How I manage bacterial prostatitis

The diagnostic yield of the Meares & Stamey test can be significantly improved by symptom-based patient selection and the experience of the test performer

BACKGROUND

Even if Meares-Stamey 4-glass (M&S) test is regarded a decisive tool for diagnosing prostatitis its use is only rarely performed in everyday clinical practice. Here, we analyze if the diagnostic yield of the M&S test could be improved by a pre-test categorization of patients due to undergo a M&S test.

METHODS

All clinical and microbiological data of patients who underwent M&S test in two urological centers from January 2004 to December 2021 were analyzed in this retrospective cohort study. One center has a dedicated staff member for the study of prostatitis (Cohort I), while the other center is a general urological unit (Cohort II). All patients were divided into 3 groups on the basis of the assembled data: patients with symptoms related to prostatitis only (Group I), patients with symptoms related to both prostatitis and BPH (Group II), patients with symptoms related to BPH only (Group III). The rates of positive microbiological results in each group were compared.

RESULTS

In the whole period, 9347 patients were analyzed and categorized as follows: Group I, 1884; Group II, 5151; Group III, 2312. Three-thousand and eight-hundred twenty-three patients showed positive culture results (40.9%). The most common isolated species was Escherichia coli (49.7%), followed by Enteroccus spp. (31.8%). The rates of positive M&S tests in the different symptom groups were: Group I, 1532 (81.4%); Group II, 1494 (29.0%); Group III, 797 (34.4%). The overall rate of positive M&S tests in each urology center showed that the center with a staff member who is dedicated to prostatitis studies (Cohort I) had a significantly higher rate of positive M&S tests than the general urological department (Cohort II) (64.3% vs 31.4%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Symptom-based patient selection and dedicated staff members will increase the diagnostic yield of the M&S test and reduce the number of unnecessary tests.

Ten common misconceptions about antibiotic use in the hospital

Antimicrobials are one of the most administered medications in hospitals. Thoughtful and rational antibiotic prescribing by clinicians are important in reducing the adverse effects to both the host that takes the antibiotic and also the individuals in the host's community. Principles informing antibiotic prescribing in the hospital are commonly rooted in misconceptions. We review 10 common myths associated with antibacterial usage in hospitalized patients and share contemporary evidence in hopes of enhancing evidence-informed practice in this patient care setting.

Tigecycline-Rifampicin Restrains Resistance Development in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

The goal of this study was to clarify the synergistic antibacterial activity of the combination of tigecycline (TGC) and rifampicin (RIF). Additionally, the study sought to investigate the impact of this combination on the development of mutational resistance and to assess its efficacy in an in vivo model using Galleria mellonella. Through a checkerboard test, we found that the combination of TGC and RIF showed synergistic antibacterial activity against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP). The fractional inhibition concentration index (FICI) was found to be ≤0.5, confirming the potency of the combination. Additionally, this synergistic effect was further validated in vivo using the G. mellonella infection model. TGC-RIF treatment had a lower mutant prevention concentration (MPC) than that of monotherapy, indicating its potential to reduce the development of mutational resistance. We observed a substantial variation in the MPCs of TGC and RIF when they were measured at different proportions in the combinations. Furthermore, during the resistant mutant selection window (MSW) test, we noticed a correlation between strains with low FICI and low MSW. The expression of efflux-pump-related genes, namely rarA and acrB, is significantly decreased in the combination therapy group. This indicates that altered expression levels of certain efflux pump regulator genes are associated with a combined decrease in bacterial mutation resistance. In conclusion, the combination of TGC and RIF effectively suppresses antibiotic resistance selection in CRKP. This study establishes a paradigm for evaluating drug-resistant mutant suppression in antimicrobial combination therapy.

Human Male Genital Tract Microbiota

The human body is vastly colonised by microorganisms, whose impact on health is increasingly recognised. The human genital tract hosts a diverse microbiota, and an increasing number of studies on the male genital tract microbiota suggest that bacteria have a role in male infertility and pathological conditions, such as prostate cancer. Nevertheless, this research field remains understudied. The study of bacterial colonisation of the male genital tract is highly impacted by the invasive nature of sampling and the low abundance of the microbiota. Therefore, most studies relied on the analysis of semen microbiota to describe the colonisation of the male genital tract (MGT), which was thought to be sterile. The aim of this narrative review is to present the results of studies that used next-generation sequencing (NGS) to profile the bacterial colonisation patterns of different male genital tract anatomical compartments and critically highlight their findings and their weaknesses. Moreover, we identified potential research axes that may be crucial for our understanding of the male genital tract microbiota and its impact on male infertility and pathophysiology.

Factors Deciding Conservative or Intervention Treatment for Prostate Abscess: A Retrospective Case-Control Study

Prostate abscess (PA) can lead to severe urosepsis and septic shock if not treated promptly. However, early diagnosis can be hindered by the declining incidence of PA, especially in developing countries and high-risk patients. Despite the prevalence of PA, there is currently a lack of well-established contemporary guidelines or treatment algorithms. This study aimed to review the etiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment options for PA, as well as analyze the characteristics, background profiles of patients, and clinical course. Ultimately, the goal was to develop a personalized treatment strategy for patients with PA. This retrospective study examined 44 patients diagnosed with PA at a tertiary medical center between 2010 and 2020. The patients were divided into two groups based on their treatment: conservative treatment or intervention (transurethral resection of the prostate [TURP] or transurethral prostate drainage [TPD]). The study evaluated various factors, including patients' background profiles, comorbidities, laboratory data, and PA size and volume. Complications of the interventions were also analyzed. No significant differences were found in basic data between the conservative treatment group (19 patients) and intervention group (25 patients; 20 for TURP, 5 for TPD). However, it was observed that single abscesses, size <2.2 cm, and prostate volume <48 cm³, may be suitable for conservative treatment. Patients with diabetes mellitus and human immunodeficiency virus should be monitored for thrombotic events. In addition, there was a significant difference in white blood count between the two groups (12.1 ± 7.0 vs. 17.6 ± 9.7 × 10⁹/L, p < 0.05). A subgroup analysis of the intervention group showed no significant difference in the risk of complications between TPD and TURP. Patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus and immunodeficiency are at a high risk of PA but are not indicated for surgical treatment. The PA profile, including number, size, volume, and percentage to prostate volume, should be considered when deciding on surgical intervention for patients with PA. Patients with higher leukocytosis may require surgical treatment. Overall, these findings can help guide the development of a personalized treatment strategy for patients with PA.