Development of a EUCAST disk diffusion method for the susceptibility testing of rapidly growing anaerobic bacteria using Fastidious Anaerobe Agar (FAA): a development study using Bacteroides species

Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Bacteroides fragilis isolated from blood cultures, Europe, 2022 (ReSuBacfrag)

OBJECTIVES

Bacteroides fragilis is the most frequent cause of anaerobic bacteraemia. Although recent data suggest a rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of this and other anaerobic bacteria, surveillance remains limited due to a lack of both data availability and comparability. However, a newly introduced standardised method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria has made larger scale surveillance possible for the first time. The aim of this study was to investigate phenotypic AMR of Bacteroides fragilis isolates from bacteraemia across Europe in 2022.

METHODS

In a multicentre approach, clinical microbiology laboratories in Europe were invited to contribute results of AST for Bacteroides fragilis blood culture isolates (including only the first isolate per patient and year). AST of a selection of four antibiotics was performed locally by participating laboratories in a prospective or retrospective manner, using the new EUCAST disc diffusion method on fastidious anaerobe agar (FAA-HB).

RESULTS

A total of 16 European countries reported antimicrobial susceptibilities in 449 unique isolates of Bacteroides fragilis from blood cultures in 2022. Clindamycin demonstrated the highest resistance rates (20.9%, range 0 - 63.6%), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (11.1%, 0-54.5%), meropenem (13.4%, 0-45.5%), and metronidazole (1.8%, 0-20.0%), all with wide variation between countries.

CONCLUSION

Considering that the mean resistance rates across Europe were higher than expected for three of the four anti-anaerobic antibiotics under surveillance, both local AST of clinically relevant isolates of Bacteroides fragilis and continued surveillance on an international level is warranted.

Ephedra alte extracts' GC-MS profiles and antimicrobial activity against multidrug-resistant pathogens (MRSA)

The extracts of E. alte offer promising potential as renewable resources for various chemical derivative products aimed at addressing antibiotic resistance. These extracts exhibited significant activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), a strain known for its resistance to multiple antibiotics. The extracts were found to be effective against several common antibiotics, including Imipenem, Ampicillin, Penicillin G, Oxacillin, and Amoxicillin-clavulanate. GC-MS analysis revealed that the phytoconstituents of E. alte extracts, obtained using both methanol and ethyl acetate, consist of a diverse range of 83 and 160 phytocompounds, respectively. These organic compounds serve as important biochemical precursors for the synthesis of vitamins E and K1, and exhibit antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory properties in both plants and microorganisms. Notable compounds identified include fatty acids (such as palmitic acid, dodecanoic acid, sebacic acid, pentadecanoic acid, myristic acid, stearic acid, behenic acid, and linoelaidic acid), phytosterols (Campesterol, β-sitosterol, Stigmast-5-ene), sugars (D-fructose, Fructofuranans), terpenoids (Phytol, citronellol), and phenolic acids (Protocatechoic acid, shikimic acid). The antimicrobial activity of all E. alte extracts was found to be superior to that of mupirocin and ciprofloxacin, as observed in susceptibility testing against MRSA ATCC 43300 and other pathogenic bacteria and fungi. It is likely that the combined action of the antimicrobial components within the E. alte extract bypasses the mechanisms employed by MRSA to protect itself from antibiotics. Further experiments are needed to investigate the individual effects of each pure compound and their potential synergistic interactions, which may enhance their overall performance.

Recommendations of the Spanish Antibiogram Committee (COESANT) for in vitro susceptibility testing of antimicrobial agents by disk diffusion

Disk diffusion is a well standardized method that provides reliable categorical results to guide antimicrobial therapy in numerous types of infections. Based on the guidelines of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), which are widely implemented in Spain, the Spanish Antibiogram Committee (COESANT) has drawn up recommendations for antimicrobial selection by the disk diffusion technique, including selective reporting and its use for the detection of resistance mechanisms. Factors affecting disk diffusion results, along with advantages and shortcomings of the method, are also discussed.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group organisms in Hong Kong, 2020-2021

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective study analyzed the susceptibility levels of Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) in a hospital-based laboratory where disk diffusion test (DDT) was routinely performed. Isolates non-susceptible to imipenem and metronidazole by DDT were further investigated using a gradient method.

METHODS

The DDT and MIC susceptibility data of clindamycin, metronidazole, moxifloxacin and imipenem obtained on Brucella blood agar for 1264 non-duplicated isolates during 2020-2021 were analyzed. Species identification was obtained by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry and 16S rRNA sequencing. Interpretative agreement of DDT results using the 2015 EUCAST tentative and 2021 CA-SFM breakpoints was compared against MIC as the reference.

