TPCT scans. Dosimetry guides treatment decisions for EBRT, and this work provides a bridge for the same paradigm to be implemented within the rapidly emerging clinical RPT space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P Adam
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Joseph J Grudzinski
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Ian R Marsh
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Patrick M Hill
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Steve Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Tyler J Bradshaw
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | | - Adam Burr
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Justine Y Bruce
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Paul M Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin; University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Bryan P Bednarz
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yang H, Liu H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Chen Y. Metastatic Lung Adenocarcinoma Received Combined 177 Lu-FAP-2286 Radiation Therapy and Targeted Therapy. Clin Nucl Med 2024; 49:569-571. [PMID: 38598734 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000005169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A 56-year-old man with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma received combined 177 Lu-FAP-2286 radiation therapy and targeted therapy. After 1 treatment cycle, improvement of symptoms and radiological remission was observed. Moreover, the patient did not report any adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongyu Yang
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University; Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province; and Institute of Nuclear Medicine, Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yit LFN, Li Y. A Review of the Evolving Role of Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Neuroendocrinology 2024; 114:856-865. [PMID: 38432216 DOI: 10.1159/000538140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare tumours that develop from neuroendocrine cells in various parts of the body. The management of this disease poses a significant challenge because of the heterogeneous clinical presentation and varying degrees of aggressiveness. A multidisciplinary approach is often required in complex clinical situations. Radiotherapy (RT) plays a key role in managing NETs in both curative and palliative settings. SUMMARY In this review, we summarize and discuss recent developments in the field of advanced RT in early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic NENs. We highlight limitations in current approaches and discuss future potential treatment strategies for patients with NENs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ling Fung Nelson Yit
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Youquan Li
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cicone F, Sjögreen Gleisner K, Sarnelli A, Indovina L, Gear J, Gnesin S, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Bischof Delaloye A, Valentini V, Cremonesi M. The contest between internal and external-beam dosimetry: The Zeno's paradox of Achilles and the tortoise. Phys Med 2024; 117:103188. [PMID: 38042710 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Radionuclide therapy, also called molecular radiotherapy (MRT), has come of age, with several novel radiopharmaceuticals being approved for clinical use or under development in the last decade. External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a well-established treatment modality, with about half of all oncologic patients expected to receive at least one external radiation treatment over their disease course. The efficacy and the toxicity of both types of treatment rely on the interaction of radiation with biological tissues. Dosimetry played a fundamental role in the scientific and technological evolution of EBRT, and absorbed doses to the target and to the organs at risk are calculated on a routine basis. In contrast, in MRT the usefulness of internal dosimetry has long been questioned, and a structured path to include absorbed dose calculation is missing. However, following a similar route of development as EBRT, MRT treatments could probably be optimized in a significant proportion of patients, likely based on dosimetry and radiobiology. In the present paper we describe the differences and the similarities between internal and external-beam dosimetry in the context of radiation treatments, and we retrace the main stages of their development over the last decades.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cicone
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, "Magna Graecia" University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy; Nuclear Medicine Unit, "Mater Domini" University Hospital, Catanzaro, Italy.
| | | | - Anna Sarnelli
- Medical Physics Unit, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", Meldola, Italy
| | - Luca Indovina
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Jonathan Gear
- Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT & Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK
| | - Silvano Gnesin
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland; University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Nantes Université, Université Angers, CHU Nantes, INSERM, CNRS, CRCI2NA, Médecine Nucléaire, F-44000 Nantes, France
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" IRCCS, Rome, Italy; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Cremonesi
- Unit of Radiation Research, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abdelaziz RF, Hussein AM, Kotob MH, Weiss C, Chelminski K, Stojanovic T, Studenik CR, Aufy M. Enhancement of Radiation Sensitivity by Cathepsin L Suppression in Colon Carcinoma Cells. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:17106. [PMID: 38069428 PMCID: PMC10707098 DOI: 10.3390/ijms242317106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer is one of the main causes of death globally. Radiotherapy/Radiation therapy (RT) is one of the most common and effective cancer treatments. RT utilizes high-energy radiation to damage the DNA of cancer cells, leading to their death or impairing their proliferation. However, radiation resistance remains a significant challenge in cancer treatment, limiting its efficacy. Emerging evidence suggests that cathepsin L (cath L) contributes to radiation resistance through multiple mechanisms. In this study, we investigated the role of cath L, a member of the cysteine cathepsins (caths) in radiation sensitivity, and the potential reduction in radiation resistance by using the specific cath L inhibitor (Z-FY(tBu)DMK) or by knocking out cath L with CRISPR/Cas9 in colon carcinoma cells (caco-2). Cells were treated with different doses of radiation (2, 4, 6, 8, and 10), dose rate 3 Gy/min. In addition, the study conducted protein expression analysis by western blot and immunofluorescence assay, cytotoxicity MTT, and apoptosis assays. The results demonstrated that cath L was upregulated in response to radiation treatment, compared to non-irradiated cells. In addition, inhibiting or knocking out cath L led to increased radiosensitivity in contrast to the negative control group. This may indicate a reduced ability of cancer cells to recover from radiation-induced DNA damage, resulting in enhanced cell death. These findings highlight the possibility of targeting cath L as a therapeutic strategy to enhance the effectiveness of RT. Further studies are needed to elucidate the underlying molecular mechanisms and to assess the translational implications of cath L knockout in clinical settings. Ultimately, these findings may contribute to the development of novel treatment approaches for improving outcomes of RT in cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramadan F. Abdelaziz
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.F.A.); (M.H.K.); (C.W.); (M.A.)
