1
|
Zhou T, Boettger M, Knopp J, Lange M, Heep A, Chase JG. Model-based subcutaneous insulin for glycemic control of pre-term infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. Comput Biol Med 2023; 160:106808. [PMID: 37163965 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.106808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Hyperglycaemia is a common problem in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). Achieving good control can result in better outcomes for patients. However, good control is difficult, where poor control and resulting hypoglycaemia reduces outcomes and confounds results. Clinically validated models can provide good control, and subcutaneous insulin delivery can provide more options for insulin therapy for clinicians. However, this combination has only been significantly utilised in adult outpatient diabetes, but could hold benefit for treating NICU infants. This research combines a well-validated NICU metabolic model with subcutaneous insulin kinetics models to assess the feasibility of a model-based approach. Clinical data from 12 very/extremely pre-mature infants was collected for an average study duration of 10.1 days. Blood glucose, interstitial and plasma insulin, as well as subcutaneous and local insulin were modelled, and patient-specific insulin sensitivity profiles were identified for each patient. Modelling error was low, where the cohort median [IQR] mean percentage error was 0.8 [0.3 3.4] %. For external validation, insulin sensitivity was compared to previous NICU cohorts using the same metabolic model, where overall levels of insulin sensitivity were similar. Overall, the combined system model accurately captured observed glucose and insulin dynamics, showing the potential for a model-based approach to glycaemic control using subcutaneous insulin in this cohort. The results justify further model validation and clinical trial research to explore a model-based protocol.
Collapse
|
2
|
Yahia A, Szlávecz Á, Knopp JL, Norfiza Abdul Razak N, Abu Samah A, Shaw G, Chase JG, Benyo B. Estimating Enhanced Endogenous Glucose Production in Intensive Care Unit Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:1208-1219. [PMID: 34078114 PMCID: PMC9445352 DOI: 10.1177/19322968211018260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Critically ill ICU patients frequently experience acute insulin resistance and increased endogenous glucose production, manifesting as stress-induced hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia. STAR (Stochastic TARgeted) is a glycemic control protocol, which directly manages inter- and intra- patient variability using model-based insulin sensitivity (SI). The model behind STAR assumes a population constant for endogenous glucose production (EGP), which is not otherwise identifiable. OBJECTIVE This study analyses the effect of estimating EGP for ICU patients with very low SI (severe insulin resistance) and its impact on identified, model-based insulin sensitivity identification, modeling accuracy, and model-based glycemic clinical control. METHODS Using clinical data from 717 STAR patients in 3 independent cohorts (Hungary, New Zealand, and Malaysia), insulin sensitivity, time of insulin resistance, and EGP values are analyzed. A method is presented to estimate EGP in the presence of non-physiologically low SI. Performance is assessed via model accuracy. RESULTS Results show 22%-62% of patients experience 1+ episodes of severe insulin resistance, representing 0.87%-9.00% of hours. Episodes primarily occur in the first 24 h, matching clinical expectations. The Malaysian cohort is most affected. In this subset of hours, constant model-based EGP values can bias identified SI and increase blood glucose (BG) fitting error. Using the EGP estimation method presented in these constrained hours significantly reduced BG fitting errors. CONCLUSIONS Patients early in ICU stay may have significantly increased EGP. Increasing modeled EGP in model-based glycemic control can improve control accuracy in these hours. The results provide new insight into the frequency and level of significantly increased EGP in critical illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anane Yahia
- Department of Control Engineering and Information Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
- Anane Yahia, Department of Control Engineering and Information Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, 2. Magyar tudosok Blvd., Budapest, H-1117, Hungary.
| | - Ákos Szlávecz
- Department of Control Engineering and Information Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Jennifer L. Knopp
- Mechanical Engineering, Centre of Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ
| | | | - Asma Abu Samah
- Institute of Energy Infrastructure, Universiti Tenaga Nasional, Jalan Ikram-UNITEN, Kajang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Geoff Shaw
- Mechanical Engineering, Centre of Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ
| | - J. Geoffrey Chase
- Mechanical Engineering, Centre of Bio-Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, NZ
| | - Balazs Benyo
- Department of Control Engineering and Information Technology, Budapest University of Technology and Economics, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
The goldilocks problem: Nutrition and its impact on glycaemic control. Clin Nutr 2021; 40:3677-3687. [PMID: 34130014 DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2020] [Revised: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glucose intolerance and insulin resistance manifest as hyperglycaemia in intensive care, which is associated with mortality and morbidities. Glycaemic control (GC) may improve outcomes, though safe and effective control has proven elusive. Nutritional glucose intake affects blood glucose (BG) outcomes, but few protocols actively control it. This study aims to examine BG outcomes in the context of nutritional management during GC. METHODS Retrospective cohort analysis of 5 glycaemic control cohorts spanning 4 years (n = 273) from Christchurch Hospital Intensive Care Unit (ICU). GC is delivered using a single model-based protocol (STAR), with default 4.4-8.0 mmol/L target range via. modulation of insulin and nutrition. Clinical adaptations/cohorts include variations on upper target (UL-9 with 9.0 mmol/L, reducing workload and nutrition responsiveness), and insulin only (IO) with clinically set nutrition at 3 glucose concentrations (71 g/L vs. 120 and 180 g/L in the TARGET study). RESULTS Percent of BG hours in the 4.4-8.0 mmol/L range highest under standard STAR conditions (78%), and was lower at 64% under UL-9, likely due to reduced time-responsiveness of nutrition-insulin changes. By comparison, IO only resulted in 64-69% BG in range across different nutrition types. A subset of patients receiving high glucose nutrition under IO were persistently hyperglycaemic, indicating patient-specific glucose tolerance. CONCLUSION STAR GC is most effective when nutrition and insulin are modulated together with timely responsiveness to persistent hyperglycaemia. Results imply modulation of nutrition alongside insulin improves GC, particularly in patients with persistent hyperglycaemia/low glucose tolerance.
