Theoretical prediction of pullout strengths for dental and orthopaedic screws with conical profile and buttress threads

Does augmentation increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws? A biomechanical cadaver study

Purpose

Open reduction and internal fixation using anterior plate osteosynthesis currently represents the gold standard for the treatment of symphyseal disruptions. Since postoperative screw loosening with consequent implant failure is frequently observed, this study aims to evaluate if and to what extent augmentation can increase the pull-out force of symphyseal screws to improve the constructs stability.

Methods

Twelve human cadaveric anterior pelvic rings were separated at the symphyseal joint for bilateral testing, consequently achieving comparable sites. First, one non-augmented screw was drilled into the superior pubic ramus, whereas the contralateral side was primarily augmented. The screws were then withdrawn with a constant speed of 10 mm/min and the fixation strengths determined by the force (N) displacement (mm) curve. Finally, the primary non-augmented site was secondary augmented, representing revision surgery after initial implant failure, and the corresponding fixation strength was measured again.

Results

Augmentation compared to non-augmented screws displayed significantly higher pull-out forces with an increase in pull-out force by 377% for primary and 353% for secondary augmentation (p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the pull-out force comparing primary and secondary augmentation (p = 0.74).

Conclusions

Primary and secondary augmentation significantly increases the stability of symphyseal screws and, therefore, potentially decreases rates of implant failure.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-022-01963-6.

How relevant is lumbar bone mineral density for the stability of symphyseal implants? A biomechanical cadaver study

PURPOSE

Osteoporotic bone tissue appears to be an important risk factor for implant loosening, compromising the stability of surgical implants. However, it is unclear whether lumbar measured bone mineral density (BMD) is of any predictive value for stability of surgical implants at the pubic symphysis. This study examines the fixation strength of cortical screws in human cadaver specimens with different BMDs.

METHODS

The lumbar BMD of ten human specimens was measured using quantitative computed tomography (qCT). A cut-off BMD was set at 120 mg Ca-Ha/mL, dividing the specimens into two groups. One cortical screw was drilled into each superior pubic ramus. The screw was withdrawn in an axial direction with a steady speed and considered failed when a force decrease was detected. Required force (N) and pull-out distance (mm) were constantly tracked.

RESULTS

The median peak force of group 1 was 231.88 N and 228.08 N in group 2. While BMD values differed significantly (p < 0.01), a comparison of peak forces between both groups showed no significant difference (p = 0.481).

CONCLUSION

Higher lumbar BMD did not result in significantly higher pull-out forces at the symphysis. The high proportion of cortical bone near the symphyseal joint allows an increased contact of pubic screws and could explain sufficient fixation. This condition is not reflected by a compromised lumbar BMD in a qCT scan. Therefore, site-specific BMD measurement could improve individual fracture management.

Homogenized finite element models can accurately predict screw pull-out in continuum materials, but not in porous materials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Bone screw fixation can be estimated with several test methods such as insertion torque, pull-out, push-in and bending tests. A basic understanding of the relationship between screw fixation and bone microstructure is still lacking. Computational models can help clarify this relationship. The objective of the paper is to evaluate homogenized finite element (hFE) models of bone screw pull-out.

METHODS

Experimental pull-out tests were performed on three materials: two polyurethane (PU) foams having a porous microstructure, and a high density polyethylene (HDPE) which is a continuum material. Forty-five titanium pedicle screws were inserted to 10, 20, and 30 mm in equally sized blocks of all three materials (N = 5/group). Pull-out characteristics i.e. stiffness (S), yield force (F_y), peak pull-out force (F_ult) and displacement at F_ult (d_ult) were measured. hFE models were created replicating the experiments. The screw was modeled as a rigid body and 5 mm axial displacement was applied to the head of the screw. Simulations were performed evaluating two different conditions at the bone-screw interface; once in which the screw fitted the pilot hole exactly ("free-stressed") and once in which interface stresses resulting from the insertion process were taken into account ("pre-stressed").

RESULTS

The simulations representing the pre-stressed condition in HDPE matched the experimental data well; S, F_y, and F_ult differed less than 11%, 2% and 0.5% from the experimental data, respectively, whereas d_ult differed less than 16%. The free-stressed simulations were less accurate, especially stiffness (158% higher than the pre-stressed condition) and d_ult (30% lower than pre-stressed condition) were affected. The simulations representing PU did not match the experiments well. For the 20 mm insertion depth, S, F_y and F_ult differed by more than 104%, 89% and 66%, respectively from the experimental values. Agreement did not improve for 10 and 30 mm insertion depths.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that hFE models can accurately quantify screw pull-out in continuum materials such as HDPE, but not in materials with a porous structure, such as PU. Pre-stresses in the bone induced by the insertion process cannot be neglected and need to be included in the hFE simulations.

