Cesarean delivery for abnormal labor

Cephalic Elevation Device for Second-Stage Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Using a cephalic elevation device during second-stage cesarean deliveries decreases time to delivery after hysterotomy by 23 seconds.

A cephalic elevation device is an inflatable device that elevates the fetal head. We sought to evaluate whether such a device reduces time to delivery after hysterotomy and lowers morbidity in cesarean deliveries during the second stage of labor.

Labor progress determined by ultrasound is different in women requiring cesarean delivery from those who experience a vaginal delivery following induction of labor

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of labor dystocia generally is determined by the deviation of labor progress, which is assessed by the use of a partogram. Recently, intrapartum transperineal ultrasound for the assessment of fetal head descent has been introduced to assess labor progress in the first stage of labor in a more objective and noninvasive way.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to determine the differences in labor progress by the use of serial transperineal ultrasound assessment of fetal head descent between women having vaginal and cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective longitudinal study performed in 315 women with singleton pregnancy who were undergoing labor induction at term between December 2016 and December 2017. Paired assessment of cervical dilation and fetal head station by vaginal examination and transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance were made serially after the commencement of labor induction. According to the hospital protocol, assessment was performed every 24 hours and 4 hours, respectively, during latent and active phases of labor. The researchers and the clinical team were blinded to each other's findings. The repeated measures data were analyzed by mixed effect models. To determine the effect of mode of delivery on the association between parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation, the significance of the interaction term between each mode of delivery and fetal head station or cervical dilation was determined, which accounted for parity and obesity. Area under receiver-operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the performance of serial intrapartum sonography in predicting women with cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

RESULTS

The total number of paired vaginal examination and ultrasound assessments was 1198, with a median of 3 per woman. The median assessment-to-assessment interval was 4.6 hours (interquartile range, 4.3-5.1 hours). Women who achieved vaginal delivery (n=261) had steeper slopes of parasagittal angle of progression and head-perineum distance against fetal head station and cervical dilation than those who achieved cesarean delivery (n=54). Objectively, an additional decrease of 5.11 and 1.37 degrees in parasagittal angle of progression was observed for an unit increase in fetal head station and cervical dilation, respectively, in women who required cesarean delivery (P<.01; P=.01), compared with women who achieved vaginal delivery, after taking account of repeated measures from individuals and confounding factors. The respective additional increases in head-perineum distance for a unit increase in fetal head station and cervical dilation were 0.27 cm (P<.01) and 0.12 cm (P<.01). A combination of maternal characteristics with the temporal changes of parasagittal angle of progression for an unit increase in fetal head station achieved an area under receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.94), with sensitivity of 79% and specificity of 80%, for the prediction of women who required cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

CONCLUSION

The differences in labor progress between vaginal and cesarean delivery have been illustrated objectively by serial intrapartum transperineal ultrasonographic assessment of fetal head descent. This tool is potentially predictive of women who will require cesarean delivery because of failure to progress.

Placental complications in subsequent pregnancies after prior cesarean section performed in the first versus second stage of labor

OBJECTIVE

To examine whether prior cesarean delivery (CD) in the first stage of labor (non-progressive labor in the first stage - NPL1), when compared with CD in the second stage of labor (non-progressive labor in the second stage - NPL2), is associated with different rates of third stage placental complications in the subsequent delivery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study, of all deliveries following a CD due to NLP1 or NLP2 that occurred between the years 1988 and 2013, was undertaken. Multiple gestation pregnancies, known uterine malformations or uterine fibroids were excluded. Rates of third stage complications (retained placenta, adherent/increta/percreta placenta, manual removal of the placenta) were compared between the groups. Univariate analysis was followed by multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 3828 subsequent deliveries of parturients who were operated due to NPL1 and NPL2 (72.91 and 27.09%, respectively). Rates of manual removal of the placenta as well as adherent placenta were significantly higher among parturients following CD due to NPL2 (28.4 versus 24.0%, p = .04, 1.2 versus 0.4% p < .01, respectively). In a multivariate analysis controlling for possible confounders, adherent placenta was found to be independently associated with vaginal delivery following CD due to NPL2 (odds ratio 2.98, 95% confidence interval 1.30-6.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior CD due to NPL2 as opposed to NPL1 is independently associated with adherent placenta in the subsequent delivery. A higher index of suspicion may be needed when evaluating these women during pregnancy as well as during management of the delivery.

Misrecognition of need: women's experiences of and explanations for undergoing cesarean delivery

International rates of operative delivery are consistently higher than the World Health Organization determined is appropriate. This suggests that factors other than clinical indications contribute to cesarean section. Data presented here are from interviews with 115 mothers on the postnatal ward of a hospital in Northeast England during February 2006 to March 2009 after the women underwent either unscheduled or scheduled cesarean childbirth. Using thematic content analysis, we found women's accounts of their experiences largely portrayed cesarean section as everything that they had wanted to avoid, but necessary given their situations. Contrary to popular suggestion, the data did not indicate impersonalized medical practice, or that cesareans were being performed 'on request.' The categorization of cesareans into 'emergency' and 'elective' did not reflect maternal experiences. Rather, many unscheduled cesareans were conducted without indications of fetal distress and most scheduled cesareans were not booked because of 'choice.' The authoritative knowledge that influenced maternal perceptions of the need to undergo operative delivery included moving forward from 'prolonged' labor and scheduling cesarean as a prophylactic to avoid anticipated psychological or physical harm. In spontaneously defending themselves against stigma from the 'too posh to push' label that is currently common in the media, women portrayed debate on the appropriateness of cesarean childbirth as a social critique instead of a health issue. The findings suggest the 'need' for some cesareans is due to misrecognition of indications by all involved. The factors underlying many cesareans may actually be modifiable, but informed choice and healthful outcomes are impeded by lack of awareness regarding the benefits of labor on the fetal transition to extrauterine life, the maternal desire for predictability in their parturition and recovery experiences, and possibly lack of sufficient experience for providers in a variety of vaginal delivery scenarios (non-progressive labor, breech presentation, and/or after previous cesarean).

When is primary cesarean appropriate: maternal and obstetrical indications

To describe appropriate maternal and obstetrical indications for primary cesarean delivery. The list of potential indications is long. Among all maternal and obstetrical indications, labor dystocia is the most common; multifetal pregnancy and malpresentation are not infrequent. Maternal indications, including human immunodeficiency virus (with high viral load) and herpes simplex virus (with active lesions), are rare. Preeclampsia alone typically is not an appropriate indication for cesarean delivery. Although the need for a cesarean is absolute for some conditions, such as complete placenta previa or placenta accreta, minimum criteria for a cesarean are variable and subjective for many indications, including dystocia. The subjective diagnosis of labor dystocia provides the best opportunity to prevent the first cesarean.