Testing patients with non-specific symptoms for antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato does not provide useful clinical information about their aetiology

Profiling disease burden and Borrelia seroprevalence in Canadians with complex and chronic illness

Lyme disease, caused by vector-borne Borrelia bacteria, can present with diverse multi-system symptoms that resemble other conditions. The objective of this study was to evaluate disease presentations and Borrelia seroreactivity in individuals experiencing a spectrum of chronic and complex illnesses. We recruited 157 participants from Eastern Canada who reported one or more diagnoses of Lyme disease, neurological, rheumatic, autoimmune, inflammatory, gastrointestinal, or cardiovascular illnesses, or were asymptomatic and presumed healthy. Intake categories were used to classify participants based on their perceived proximity to Lyme disease, distinguishing between those with a disclosed history of Borrelia infection, those with lookalike conditions (e.g. fibromyalgia syndrome), and those with unrelated ailments (e.g. intestinal polyps). Participants completed three questionnaires, the SF-36 v1, SIQR, and HMQ, to capture symptoms and functional burden, and provided blood serum for analysis at an accredited diagnostic lab. Two-tiered IgG and IgM serological assessments (whole cell ELISA and Western blot) were performed in a blinded fashion on all samples. The pattern of symptoms and functional burden were similarly profound in the presumptive Lyme and Lyme-like disease categories. Borrelia seroprevalence across the study cohort was 10% for each of IgG and IgM, and occurred within and beyond the Lyme disease intake category. Western blot positivity in the absence of reactive ELISA was also substantial. Fibromyalgia was the most common individual diagnostic tag disclosed by two-tier IgG-positive participants who did not report a history of Lyme disease. Within the IgG seropositive cohort, the presence of antibodies against the 31 kDa Outer Surface Protein A (OspA) was associated with significantly better health outcomes. Previously, this marker has been linked to treatment-refractory Lyme arthritis. Overall, our findings support prior observations of phenotypic overlap between Lyme and other diseases. Seropositivity associated with non-specific symptoms and functional impairment warrants further mechanistic investigation and therapeutic optimization.

Persistent Anti-Borrelia IgM Antibodies without Lyme Borreliosis in the Clinical and Immunological Context

The aim of the study was to investigate the etiology of persistent IgM antibodies against Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (sl) and to analyze their association with nonspecific symptoms. The study group comprised individuals with persistent IgM antibodies in the absence of IgG. The relation between ELISA values and time elapsed since past erythema migrans (EM) was analyzed. Previous antibiotic treatments were assessed. The association between persistent IgM and nonspecific symptoms was evaluated statistically. Specificity of IgM antibodies for outer surface protein C (OspC) of B. burgdorferi sl was examined by immunoblotting. Further, we investigated the cross-reactivity with Borrelia-unrelated proteins. Fifty-nine patients (46 women; 78%) were included in the study group. The mean IgM-ELISA values did not change significantly during follow-up (median 6.2 months). The mean ELISA value in the study group was dependent on time elapsed since past EM. Nonspecific symptoms improved significantly more often in patients with lower IgM ELISA results. Persistent IgM antibodies were specific for the C-terminal PKKP motif of OspC. Cross-reacting C-terminal PKKP antigens from both human and prokaryotic origins were identified. We demonstrate that the C-terminal PKKP motif plays a main role for the reactivity of persistent Borrelia IgM toward OspC. However, cross-reactivity to other eukaryotic and/or prokaryotic antigens may hamper the specificity of OspC in the serological diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Lack of improvement of nonspecific symptoms was associated with higher IgM ELISA values.

IMPORTANCE The reactivity of human IgM with the outer surface protein C (OspC) of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato is frequently used to detect Borrelia specific IgM in commercial immunoassays, and such antibodies usually occur in the early phase of the infection. We identified a group of individuals with persistent Borrelia IgM without symptoms of Lyme borreliosis. We used their sera to demonstrate that the C-terminal epitope of OspC binds the IgM. Strikingly, we found that the same epitope occurs also in certain proteins of human and environmental origin; the latter include other bacteria and food plants. Our experimental data show that these Borrelia-unrelated proteins cross-react with the OpsC-specific IgM. This knowledge is important for the development of serologic assays for Lyme borreliosis and provides a cross-reactive explanation for the persistence of Borrelia-IgM.

