1
|
Wahid KA, Cardenas CE, Marquez B, Netherton TJ, Kann BH, Court LE, He R, Naser MA, Moreno AC, Fuller CD, Fuentes D. Evolving Horizons in Radiation Therapy Auto-Contouring: Distilling Insights, Embracing Data-Centric Frameworks, and Moving Beyond Geometric Quantification. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101521. [PMID: 38799110 PMCID: PMC11111585 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem A. Wahid
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Carlos E. Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Barbara Marquez
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Houston Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Tucker J. Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Benjamin H. Kann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laurence E. Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Renjie He
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mohamed A. Naser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amy C. Moreno
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Clifton D. Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David Fuentes
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akramova R, Watanabe Y. Radiomics as a measure superior to common similarity metrics for tumor segmentation performance evaluation. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024:e14442. [PMID: 38922790 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose radiomics features as a superior measure for evaluating the segmentation ability of physicians and auto-segmentation tools and to compare its performance with the most commonly used metrics: Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), surface Dice similarity coefficient (sDSC), and Hausdorff distance (HD). MATERIALS/METHODS The data of 10 lung cancer patients' CT images with nine tumor segmentations per tumor were downloaded from the RIDER (Reference Database to Evaluate Response) database. Radiomics features of 90 segmented tumors were extracted using the PyRadiomics program. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of radiomics features were used to evaluate the segmentation similarity and compare their performance with DSC, sDSC, and HD. We calculated one ICC per radiomics feature and per tumor for nine segmentations and 36 ICCs per radiomics feature for 36 pairs of nine segmentations. Meanwhile, there were 360 DSC, sDSC, and HD values calculated for 36 pairs for 10 tumors. RESULTS The ICC of radiomics features exhibited greater sensitivity to segmentation changes than DSC and sDSC. The ICCs of the wavelet-LLL first order Maximum, wavelet-LLL glcm MCC, wavelet-LLL glcm Cluster Shade features ranged from 0.130 to 0.997, 0.033 to 0.978, and 0.160 to 0.998, respectively. On the other hand, all DSC and sDSC were larger than 0.778 and 0.700, respectively, while HD varied from 0 to 1.9 mm. The results indicated that the radiomics features could capture subtle variations in tumor segmentation characteristics, which could not be easily detected by DSC and sDSC. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the superiority of radiomics features with ICC as a measure for evaluating a physician's tumor segmentation ability and the performance of auto-segmentation tools. Radiomics features offer a more sensitive and comprehensive evaluation, providing valuable insights into tumor characteristics. Therefore, the new metrics can be used to evaluate new auto-segmentation methods and enhance trainees' segmentation skills in medical training and education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rukhsora Akramova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Yoichi Watanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Podobnik G, Ibragimov B, Tappeiner E, Lee C, Sung Kim J, Mesbah Z, Modzelweski R, Ma Y, Yang F, Rudecki M, Wodziński M, Peterlin P, Strojan P, Vrtovec T. HaN-Seg: The head and neck organ-at-risk CT and MR segmentation challenge. Radiother Oncol 2024:110410. [PMID: 38917883 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To promote the development of auto-segmentation methods for head and neck (HaN) radiation treatment (RT) planning that exploit the information of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging modalities, we organized HaN-Seg: The Head and Neck Organ-at-Risk CT and MR Segmentation Challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS The challenge task was to automatically segment 30 organs-at-risk (OARs) of the HaN region in 14 withheld test cases given the availability of 42 publicly available training cases. Each case consisted of one contrast-enhanced CT and one T1-weighted MR image of the HaN region of the same patient, with up to 30 corresponding reference OAR delineation masks. The performance was evaluated in terms of the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95-percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), and statistical ranking was applied for each metric by pairwise comparison of the submitted methods using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS While 23 teams registered for the challenge, only seven submitted their methods for the final phase. The top-performing team achieved a DSC of 76.9 % and a HD95 of 3.5 mm. All participating teams utilized architectures based on U-Net, with the winning team leveraging rigid MR to CT registration combined with network entry-level concatenation of both modalities. CONCLUSION This challenge simulated a real-world clinical scenario by providing non-registered MR and CT images with varying fields-of-view and voxel sizes. Remarkably, the top-performing teams achieved segmentation performance surpassing the inter-observer agreement on the same dataset. These results set a benchmark for future research on this publicly available dataset and on paired multi-modal image segmentation in general.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gašper Podobnik
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty Electrical Engineering, Tržaška cesta 25, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia.
