In support of pressure support

A Retrospective Cohort Study of the Impact of Implementing Volume-Targeted Compared to Pressure-Limited Ventilation in a Single-Center, Level III Neonatal Intensive Care Unit in Oman

Background The use of volume-targeted ventilation (VTV) in neonatology has been introduced in the last decade. This study was performed to determine the impact of clinical implementation of volume-targeted conventional mechanical ventilation using the volume guarantee mode in mechanical ventilation of all neonates needing mechanical ventilation compared to pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) modes. The mortality rate, duration of mechanical ventilation, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia were the primary outcomes of the study. Methodology This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a level III-VI neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) within a tertiary academic hospital in Oman. All intubated neonates admitted to the NICU within two time periods, i.e., the PLV cohort: January 2011 to December 2013 (three years), and the VTV cohort: January 2017 to December 2019 (three years), were eligible for inclusion in the study. Neonates were excluded if they had multiple congenital anomalies, tracheostomy, and those with a Do Not Resuscitate status. A predetermined data set was collected retrospectively from electronic records. The PLV and VTV cohorts were compared, and SPSS version 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) was used for data analysis. Results A total of 290 neonates were included (PLV: n = 138, and VTV: n = 152). The two cohorts were statistically similar in their baseline characteristics, including gestational age, birth weight, Apgar scores, indications for mechanical ventilation, age at intubation, need for surfactant therapy, and age at extubation. The VTV cohort had a significantly lower mortality rate (n (%) = 10 (6.6%) vs. 21 (15.3%), p = 0.02). An insignificant trend of lower duration of ventilation was observed in the VTV cohort (34.5 vs. 50.5 hours, p = 0.24). There was no significant difference in bronchopulmonary dysplasia (16 (21.3%) vs. 12 (17.8%), p = 0.18). VTV was associated with a significant reduction in pulmonary hemorrhage (1 (0.7%) vs. 8 (5.7%), p = 0.04), episodes of hypocapnia (2 vs. 3/patient, p = 0.04), and episodes of hypercapnia (0 vs 1/patient, p = 0.04). Conclusions The implementation of VTV in clinical practice in our level III-VI NICU was associated with significant advantages, including reduction in mortality, pulmonary hemorrhage, and episodes of hypercapnia and hypocapnia. A large prospective, randomized, and multicenter trial is recommended to confirm these findings.

Comparison of SIMV + PS and AC modes in chronically ventilated children and effects on speech

BACKGROUND

Two modes of ventilation commonly used in children requiring chronic home mechanical ventilation (HMV) via tracheostomy are Assist Control (AC) and Synchronized Intermittent Mandatory Ventilation with Pressure Support (SIMV + PS). There has been no study comparing these two modes of ventilation in children requiring chronic HMV.

METHODS

We studied children requiring HMV capable of completing speech testing. Study participants were blinded to changes and studied on both modes, evaluating their oxygen saturation, end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2), heart rate, respiratory rate, and respiratory pattern. Subjects completed speech testing and answered subjective questions about their level of comfort, ease of breathing, and ease of speech.

RESULTS

Fifteen children aged 12.3 ± 4.8 years were tested. There was no difference in mean oxygen saturation, minimum oxygen saturation, mean PETCO2, maximum PETCO2, mean heart rate, and mean respiratory rate. The maximum heart rate on AC was significantly lower than SIMV + PS, p = .047. Subjects breathed significantly above the set rate on SIMV + PS (p = .029), though not on AC. Subjects found it significantly easier to speak on AC, though there was no statistically significant difference in speech testing. Four subjects had multiple prolonged PS breaths on SIMV + PS. Many subjects exhibited an abnormal cadence to speech, with some speaking during both inhalation and exhalation phases of breathing.

CONCLUSIONS

There were few differences between AC and SIMV + PS, with a few parameters favoring AC that may not be clinically significant. This includes the subjective perception of ease of speech. We also found unnatural patterns of speech in children requiring HMV.

Achieving and maintaining lung volume in the preterm infant: from the first breath to the NICU

The main goal for the neonatologist is to facilitate the adaptation to extra-uterine life during initial transition, while minimizing lung injury opening and protecting the premature lung from the first breath onwards. An appropriate management from birth should lead to the achievement of an early functional residual capacity (FRC), and the following steps should aim at maintaining an adequate lung volume. To date, different strategies are available to optimize fetal-neonatal transition and promote lung recruitment. New ventilation approaches, such as sustained lung inflation (SLI) and "open lung strategy", well-established ventilation techniques with a more tailored application and less invasive modalities to administer surfactant have been recently introduced in clinical practice with promising results.