RESULTS

The dataset included 604 B. fragilis (483 division I, 121 division II isolates), 415 non-fragilis Bacteroides, 177 Phocaeicola and 68 Parabacteroides. Susceptibility rates for clindamycin (22.1-62.1%) and moxifloxacin (59.9-80.9%) were low and many had no inhibition zones. At the EUCAST and CA-SFM breakpoints, 83.0 and 89.4% were imipenem-susceptible, and 89.6% and 97.4 were metronidazole-susceptible. MIC testing confirmed 11.4% and 2.8% isolates as imipenem-non-susceptible and metronidazole-resistant, respectively. Significant numbers of false-susceptibility and/or false-resistance results were observed at the CA-SFM breakpoint but not the EUCAST breakpoint. Higher rates of imipenem and/or metronidazole resistance were detected in B. fragilis division II, B. caccae, B. ovatus, B. salyersiae, B. stercoris and Parabacteroides. Co-resistance to imipenem and metronidazole was detected in 3 B. fragilis division II isolates.

CONCLUSIONS

The data demonstrated emerging BFG resistance to several important anti-anaerobic antibiotics and highlights the importance of anaerobic susceptibility testing in clinical laboratories to guide therapy.

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Bacteroides species by disk diffusion: The NordicAST Bacteroides study

OBJECTIVES

- Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria has until recently been done by MIC methods. We have carried out a multi-centre evaluation of the newly validated EUCAST disk diffusion method for AST of Bacteroides spp.

METHODS

- A panel of 30 Bacteroides strains was assembled based on reference agar dilution MICs, resistance gene detection and quantification of cfiA carbapenemase gene expression. Nordic clinical microbiology laboratories (n = 45) performed disk diffusion on Fastidious Anaerobe Agar with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood (FAA-HB) for piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem and metronidazole.

RESULTS

- A total of 43/45 (95.6%) laboratories carried out disk diffusion per protocol. Intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.87 (0.80-0.93) for piperacillin-tazobactam, 0.95 (0.91-0.97) for meropenem and 0.89 (0.83-0.94) for metronidazole. For metronidazole, one media lot yielded smaller zones and higher variability than another. Piperacillin-tazobactam and meropenem zone diameters correlated negatively with cfiA expression. A meropenem zone diameter of <28 mm in B. fragilis indicated presence of cfiA. Piperacillin-tazobactam had the most false susceptible results. Categorical errors for this antimicrobial were particularly prevalent in cfiA-positive strains, and piperacillin-tazobactam had the highest number of comments describing zone reading difficulties.

CONCLUSIONS

- Inter-laboratory agreement by disk diffusion was good or very good. The main challenges were media-related variability for metronidazole and categorical disagreement with the reference method for piperacillin-tazobactam in some cfiA-positive strains. An area of technical uncertainty specific for such strains may be warranted.

Assessing the quality of the anaerobic environment - a method developed to support EUCAST disk diffusion of anaerobic bacteria

The purpose of this study is to establish a method for assessing the anaerobic environment for EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria on fastidious anaerobe agar with 5% mechanically defibrinated horse blood (FAA-HB). The method utilizes the association between a decrease in the metronidazole disk zone diameter and increasing oxygen levels with an aerotolerant Clostridium perfringens strain DSM 25589 (CCUG 75076 and NCTC 14679). The C. perfringens strain was tested on FAA-HB with a McFarland 1 inoculum and a metronidazole 5 μg disk. FAA-HB was incubated for 16-20 h at 35-37°C. The association between oxygen levels (0, 0.16, 1, 2, and 4% oxygen) and the metronidazole zone diameter was determined. Reproducibility at 0% oxygen was investigated as part of a European multi-centre study of disk diffusion of anaerobic bacteria. The median zone diameters (n=12) at each oxygen level were 29 mm (0%), 21 mm (0.16%), 16 mm (1%), 15 mm (2%), and 15 mm (4%). The metronidazole zone diameters at 0% oxygen from the multi-centre reproducibility-study had a median of 29 mm and a 95%-percentile range of 25-33 mm (n=236). Only one reading was below 25 mm. Based on our results, a zone diameter of ≥25 mm using a metronidazole 5 μg disk and the C. perfringens strain, tested with EUCAST recommendations, can be used to indicate that the anaerobic environment is of sufficient quality for culture and disk diffusion AST. EUCAST has included the method as part of the quality control for AST of anaerobic bacteria.

The European committee on antimicrobial susceptibility testing disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria

OBJECTIVES

Antimicrobial resistance in anaerobic bacteria is increasing and there is a link between inappropriate antimicrobial therapy and poor clinical outcome in the treatment of infections caused by anaerobic bacteria. Accurate and timely antimicrobial susceptibility testing of anaerobic bacteria is therefore of critical importance. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) has recently described a disc diffusion susceptibility testing method for anaerobic bacteria using fastidious anaerobe agar (FAA) supplemented with 5% defibrinated horse blood (HB). This method was previously validated for Bacteroides spp. only. The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of FAA-HB for disc diffusion and also for frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria.

