Inspiratory respiratory mechanics estimation by using expiratory data for reverse-triggered breathing cycles

Reconstructing asynchrony for mechanical ventilation using a hysteresis loop virtual patient model

BACKGROUND

Patient-specific lung mechanics during mechanical ventilation (MV) can be identified from measured waveforms of fully ventilated, sedated patients. However, asynchrony due to spontaneous breathing (SB) effort can be common, altering these waveforms and reducing the accuracy of identified, model-based, and patient-specific lung mechanics.

METHODS

Changes in patient-specific lung elastance over a pressure-volume (PV) loop, identified using hysteresis loop analysis (HLA), are used to detect the occurrence of asynchrony and identify its type and pattern. The identified HLA parameters are then combined with a nonlinear mechanics hysteresis loop model (HLM) to extract and reconstruct ventilated waveforms unaffected by asynchronous breaths. Asynchrony magnitude can then be quantified using an energy-dissipation metric, Easyn, comparing PV loop area between model-reconstructed and original, altered asynchronous breathing cycles. Performance is evaluated using both test-lung experimental data with a known ground truth and clinical data from four patients with varying levels of asynchrony.

RESULTS

Root mean square errors for reconstructed PV loops are within 5% for test-lung experimental data, and 10% for over 90% of clinical data. Easyn clearly matches known asynchrony magnitude for experimental data with RMS errors < 4.1%. Clinical data performance shows 57% breaths having Easyn > 50% for Patient 1 and 13% for Patient 2. Patient 3 only presents 20% breaths with Easyn > 10%. Patient 4 has Easyn = 0 for 96% breaths showing accuracy in a case without asynchrony.

CONCLUSIONS

Experimental test-lung validation demonstrates the method's reconstruction accuracy and generality in controlled scenarios. Clinical validation matches direct observations of asynchrony in incidence and quantifies magnitude, including cases without asynchrony, validating its robustness and potential efficacy as a clinical real-time asynchrony monitoring tool.

Quantifying neonatal patient effort using non-invasive model-based methods

Patient-specific spontaneous breathing effort (SB) is common in invasively mechanically ventilated (MV) adult patients, and especially common in preterm neonates who are not typically sedated. However, there is no proven, ethically feasible and non-invasive method to quantify SB effort in neonates, creating the potential for model-based measures. Lung mechanics and SB effort are segregated using a basis function model to identify passive lung mechanics, and an additional time-varying elastance model to identify patient-specific SB effort and asynchrony as negative and positive added elastances, respectively. Data from ten preterm neonates on standard MV care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are used to assess this model-based approach, using area under the curve (AUC) for positive (asynchrony) and negative (SB effort) time-varying elastance. Median [interquartile-range (IQR)] of passive pulmonary lung elastance was 3.82 [2.09-5.80] cmH₂O/ml. Median [IQR] AUC quantified SB effort was -0.32 [-0.43--0.12]cmH₂O/ml. AUC quantified asynchrony was 0.00 [0.00-0.01]cmH₂O/ml, and affected 28% of the 25,287 total breaths. This proof of concept model-based approach provides a non-invasive, computationally straightforward, and thus clinically feasible means to quantify patient-specific spontaneous breathing effort and asynchrony.

Quantifying ventilator unloading in CPAP ventilation

BACKGROUND

The intrinsic (muscular) patient effort driving inspiration in non-invasive ventilation modes, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy, has not been identified from non-invasive data. Current CPAP settings are based on clinical judgment and assessment of symptoms of respiratory distress. Non-optimal settings, including too much positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) can cause unintended lung injury and ventilator unloading, where patient effort drops and the CPAP device enables too much work being imposed on the injured lung. Currently, there is no non-invasive means of quantifying or identifying these effects.

METHODS

A novel model-based method of ascertaining intrinsic patient work of breathing (WOB) in CPAP is developed based on linear single compartment and 2nd order b-spline models previously used in invasive ventilation modes. Results are compared to current clinical indications, such as total Imposed WOB from the CPAP device and beak length, the latter of which is the clinical metric used to indicate alveolar overdistension. Intrinsic and Imposed WOB are compared. The hypothesis is that ventilator unloading can be assessed as a decrease in Intrinsic WOB relative to Imposed WOB, as PEEP and associated ventilator unloading rise. This hypothesis is tested using 14 subjects from a CPAP trial of several breathing rates at two PEEP levels.

RESULTS

The ratio of Intrinsic to Imposed WOB, normalised per unit tidal volume, decreased with increasing PEEP (4-7 cm H₂O), capturing the expected trend of ventilator unloading. Ventilator unloading was observed across all breathing rates. Beak length measurements showed no conclusive evidence of capturing overdistension at higher PEEP or ventilator unloading.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient Intrinsic WOB in CPAP was non-invasively quantified using model-based methods, based on pressure and flow measurements. The ratio of Intrinsic to Imposed WOB per unit tidal volume clearly and consistently showed ventilator unloading across all patients and breathing rates, with Intrinsic WOB decreasing with increasing PEEP. This trend was not observed in the current clinical metric of beak length. Non-invasively quantifying Intrinsic WOB and ventilator unloading is the critical first step to objectively optimising clinical CPAP settings, patient care, and outcomes.

Measuring lung mechanics of expiratory tidal breathing with non-invasive breath occlusion

Background and objective

Lung mechanics measurements provide clinically useful information about disease progression and lung health. Currently, there are no commonly practiced methods to non-invasively measure both resistive and elastic lung mechanics during tidal breathing, preventing the important information provided by lung mechanics from being utilised. This study presents a novel method to easily assess lung mechanics of spontaneously breathing subjects using a dynamic elastance, single-compartment lung model.

Methods

A spirometer with a built-in shutter was used to occlude expiration during tidal breathing, creating exponentially decaying flow when the shutter re-opened. The lung mechanics measured were respiratory system elastance and resistance, separated from the exponentially decaying flow, and interrupter resistance calculated at shutter closure. Progressively increasing resistance was added to the spirometer mouthpiece to simulate upper airway obstruction. The lung mechanics of 17 healthy subjects were successfully measured through spirometry.

Results

N = 17 (8 female, 9 male) healthy subjects were recruited. Measured decay rates ranged from 5 to 42/s, subjects with large variation of decay rates showed higher muscular breathing effort. Lung elastance measurements ranged from 3.9 to 21.2 cmH\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$_2$$\end{document}2O/L, with no clear trend between change in elastance and added resistance. Resistance calculated from decay rate and elastance ranged from 0.15 to 1.95 cmH\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$_2$$\end{document}2Os/L. These very small resistance values are due to the airflow measured originating from low-resistance areas in the centre of airways. Occlusion resistance measurements were as expected for healthy subjects, and increased as expected as resistance was added.

Conclusions

This test was able to identify reasonable dynamic lung elastance and occlusion resistance values, providing new insight into expiratory breathing effort. Clinically, this lung function test could impact current practice. It does not require high levels of cooperation from the subject, allowing a wider cohort of patients to be assessed more easily. Additionally, this test can be simply implemented in a small standalone device, or with standard lung function testing equipment.