1
|
Onishi K, Bitas C, Kawakita T. Infant Mortality Categorized by Birth Weight Percentiles for Deliveries between 22 and 28 Weeks of Gestation. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:1779-1788. [PMID: 38290555 DOI: 10.1055/a-2257-5752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective was to describe infant mortality within 1 year of life according to gestational age and birth weight percentile in infants delivered between 22 and 28 weeks of gestation. STUDY DESIGN This study was a retrospective cohort study based on publicly available U.S. birth certificate data linked to infant death data between 2014 and 2020. Maternal-neonate pairs of singleton live births between 220/7 and 286/7 weeks' gestation (vaginal or cesarean) were evaluated. We excluded infants with major fetal anomalies, chromosomal disorders, and birth weight outliers. Our primary outcome was infant mortality within 1 year of life. Individuals were categorized into eight sex-specific birth weight percentiles categories: less than the 3rd, 3rd-less than the 10th, 10th-less than the 25th, 25th-to less than the 50th, 50th-less than the 75th, 75th-to less than the 90th, 90th-less than the 97th, and 97th or higher. RESULTS Of 27,014,444 individuals with live births from January 2014 to December 2020, 151,677 individuals who gave birth at 22 to 28 weeks of gestation were included in the study population. The mortality rate ranged from 4.2% for the 50th-less than the 75th percentiles at 28 weeks to 80.3% for the 3rd-less than the 10th percentile at 22 weeks. Using the 50th-less than the 75th birth weight percentile at each gestational age as a reference group, birth weight less than the 50th percentile was associated with increased mortality at all gestational ages in a dose-dependent manner. From 22 to 25 weeks of gestation, higher birth weight percentiles were associated with lower mortality, while the 97th or higher birth weight percentile was associated with increased mortality compared with the 50th-less than the 75th birth weight percentile at 26 to 28 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION The lower birth weight percentiles were associated with higher mortality across all gestational ages, but the association between higher birth weight percentiles and infant mortality exhibited an opposite pattern at 22 to 25 weeks as compared to later gestational age. KEY POINTS · Birth weight ≥97th percentile was associated with increased infant mortality at 26 to 28 weeks.. · Higher birth weight percentiles were associated with a lower risk of mortality at 22 to 25 weeks.. · Lower birth weight percentiles were associated with a higher risk of mortality at 22 to 28 weeks..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuma Onishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| | - Christiana Bitas
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| | - Tetsuya Kawakita
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Usuda H, Carter S, Takahashi T, Newnham JP, Fee EL, Jobe AH, Kemp MW. Perinatal care for the extremely preterm infant. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 27:101334. [PMID: 35577715 DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2022.101334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Being born preterm (prior to 37 weeks of completed gestation) is a leading cause of childhood death up to five years of age, and is responsible for the demise of around one million preterm infants each year. Rates of prematurity, which range from approximately 5 to 18% of births, are increasing in most countries. Babies born extremely preterm (less than 28 weeks' gestation) and in particular, in the periviable (200/7-256/7 weeks) period, are at the highest risk of death, or the development of long-term disabilities. The perinatal care of extremely preterm infants and their mothers raises a number of clinical, technical, and ethical challenges. Focusing on 'micropremmies', or those born in the periviable period, this paper provides an update regarding the aetiology and impacts of periviable preterm birth, advances in the antenatal, intrapartum, and acute post-natal management of these infants, and a review of counselling/support approaches for engaging with the infant's family. It concludes with an overview of emerging technology that may assist in improving outcomes for this at-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haruo Usuda
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia; Centre for Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Sean Carter
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Tsukasa Takahashi
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia; Centre for Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - John P Newnham
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Erin L Fee
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia
| | - Alan H Jobe
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia; Perinatal Research, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Centre, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, 45229, USA
| | - Matthew W Kemp
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, 6009, Australia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, 119228, Singapore; School of Veterinary and Life Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, 6150, Australia; Centre for Perinatal and Neonatal Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Controversies in treatment practices of the mother-infant dyad at the limit of viability. Semin Perinatol 2022; 46:151539. [PMID: 34887106 DOI: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In the setting of threatened extreme preterm birth, balancing maternal and fetal risks and benefits in order to choose the best available treatment options is of utmost importance. Inconsistency in treatment practices for infants born between 22 and 24 weeks of gestatotional age may account for inter-hospital variation in survival rates with and without impairment. Most importantly, non-biased and accurate information must be presented to the family as soon as extremely preterm birth is suspected, including counseling on morbidities and mortality associated with delivery at the limits of viability. This review will focus on different therapeutic medical and surgical practices available for threatened extremely preterm birth to improve fetal and maternal outcomes while highlighting the importance of patient-centered approaches.
