Duration of antibiotic therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: the long and the short of it

Mathematical modelling of antibiotic interaction on evolution of antibiotic resistance: an analytical approach

Background

The emergence and spread of antibiotic-resistant pathogens have led to the exploration of antibiotic combinations to enhance clinical effectiveness and counter resistance development. Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between antibiotics can intensify or diminish the combined therapy's impact. Moreover, these interactions can evolve as bacteria transition from wildtype to mutant (resistant) strains. Experimental studies have shown that the antagonistically interacting antibiotics against wildtype bacteria slow down the evolution of resistance. Interestingly, other studies have shown that antibiotics that interact antagonistically against mutants accelerate resistance. However, it is unclear if the beneficial effect of antagonism in the wildtype bacteria is more critical than the detrimental effect of antagonism in the mutants. This study aims to illuminate the importance of antibiotic interactions against wildtype bacteria and mutants on the deacceleration of antimicrobial resistance.

Methods

To address this, we developed and analyzed a mathematical model that explores the population dynamics of wildtype and mutant bacteria under the influence of interacting antibiotics. The model investigates the relationship between synergistic and antagonistic antibiotic interactions with respect to the growth rate of mutant bacteria acquiring resistance. Stability analysis was conducted for equilibrium points representing bacteria-free conditions, all-mutant scenarios, and coexistence of both types. Numerical simulations corroborated the analytical findings, illustrating the temporal dynamics of wildtype and mutant bacteria under different combination therapies.

Results

Our analysis provides analytical clarification and numerical validation that antibiotic interactions against wildtype bacteria exert a more significant effect on reducing the rate of resistance development than interactions against mutants. Specifically, our findings highlight the crucial role of antagonistic antibiotic interactions against wildtype bacteria in slowing the growth rate of resistant mutants. In contrast, antagonistic interactions against mutants only marginally affect resistance evolution and may even accelerate it.

Conclusion

Our results emphasize the importance of considering the nature of antibiotic interactions against wildtype bacteria rather than mutants when aiming to slow down the acquisition of antibiotic resistance.

Short-term versus usual-term antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Uncomplicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients. Current guidelines recommend a minimum of 14 days of treatment.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of short versus usual antibiotic therapy in adults with uncomplicated S. aureus bacteremia (SAB).

Methods

We developed a search strategy to identify systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies (NRS), comparing short versus usual or long antibiotic regimens for uncomplicated SAB in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Register up to June 2023. The risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS I tool. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager software with a random effect model.

Results

Six NRS with a total of 1700 patients were included. No significant differences were found when comparing short versus prolonged antibiotic therapy as defined by the authors for 90-day mortality [odds ratio (OR): 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-1.46, p: 0.55; I2 = 0%] or 90-day recurrence or relapse of bacteremia [OR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.31-1.68, p: 0.45; I2 = 26%]. Sensitivity analysis showed similar results when comparing a predefined duration of <14 days versus ⩾14 days and when excluding the only study with a high risk of bias.

Conclusion

Shorter-duration regimens could be considered as an alternative option for uncomplicated SAB in low-risk cases. However, based on a small number of studies with significant methodological limitations and risk of bias, the benefits and harms of shorter regimens should be analyzed with caution. Randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the best approach regarding the optimal duration of therapy.

Which trial do we need? Next-generation sequencing to individualize therapy in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

We propose a two-stage clinical trial in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). In Stage 1 we will evaluate metagenomic next generation sequencing from blood as a quantitative biological surrogate for clinical endpoint in patients with SAB, similar to quantitative HIV viral load in HIV-infected patients. In Stage 2, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial to individualize duration of antibiotic therapy for based upon the presence of S. aureus genetic material in patients’ blood. The proposed study addresses two critical aspects of treatment of patients with SAB: the identification of a surrogate biological endpoint for future clinical trials, and a new approach by which to individualize patient management.

Update on Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recently published evidence relevant to Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Staphylococcus aureus is the most common pathogen causing co-infections and superinfections in patients with COVID-19. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia ratios have sharply risen during the pandemic. SAB mortality is 18% at 1 month and 27% at 3 months but has gradually decreased over the last 30 years. Recurrences and reinfections are common (9%). Standardised items to define complicated SAB, and a new cut-off defining persisting bacteremia after 2 days with positive blood cultures have been proposed. Multiple antibiotic combinations have been trialled including vancomycin or daptomycin with β-lactams, fosfomycin, or clindamycin, without significant results. In the recently published guidelines, vancomycin remains the first line of treatment for MRSA bacteremia. For the management of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus , cefazolin less frequently causes acute kidney injury than flucloxacillin, and when susceptibility is demonstrated, de-escalation to penicillin G is suggested.

SUMMARY

Our review confirms that Staphylococcus aureus represents a special aetiology among all causes of bloodstream infections. Pending results of platform and larger trials, its distinct epidemiology and determinants mandate careful integration of clinical variables and best available evidence to optimize patient outcomes.

How I manage a patient with MRSA bacteraemia

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections are common and associated with a high mortality of 15-25%. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection accounts for 10-40% of cases, and has an even higher mortality. Despite being the 'bread and butter' of clinical infectious diseases practice, robust evidence to guide optimal management is often lacking and there is wide variation in practice.

OBJECTIVES

To provide a real-world example of a case of MRSA bacteraemia and the thought processes of the authors as key management decision points are reached.

SOURCES

The discussion is based on recent literature searches of relevant topics. In making recommendations, randomized clinical trial data have been prioritized and highlighted, and where these are not available recommendations are based on the experience and opinions of the authors.

CONTENT

For a patient with MRSA bacteraemia and a primary bone and joint infection the following points are discussed: empirical antibiotic choice for suspected S. aureus bacteraemia; directed antibiotic choice for MRSA; monitoring and dosing of vancomycin; the role of combination therapy when bacteraemia is persistent; and the duration of therapy and role of switching to oral antibiotics.

IMPLICATIONS

While broad principles of aggressive source control and appropriate choice and duration of antibiotics are important, the heterogeneity of S. aureus bacteraemia means that a tailored rather than algorithmic approach to management is often required. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to strengthen the evidence base for the management of MRSA bacteraemia.

Comparable outcomes of short-course and prolonged-course therapy in selected cases of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia:A pooled cohort study

BACKGROUND

The recommended duration of antimicrobial treatment for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a minimum of 14 days. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients receiving short-course (SC), 6-10 days, or prolonged-course (PC), 10-16 days, antibiotic therapy for low risk methicillin-susceptible SAB (MS-SAB).

METHODS

Adults with MS-SAB in 1995-2018 were included from three independent retrospective cohorts. Logistic regression models fitted with inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to assess the association between the primary outcome of 90-day mortality and treatment duration for the individual cohorts as well as a pooled cohort analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 645, 219 and 141 patients with low risk MS-SAB were included from Cohort I, II and III. Median treatment duration in the three SC groups were 8 days (interquartile range [IQR] 7-10), 9 days (IQR 8-10), and 8 days (IQR 7-10). In the PC groups patients received a median therapy of 14 days (IQR 13-15), 14 days (IQR 13-15) and 13 days (IQR 12-15). No significant differences in 90-day mortality were observed between the SC and PC group in Cohort I (Odds ratio [OR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-1.41), Cohort II (OR 1.24, 95% CI 0.60-2.62) nor Cohort III (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.24-4.019). This result was consistent in the pooled cohort analysis (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71-1.51). Furthermore, duration of therapy was not associated with the risk of relapse.

CONCLUSION

In patients with low risk MS-SAB, shorter courses of antimicrobial therapy yielded similar clinical outcomes compared to longer courses of therapy.