The need for a holistic view on management of Clostridioides difficile infection

Impact of an Intervention Program on Clostridioides difficile Infections: Comparison of 2 Hospital Cohorts

Background

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurs in various contexts and care settings and is managed by multiple specialists who are not experts in its management. While there are many initiatives to improve the diagnosis and avoid overdiagnosis, there is less focus on the overall management of the infection.

Methods

We studied a cohort of patients with a positive test result for toxigenic C difficile in 2 hospitals. Hospital A has a program that provides advice from an infectious disease specialist (IDS) and promotes continuity of care by providing a phone number to contact the IDS. Hospital B does not have any specific CDI program. The evaluation assessed the proportion of patients not treated (carriers or self-limited disease), adherence to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines, access to novel therapies, recurrence and mortality rates, and readmission and emergency department visits due to CDI. We assessed the program's effectiveness through a logistic regression model adjusted for covariates chosen by clinical criteria.

Results

Hospital A avoided more unnecessary treatments (19.3% vs 11.5%), provided access to novel therapies more frequently (35.3% vs 13%), and adhered more closely to current guidelines (95.8% vs 71.3%). Although the mortality and recurrence rates did not differ, the absence of an intervention program was associated with greater odds of admission due to recurrence (odds ratio, 4.19; P = .037) and more visits to the emergency department due to CDI (odds ratio, 8.74; P = .001).

Conclusions

Implementation of a CDI intervention program based on recommendations from IDSs and improved access to specialized care during the follow-up is associated with enhanced quality of CDI management and potential reductions in hospital resource utilization.

A Retrospective Budget Impact Analysis of Fidaxomicin Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infections (CDI) in Germany

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Research suggests that treating C. difficile infections (CDI) with fidaxomicin (FDX) is more effective than vancomycin (VAN), with potential cost savings. The objective was to calculate the budget impact of FDX treatment compared to VAN from a German payer perspective.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

The analysis used real-world data of patients discharged from University Hospital Cologne between Jan-01-2018 and Dec-31-2019. We identified recurrent and non-recurrent CDI cases and calculated direct treatment costs based on G-DRG flat rates. To calculate average costs per treatment and the budget impact, recurrence probabilities for VAN and FDX were taken from published evidence (28-day and 90-day scenarios).

RESULTS

Totally, 475 cases were analyzed, thereof 421 non-recurrent, causing mean costs of €32,901 per case (95% CI: 27.752-38.050). Thirty-two patients experienced a recurrence within 28 days, yielding mean costs of €10,952 (95% CI: 5.627-16.277) for their additional hospital stay. The resulting budget impact was €1,303 (95% CI: 670 - 1.937) in favor of FDX, ranging from €148.34 to €2,190.30 in scenario analyses.

CONCLUSION

The analysis indicates FDX treatment can lead to cost savings compared to VAN. Future research should focus on specific patient groups, such as refractory CDI patients.

The ESCMID Study Group for Clostridioides difficile: History, Role, and Perspectives

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is a major nosocomial pathogen but is also increasingly recognised as an important diarrhoeal pathogen in the community, not always associated with antibiotics. The European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) Study Group for C. difficile (ESGCD) is a group of clinicians, scientists, and others from many European countries and further afield, who share a common interest in C. difficile. The aims of the Study Group are centred around raising the profile of  C. difficile infection (CDI) in humans and animals, fostering collaboration amongst centres in different European countries and providing a forum for discussing and disseminating information. One of the principal aims of the Study Group is to raise awareness of C. difficile infections in Europe. ESGCD has a particular interest in the development and dissemination of European guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of CDI. This chapter will discuss the organisation of ESGCD within the ESCMID Study Group structure, the origins of the Study Group, the aims, and objectives of the group, and will highlight some of the past and present activities of ESGCD in relation to these.

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI): A pan-European multi-center cost and resource utilization study, results from the Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe CDI (COMBACTE-CDI)

OBJECTIVES

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is one of the leading nosocomial infections worldwide, resulting in a significantly increasing burden on the healthcare systems. However, Pan-European data about cost and resource utilization of CDI treatment do not exist.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis within the Combatting Bacterial Resistance in Europe CDI project was conducted based on resource costs for inpatient treatment and productivity costs. Country-specific cost values were converted to EURO referred to 1 January, 2019 values. Differences in price levels for healthcare services among the participating countries were adjusted by using an international approach of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. As the study focused on patients with recurrent CDI, the observed study population was categorized into (a) patients with CDI but without CDI recurrence (case group), (b) patients with CDI recurrence (recurrence group), and (c) patients without CDI (control group).

RESULTS

Overall, 430 hospitalized patients from 12 European countries were included into the analysis between July 2018 and November 2018. Distribution of mean hospital length of stay and mean overall costs per patient between the case group, recurrence group, and control group were as follows: 22 days (95% CI 17-27 days) vs. 55 days (95% CI 17-94 days) vs. 26 days (95% CI 22-31 days; p 0.008) and € 15 242 (95% CI 10 593-19 891) vs. € 52 024 (95% CI 715-103 334) vs. € 21 759 (95% CI 16 484-27 035; p 0.010), respectively. The CDI recurrence rate during the observational period was 18%. Change escalation in CDI medication (OR 3.735) and treatment in an intensive care unit (OR 5.454) were found to be the most important variables associated with increased overall costs of patients with CDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of patients with recurrent CDI results in a significant burden. Prevention of CDI recurrences should be in focus of daily patient care to identify the most cost-effective treatment strategy.