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Periviable deliveries (less than 26 weeks) are a small percentage of deliveries but account for a disproportionately high number of long-term morbidities. Few studies describe interventions and outcomes for periviable preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). The available reports may include only those neonates who received resuscitation, making interpretation and application difficult. Counseling should consider the impact of oligohydramnios on fetal lung development. This article discusses standard and experimental interventions that may offer neonatal benefit. Antenatal corticosteroids, antibiotics, and magnesium sulfate may improve outcomes but data to support an improvement in outcome are limited. Studies specifically evaluating these interventions are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly S Gibson
- Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, The MetroHealth System, Suite G240, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 44109, USA.
| | - Kerri Brackney
- Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Case Western Reserve University, The MetroHealth System, Suite G240, 2500 MetroHealth Drive, Cleveland, Ohio 44109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kunpalin Y, Burul G, Greenwold N, Tetteh A, Casagrandi D, Warner D, Fox G, Greig E, James CP, David AL. Factors associated with preterm birth in women undergoing cervical cerclage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2020; 251:141-145. [PMID: 32505054 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.05.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cervical cerclage is used to manage women at high risk of late miscarriage (LM) and spontaneous preterm birth (PTB) due to factors such as history of cervical insufficiency (CI), uterine anomaly, cervical surgery and ultrasound (US) diagnosed cervical shortening. Urinary tract infection (UTI) and subsequent pyelonephritis, and bacterial infection are associated with PTB, but their role in PTB after cervical cerclage is unknown. We examined the relationship between UTI and bacterial vaginosis (BV), fetal fibronectin (fFN) test and PTB in women undergoing elective- or US-indicated cervical cerclage. We also investigated whether fetal fibronectin (fFN) test were useful to predict PTB. STUDY DESIGN This is a single center, retrospective study of singleton pregnant women at PTB clinic, University College London Hospital (UCLH, 2005-2015) who underwent elective or US-indicated cervical cerclage. Women were tested for UTI and BV before cerclage placement and received mid-gestation fFN testing. Patient data were extracted from the PTB clinic database and electronic records. Statistical analyses used Pearson's chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests. P values were corrected by Bonferroni method as required. RESULTS 267 singleton pregnant women attended our clinic with completed birth outcome. Of those, 32.2% (86/267) delivered prematurely. All women with UTI or BV received antibiotic treatment. Women with a UTI before cerclage placement were more likely to deliver preterm when compared to those with negative MSU culture (OR 3.39, 95%CI 1.24-9.27, p = 0.04). Their gestational age at delivery were also lower than those with negative MSU result (36+6, IQR 31+4-38+2week vs 38+1, IQR 36+1-39+5-week, p = 0.05). However, UTI after cerclage placement or BV either before or after cerclage placement were not associated with PTB. Women who had a positive fFN result were more likely to deliver preterm (OR 3.85, 95% CI 1.81-8.41, p = 0.0007). CONCLUSIONS The presence of a UTI before cervical cerclage is associated with a higher rate of PTB in women who receive a cervical cerclage, even when treated. We did not find an association between pre or post-cerclage BV or post-cerclage UTI and PTB. Further research is needed to elucidate the link between UTI and PTB in women undergoing cervical cerclage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yada Kunpalin
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6AU, UK.
| | - Giorgia Burul
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Natalie Greenwold
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Amos Tetteh
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Davide Casagrandi
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Deborah Warner
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Georgina Fox
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Eliza Greig
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK
| | - Catherine P James
- Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| | - Anna L David
- Fetal Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Obstetric Wing, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK; Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Institute for Women's Health, University College London, 86-96 Chenies Mews, Bloomsbury, London WC1E 6AU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Medical decision making and practices surrounding extremely premature birth remains challenging for parents and care providers alike. Recently, concerns have been raised regarding wide practice variation, selection bias, and the limitations of outcomes data in this population. The purpose of this review is to summarize the recent literature relevant to deliveries at extreme prematurity with a focus on outcomes, approaches, and institutional variation. RECENT FINDINGS Newer data suggest that evidence-based clinical guidelines and protocols for both pregnant women and infants at extreme prematurity are emerging and may improve care and outcomes at lower gestational ages. It has also been recently shown that wide practice variation, selection bias, and methodological limitations of outcomes data reporting with respect to deliveries at extreme prematurity exist. SUMMARY Counseling at extreme prematurity should prioritize eliciting parental values and preferences with the goal of personalized shared decision-making. Providers should recognize limitations in counseling families at extreme prematurity, including selection bias, institutional variation, outcomes inaccuracies, prognostic uncertainty, and implicit biases. Standardized reporting of perinatal outcomes should be developed to help alleviate current outcomes misrepresentations and improve counseling at extreme prematurity. Education for providers in advanced communication skills is needed when counseling at extreme prematurity.
Collapse
|