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Str. 5, 1400 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Ahmed M. Hussein
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.F.A.); (M.H.K.); (C.W.); (M.A.)
| | - Mohamed H. Kotob
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.F.A.); (M.H.K.); (C.W.); (M.A.)
| | - Christina Weiss
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.F.A.); (M.H.K.); (C.W.); (M.A.)
| | - Krzysztof Chelminski
- Division of Human Health, International Atomic Energy Agency, Wagramer Str. 5, 1400 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Tamara Stojanovic
- Programme for Proteomics, Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| | - Christian R. Studenik
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.F.A.); (M.H.K.); (C.W.); (M.A.)
| | - Mohammed Aufy
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Division of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria; (R.F.A.); (M.H.K.); (C.W.); (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Giraudet AL. [Combination of internal and external beam radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2023; 27:754-758. [PMID: 37953187 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy and internal vectorized radiation therapy are two types of radiotherapy that can be used to treat cancer. They differ in the way they are administered, and the type of radiation used. Although they can be effective in treating cancer, they each have their own advantages and disadvantages, and their combination could be synergistic. Preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy have mainly used radiolabelled antibodies, whose bone marrow toxicity remains the limiting factor in increasing the administered activities. The use of small radioligands in clinical trials has shown to be better tolerated and more effective, which explains their rapid development. The results of preclinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy appear heterogeneous, making it impossible to determine an ideal therapeutic sequencing scheme, and complicating the transposition to clinical studies. The few clinical studies on combined internal and external beam radiation therapy available to date have demonstrated feasibility and tolerability. More work remains to be done in the fields of dosimetry and radiobiology, as well as in the sequencing of these two irradiation modalities to optimize their combination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A-L Giraudet
- Centre Léon-Bérard, 15, rue Gabriel-Sarrazin, 69008 Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Volpe F, Nappi C, Piscopo L, Zampella E, Mainolfi CG, Ponsiglione A, Imbriaco M, Cuocolo A, Klain M. Emerging Role of Nuclear Medicine in Prostate Cancer: Current State and Future Perspectives. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4746. [PMID: 37835440 PMCID: PMC10571937 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most frequent epithelial neoplasia after skin cancer in men starting from 50 years and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) dosage can be used as an early screening tool. Prostate cancer imaging includes several radiological modalities, ranging from ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance to nuclear medicine hybrid techniques such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT. Innovation in radiopharmaceutical compounds has introduced specific tracers with diagnostic and therapeutic indications, opening the horizons to targeted and very effective clinical care for patients with prostate cancer. The aim of the present review is to illustrate the current knowledge and future perspectives of nuclear medicine, including stand-alone diagnostic techniques and theragnostic approaches, in the clinical management of patients with prostate cancer from initial staging to advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michele Klain
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80138 Naples, Italy; (F.V.); (C.N.); (L.P.); (E.Z.); (C.G.M.); (A.P.); (M.I.); (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
George SC, Samuel EJJ. Developments in 177Lu-based radiopharmaceutical therapy and dosimetry. Front Chem 2023; 11:1218670. [PMID: 37583569 PMCID: PMC10424930 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2023.1218670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
177Lu is a radioisotope that has become increasingly popular as a therapeutic agent for treating various conditions, including neuroendocrine tumors and metastatic prostate cancer. 177Lu-tagged radioligands are molecules precisely designed to target and bind to specific receptors or proteins characteristic of targeted cancer. This review paper will present an overview of the available 177Lu-labelled radioligands currently used to treat patients. Based on recurring, active, and completed clinical trials and other available literature, we evaluate current status, interests, and developments in assessing patient-specific dosimetry, which will define the future of this particular treatment modality. In addition, we will discuss the challenges and opportunities of the existing dosimetry standards to measure and calculate the radiation dose delivered to patients, which is essential for ensuring treatments' safety and efficacy. Finally, this article intends to provide an overview of the current state of 177Lu- tagged radioligand therapy and highlight the areas where further research can improve patient treatment outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siju C. George
- Radiation Oncology Department, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Salerno KE, Roy S, Ribaudo C, Fisher T, Patel RB, Mena E, Escorcia FE. A Primer on Radiopharmaceutical Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 115:48-59. [PMID: 35970373 PMCID: PMC9772089 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this article is to serve as a primer for the United States-based radiation oncologist who may be interested in learning more about radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT). Specifically, we define RPT, review the data behind its current and anticipated indications, and discuss important regulatory considerations for incorporating it into clinical practice. RPT represents an opportunity for radiation oncologists to leverage 2 key areas of expertise, namely therapeutic radiation therapy and oncology, and apply them in a distinct context in collaboration with nuclear medicine and medical oncology colleagues. Although not every radiation oncologist will incorporate RPT into their day-to-day practice, it is important to understand the role for this modality and how it can be appropriately used in select patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian E Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Soumyajit Roy
- Radiation Oncology Department, Rush Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Cathy Ribaudo
- Division of Radiation Safety, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Teresa Fisher
- Division of Radiation Safety, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Ravi B Patel
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Esther Mena
- Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Freddy E Escorcia
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Molecular Imaging Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Novel Radiobiology is an Essential Pillar for the Future of Radiation Oncology. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2021; 33:681-682. [PMID: 34544641 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|