CONCLUSIONS

given the current status of neonatal care, it seems that lung injury and BPD could be reduced with multiple strategies starting early in the delivery room. Literature underlines the importance of a respiratory tailored management of preterm infants from birth and during the whole NICU stay. What is Known: • Experimental and clinical studies have shown that the transition from fetal to adult type cardiorespiratory circulation needs an adequate lung ventilation. An appropriate management in the delivery room should lead to the achievement of an early FRC, and through the following steps, the neonatologist should aim at maintaining an adequate lung volume. • Literature underlines the importance of a respiratory tailored management of preterm infants during the whole NICU stay to maintain the benefits of a successful postnatal adaption. What is New: • Herewith, we describe the most relevant and recent interventions which can be performed from the delivery room to the NICU stay to guarantee an adequate tradition to postnatal life and an effective cardiorespiratory stability.

Respiratory dynamics and dead space to tidal volume ratio of volume-controlled versus pressure-controlled ventilation during prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgery

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic operations have become longer and more complex and applied to a broader patient population in the last decades. Prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgeries require prolonged pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position, which can influence respiratory dynamics and other measurements of pulmonary function. We investigated the differences between volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) and pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) and tried to determine the more efficient ventilation mode during prolonged pneumoperitoneum in gynecological laparoscopy.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients scheduled for laparoscopic radical hysterectomy combined with or without laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy were randomly allocated to be ventilated by either VCV or PCV. Standard anesthesic management and laparoscopic procedures were performed. Measurements of respiratory and hemodynamic dynamics were obtained after induction of anesthesia, at 10, 30, 60, and 120 min after establishing pneumoperitoneum, and at 10 min after return to supine lithotomy position and removal of carbon dioxide. The logistic regression model was applied to predict the corresponding critical value of duration of pneumoperitoneum when the Ppeak was higher than 40 cmH₂O.

RESULTS

Prolonged pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg position produced significant and clinically relevant changes in dynamic compliance and respiratory mechanics in anesthetized patients under PCV and VCV ventilation. Patients under PCV ventilation had a similar increase of dead space/tidal volume ratio, but had a lower Ppeak increase compared with those under VCV ventilation. The critical value of duration of pneumoperitoneum was predicted to be 355 min under VCV ventilation, corresponding to the risk of Ppeak higher than 40 cmH₂O.

CONCLUSIONS

Both VCV and PCV can be safely applied to prolonged gynecological laparoscopic surgery. However, PCV may become the better choice of ventilation after ruling out of other reasons for Ppeak increasing.

Modalities of Mechanical Ventilation: Volume-Targeted Versus Pressure-Limited

BACKGROUND

Respiratory distress syndrome remains the most common admission diagnosis in the neonatal intensive care unit. Healthcare providers have a clear appreciation for the potential harm to pulmonary structures that have been associated with mechanical ventilation (MV) in the preterm infant. Although life sustaining, the goal is to optimally ventilate while limiting trauma to the neonatal lung in order to preserve long-term cardiopulmonary and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

PURPOSE

To describe, compare, and contrast 2 primary methods of neonatal MV, pressure-limited ventilation (PLV) and volume-targeted ventilation (VTV), highlighting key considerations during therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of the literature was completed using the following databases: CINAHL, Cochrane, Google Scholar, and PubMed. Research articles that were published in English over the last 10 years were reviewed for key information to describe and support the topic. Expert content review was conducted prior to publication by respiratory care providers, neonatal nurse practitioners, staff nurses, and neonatologist.

FINDINGS

Technology is rapidly evolving, with the newest mechanical ventilators providing the clinician with real-time data not previously available. Advanced microprocessors and feedback mechanisms can better support various ventilatory strategies including PLV and VTV. Renewed interest in volume ventilation has led many clinicians to ask about current evidence to support ventilatory modalities with regard to timing, settings, and short- and long-term effects.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The clinician understands that neonatal pulmonary status is frequently changing based on gestational age, current age, and physiologic influences. Evidence supporting recommendations for the described MV modalities of PLV and VTV is provided for both preterm and term neonates.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Comparison between MV strategies, specifically PLV and VTV, including short- and long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, is needed. Recommendations regarding physiologic tidal volume for the extremely preterm infant are lacking.