Collapse
|
4
|
Uyttendaele V, Chase JG, Knopp JL, Gottlieb R, Shaw GM, Desaive T. Insulin sensitivity in critically ill patients: are women more insulin resistant? Ann Intensive Care 2021; 11:12. [PMID: 33475909 PMCID: PMC7818291 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00807-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Glycaemic control (GC) in intensive care unit is challenging due to significant inter- and intra-patient variability, leading to increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Recent work showed higher insulin resistance in female preterm neonates. This study aims to determine if there are differences in inter- and intra-patient metabolic variability between sexes in adults, to gain in insight into any differences in metabolic response to injury. Any significant difference would suggest GC and randomised trial design should consider sex differences to personalise care. Methods Insulin sensitivity (SI) levels and variability are identified from retrospective clinical data for men and women. Data are divided using 6-h blocks to capture metabolic evolution over time. In total, 91 male and 54 female patient GC episodes of minimum 24 h are analysed. Hypothesis testing is used to determine whether differences are significant (P < 0.05), and equivalence testing is used to assess whether these differences can be considered equivalent at a clinical level. Data are assessed for the raw cohort and in 100 Monte Carlo simulations analyses where the number of men and women are equal. Results Demographic data between females and males were all similar, including GC outcomes (safety from hypoglycaemia and high (> 50%) time in target band). Females had consistently significantly lower SI levels than males, and this difference was not clinically equivalent. However, metabolic variability between sexes was never significantly different and always clinically equivalent. Thus, inter-patient variability was significantly different between males and females, but intra-patient variability was equivalent. Conclusion Given equivalent intra-patient variability and significantly greater insulin resistance, females can receive the same benefit from safe, effective GC as males, but may require higher insulin doses to achieve the same glycaemia. Clinical trials should consider sex differences in protocol design and outcome analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Uyttendaele
- GIGA-In silico Medicine,, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, Bât. B5a, 4000, Liège, Belgium. .,Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | - J Geoffrey Chase
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer L Knopp
- GIGA-In silico Medicine,, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, Bât. B5a, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Rebecca Gottlieb
- Medtronic Diabetes, 18000 Devonshire St, Northridge, CA, 91325, USA
| | - Geoffrey M Shaw
- Christchurch Hospital, Dept of Intensive Care, Christchurch, New Zealand and University of Otago, School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Thomas Desaive
- GIGA-In silico Medicine,, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, Bât. B5a, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Uyttendaele V, Chase JG, Knopp JL, Gottlieb R, Shaw GM, Desaive T. Insulin sensitivity in critically ill patients: are women more insulin resistant? Ann Intensive Care 2021. [PMID: 33475909 DOI: 10.1186/s13613-021-00807-7.] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glycaemic control (GC) in intensive care unit is challenging due to significant inter- and intra-patient variability, leading to increased risk of hypoglycaemia. Recent work showed higher insulin resistance in female preterm neonates. This study aims to determine if there are differences in inter- and intra-patient metabolic variability between sexes in adults, to gain in insight into any differences in metabolic response to injury. Any significant difference would suggest GC and randomised trial design should consider sex differences to personalise care. METHODS Insulin sensitivity (SI) levels and variability are identified from retrospective clinical data for men and women. Data are divided using 6-h blocks to capture metabolic evolution over time. In total, 91 male and 54 female patient GC episodes of minimum 24 h are analysed. Hypothesis testing is used to determine whether differences are significant (P < 0.05), and equivalence testing is used to assess whether these differences can be considered equivalent at a clinical level. Data are assessed for the raw cohort and in 100 Monte Carlo simulations analyses where the number of men and women are equal. RESULTS Demographic data between females and males were all similar, including GC outcomes (safety from hypoglycaemia and high (> 50%) time in target band). Females had consistently significantly lower SI levels than males, and this difference was not clinically equivalent. However, metabolic variability between sexes was never significantly different and always clinically equivalent. Thus, inter-patient variability was significantly different between males and females, but intra-patient variability was equivalent. CONCLUSION Given equivalent intra-patient variability and significantly greater insulin resistance, females can receive the same benefit from safe, effective GC as males, but may require higher insulin doses to achieve the same glycaemia. Clinical trials should consider sex differences in protocol design and outcome analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Uyttendaele
- GIGA-In silico Medicine,, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, Bât. B5a, 4000, Liège, Belgium. .,Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand.