| | - Bulat Ibragimov
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty Electrical Engineering, Tržaška cesta 25, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia; University of Copenhagen, Department of Computer Science, Universitetsparken 1, Copenhagen 2100, Denmark
| | - Elias Tappeiner
- UMIT Tirol - Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Eduard-Wallnöfer-Zentrum 1, Hall in Tirol 6060, Austria
| | - Chanwoong Lee
- Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Department of RadiationOncology, 50-1, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 50, Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea; Yonsei Cancer Center, Department of RadiationOncology, 50-1, Yonsei-Ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea; Oncosoft Inc, 37, Myeongmul-gil, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 03722, South Korea
| | - Zacharia Mesbah
- Henri Becquerel Cancer Center1 Rue d'Amiens, Rouen 76000, France; Siemens Healthineers, 6 Rue du Général Audran, CS20146, Courbevoie 92412, France
| | - Romain Modzelweski
- Henri Becquerel Cancer Center1 Rue d'Amiens, Rouen 76000, France; Litis UR 4108, 684 Av. de l'Université, Saint- Étienne-du-Rouvray 76800, France
| | - Yihao Ma
- Guizhou Medical University, School of Biology & Engineering9FW8+2P3, Ankang Avenue, Gui'an New Area, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 561113, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Guizhou Medical University, School of Biology & Engineering9FW8+2P3, Ankang Avenue, Gui'an New Area, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 561113, China
| | - Mikołaj Rudecki
- AGH University of Kraków, Department of Measurement and Electronicsal, Mickiewicza 30, Kraków 30-059, Poland
| | - Marek Wodziński
- AGH University of Kraków, Department of Measurement and Electronicsal, Mickiewicza 30, Kraków 30-059, Poland; University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Information Systems InstituteRue de la Plaine 2, Sierre 3960, Switzerland
| | - Primož Peterlin
- Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Primož Strojan
- Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Zaloška cesta 2, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| | - Tomaž Vrtovec
- University of Ljubljana, Faculty Electrical Engineering, Tržaška cesta 25, Ljubljana 1000, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Finnegan RN, Quinn A, Booth J, Belous G, Hardcastle N, Stewart M, Griffiths B, Carroll S, Thwaites DI. Cardiac substructure delineation in radiation therapy - A state-of-the-art review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024. [PMID: 38757728 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
Delineation of cardiac substructures is crucial for a better understanding of radiation-related cardiotoxicities and to facilitate accurate and precise cardiac dose calculation for developing and applying risk models. This review examines recent advancements in cardiac substructure delineation in the radiation therapy (RT) context, aiming to provide a comprehensive overview of the current level of knowledge, challenges and future directions in this evolving field. Imaging used for RT planning presents challenges in reliably visualising cardiac anatomy. Although cardiac atlases and contouring guidelines aid in standardisation and reduction of variability, significant uncertainties remain in defining cardiac anatomy. Coupled with the inherent complexity of the heart, this necessitates auto-contouring for consistent large-scale data analysis and improved efficiency in prospective applications. Auto-contouring models, developed primarily for breast and lung cancer RT, have demonstrated performance comparable to manual contouring, marking a significant milestone in the evolution of cardiac delineation practices. Nevertheless, several key concerns require further investigation. There is an unmet need for expanding cardiac auto-contouring models to encompass a broader range of cancer sites. A shift in focus is needed from ensuring accuracy to enhancing the robustness and accessibility of auto-contouring models. Addressing these challenges is paramount for the integration of cardiac substructure delineation and associated risk models into routine clinical practice, thereby improving the safety of RT for future cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert N Finnegan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Alexandra Quinn
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jeremy Booth
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Gregg Belous
- Australian e-Health Research Centre, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nicholas Hardcastle
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maegan Stewart
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Brooke Griffiths
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Susan Carroll
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David I Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Institute of Medical Research, St James's Hospital and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rong Y, Chen Q, Fu Y, Yang X, Al-Hallaq HA, Wu QJ, Yuan L, Xiao Y, Cai B, Latifi K, Benedict SH, Buchsbaum JC, Qi XS. NRG Oncology Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning-Based Auto-segmentation for Radiation Therapy: Current Developments, Clinical Considerations, and Future Directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:261-280. [PMID: 37972715 PMCID: PMC11023777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Deep learning neural networks (DLNN) in Artificial intelligence (AI) have been extensively explored for automatic segmentation in radiotherapy (RT). In contrast to traditional model-based methods, data-driven AI-based models for auto-segmentation have shown high accuracy in early studies in research settings and controlled environment (single institution). Vendor-provided commercial AI models are made available as part of the integrated treatment planning system (TPS) or as a stand-alone tool that provides streamlined workflow interacting with the main TPS. These commercial tools have drawn clinics' attention thanks to their significant benefit in reducing the workload from manual contouring and shortening the duration of treatment planning. However, challenges occur when applying these commercial AI-based segmentation models to diverse clinical scenarios, particularly in uncontrolled environments. Contouring nomenclature and guideline standardization has been the main task undertaken by the NRG Oncology. AI auto-segmentation holds the potential clinical trial participants to reduce interobserver variations, nomenclature non-compliance, and contouring guideline deviations. Meanwhile, trial reviewers could use AI tools to verify contour accuracy and compliance of those submitted datasets. In recognizing the growing clinical utilization and potential of these commercial AI auto-segmentation tools, NRG Oncology has formed a working group to evaluate the clinical utilization and potential of commercial AI auto-segmentation tools. The group will assess in-house and commercially available AI models, evaluation metrics, clinical challenges, and limitations, as well as future developments in addressing these challenges. General recommendations are made in terms of the implementation of these commercial AI models, as well as precautions in recognizing the challenges and limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Rong
- Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Quan Chen
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center Duarte, CA
| | - Yabo Fu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Commack, NY
| | | | | | | | - Lulin Yuan
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA
| | - Ying Xiao
- University of Pennsylvania/Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bin Cai
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | | | - Stanley H Benedict
- University of California Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento, CA
| | | | - X Sharon Qi
- University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stewart J, Sahgal A, Hudson J, Lau A, Keller B, Chen H, Detsky J, Soliman H, Tseng CL, Myrehaug S, Ruschin M. Technical note: The migration distance - a unidirectional distance metric for region-of-interest comparisons. Med Phys 2024; 51:3597-3603. [PMID: 38088935 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16872] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The radiotherapy process relies on several metrics in determining a notion of "distance" from one three-dimensional region-of-interest (ROI) to another. The majority are symmetric (or commutative) and do not contain information pertaining to directionality. Growth versus regression, for example, is not inherently distinguished by these metrics. PURPOSE The purpose of this work was to formalize a unidirectional distance metric, motivated by radiotherapy margin concepts, which we term the migration distance. Informally, the migration distance from ROI X $X$ to Y $Y$ is the minimum isotropic expansion of X $X$ such that Y $Y$ is completely encompassed by the expansion. If Y $Y$ is contained within X $X$ , the migration distance is negative with magnitude equal to the maximum isotropic contraction of X $X$ such that Y $Y$ remains contained within contraction. The metric is demonstrated by quantifying glioblastoma interfraction target changes. METHODS An explicit mathematical formulation of the migration distance is presented and contrasted with the related Hausdorff distance. The results are demonstrated for the gross tumor volume (GTV) dynamics of a glioblastoma cohort consisting of 111 patients that underwent standard chemoradiotherapy with offline MR imaging at planning, fraction 10, fraction 20, and 1-month post radiotherapy. RESULTS The mean ± SD of the GTV migration distance relative to planning was 5.9 ± 3.9 mm at fraction 10, 6.2 ± 4.4 mm at fraction 20, and 7.9 ± 7.1 mm at 1-month post radiotherapy. The maximum GTV migration distance across all patients at the same timepoints was 20.4, 20.7, and 45.5 mm, respectively. CONCLUSIONS We have proposed and demonstrated a unidirectional distance metric. The migration distance may have applications in the quantification of anatomical changes, planning target volume designs, and dosimetric radiotherapy plan assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Stewart
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Hudson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Angus Lau
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Brian Keller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jay Detsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Hany Soliman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sten Myrehaug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Mark Ruschin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Physical Sciences, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Singh S, Singh BK, Kumar A. Multi-organ segmentation of organ-at-risk (OAR's) of head and neck site using ensemble learning technique. Radiography (Lond) 2024; 30:673-680. [PMID: 38364707 DOI: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This paper presents a novel approach to automate the segmentation of Organ-at-Risk (OAR) in Head and Neck cancer patients using Deep Learning models combined with Ensemble Learning techniques. The study aims to improve the accuracy and efficiency of OAR segmentation, essential for radiotherapy treatment planning. METHODS The dataset comprised computed tomography (CT) scans of 182 patients in DICOM format, obtained from an institutional image bank. Experienced Radiation Oncologists manually segmented seven OARs for each scan. Two models, 3D U-Net and 3D DenseNet-FCN, were trained on reduced CT scans (192 × 192 x 128) due to memory limitations. Ensemble Learning techniques were employed to enhance accuracy and segmentation metrics. Testing was conducted on 78 patients from the institutional dataset and an open-source dataset (TCGA-HNSC and Head-Neck Cetuximab) consisting of 31 patient scans. RESULTS Using the Ensemble Learning technique, the average dice similarity coefficient for OARs ranged from 0.990 to 0.994, indicating high segmentation accuracy. The 95% Hausdorff distance (mm) ranged from 1.3 to 2.1, demonstrating precise segmentation boundaries. CONCLUSION The proposed automated segmentation method achieved efficient and accurate OAR segmentation, surpassing human expert performance in terms of time and accuracy. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE This approach has implications for improving treatment planning and patient care in radiotherapy. By reducing manual segmentation reliance, the proposed method offers significant time savings and potential improvements in treatment planning efficiency and precision for head and neck cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Singh
- Department of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India; Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, New Delhi, India.
