How common is subsequent central nervous system toxicity in asymptomatic patients with haematologic malignancy and supratherapeutic voriconazole serum levels?

Voriconazole-induced central nervous system toxicity: a pharmacovigilance study based on FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database

BACKGROUND

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between voriconazole (VRC) and central nervous system (CNS) toxicity based on the real world data.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The reports of FAERS from January 2004 to March 2022 were included in our study. The CNS toxicity events were identified by using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terms. Reporting odds ratios corresponding to 95% confidence intervals were employed to quantify the signals of VRC-associated CNS events.

RESULTS

The overall RORs (95%CI) for psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, and eye disorders were 1.84 (1.70, 2.00), 1.09 (1.01, 1.18), and 3.84 (3.48, 4.23), respectively (p < 0.05). The median time to the CNS events of VRC was 1(IQR 0-5) day. Top six signals were macular opacity, chloropsia, scintillating scotoma, toxic optic neuropathy, corneal bleeding, and dyschromatopsia, all of them grouped as eye disorders. Compared with itraconazole, fluconazole, posaconazole, and isavuconazole, VRC shows significant relationship and higher incidence rate of psychiatric disorders, nervous system disorders, and eye disorders, respectively (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

VRC was significantly associated with the CNS toxicity. Dosing adjustment, model-based individualized treatment project, and the therapeutic drug monitoring-guided individualized medication regime could be good strategies for efficacy improvement and the adverse events of reducing of VRC.

Antimicrobials in patients with hematologic malignancies and recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation and other cellular therapies

BACKGROUND

Appropriate use of antimicrobials for hematologic malignancy, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and other cellular therapies is vital, with infection causing significant morbidity and mortality in this unique population of immunocompromised hosts. However, often in this population the choice and management of antimicrobial therapy is complex. When selecting an antimicrobial agent, key considerations include the need for dose adjustments due to renal or hepatic impairment, managing drug interactions, the potential for additive drug toxicity among those receiving polypharmacy and therapeutic drug monitoring. Other factors include leveraging pharmacodynamic principles to enable optimization of directed therapy against challenging pathogens, as well as judicious use of antimicrobials to limit drug resistance and adverse drug reactions.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the clinical considerations for commonly used antimicrobials in this setting, including antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal agents.

Central Nervous System Toxicity of Voriconazole: Risk Factors and Threshold - A Retrospective Cohort Study

Purpose

Voriconazole (VRC) is an antifungal agent which is used for treatment and prophylaxis of invasive fungal infections. The common clinical adverse reactions mainly include central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and abnormal liver function. These adverse reactions limit the clinical use of voriconazole to a certain extent. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the risk factors of voriconazole neurotoxic side effects and to determine the plasma trough concentration (C _min) threshold of voriconazole-induced CNS toxicity, so as to improve the safety of voriconazole treatment.

Patients and Methods

This study retrospectively collected the clinical data of 165 patients who received voriconazole and underwent therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). CNS toxicity was defined using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) criteria, logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of CNS toxicity, classification and Regression tree (CART) model was used to determine the C _min threshold for CNS toxicity.

Results

Voriconazole-related CNS toxicity occurred during treatment in 34 of 165 patients (20.6%) and the median time from administration to onset of CNS toxicity was 6 days (range, 2-19 days). The overall incidence of CNS toxicity was 20.6% (34/165), including visual disturbances in 4.8% (8/165) and nervous system disorders in 15.8% (26/165). C _min significantly affects the occurrence of CNS toxicity and the threshold of C _min for voriconazole CNS toxicity was determined to be 4.85 mg/L, when C _min >4.85 mg/L and ≤4.85 mg/L, the incidence of CNS was 32.9% and 11.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

Voriconazole trough concentration of C _min is an independent risk factor for CNS toxicity, and the threshold of C _min for CNS toxicity is 4.85mg/L. TDM should be routinely performed in patients with clinical use of voriconazole to reduce the occurrence of CNS toxicity of voriconazole.

Impact of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms on the clinical efficacy and safety of voriconazole: an update systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 polymorphisms on the clinical efficacy and safety of voriconazole.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and three Chinese databases from their inception to 18 March 2021 using a predefined search algorithm to identify relevant studies. Studies that reported voriconazole-treated patients and information on CYP2C19 polymorphisms were included. The efficacy outcome was success rate. The safety outcomes included overall adverse events, hepatotoxicity, and neurotoxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 20 studies were included. Intermediate metabolizers (IMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) were associated with increased success rates compared with normal metabolizers (NMs) [risk ratio (RR), 1.18; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.03-1.34; I2 = 0%; P = 0.02; RR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.06-1.54; I2 = 0%; P = 0.01]. PMs were at increased risk of overall adverse events in comparison with NMs and IMs (RR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.35-3.53; I2 = 0%; P = 0.001; RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.23-2.64; I2 = 0%; P = 0.003). PMs demonstrated a trend towards an increased incidence of hepatotoxicity when compared with NMs (RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.94-2.74; I2 = 27%; P = 0.08), although there was no statistically significant difference. In addition, there was no significant association between CYP2C19 polymorphisms and neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

IMs and PMs were at a significant higher success rate in comparison with NMs. PMs were significantly associated with an increased incidence of all adverse events compared with NMs and IMs. Researches are expected to further confirm these findings. Additionally, the relationship between hepatotoxicity and CYP2C19 polymorphisms deserves clinical attention.