Lyme disease: diagnosis and treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lyme disease is an important, vector-borne infection found throughout the temperate Northern hemisphere. The disease causes rash, acute systemic illness, and in some untreated patients, inflammatory arthritis. This review examines the emergence, clinical features and management of early Lyme disease and Lyme arthritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

There has been continuing progress in characterizing the clinical manifestations, diagnostic testing and treatment of Lyme disease. Almost all patients with early Lyme disease can be cured with antibiotic treatment. In most cases, Lyme arthritis also responds to antibiotics, but some patients require additional treatment approaches.

SUMMARY

The diagnosis of Lyme disease is based on clinical manifestations and adjunctive laboratory testing. For the rheumatologist, Lyme arthritis should be recognized by a pattern of attacks of asymmetric, oligo-arthritis, recognizable by clinical manifestations in the same way that other rheumatic diseases, such as gout or rheumatoid arthritis, are diagnosed.

Nonspecific Symptoms in Children Referred to a Lyme Borreliosis Center

BACKGROUND

Nonspecific symptoms in children suspected of Lyme borreliosis (LB) are challenging for clinicians. We assessed whether nonspecific symptoms are more prevalent among children with positive immunoglobulin G (IgG) serology or a history of clinical LB.

METHODS

We included children (<18 years) suspected of LB who visited the Lyme Center Apeldoorn of Gelre Hospital between 2008 and 2017. Serum samples were taken, and questionnaires on nonspecific symptoms completed. Clinical data were collected from patients' medical records. The prevalence of nonspecific symptoms was compared between patients with positive versus negative IgG serology and between patients with versus without previous LB with the χ and Fisher exact tests with Bonferroni correction. A history of LB was anamnestically determined. Patients with active Lyme manifestations were excluded.

RESULTS

Included were 149 children (66% female; median age 13 years); 29 (19%) had positive IgG serology; 36 (24%) had previous LB; 12 (8%) had both. Common nonspecific symptoms were sleep disturbances (58%), severe fatigue (57%) and headache (42%). The prevalence of nonspecific symptoms was similar in children with positive versus negative IgG serology. None of the nonspecific symptoms occurred more frequently in children with previous LB compared with children without. More prevalent in children without previous LB were sleep disturbances (40 vs. 66%; P = 0.002) and tingling (6 vs. 34%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Nonspecific symptoms were not more prevalent in children with positive IgG serology nor in children with previous LB, where some were significantly less prevalent. Hence, questionnaires on nonspecific symptoms cannot be used to identify children for serologic testing in Lyme centers.

Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Lyme Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Since recognition in 1975, Lyme disease has become the most common vector-borne illness in North America and Europe. The clinical features are well-characterized and treatment is usually curative, but misperceptions about morbidity persist. The purpose of this review is to examine advances in the diagnosis and treatment of Lyme disease, as well as ongoing management challenges.

RECENT FINDINGS

It is useful to recognize that Lyme disease occurs in stages, with early- and late-stage disease. Clinical expression is in part determined by Borrelial variability. For example, some strains of Borrelia burgdorferi, the causative organism in North America, are particularly arthritogenic. Most patients with early Lyme disease can be cured with a single course of oral antibiotic therapy, in contrast to some patients with Lyme arthritis, a late-stage manifestation, who are more antibiotic refractory and require other treatment strategies. Successful treatment of Lyme disease begins with successful diagnosis and with an understanding of the emergence, clinical features, and impact of Lyme disease over the past half century.

The French Society of Internal Medicine's Top-5 List of Recommendations: a National Web-Based Survey

BACKGROUND

The international project "Choosing Wisely" aims to target unnecessary and potentially harmful examinations and treatments.

OBJECTIVE

To define the French Internal Medicine Top-5 list.

DESIGN

Based on a review of existing Top-5 lists and personal experience, a working group of the French National Society of Internal Medicine selected 27 diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. They were submitted through a national web-based survey to French internists who rated from 1 to 5 the perceived frequency, uselessness, and risk of each procedure. A composite score was calculated as the unweighted addition of the three scores.

PARTICIPANTS

Four hundred thirty internists answered the web-based survey (14% of all French internists including residents). All the French regions and status of the profession were represented.