| | - J Geoffrey Chase
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer L Knopp
- GIGA-In silico Medicine,, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, Bât. B5a, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| | - Rebecca Gottlieb
- Medtronic Diabetes, 18000 Devonshire St, Northridge, CA, 91325, USA
| | - Geoffrey M Shaw
- Christchurch Hospital, Dept of Intensive Care, Christchurch, New Zealand and University of Otago, School of Medicine, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Thomas Desaive
- GIGA-In silico Medicine,, University of Liège, Allée du 6 Août 19, Bât. B5a, 4000, Liège, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abdul Razak A, Abu-Samah A, Abdul Razak NN, Jamaludin U, Suhaimi F, Ralib A, Mat Nor MB, Pretty C, Knopp JL, Chase JG. Assessment of Glycemic Control Protocol (STAR) Through Compliance Analysis Amongst Malaysian ICU Patients. MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH 2020; 13:139-149. [PMID: 32607009 PMCID: PMC7282801 DOI: 10.2147/mder.s231856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This paper presents an assessment of an automated and personalized stochastic targeted (STAR) glycemic control protocol compliance in Malaysian intensive care unit (ICU) patients to ensure an optimized usage. Patients and Methods STAR proposes 1–3 hours treatment based on individual insulin sensitivity variation and history of blood glucose, insulin, and nutrition. A total of 136 patients recorded data from STAR pilot trial in Malaysia (2017–quarter of 2019*) were used in the study to identify the gap between chosen administered insulin and nutrition intervention as recommended by STAR, and the real intervention performed. Results The results show the percentage of insulin compliance increased from 2017 to first quarter of 2019* and fluctuated in feed administrations. Overall compliance amounted to 98.8% and 97.7% for administered insulin and feed, respectively. There was higher average of 17 blood glucose measurements per day than in other centres that have been using STAR, but longer intervals were selected when recommended. Control safety and performance were similar for all periods showing no obvious correlation to compliance. Conclusion The results indicate that STAR, an automated model-based protocol is positively accepted among the Malaysian ICU clinicians to automate glycemic control and the usage can be extended to other hospitals already. Performance could be improved with several propositions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Asma Abu-Samah
- Department of Electrical, Electronics and Systems, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia
| | | | - Ummu Jamaludin
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Fatanah Suhaimi
- Advanced Medical and Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Azrina Ralib
- Department of Anesthesiology, International Islamic University Malaysia, Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Mohd Basri Mat Nor
- Intensive Care Unit, International Islamic University Medical Centre, Kuantan, Malaysia
| | - Christopher Pretty
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Jennifer Laura Knopp
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - James Geoffrey Chase
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
de Watteville A, Pielmeier U, Graf S, Siegenthaler N, Plockyn B, Andreassen S, Heidegger CP. Usability study of a new tool for nutritional and glycemic management in adult intensive care: Glucosafe 2. J Clin Monit Comput 2020; 35:525-535. [PMID: 32221777 DOI: 10.1007/s10877-020-00502-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The new decision support tool Glucosafe 2 (GS2) is based on a mathematical model of glucose and insulin dynamics, designed to assist caregivers in blood glucose control and nutrition. This study aims to assess end-user acceptance and usability of this bedside decision support tool in an adult intensive care setting. Caregivers were first trained and then invited to trial GS2 prototype on bedside computers. Data for qualitative analysis were collected through semi-structured interviews from twenty users after minimum three trial days. Most caregivers (70%) rated GS2 as convenient and believed it would help improving adherence to current guidelines (85%). Moreover, most nurses (80%) believed that GS2 would be timesaving. Nurses' risk perceptions and manual data entry emerged as central barriers to use GS2 in routine practice. Issues emerged from the caregivers were compiled into a list of 12 modifications of the GS2 prototype to increase end-user acceptance and usability. This usability study showed that GS2 was considered by ICU caregivers as helpful in daily clinical practice, allowing time-saving and better standardization of ICU patient's care. Important issues were raised by the users with implications for the development and deployment of GS2. Integrating the technology into existing IT infrastructure may facilitate caregivers' acceptance. Further clinical studies of the performance and potential health outcomes are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aude de Watteville
- Division of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine (DMA), Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.,Nutrition Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Pielmeier
- Respiratory and Critical Care Group (Rcare), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Séverine Graf
- Nutrition Unit, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Nils Siegenthaler
- Division of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine (DMA), Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Bernard Plockyn
- Division of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine (DMA), Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Steen Andreassen
- Respiratory and Critical Care Group (Rcare), Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Claudia-Paula Heidegger
- Division of Intensive Care, Department of Acute Medicine (DMA), Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|