Variable incidence of candidemia in patients admitted to ICUs or medical wards of large tertiary-care Italian hospitals

Management of patients with septic shock due to Candida infection

Septic shock represents a serious complication occurring between 6% and 30% of all hospitalized patients; Candida septic shock represents a challenge for clinicians due to the absence of specific risk factors, diagnostic tests, and management. Identification of specific risk factors and use of biomarkers are useful tools considering that differentiation of Candida from bacterial septic shock is demanding. Early effective antifungal treatment, preferably with echinocandins with an adequate source control, represents the best approach for improving survival of patients with septic shock due to Candida. Given the importance of adequate therapy and source control in septic shock attributable to Candida clinical strategies and pathways are needed. This review will focus on epidemiology of septic shock in patients with invasive candidiasis with special attention to diagnostic pathways and treatment strategies.

Candidemia in Patients with Body Temperature Below 37°C and Admitted to Internal Medicine Wards: Assessment of Risk Factors

BACKGROUND

An increasing number of candidemia episodes has been reported in patients cared for in internal medicine wards. These usually older and frail patients may not be suspected as having candidemia because they lack fever at the onset of the episode. To identify the risk factors associated with the lack of fever at the onset of candidemia (ie, the collection of the first positive blood culture for Candida spp.) in patients cared for in internal medicine wards, we compared 2 group of patients with or without fever.

METHODS

We retrospectively review data charts from 3 tertiary care, university hospitals in Italy, comparing patients with or without fever at onset of candidemia. Consecutive candidemic episodes in afebrile patients and matched febrile controls were identified during the 3-year study period. Patient baseline characteristics and several infection-related variables were examined. Random forest analysis was used, given the number of predictors to be considered and the potential complexity of their relations with the onset of fever.

RESULTS

We identified 147 candidemic episodes without fever at onset and 147 febrile candidemia episodes. Factors associated with the lack of fever at onset of candidemia were diabetes, Clostridium difficile infection, and a shorter delta time from internal medicine wards admission to the onset of candidemia. The only variable associated with fever was the use of intravascular devices. Quite unexpectedly, antifungal therapy was administered more frequently to patients without fever, and no differences on 30-day mortality rate were documented in the 2 study groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware that an increasing number of patients with invasive candidiasis cared for in internal medicine wards may lack fever at onset, especially those with diabetes and C. difficile infection. Candidemia should be suspected in patients with afebrile systemic inflammatory response syndrome or in worsening clinical condition: blood cultures should be taken, and a timely and appropriate antifungal therapy should be considered.