| | - B K Singh
- Department of Physics, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| | - A Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy, S N. Medical College, Agra, Uttar Pradesh, India.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Marchant T, Price G, McWilliam A, Henderson E, McSweeney D, van Herk M, Banfill K, Schmitt M, King J, Barker C, Faivre-Finn C. Assessment of heart-substructures auto-contouring accuracy for application in heart-sparing radiotherapy for lung cancer. BJR Open 2024; 6:tzae006. [PMID: 38737623 PMCID: PMC11087931 DOI: 10.1093/bjro/tzae006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives We validated an auto-contouring algorithm for heart substructures in lung cancer patients, aiming to establish its accuracy and reliability for radiotherapy (RT) planning. We focus on contouring an amalgamated set of subregions in the base of the heart considered to be a new organ at risk, the cardiac avoidance area (CAA), to enable maximum dose limit implementation in lung RT planning. Methods The study validates a deep-learning model specifically adapted for auto-contouring the CAA (which includes the right atrium, aortic valve root, and proximal segments of the left and right coronary arteries). Geometric, dosimetric, quantitative, and qualitative validation measures are reported. Comparison with manual contours, including assessment of interobserver variability, and robustness testing over 198 cases are also conducted. Results Geometric validation shows that auto-contouring performance lies within the expected range of manual observer variability despite being slightly poorer than the average of manual observers (mean surface distance for CAA of 1.6 vs 1.2 mm, dice similarity coefficient of 0.86 vs 0.88). Dosimetric validation demonstrates consistency between plans optimized using auto-contours and manual contours. Robustness testing confirms acceptable contours in all cases, with 80% rated as "Good" and the remaining 20% as "Useful." Conclusions The auto-contouring algorithm for heart substructures in lung cancer patients demonstrates acceptable and comparable performance to human observers. Advances in knowledge Accurate and reliable auto-contouring results for the CAA facilitate the implementation of a maximum dose limit to this region in lung RT planning, which has now been introduced in the routine setting at our institution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tom Marchant
- Christie Medical Physics & Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
| | - Gareth Price
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Alan McWilliam
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Henderson
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Dónal McSweeney
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Kathryn Banfill
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Schmitt
- Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M13 9WL, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer King
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Claire Barker
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hoque SMH, Pirrone G, Matrone F, Donofrio A, Fanetti G, Caroli A, Rista RS, Bortolus R, Avanzo M, Drigo A, Chiovati P. Clinical Use of a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Software for Autocontouring in Radiation Therapy: Geometric Performance and Dosimetric Impact. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5735. [PMID: 38136281 PMCID: PMC10741804 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE When autocontouring based on artificial intelligence (AI) is used in the radiotherapy (RT) workflow, the contours are reviewed and eventually adjusted by a radiation oncologist before an RT treatment plan is generated, with the purpose of improving dosimetry and reducing both interobserver variability and time for contouring. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the results of application of a commercial AI-based autocontouring for RT, assessing both geometric accuracies and the influence on optimized dose from automatically generated contours after review by human operator. MATERIALS AND METHODS A commercial autocontouring system was applied to a retrospective database of 40 patients, of which 20 were treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PCa) and 20 for head and neck cancer (HNC). Contours resulting from AI were compared against AI contours reviewed by human operator and human-only contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Hausdorff distance (HD), and relative volume difference (RVD). Dosimetric indices such as Dmean, D0.03cc, and normalized plan quality metrics were used to compare dose distributions from RT plans generated from structure sets contoured by humans assisted by AI against plans from manual contours. The reduction in contouring time obtained by using automated tools was also assessed. A Wilcoxon rank sum test was computed to assess the significance of differences. Interobserver variability of the comparison of manual vs. AI-assisted contours was also assessed among two radiation oncologists for PCa. RESULTS For PCa, AI-assisted segmentation showed good agreement with expert radiation oncologist structures with average DSC among patients ≥ 0.7 for all structures, and minimal radiation oncology adjustment of structures (DSC of adjusted versus AI structures ≥ 0.91). For HNC, results of comparison