Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer

Early Detection of Local Recurrence After Rectal Cancer Resection in Asymptomatic Patients Is Essential for Survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite advancements in rectal cancer treatment, therapy of local recurrence remains a significant challenge as it has to be individualized to the extent of recurrence and prior treatment. This study aims to analyze outcomes of patients with local recurrence after resection for rectal cancer, focusing on R0-resection rates and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study included 31 patients with local recurrence after initial curative resection for rectal cancer between 2003 and 2021.

RESULTS

Recurrence was diagnosed in 77.4% of cases during scheduled routine follow-up and 58,1% of patients reported of symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Symptomatic patients tended to be treated palliatively (66.7%, 12/18, p = 0.073). A curative treatment approach was intended in 48.4% of all patients, with 80% achieving R0-resection by surgery. The 5-year OS was significantly longer in patients achieving R0-resection (58.3% vs. 5.3%, p = 0.0) and decreased in symptomatic patients (11.1% vs. 46.2%, p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings emphasize the importance of early recurrence detection, optimally in a scheduled cancer follow-up.

Efficacy and safety of transanal endoscopic microsurgery for early rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Background

The gold standard for the treatment of rectal cancer is radical surgery with total mesorectal excision (TME). As one of the alternatives to radical surgery, local resection has been proposed for the treatment of early rectal cancer. The purpose of this article was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) in the treatment of early rectal cancer.

Methods

By searching the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases, we selected all articles on TEM for early rectal cancer. Two researchers independently completed the entire process from screening, inclusion to data extraction and performed statistical analysis using RevMan 5.3. The primary outcomes included basic patient characteristics, overall survival rate, disease-free survival rate, disease-specific survival rate, recurrence rate, and complication rate and type.

Results

A total of 33 articles were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that the overall survival rate was 100% for T0 stage, 98.1% for Tis (carcinoma in situ) stage, and 80.2% for early stage rectal cancer patients (83.9% for T1 and 72.4% for T2). The weighted overall survival rate was 94% (RD = 0.94, 95% CI = 0.93-0.95, I 2 = 80%, P < 0.00001) for all stage patients, the weighted disease-free survival rate was 91% (RD = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.90-0.93, I 2 = 83%, P < 0.00001), and the disease-specific survival rate was 97% (RD = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.96-0.98, I 2 = 63%, P < 0.00001). The recurrence rate was 0.5% for T0 stage, 1.9% for Tis stage, and 11.9% for early stage rectal cancer patients (8.1% for T1 and 19.7% for T2). The weighted recurrence rate was 7% (RD = 0.07, 95% CI = 0.06-0.08, I 2 = 69%, P < 0.00001) for all stage patients. The weighted complications rate was 11% (RD = 0.11, 95% CI = 0.10-0.12, I 2 = 66%, P < 0.00001) for all stage patients, with Clavien-Dindo grade I accounting for 77.7%, Clavien-Dindo grade II accounting for 8%, and Clavien-Dindo grade III accounting for 14.3%.

Conclusion

The results showed that TEM has a high postoperative survival rate, low recurrence rate, and low complication rate in the T0 stage, Tis stage, and T1 stage, indicating its good safety and efficacy. For the treatment of T2 stage, TEM has a lower overall survival rate and a higher recurrence rate. Our meta-analysis results suggest that TEM alone is not recommended as a curative treatment for T2 stage; on the contrary, TME is more frequently recommended.

Early Rectal Cancer and Local Excision: A Narrative Review

A rise in the incidence of early rectal cancer consequent to bowel-screening programs around the world and an increase in the incidence in young adults has led to a growing interest in organ-sparing treatment options. The rectum, being the most distal portion of the large intestine, is a fertile ground for local excision techniques performed with endoscopic or surgical techniques. Moreover, the advancement in endoscopic optical evaluation and the better definition of imaging techniques allow for a more precise local staging of early rectal cancer. Although the local treatment of early rectal cancer seems promising, in clinical practice, a significant number of patients who could benefit from local excision techniques undergo total mesorectal excision (TME) as the first approach. All relevant prospective clinical trials were identified through a computer-assisted search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Medline databases until January 2024. This review is dedicated to endoscopic and surgical local excision in the treatment of early rectal cancer and highlights its possible role in current and future clinical practice, taking into account surgical completion techniques and chemoradiotherapy.

Brachytherapy for rectal and anal cancer: Where are we and current perspectives?

Anal and rectal cancers were some of the first disease sites treated with brachytherapy due to the anatomic ease of implantation. As external beam radiotherapy grew in popularity the use of ano-rectal brachytherapy declined. However, the past few years have seen a steady resurgence in the use of brachytherapy in the ano-rectum supported by the use of large clinical series and randomized trials. The increasing acceptance by the surgical community of organ preservation as a valid treatment strategy for rectal cancer has encouraged the use of nonsurgical approaches and brachytherapy has shown itself to be a valuable tool for this. The current role of anal and rectal brachytherapy is presented with perspectives on its future use.

Comparing neoadjuvant therapy followed by local excision to total mesorectal excision in the treatment of early stage rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard-of-care in early, clinical stage (cT2-3 N0 M0) rectal cancer. Local excision (LE) may be an alternative after adequate response to neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), with either long-course chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) or short-course radiotherapy (SCRT), as a means of preserving the rectum and potentially obviating the morbidity of TME.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines for studies that randomly assigned patients with cT2-3 N0 M0 rectal cancer to either NAT + LE or TME that reported radiologic, oncologic, surgical, and morbidity outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 4 RCTs comprise 462 patients (232 patients receiving NAT + LE; nCRT n = 205; SCRT n = 27) and 230 undergoing TME, respectively. NAT compliance was 98.86%. The rate of early completion TME in the NAT + LE group was 22.3%, while the proportion of patients achieving durable organ preservation was 75.4% at mean follow-up of 5.6 years. There was no difference in disease-free survival (DFS) (HR [hazard ratio] 1.19; 95% CI 0.95, 1.49; p = 0.13) or overall survival (OS) (HR 0.94; 95% CI 0.72, 1.23; p = 0.63]) according to the assigned treatment arm. The local recurrence rate (LRR) (HR 1.22; 95% CI 0.5-3.02; p = 0.66) and distant metastases (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.45, 1.90; p = 0.82) were also comparable between the groups. There was a significant reduction in major (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.21, 0.95; p = 0.04) and minor morbidity (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24, 0.85; p = 0.01) for patients undergoing NAT + LE. Overall stoma formation was decreased in the NAT + LE group (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.0, 0.23; p ≤ 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

NAT + LE reduces adverse effects of TME, without any compromise in oncological outcomes, and the potential for an organ preserving strategy should be discussed with patients with T2-3N0 rectal cancers prior to treatment.