KEY RESULTS

For the 27 submitted procedures, the mean score (± SD) was 3.25 (± 0.48) for frequency, 3.10 (± 0.43) for uselessness, and 2.63 (± 0.84) for risk. The Top-5 list obtained with the composite score was as follows: 1. Do not prescribe long-term treatment with proton pump inhibitors without regular reevaluation of the indication 2. Do not administer preventive treatments (e.g., for dyslipidemia, hypertension…) in elderly people with dementia when potential risks outweigh the benefits 3. Do not administer hypnotic medications as first-line treatment for insomnia 4. Do not treat with an anticoagulant for more than 3 months a patient with a first venous thromboembolism occurring in the setting of a major transient risk factor 5. Do not screen for Lyme disease without an exposure history or related clinical examination findings We found that the composite score was strongly correlated to the risk score (r_s = 0.88, p < 10^-5) and not to the frequency (r_s = 0.06, p = 0.75) or uselessness score (r_s = 0.17, p = 0.38).

CONCLUSIONS

This Top-5 list provides an opportunity to discuss appropriate use of health care practices in internal medicine.

Non-specific symptoms in adult patients referred to a Lyme centre

OBJECTIVES

There is controversy whether non-specific symptoms can be related to previous Lyme borreliosis (LB). Positive serology can be considered a proxy for previous or persistent LB. We assessed non-specific symptoms and serology in patients suspected of LB referred to a Lyme centre.

METHODS

Included were adult patients who visited a Lyme centre between 2008 and 2014. Before medical consultation, serum samples were taken and questionnaires on non-specific symptoms completed. The prevalence of non-specific symptoms was calculated for patients with positive and negative IgG serology. Logistic regression was used to obtain odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for an association between positive serology and non-specific symptoms.

RESULTS

Of 1439 included patients, 31.6% (455/1439) had positive serology. The most common non-specific symptoms were severe fatigue (61.4%, 883/1439), sleep disturbances (54.8%, 789/1439) and stiffness of neck/back (52.6%, 757/1439). The prevalence of severe fatigue was 53.0% (241/455) in patients with positive serology vs. 65.2% (642/984) in patients with negative serology (OR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.94). The prevalence of sleep disturbances was respectively 46.2% (210/455) vs. 58.8% (579/984) (OR = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93). The prevalence of stiffness of neck/back was respectively 47.7% (217/455) vs. 54.9% (540/984) (OR = 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67-1.06).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients referred to a Lyme centre, non-specific symptoms did not occur more frequently in patients with positive serology compared to patients with negative serology. Hence, a questionnaire on non-specific symptoms cannot be used for identifying patients with possible post-LB symptoms in clinical practice.

Lyme disease: why the controversy?

Some Australians have become convinced of the existence of locally acquired Lyme disease (LD). The history of LD, since its recognition in the early 1970s, is reviewed as a model for investigative approaches to unknown syndromes. Australian Management Guidelines for LD include the requirement for diagnostic testing by National Association of Testing Authorities-accredited laboratories using Therapeutic Goods Administration-licensed tests, which result in the efficient diagnosis of LD in overseas travellers. Despite this, patients who have not left Australia pay many thousands of dollars for non-specialist consultations and testing at overseas laboratories. Unproven long-term therapy with multiple antibiotics has resulted in serious complications, including allergies, line sepsis, pancreatitis and pseudomembranous colitis. Studies have shown that LD vectors are not found in Australia, and Lyme Borrelia has not been found in Australian vectors, animals or patients with autochthonous illnesses. I propose that (i) A non-controversial name for the chronic syndrome should be adopted, 'Australian Multisystem Disorder'. (ii) Research funding should enable the development of a consensus case definition and studies of the epidemiology of this syndrome with laboratory investigations to identify an aetiology and surrogate markers of disease. Prospective, randomised treatment studies could then be undertaken using ethical protocols.

Diagnosing Borreliosis

Borrelia species fall into two groups, the Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato (Bbsl) complex, the cause of Lyme borreliosis (also known as Lyme disease), and the relapsing fever group. Both groups exhibit inter- and intraspecies diversity and thus have variations in both clinical presentation and diagnostic approaches. A further layer of complexity is derived from the fact that ticks may carry multiple infectious agents and are able to transmit them to the host during blood feeding, with potential overlapping clinical manifestations. Besides this, pathogens like Borrelia have developed strategies to evade the host immune system, which allows them to persist within the host, including humans. Diagnostics can be applied at different times during the clinical course and utilize sample types, each with their own advantages and limitations. These differing methods should always be considered in conjunction with potential exposure and compatible clinical features. Throughout this review, we aim to explore different approaches providing the reader with an overview of methods appropriate for various situations. This review will cover human pathogenic members of Bbsl and relapsing fever borreliae, including newly recognized Borrelia miyamotoi spirochetes.