Renal safety of a single dose of gentamicin in patients with sepsis in the emergency department

Acute Kidney Injury in a Previously Healthy 56-Year-Old Male Following a Direct Visual Internal Urethrotomy of a Bulbar Stricture

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a frequent finding in acutely ill and hospitalized patients arising from various etiologies. Anuric AKI, a more pronounced form of AKI in which less than 100 cc of urine is produced per day, is most frequently encountered in hospitalized, septic, and post-surgical patients, often secondary to shock or bilateral urinary tract obstruction. The development of anuric AKI in previously healthy patients after outpatient urological procedures presents a unique challenge to physicians, as many outpatient procedures require the routine perioperative administration of multiple nephrotoxic medications. Further complicating this clinical scenario, some surgical procedures that intrinsically involve iatrogenic injury to the kidney, ureter, bladder, or nearby organ can rarely lead to a phenomenon known as reflex anuria, an anuric state typically associated with AKI. Here, we report an unusual case of a previously healthy 56-year-old male who developed anuric AKI two days after direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) for the treatment of a bulbar stricture. Non-contrast CT revealed no signs of an obstructive process, and laboratory findings supported an intrarenal cause of AKI. Consideration was given to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)-induced nephrotoxicity, gentamicin-associated acute tubular necrosis, and propofol infusion syndrome, in addition to their potential synergistic effects. We also explore this as the first reported case of reflex anuria occurring at the level of the bulbar urethra, as most cases have involved direct injury to the kidney or ureter. Over the course of 10 days, our patient responded well to treatment with supportive measures and dialysis, with his vomiting, electrolyte abnormalities, renal state, and anuria eventually improving.

CON: Carbapenems are NOT necessary for all infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales

Carbapenems are considered the drugs of choice for the treatment of serious infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales. However, because of the dramatic increase in carbapenem-resistant organisms worldwide, finding alternatives to carbapenems is a must. The potential options include β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combinations, temocillin, cephamycins and some non-β-lactam drugs. The most controversial is piperacillin/tazobactam; the results of the MERINO trial are challenged because the isolates of patients with worse outcomes were frequently not susceptible to piperacillin/tazobactam when studied by reference methods, and also because the drug was not administered in extended infusion. Other potential options are briefly discussed. We conclude that carbapenems are not necessary for all patients with infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Enterobacterales.