Comparison of Two Levels of Pressure Support Ventilation on Success of Extubation in Preterm Neonates: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background:

Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) is one of the modes of mechanical ventilation that can be used alone as a weaning strategy in neonates. However, studies on the appropriate pressure level for this mode in neonates are limited.

Objectives:

Because the use of adequate pressure support in this mode, keeping the appropriate neonate’s tidal volume, and preventing the respiratory complications, this study was aimed to compare extubation failure in the two levels of pressure support ventilation of 10 and 14 cmH2O when removing the neonates from the ventilator.

Materials & Methods:

In this randomized clinical trial 50 premature infants of 27-37 weeks with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were under mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours, were randomly assigned to two groups. One group was extubated in PSV mode with pressure of 14 cmH₂O and the other with 10 cmH₂O. Extubation failure rate and complications such as pneumothorax, death and respiratory parameters were compared in the two groups.

Results:

Twenty five neonates in each group were assessed. Weaning time, extubation failure rate, and mean airway pressure was lesser in PSV of 10 cmH20 group than Level of 14 cmH2O and those differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). Difference between work of breathing, ventilation time, pneumothorax and mortality rate between two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion:

The results of our study show that extubation of the neonates using 10 CmH₂O in PSV mode increases the success rate of extubation. Although when Volume- assured PSV can be used, it is more logical to use it for guaranteeing tidal volume, but using the appropriate level of pressure support when the PSV mode is used alone is inevitable and further studies are necessary to demonstrate the level of pressure in this mode.

Understanding neonatal ventilation: strategies for decision making in the NICU

Neonatal ventilation is an integral component of care delivered in the neonatal unit. The aim of any ventilation strategy is to support the neonate's respiratory system during compromise while limiting any long-term damage to the lungs. Understanding the principles behind neonatal ventilation is essential so that health professionals caring for sick neonates and families have the necessary knowledge to understand best practice. Given the range of existing ventilation modes and parameters available, these require explanation and clarification in the context of current evidence. Many factors can influence clinical decision making on both an individual level and within the wider perspective of neonatal care.

Neonatal ventilators: how do they differ?

Remarkable technological advances over the past two decades have brought dramatic changes to the neonatal intensive care unit. Microprocessor-based mechanical ventilation has replaced time-cycled, pressure-limited, intermittent mandatory ventilation with almost limitless options for the management of respiratory failure in the prematurely born infant. Unfortunately, much of the infusion of technology occurred before the establishment of a convincing evidence base. This review focuses on the basic principles of mechanical ventilation, nomenclature and the characteristics of both conventional and high-frequency devices.

New and alternative modes of mechanical ventilation in neonates

Innovative ventilation modes for infants attempt to reduce volume-induced lung damage, to decrease airway pressure and oxygen exposure, and to improve patient comfort. Volume-targeted ventilation results in more consistent tidal volumes, allows automatic weaning of airway pressure, may avoid hypocapnia and may be associated with long-term clinical benefits. Pressure support ventilation allows the patient to control the duration of mechanical breaths. It requires a stable respiratory drive or back-up for apnoea. Pressure support ventilation may be effective for weaning. Proportional assist ventilation was studied in small animal species. In preterm infants with acute and chronic lung disease, ventilator pressure requirements were lower in cross-over short-term comparisons with conventional triggered ventilation. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist delivers ventilator pressure in proportion and in synchrony with the phasic inspiratory diaphragmatic electrical activity obtained from intra-oesophageal electrodes. Large multicentre clinical trials are required to prove long-term clinical benefits of these new modes.

Newer forms of conventional ventilation for preterm newborns

Although life saving, mechanical ventilation can cause complications such as ventilator-induced lung injury and bronchopulmonary dysplasia in very preterm babies. The ventilator-induced lung injury is multi-factorial. There has been an introduction of a number of newer forms of mechanical ventilation, which are aimed to reduce such complications. These are based on sound physiologic principles and clinicians should familiarize themselves with these advances.

Monitoring the mechanically ventilated patient

In the intensive care setting, monitored data relevant to the output, efficiency, and reserve of the respiratory system alert the clinician to sudden untoward events, aid in diagnosis, help guide management decisions, aid in determining prognosis, and enable the assessment of therapeutic response. This review addresses those aspects of monitoring we find of most value in the care of patients receiving ventilatory support. We concentrate on those modalities and variables that are routinely available or easily calculated from data readily collected at the bedside.