METHODS

Clinical isolates, including 54 Bacteroides/Phocaeicola/Parabacteroides spp., 49 Prevotella spp., 51 Fusobacterium necrophorum, 58 Clostridium perfringens, and 54 Cutibacterium acnes were evaluated against six antimicrobial agents. MICs were determined by agar dilution following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute methodology, modified to use FAA-HB as recommended by EUCAST, instead of supplemented Brucella agar, and disc diffusion was performed on FAA-HB following EUCAST methodology.

RESULTS

Results for quality control strains were reproducible, with 99.3% of zones within range. Disc diffusion by EUCAST methodology was able to distinguish between susceptible and resistant isolates of anaerobic bacteria for benzylpenicillin, piperacillin-tazobactam, meropenem, clindamycin, and metronidazole (98.7% correct categorization). No isolates resistant to vancomycin were tested, but zone diameters correctly categorized the susceptible isolates, and there was a logical relationship between MICs and inhibition zones.

DISCUSSION

The recently published EUCAST method for disc diffusion for anaerobic bacteria based on FAA-HB is a reproducible and accurate method for susceptibility testing of frequently isolated anaerobic bacteria.

Time for Some Group Therapy: Update on Identification, Antimicrobial Resistance, Taxonomy, and Clinical Significance of the Bacteroides fragilis Group

Bacteroides fragilis group (BFG) species are common members of the human microbiota that provide several benefits to healthy hosts, yet BFG are also the most common anaerobes isolated from human infections, including intra-abdominal infections, abscesses, and bloodstream infection. Compared to many other anaerobes associated with disease, members of the BFG are more likely to be resistant to commonly used antimicrobials, including penicillin (>90% resistant), carbapenems (2 to 20% resistant), and metronidazole (0.2 to 4% resistant). As a result, infection with BFG bacteria can be associated with poor clinical outcomes. Here, we discuss the role of BFG in human health and disease, proposed taxonomic reclassifications within the BFG, and updates in methods for species-level identification. The increasing availability of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) supports recent proposals that the BFG now span two families (Bacteroidaceae and "Tannerellaceae") and multiple genera (Bacteroides, Parabacteroides, and Phocaeicola) within the phylum Bacteroidota. While members of the BFG are often reported to "group" rather than "species" level in many clinical settings, new reports of species-specific trends in antimicrobial resistance profiles and improved resolution of identification tools support routine species-level reporting in clinical practice. Empirical therapy may not be adequate for treatment of serious infections with BFG, warranting susceptibility testing for serious infections. We summarize methods for antimicrobial susceptibility testing and resistance prediction for BFG, including broth microdilution, agar dilution, WGS, and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS). We examine global trends in BFG antimicrobial resistance and review genomics of BFG, revealing insights into rapid activation and dissemination of numerous antimicrobial resistance mechanisms.

Correlation between antibiotic resistance and clinical outcome of anaerobic infections; mini-review

In anaerobic infections, the relationship between clinical failure and antibiotic resistance is difficult to demonstrate, especially in mixed anaerobic-aerobic infections. Single isolates of anaerobes in cases of bacteraemia revealed that treatment failures were due to inappropriate therapy. We review here cases, where the empiric treatment was unsuccessful due to resistance of anaerobic bacteria to the administered agents and where the change of the antibiotic allowed the patients to be cured. Many therapeutic failures could be linked to the lack of timely detection of resistance, including heteroresistance of the anaerobes. Disk diffusion or Etest methodology may be suitable, at least for rapidly growing anaerobes, to detect both resistance and heteroresistance to antibiotics widely used for empirical therapy.

Comparative evaluation of agar dilution and broth microdilution by commercial and in-house plates for Bacteroides fragilis group: An economical and expeditious approach for resource-limited settings

OBJECTIVE

To compare the performance of agar dilution and broth microdilution by commercial and in-house prepared plates for the Bacteroides fragilis group. The cost analysis was performed to demonstrate that in-house prepared BMD plates were a suitable alternative to agar dilution given the high cost and low feasibility of incorporating commercial BMD plates in routine, particularly in the tertiary care institutes of many low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS

Thirty B. fragilis group isolates were tested against six antibiotics, frequently used as empirical therapy for anaerobic infections including metronidazole, clindamycin, imipenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, cefoxitin, and chloramphenicol. The running consumable expenditure for all methodologies was calculated.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated essential and categorical agreement of >90% for all antibiotics except cefoxitin, which showed <90% categorical agreement. No major or very major errors were observed. We observed a high agreement and strong concordance for MIC values between both methods and inter-rate reliability of >0.9 by Cohen's kappa analysis, indicating almost perfect agreement between both methods using either of the plates. In contrast to agar dilution, a 20.5 fold cost reduction was seen in BMD using in-house plates and a 5.8 fold reduction using commercial plates to test a single isolate. However, when testing 30 isolates concurrently the cost significantly increased for commercial BMD plates by 8.4 folds, and only 1.03 fold cost reduction was seen with in-house BMD plates.

CONCLUSION

BMD gives comparable results to agar dilution and can be considered a method of choice to test a small number of samples. The technique is an economical option when plates are standardized in-house and could be employed for susceptibility testing of the B. fragilis group.