Managing uncertainty in antifungal dosing: antibiograms, therapeutic drug monitoring and drug-drug interactions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

A number of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors in critically ill or severely immunosuppressed patients influence the effectiveness of antifungal therapy making dosing less certain. Recent position papers from infectious diseases societies and working groups have proposed methods for dosage individualization of antibiotics in critically ill patients using a combination of population pharmacokinetic models, Monte-Carlo simulation and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to guide dosing. In this review, we examine the current limitations and practical issues of adapting a pharmacometrics-guided dosing approaches to dosing of antifungals in critically ill or severely immunosuppressed populations.

RECENT FINDINGS

We review the current status of antifungal susceptibility testing and challenges in incorporating TDM into Bayesian dose prediction models. We also discuss issues facing pharmacometrics dosage adjustment of newer targeted chemotherapies that exhibit severe pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions with triazole antifungals.

SUMMARY

Although knowledge of antifungal pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic is maturing, the practical application of these concepts towards point-of-care dosage individualization is still limited. User-friendly pharmacometric models are needed to improve the utility of TDM and management of a growing number of severe pharmacokinetic antifungal drug-drug interactions with targeted chemotherapies.

Delirium incidence, risk factors, and treatments in older adults receiving chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Older adults with cancer are at increased risk of delirium due to age, comorbidities, medications, cognitive impairment, and possibly cancer treatments. However, there is scant information on the risks of delirium with chemotherapy and approaches to prevent or treat it. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize available evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically searched peer-reviewed journal articles in English, French, German, and Dutch from five databases from 1990 to May 2019 to identify studies examining delirium in adult patients receiving chemotherapy. We also attempted to identify delirium risk prediction models and prevention or treatment trials. All reviews and data extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Summary estimates were derived from random effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 23,389 titles and abstracts were screened, and 1272 full-text articles were reviewed. Nineteen articles reported on delirium using an acceptable diagnostic standard. Sample sizes varied from 7 to 324. The incidence of delirium ranged from 0 to 51% (weighted mean 9%, 95% confidence interval 5-16%). In a sensitivity analysis including 122 studies that used terminology suggestive of delirium but did not meet our inclusion criteria, the weighted incidence of delirium was 10% (95% confidence interval 8-12%). Age was not consistently associated with increased delirium risk. No intervention studies to prevent or treat delirium were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Delirium may occur in 1 in 11 older adults receiving chemotherapy; however, there were substantial limitations in reported studies. This systemic review highlights key gaps in knowledge, particularly regarding risk factors, prevention, and treatments.

Impact of voriconazole plasma concentrations on treatment response in critically ill patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Several authors have demonstrated the relationship between voriconazole concentrations and the risk of therapeutic failure and adverse events However, the information about voriconazole concentrations in the critically ill patient is scarce. The aim of this study was to analyse the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetic behaviour of voriconazole in critically ill patients and their association with the treatment response and development of toxicity.

METHODS

A prospective, observational study was conducted. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit and on treatment with intravenous voriconazole were included. Plasma concentrations were measured between days 4 and 7 from the start of the treatment. The pharmacokinetic analysis was performed using the NONMEM^® software. A regression model was used to evaluate the variables associated with the values outside the therapeutic range, as well as the relationship between the plasma concentrations and the treatment response and the development of hepatotoxicity.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

A total of 33 patients were included. Plasma concentrations outside the therapeutic range (1-5.5 mg/L) were observed in 15 patients, being above the established range in 9 (27.3%) cases, and below it in 6 (18.2%) cases. The presence of a bilirubin value of >1.5 mg/dL and a C-reactive protein >100 mg/dL was associated with supra-therapeutic concentrations. Voriconazole concentrations greater than 5.5 mg/dL were associated with the development of hepatotoxicity.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in voriconazole concentrations in critically ill patients, being associated with a high frequency of adverse events. Close monitoring of these values is required in order to decrease the risk of therapeutic failure and toxicity.

Optimization of Voriconazole Therapy for the Treatment of Invasive Fungal Infections in Adults

Therapeutic concentrations of voriconazole in invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are ensured using a drug monitoring approach, which relies on attainment of steady-state pharmacokinetics. For voriconazole, time to reach steady state can vary from 5-7 days, not optimal for critically ill patients. We developed a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based approach to predict doses that can maximize the net benefit (probability of efficacy-probability of adverse events) and ensure therapeutic concentrations, early on during treatment. The label-recommended 200 mg voriconazole dose resulted in attainment of targeted concentrations in ≥80% patients in the case of Candida spp. infections, as compared to only 40-50% patients, with net benefit ranging from 5.8-61.8%, in the case of Aspergillus spp. infections. Voriconazole doses of 300-600 mg were found to maximize the net benefit up to 51-66.7%, depending on the clinical phenotype (due to CYP2C19 status and pantoprazole use) of the patient and type of Aspergillus infection.