Can barb thread design improve the pullout strength of bone screws?

AIMS

To draw a comparison of the pullout strengths of buttress thread, barb thread, and reverse buttress thread bone screws.

METHODS

Buttress thread, barb thread, and reverse buttress thread bone screws were inserted into synthetic cancellous bone blocks. Five screw-block constructs per group were tested to failure in an axial pullout test. The pullout strengths were calculated and compared. A finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to explore the underlying failure mechanisms. FEA models of the three different screw-bone constructs were developed. A pullout force of 250 N was applied to the screw head with a fixed bone model. The compressive and tensile strain contours of the midsagittal plane of the three bone models were plotted and compared.

RESULTS

The barb thread demonstrated the lowest pullout strength (mean 176.16 N (SD 3.10)) among the three thread types. It formed a considerably larger region with high tensile strains and a slightly smaller region with high compressive strains within the surrounding bone structure. The reverse buttress thread demonstrated the highest pullout strength (mean 254.69 N (SD 4.15)) among the three types of thread. It formed a considerably larger region with high compressive strains and a slightly smaller region with high tensile strains within the surrounding bone structure.

CONCLUSION

Bone screws with a reverse buttress thread design will significantly increase the pullout strength. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):105-112.

Cross-elements to enhance fixation in osteoporotic bone with application to proximal humeral locking plates: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures occur predominantly in elderly, osteoporotic individuals, especially women, with surgery performed in one-fifth. Proximal humeral locking plates are the gold standard operative treatment; however, complications are frequent, partially because of poor screw purchase in osteoporotic bone. A new method uses threaded posts through which threaded cross-elements orthogonally pass to create a 3-dimensional scaffold for bone engagement. We examined the pullout characteristics of the posts with (1 or 2) or without the cross-elements and tested 2 types of 3.5-mm cortical locking screws for comparison.

METHODS

Low-density closed-cell polyurethane foam served as a model osteoporotic bone substrate. Following implantation in the substrate, the devices were axially loaded by a mechanical test system. Quantities of interest included failure mode, peak load, displacement to peak load, initial stiffness, and work expended.

RESULTS

The post groups outperformed the 3.5-mm screw groups, as expected. Relative to posts with no cross-elements, 1 and 2 cross-elements increased the peak load by 29% and 87% and increased the work to peak load by 126% and 343%, respectively. After reaching peak load, 1 and 2 cross-elements increased the work-resistance to further displacement by 158% and 330%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cross-elements significantly increased the ability of the threaded posts to resist axial displacement from a model osteoporotic bone substrate. This suggests that posts, used in conjunction with cross-elements, have the potential to enhance the stability of proximal humeral locking plates in osteoporotic bone.

Evaluation of the internal fixation effect of nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid composite screws for intraarticular fractures in rabbits

Objective

To evaluate the internal fixation effect of nano-calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite/poly-amino acid (n-CDHA/PAA) composite screws in the intraarticular fracture model.

Materials and methods

A total of 35 New Zealand White rabbits were used in a bilateral femoral intercondylar fracture model and randomly divided into two groups. n-CDHA/PAA screws were used in the experimental group, and medical metal screws were used in the control group. The fracture condition, range of motion, and the screw push-out strength were assessed, and an arthroscopic examination of knee joint was performed at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after surgery. The biodegradation of the n-CDHA/PAA screws in vivo was tested through weighing, and changes in screw structure were assessed by X-ray diffraction at 12 weeks after surgery.

Results

The general situation of all animals was good and showed no incision infection and dehiscence after surgery. X-ray scanning showed that significant callus growth was present in both groups at 4 weeks after surgery, and there was no significant difference (P>0.05) in the Lane-Sandhu score between the experimental and control groups at all time points after surgery. There were no statistically significant differences (P>0.05) in the range of motion and Oswestry Arthroscopy Score of arthroscopic examination of the knee joints between the two groups. The screw push-out strength of the control group was stronger than that of the experimental group at 4 weeks after surgery (P<0.05), but after that, there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). The degradation tests showed that the n-CDHA/PAA screws degraded gradually after implantation, and the weight loss rate was approximately 16% at 12 weeks after surgery. The X-ray diffraction results showed that the crystal structure of the outer surface of the n-CDHA/PAA screw has changed at 12 weeks after surgery.

Conclusion

The n-CDHA/PAA screw is an effective and safe implant as a potential internal fixation device for an intercondylar fracture of the femur, and its internal fixation effect was similar to that of medical metal screw.