between manual and AI contouring varied considerably e.g., 0.77 for oral cavity and 0.11-0.13 for brachial plexus, but again, adjustment was generally minimal (DSC of adjusted against AI contours 0.97 for oral cavity, 0.92-0.93 for brachial plexus). The difference in dose for the target and organs at risk were not statistically significant between human and AI-assisted, with the only exceptions of D0.03cc to the anal canal and Dmean to the brachial plexus. The observed average differences in plan quality for PCa and HNC cases were 8% and 6.7%, respectively. The dose parameter changes due to interobserver variability in PCa were small, with the exception of the anal canal, where large dose variations were observed. The reduction in time required for contouring was 72% for PCa and 84% for HNC. CONCLUSIONS When an autocontouring system is used in combination with human review, the time of the RT workflow is significantly reduced without affecting dose distribution and plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Hasibul Hoque
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (S.M.H.H.); (G.P.); (R.S.R.); (M.A.); (A.D.)
| | - Giovanni Pirrone
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (S.M.H.H.); (G.P.); (R.S.R.); (M.A.); (A.D.)
| | - Fabio Matrone
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (A.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Alessandra Donofrio
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (A.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Fanetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (A.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Angela Caroli
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (A.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Rahnuma Shahrin Rista
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (S.M.H.H.); (G.P.); (R.S.R.); (M.A.); (A.D.)
| | - Roberto Bortolus
- Radiation Oncology Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (F.M.); (A.D.); (G.F.); (A.C.); (R.B.)
| | - Michele Avanzo
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (S.M.H.H.); (G.P.); (R.S.R.); (M.A.); (A.D.)
| | - Annalisa Drigo
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (S.M.H.H.); (G.P.); (R.S.R.); (M.A.); (A.D.)
| | - Paola Chiovati
- Medical Physics Department, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; (S.M.H.H.); (G.P.); (R.S.R.); (M.A.); (A.D.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hirotaki K, Tomizawa K, Moriya S, Oyoshi H, Raturi V, Ito M, Sakae T. Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for locally advanced rectal cancer: feasibility and efficiency. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:147. [PMID: 37670390 PMCID: PMC10481560 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02334-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has emerged as a promising technique, but the planning process can be time-consuming and dependent on planner expertise. We aimed to develop a fully automated VMAT planning program for LARC and evaluate its feasibility and efficiency. METHODS A total of 26 LARC patients who received VMAT treatment and the computed tomography (CT) scans were included in this study. Clinical target volumes and organs at risk were contoured by radiation oncologists. The automatic planning program, developed within the Raystation treatment planning system, used scripting capabilities and a Python environment to automate the entire planning process. The automated VMAT plan (auto-VMAT) was created by our automated planning program with the 26 CT scans used in the manual VMAT plan (manual-VMAT) and their regions of interests. Dosimetric parameters and time efficiency were compared between the auto-VMAT and the manual-VMAT created by experienced planners. All results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test. RESULTS The auto-VMAT achieved comparable coverage of the target volume while demonstrating improved dose conformity and uniformity compared with the manual-VMAT. V30 and V40 in the small bowel were significantly lower in the auto-VMAT compared with those in the manual-VMAT (p < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively); the mean dose of the bladder was also significantly reduced in the auto-VMAT (p < 0.001). Furthermore, auto-VMAT plans were consistently generated with less variability in quality. In terms of efficiency, the auto-VMAT markedly reduced the time required for planning and expedited plan approval, with 93% of cases approved within one day. CONCLUSION We developed a fully automatic feasible VMAT plan creation program for LARC. The auto-VMAT maintained target coverage while providing organs at risk dose reduction. The developed program dramatically reduced the time to approval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kouta Hirotaki
- Doctoral Program in Medical Sciences, Graduate School of Comprehensive Human Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kento Tomizawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1, Kashiwanoha, 277-8577, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
| | | | - Hajime Oyoshi
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Vijay Raturi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Apollomedics Hospital, Lucknow, India
| | - Masashi Ito
- Department of Radiological Technology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takeji Sakae
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|